More seriously:
Quazie wrote:
> Casting a vote endorsing another voter is equivalent to conditionally
> casting a vote whose value is the same as the most common value (if
> any) among that voter's valid votes on that decision. Casting a vote
> endorsing Agora is equivalent to conditionally cast
Quazie wrote:
> Casting a vote denouncing another voter is equivalent to conditionally
> casting a vote whose value is opposite to the most common value (if
> any) among that voter's valid votes on that decision. Casting a vote
> denouncing Agora is treason, punishable by summary execution. FOR
Proposal: Agora is my conditional value AI =1 ii = 1
---
In R2127 replace:
{
Casting a vote endorsing another voter is equivalent to
conditionally casting a vote whose value is the same as the most
common value (if any) among that voter's valid votes on that
decision.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i mill 9 / 4 to get a 5 crop (i think)
Easy way to check your divisions: Check the inverse.
5 * 4 = 20 - 11 = 9.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If it was changed to Any player CAN award the ribbon i'd be for it,
>> the problem comes in with new players who don't know or haven't
>> noticed that they should give themselves a white ribbon.
>
> Very good point. Seconded.
BobTHJ wrote:
> Why not allow the Assessor to auction off anything in the L&FD?
Accountor, surely?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why not allow the Assessor to auction off anything in the L&FD?
>
> I assume you mean the Accountor.
>
> -root
>
Oops...that's the one.
BobTHJ
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not allow the Assessor to auction off anything in the L&FD?
I assume you mean the Accountor.
-root
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The CFJ on whether the win worked at all I thought had little merit at
>> first, but Zefram's argument (on the specificity of "all players who
>> support me" in dependent action intent
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 9 July 2008 3:15:52 Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Ben Caplan
>> > L&FD transfer usually breaks the same things as outright destruction.
>> > If the Lost & Found Department gets 3 VP, for ex
On Wednesday 9 July 2008 3:15:52 Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Ben Caplan
> > L&FD transfer usually breaks the same things as outright destruction.
> > If the Lost & Found Department gets 3 VP, for example, they're as good
> > as gone.
>
> Why not allow the Assessor to auct
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 8 July 2008 2:12:57 Zefram wrote:
>> I think there should not be any extra capability here. If a contract
>> doesn't allow voluntary destruction then this should not be a valid
>> subject for a fine. Don't break z
On Wednesday 9 July 2008 1:49:59 comex wrote:
> It would be interesting if we forced the ninny to transfer the goods
> to a first-class player not obligated to give them back-- of eir
> choice.
SCAM
I wrote:
> I harvest 5613 (proposal number) for (2 or 4) points.
4 points, as it happens. (I forgot to re-edit that part of the line
after looking up the chambers of 5613 and 5617, my second choice.)
On Tuesday 8 July 2008 3:03:52 Quazie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When a player has become eligible for a ribbon within the last 7
> > days and does not already have that ribbon, e CAN award emself
> > that ribbon by announcement.
>
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You could allow fining by transferring currency to the L&FD in lieu
>> of destruction. That would make more currencies available for fines.
>
> L&FD transfer usually breaks the same things as outright destruction.
> If the Lo
On Tuesday 8 July 2008 2:12:57 Zefram wrote:
> I think there should not be any extra capability here. If a contract
> doesn't allow voluntary destruction then this should not be a valid
> subject for a fine. Don't break zero-sum currencies, and in general
> don't break how particular currencies a
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:44 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> CoE: I'd like an Ultraviolet ribbon, too. I think I might have won or
>> something, along with the rest of Sgeo's buddies.
>
> You get the ultraviolet ribbon by being awarded Champion, not d
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:44 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CoE: I'd like an Ultraviolet ribbon, too. I think I might have won or
> something, along with the rest of Sgeo's buddies.
You get the ultraviolet ribbon by being awarded Champion, not directly
by winning.
-root
2008/7/9 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> CoE: I'd like an Ultraviolet ribbon, too. I think I might have won or
> something, along with the rest of Sgeo's buddies.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
Doubt it.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:44 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:23 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 12:32 -0700, Taral wrote:
>>> Tailor's Ribbon Report
>>> Player ROGCBKWMUVIY Ribbon count (12 to win)
>>> ---
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:44 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 00:53 +, Zefram wrote:
>> NUM FL AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> I vote as follows:
>> 5634 O1 1.7 Taral Specific crinimality
FOR * 5
>> 5635 O1 1.7 SgeoImpeachment
Endorse Murphy x 3, Deno
22 matches
Mail list logo
