On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > If there is not a CFJ concerning whether I am a party to the Vote Market, I > initiate a CFJ on the statement "ehird is a party to the Vote Market". > > Arguments: I recently abused the naming rules to define a contract defining > VP as a currency that I can create by announcement, and used it to escape > from the VM.
Gratuitous: the new contract was not the backing document for VP, as they would continue to exist if the new contract didn't exist, thus it couldn't grant the power to create VP.
