On 9/26/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Proto-Proposal: Caveat suffragor > (AI = 3, please) > > Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by replacing this text: > > Among the otherwise-valid votes on an Agoran decision, only the > first N submitted by each entity are valid, where N is the > entity's voting limit on that decision. > > with this text: > > Among the otherwise-valid votes on an Agoran decision: > > a) The first N votes submitted by each entity are protected, > where N is the entity's voting limit on that decision. > > b) Any other votes are unprotected. The vote collector CAN > invalidate or change an unprotected vote by announcement > when e resolves the decision. > > c) If an entity makes a reasonable effort to notify the vote > collector which of eir votes e believes will be unprotected, > then the vote collector SHALL invalidate all of that entity's > unprotected votes.
Is it just me, or wouldn't this give the vote collector the power to allow a voter to cast more valid, counted votes than e has the right to? Sounds like a scam to me. -- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
