comex wrote:
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
This would require the CotC's report to track all judged cases.
Honestly I don't think this is such a bad thing (with a time limit to
excuse the absence of ancient CFJs)... why/when was the Stare Decisis
removed from the ruleset?
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> This would require the CotC's report to track all judged cases.
Honestly I don't think this is such a bad thing (with a time limit to
excuse the absence of ancient CFJs)... why/when was the Stare Decisis
removed from the ruleset?
signature.asc
comex wrote:
Within a judicial case, one or more judicial questions may
arise. Each judicial question is either inapplicable (default)
or applicable, as defined by the rules. Status is a judicial
question switch, tracked by the CotC, with values of open
(default),
On 9/12/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Within a judicial case, one or more judicial questions may
> arise. Each judicial question is either inapplicable (default)
> or applicable, as defined by the rules. Status is a judicial
> question switch, tracked by the CotC,
Amend Rule 2158 by replacing:
Within a judicial case, one or more judicial questions may
arise. Each judicial question is either inapplicable (default)
or applicable; this is not a persistent status but is evaluated
instantaneously. Each judicial question either is open
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Pavitra wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement, barring Levi:
> It is possible for a judicial case to exist that has no subclass.
Have you read http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/MousetrapThesis ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
> It is possible for a judicial case to exist that has no subclass.
If this comes back TRUE, I recommend against patching it out. A
general-purpose way to resolve unforseen controversies would be a very
useful failsafe if the need ever came up.
Perhaps a General Case should be initiable with (say
AI=1 II=?
Amend rule 1922 by appending the following paragraph (e):
If any type of Patent Title was formerly explicitly defined
by the rules, and is so no longer, than it is implicitly
defined. No Patent Title can cease to exist as the result
of its def
root wrote:
On 9/12/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I am not a player then I register as a player. (Do such conditionals work?)
Traditionally no, apart from conditional votes, which are explicitly
legislated. However, it is customary to allow it in cases such as
this where the resul
On 9/12/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I am not a player then I register as a player. (Do such conditionals work?)
Traditionally no, apart from conditional votes, which are explicitly
legislated. However, it is customary to allow it in cases such as
this where the resulting game state
On 9/11/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
>
> > On 9/11/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The only textual file format that is reliably legible
> >> is text/plain with strict ASCII. We have done very well by keeping our
> >> game documents in this format. I'd favou
Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
So I'm going to poll the players and watchers: Upon first seeing
Peekee's message, were you able to understand it within a reasonable
amount of effort? If so, was a knowledge of HTML required?
My web based mail client (That I use for agora) did not pick
12 matches
Mail list logo
