On 8/24/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The submitted form of each of these three proposals is in the proposal
> pool (as it has been since late 2006).
Can they be withdrawn?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
Ed Murphy wrote:
>I don't recall that offhand, and don't have time to run a full
>search.
I just looked it up, to borrow the wording, and the context (which I'd
forgotten) turns out to be a proposal to have fora tracked by the speaker.
That must have been just before you came up with truthiness.
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
This could be a monthly report;
Yes. I wanted to make it a monthly report, but that would depend on
the ability to report switches monthly. You protoed something to that
effect, but it's not in the ruleset yet.
I don't recall that offhand, and don't have tim
Ed Murphy wrote:
> When a non-player wins the game, e becomes a player.
Mm. You still need the changes that I protoed, of course. Automatic
registration is potentially a problem, if it could happen without the
subject intending to play Agora in the wider sense. It's not likely
that we'd se
On 8/24/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zefram wrote:
>
> > proto-proposal: allow non-player wins
>
> Create a rule titled "Non-Player Wins" with this text:
>
>When a non-player wins the game, e becomes a player.
>
Upon the adoption of this proposal, Rule 2029 becomes a player.
Ed Murphy wrote:
>This could be a monthly report;
Yes. I wanted to make it a monthly report, but that would depend on
the ability to report switches monthly. You protoed something to that
effect, but it's not in the ruleset yet.
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
proto-proposal: allow non-player wins
Create a rule titled "Non-Player Wins" with this text:
When a non-player wins the game, e becomes a player.
Zefram wrote:
The distributor is an office. The distributor SHALL send eir
weekly report to each non-null forum at least once each quarter.
This could be a monthly report; it's not like the fora change very
often. I don't know whether the Distributor's workload is large
enough to
proto-proposal: calendar cleanup
AI: 2
{{{
Enact a power=2 rule titled "Calendar" with text
Times of day are by default specified using the hours, minutes,
and seconds of Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), as maintained
by the BIPM and the IERS. "Greenwich Mean Time" ("GMT") is
proto-proposal: allow non-player wins
AI: 2
{{{
Amend rule 2126 by replacing the text "When one or more players win
the game" with "When a game win occurs".
Amend rule 1922 by replacing the text "any player who wins the game"
with "any person who wins the game".
[This doesn't actually allow a n
proto-proposal: distributor as an office
AI: 3
{{{
[This proposal depends on proposal 5172.]
Amend rule 478 by replacing each instance of "Registrar" with
"distributor", and by inserting before the paragraph that begins
"Publicity is a forum switch" the paragraph
The distributor is an off
Peekee wrote:
>Can any entity win? non-players, fish, rocks?
Interesting question, and I certainly overlooked that in the proto.
We don't currently have any formal definition of winning, not even a rule
that winning doesn't terminate Agora. (I'd say that's game custom now,
though it was explicitl
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
proto-proposal: stronger definition of paradox
AI: 3
{{{
Amend rule 2110 to read
If an inquiry case on the possibility of a rule-defined action
or the permissibility of an action results in a judgement of
UNDECIDABLE, and that judgement is
proto-proposal: stronger definition of paradox
AI: 3
{{{
Amend rule 2110 to read
If an inquiry case on the possibility of a rule-defined action
or the permissibility of an action results in a judgement of
UNDECIDABLE, and that judgement is not appealed within a week,
then
Peekee wrote:
>rounding?
VVLOP doesn't get rounded. EVLOP gets set to a rounded form of VVLOP,
and VVLOP gets set to the same value, so fractions are restricted to a
single week.
> e) A Player may spend 2 * (N + 1) VCs of different colors to multiply
> another players VVLOP by 1 +
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
proto-proposal: spending multiple VCs on VVLOP
AI: 2
d) A player may spend N+2 VCs of different colors to multiply
another player's VVLOP by (10-N)/10, where 1 <= N <= 10.
rounding?
e) A Player may spend 2 * (N + 1) VCs of different c
16 matches
Mail list logo
