On Saturday 22 November 2008 08:58:16 am Joshua Boehme wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:52 -0500
>
> "Jamie Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both
> > sides. If need be this can be a Werewolves-like endeavour.
> >
> > Would anyone b
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 22:18, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Warrigal8 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
>
> I have too many crops. I PBA-deposit a 0 crop.
>
>> Warrigal0 0 0 1
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 23/11/2008, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I intend, with the support of the people, to amend the PBA by
>>> replacing section 17 wi
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23/11/2008, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend, with the support of the people, to amend the PBA by
>> replacing section 17 with:
>> {{
>> 17. Every midnight (UTC) that the PBA had zero of a given Eligib
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Sgeo wrote:
> BARD
> Goethe, Maud, Elysion, Sherlock
I awarded Bard to Murphy recently. Otherwise matches what I had
tracked. -Goethe
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 17:00, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I PBA-deposit all the assets I recently withdrew in the message titled
> "Bank run, part 1" (I believe this gets me ^667).
>
> -root
>
The results of this are in my copy of the PBA report. I show you at
666 coins (satanist!). ehird, let m
On 22 Nov 2008, at 22:31, Roger Hicks wrote:
Did you forget co-authorship: Bayes?
Wow, that line wasn't even hard-coded.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 15:28, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following:
> {{{
> Raargh! A public contract identifying itself as such.
Did you forget co-authorship: Bayes?
BobTHJ
This is a draft, this is only a draft, if this were a real report, it
would already be in a-o.
Herald's Draft Report - November N, 2008
--
EVENTS LOG
--
7 Jul 2008 15:49:0
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:52 -0500
"Jamie Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both sides. If
> need be this can be a Werewolves-like endeavour.
>
> Would anyone be interested in playing the following, based on Robert
> Axelrod's and WD
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> However, there are other reasons why the
> resulting contract might not take effect; effects of a contract which
> rely on agreement to it (such as acting on behalf) won't work unless the
> players in question have actually agreed to it, and violations of
>
On 22 Nov 2008, at 13:11, Alex Smith wrote:
So I judge CFJ 2264 trivially TRUE to the literal question asked, and
TRUE to the spirit of the question, but with many caveats; the
contract
can be amended, but might not be enforceable.
I hate contract law.
12 matches
Mail list logo
