On 9/12/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Within a judicial case, one or more judicial questions may > arise. Each judicial question is either inapplicable (default) > or applicable, as defined by the rules. Status is a judicial > question switch, tracked by the CotC, with values of open > (default), suspended, or judged. The possible types of > judgement for a judicial question vary according to the type of > question. > > When a judicial case has an applicable open judicial question, > it requires a judge, who SHALL as soon as possible assign a > valid judgement to that question by announcement, thereby > changing the question's status to judged.
This appears to allow a question to have more than one judgement assigned to it. This could come up if the original judgement was appealed, e.g. Also, making status a switch would require the CotC's report to include the status of *every* judicial question, rather than just the ones that are currently open, suspended, or requiring a judge. -root > > Whenever a judicial case has a judicial question that has > remained applicable and open, while the same judge has been > assigned to the case, continuously for the past week, the CotC > SHALL within two weeks recuse that judge with cause by > announcement. > > [[Switchifies status, thereby removing the annoying evaluated clauses. > Takes advantage of the fact that specifying a method implies CAN to add > brevity.]] > >
