Ian Kelly wrote:
Here and Gone Again: a Registrar's Report
Date of this Report: Tue 28 Aug 2007
Date of last Report: Sat 18 Aug 2007
Date last ratified : Tue 03 May 2005
Ratified Report: Thu 28 Apr 2005
(All times are in UTC. Precision in timing not guaranteed.)
EVENT HISTORY
16 A
On 8/28/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just playing devil's advocate here: a failure to satisfy an
> > obligation before it is removed is still a failure to satisfy that
> > obligation. In any other circumstance there would be no issue
On 8/28/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Kelly wrote:
> >Arguably, removing an obligation does not count as satisfying it.
>
> Indeed it does not. But it does mean that there is no longer an
> unsatisfied obligation. Precedent is pretty clear that there is no
> obligation unless the ru
Ian Kelly wrote:
>Arguably, removing an obligation does not count as satisfying it.
Indeed it does not. But it does mean that there is no longer an
unsatisfied obligation. Precedent is pretty clear that there is no
obligation unless the rules currently impose one.
-zefram
On 8/28/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Kelly wrote:
> >This might be considered a violation of Rule 2157, wrt the R2158
> >requirement to assign a judgement ASAP.
>
> I believe not, because self-recusal removes the obligation to judge.
> However, as there's only one qualified panel for
On 8/28/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to cause the panel to recuse itself.
> I support this, and note that you haven't responded to the email I sent you.
>
You'll have to resend, I can find any such e-mail.
BobTHJ
On 8/28/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/28/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal:
> >
> > Make Bob's messages valid
> > AI: 3
> > {
> > Flip the publicity of agora-discussion@agoranomic.org to "Public"
> > }
>
> This defeats the purpose of th
On 8/28/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to cause the panel to recuse itself.
I support this, and note that you haven't responded to the email I sent you.
Ian Kelly wrote:
>This might be considered a violation of Rule 2157, wrt the R2158
>requirement to assign a judgement ASAP.
I believe not, because self-recusal removes the obligation to judge.
However, as there's only one qualified panel for this case, I'd just
have to assign the same panel again.
On 8/28/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Make Bob's messages valid
> AI: 3
> {
> Flip the publicity of agora-discussion@agoranomic.org to "Public"
> }
This defeats the purpose of the discussion forum. We might just as
well strip the DF of its forum
On 8/28/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/27/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Therefore, I intend to cause the panel to judge AFFIRM on the appeal
> > > of CFJ 1711.
> >
> > I will agree to this judgement if BobTHJ does,
Roger Hicks wrote:
>I object,
NTTPF.
> not that it has any meaning...
It doesn't in the DF, certainly.
-zefram
On 8/27/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Therefore, I intend to cause the panel to judge AFFIRM on the appeal
> > of CFJ 1711.
>
> I will agree to this judgement if BobTHJ does, although as I stated in
> my own analysis, I would prefer a ju
On 8/27/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal root's judgement of CFJ 1729.
>
I object, not that it has any meaning...
BobTHJ
Levi Stephen wrote:
>Why doesn't a panel qualify as a partnership under Rule 2145?
It's not a contract. It's governed solely by R2157, and is not subject
to amendment or dissolution by the procedures of R1742.
I designed judicial panels to be non-persons but to take advantage of
some of the conc
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ed Murphy wrote:
When a non-player wins the game, e becomes a player.
Mm. You still need the changes that I protoed, of course. Automatic
registration is potentially a problem, if it could happen without the
subject intending to play Agora in the wid
16 matches
Mail list logo
