Murphy wrote:
I leave The Variety Show.
Would anyone else like to become contestmaster (if this failed),
or re-create it as contestmaster (if it succeeded)? I still like
the idea of it, I've just gotten tired of digging through the
messages and figuring out who gets what.
Levi wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Eris wrote:
On 9/26/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
b) Any other votes are unprotected. The vote collector CAN
invalidate or change an unprotected vote by announcement
when e resolves the decision.
Actually, I'm just t
root wrote:
On 9/27/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/27/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Human Point Twoc/o Murphy 29 Apr 07 A
Murphy left the Human Point Two partnership at the time e deregistered.
Who are the current members?
Quazie and Os
On 9/27/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/27/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Human Point Twoc/o Murphy 29 Apr 07 A
> >
> > Murphy left the Human Point Two partnership at the time e deregiste
On 9/27/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Human Point Twoc/o Murphy 29 Apr 07 A
>
> Murphy left the Human Point Two partnership at the time e deregistered.
Who are the current members?
-root
On 9/27/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Human Point Twoc/o Murphy 29 Apr 07 A
Murphy left the Human Point Two partnership at the time e deregistered.
--
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
On 9/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I oppose this.
Any particular reason why?
-root
On 9/27/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, is it just me or does anyone else's mail client thread things
> horribly when the title changes to start with "DIS" instead of "BUS"
> therefore making the earlier replies not show up with what they're
> replying to? I think I need to s
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>I judge IRRELEVANT. The veracity of the statement is not relevant to
>the game.
NttPF.
-zefram
On 9/27/07, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it just me, or wouldn't this give the vote collector the power to
> allow a voter to cast more valid, counted votes than e has the right
> to? Sounds like a scam to me.
Also, is it just me or does anyone else's mail client thread things
h
On 9/26/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto-Proposal: Caveat suffragor
> (AI = 3, please)
>
> Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by replacing this text:
>
>Among the otherwise-valid votes on an Agoran decision, only the
>first N submitted by each entity are va
> Statement: It is possible for a judicial case to have more than one
>subclass.
I judge IRRELEVANT. The veracity of the statement is not relevant to
the game.
--Wooble
Ed Murphy wrote:
>b) Any other votes are unprotected. The vote collector CAN
> invalidate or change an unprotected vote by announcement
> when e resolves the decision.
Gives the vote collector way too much discretionary power. E could,
for example, cast Graham's numbe
Peekee wrote:
>Polarity is also not quite right... oiliness or ??? ]
"Hydrophobic" and "hydrophilic" are relevant chemical terms. Most
molecules are one or the other, but lipids are long molecules with one
hydrophobic end and one hydrophilic end.
-zefram
Ian Kelly wrote:
>[Judges don't gain VCs for sentencing, so they shouldn't lose them for
> overturned sentences either.
They gain black VCs for sentencing. It's deliberate that the loss is
of a different colour from the gain here; black VC loss occurs in a
different situation.
-zefram
Proto: "Water and oil"
[On the analogy: Maybe detergent instead of emulsion. I am not sure
about fluid as the name of the witch. I was tempted to use "liquid" as
the switch name but we also use liquid in describing currencies.
Polarity is also not quite right... oiliness or ??? ]
[ On th
16 matches
Mail list logo
