ais523 wrote:
> I call for judgement on the statement "P9 is a contest".
>
> Arguments:
> comex never explicitly consented to be contestmaster of P9, thus
> proposal 5842 had no effect (despite passing) because it is
> insufficiently powerful to override rule 2136a.
Gratuituous counterargument: comex's actions reasonably triggered
this clause in 2136c:
(If a player intends to flip the
contestmaster of a contract to emself, this is considered
explicit consent to be contestmaster of that contract.)
