On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> Gratuitous: the new contract was not the backing document for VP, as
>>> they would continue to exist if the new contract didn't exist, thus it
>>> couldn't grant the power to create VP.
>> Gratuitous: The same could be said about the Vote
On 11 Dec 2008, at 22:57, Chris Blair wrote:
Seeing as how no other entity in Agora, as of three months before the
player formerly known as ehird changed their name to the null string
(""), bore the name of the null string; and as I do not particularly
find the player formerly known as ehird's n
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 15:10, Sgeo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Sgeo wrote:
>> I join the Note Exchange, if I'm not already a party.
>> I create 1 C credit and 1 C marker in my possession.
>> I create 2 D credits and 2 D markers in my possession.
>> I create 1 F# credit and 1 F# mar
On 11 Dec 2008, at 21:32, Roger Hicks wrote:
Now we have a robust economy with dozens of tradable currencies,
including universal currencies like Coins and Chits. Buy and Sell
tickets can be issued with costs in these currencies and recent
history suggests they often are. Vote Points are no long
The Vote Market is the oldest of the currently active economic
contracts. At the time it was created there were no other commonly
traded currencies, there were only VCs (which became Notes). As a
result when I created the Vote Market I had to include a currency as a
means of tracking obligations in
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2008, at 21:02, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
>> Gratuitous: the new contract was not the backing document for VP, as
>> they would continue to exist if the new contract didn't exist, thus it
>> couldn't grant the power to create VP.
>
> G
On 11 Dec 2008, at 21:02, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Gratuitous: the new contract was not the backing document for VP, as
they would continue to exist if the new contract didn't exist, thus it
couldn't grant the power to create VP.
Gratuitous: The same could be said about the Vote Market at that ti
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> If there is not a CFJ concerning whether I am a party to the Vote Market, I
> initiate a CFJ on the statement "ehird is a party to the Vote Market".
>
> Arguments: I recently abused the naming rules to define a contract defining
> VP as a curr
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> Le doy un prop a comex por disminuir la relación señal/ruido.
> (Translation: I give a prop to comex for lowering the signal-to-noise
> ratio.)
Oops. I meant "para" here, not "por". The translation remains the same.
--Warrigal
BobTHJ wrote:
> I think Murphy gave me the authority to issue these. If not this
> report is unofficial (in which case: Murphy, you can find a text
> report to cut and paste at
> http://nomic.bob-space.com/agorareport.aspx?contract=AirstripOne)
I thought I did, but I can't find it (it wasn't even
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote:
>
>> Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal 'Separation of
>> Powers'"
>> (AI=2, II=0): {
>> Repeal Rule 1450 (Separation of Powers).
>> }
>
> I wonder if the current ru
On 11 Dec 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote:
Bayes submits the following proposal, titled "Repeal 'Separation of
Powers'"
(AI=2, II=0): {
Repeal Rule 1450 (Separation of Powers).
}
I wonder if the current rule is "only make Terrible Proposals".
On 11 Dec 2008, at 03:53, Ed Murphy wrote:
Anyone want to take over Notary now that it's been caught up?
Maybe later. ;-)
13 matches
Mail list logo
