root wrote:
On 6/25/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5047 AGAINST (see above; existing rule could be interpreted as "voting
limit on the proposal's current chamber at the start of its
voting period"; this is awkward, but so is the phrase "ballot
allotment time")
On 6/25/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5047 AGAINST (see above; existing rule could be interpreted as "voting
limit on the proposal's current chamber at the start of its
voting period"; this is awkward, but so is the phrase "ballot
allotment time")
"...where N
At some point, a router setting on this end got mangled. (May have been
when I was configuring a signal booster yesterday.) Anyway, fixed now.
comex wrote:
If Murphy will not bring the CotC database up, e may as well say so.
I have ample time to assign CFJs and even maintain a database if
necessary, but one already exists, and Murphy seems to be the only one
that can access it. I will neither object to this nor support it.
The probl
Ed Murphy wrote:
> A sentencing order is a judicial order directed at the defendant
> of a lawsuit in eir role as defendant.
Terminology doesn't match up here. In legal theory, sentencing is only
applicable in criminal cases. The way you define "lawsuit" includes
civil cases. I think
Ed Murphy wrote:
> An inquiry is a CFJ that is not a lawsuit.
Good terminology.
> A binding agreement is an agreement made by two or more players
> with the intention that it will be binding (i.e. that they
> become parties to it and agree to be bound by it).
Is it intentiona
Ed Murphy wrote:
>This should probably be decided if/when we actually propose a
>specific switch that would set up this possibility.
I think the obviously-most-sensible behaviour is also what you'll get
by default if you don't specify.
>The original case in question was "what happens to person/pl
Zefram wrote:
When an entity becomes a type of entity with one or more
switches, all of eir switches for that type are set to their
default values.
Careful here. What if an entity changes from one type to another where
both types have the same switch? That is, it has changed b
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Did the UK version of WLIIA
Is this a reference to "Whose Line is it Anyway?"? I don't recall any
game in it featuring lying down, but I haven't seen any episode of it
since 1994, so I might be out of date. (I don't have a TV.)
*rummage*wikipedia*
Ah, Wikipedia claims that th
9 matches
Mail list logo
