comex wrote:
> It appears zenith.homelinux.net is already down by now.
It's back up (as of about 2 hours ago).
ehird wrote:
> Unfortunately, that pledge did not specify itself as a public
> contract and thus never existed.
Yes, it did:
> I agree to the following:
>
> {This is a public contract called "The Dollarous Exchange". Any person
> CAN leave this contract if they have no USD Blots. This contrac
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, then, how should I rephrase it so that it is an equation?
Like a contract. X shall Y.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16 Nov 2008, at 00:58, Warrigal wrote:
>> I award myself a USD Voucher and a USD Blot. I redeem a USD Voucher,
>> specifying ehird as the indebted one and a money order redeemable for
>> at least 1 USD sent to 5788 Dix Dr
On 15 Nov 2008, at 20:20, comex wrote:
I nominate ehird for Notary.
I nominate ehird for CotC.
Cool. Kay.
--
ehird
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Due to possible power fluctuations due to nearby fires, we're about
> to shut down all the computers here for a day or so. comex, if you
> get this message soon enough, you may want to force the mirror at
> http://cfj.qoid.us
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposal: This sounds like a job for the Rulekeepor
> (AI = 3, please)
>
> Create a rule titled "Cleanliness" with Power 3 and this text:
>
> The Rulekeepor CAN clean a rule without objection by specifying
> one or m
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P9 is the only contract which has a chance of becoming a contest; the
> other 99 proposals are not powerful enough to override rule 2136b and
> cause comex to be contestmaster of more than one contest at once.
Even if they we
Due to possible power fluctuations due to nearby fires, we're about
to shut down all the computers here for a day or so. comex, if you
get this message soon enough, you may want to force the mirror at
http://cfj.qoid.us/ to sync ahead of schedule.
ais523 wrote:
> I call for judgement on the statement "P9 is a contest".
>
> Arguments:
> comex never explicitly consented to be contestmaster of P9, thus
> proposal 5842 had no effect (despite passing) because it is
> insufficiently powerful to override rule 2136a.
Gratuituous counterargument:
Proto-Proposal: Contract revision
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 2197 (Defining Contract Changes) to read:
The following are contract changes:
(a) A person becoming a party to a contract.
(b) A person ceasing to be a party to a contract.
(c) Amending a contract.
On Nov 12, 2008, at 8:44 PM, Taral wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Accordingly, I instruct the parties to the Russian Roulette
contract to
modify the contract and obligations as necessary, and as soon as
possible,
to ensure that disclosin
12 matches
Mail list logo
