Re: [agi] The Cognitive Singularity Theorem (CST)

2025-02-19 Thread Matt Mahoney
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025, 4:37 PM John Rose wrote: > On Wednesday, February 19, 2025, at 1:42 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote: > > Space, time, and matter are not fundamental. Physics tells us what we > observe, not what is. The key property of an observer is not consciousness, > but simply memory. Writing to

Re: [agi] The Cognitive Singularity Theorem (CST)

2025-02-19 Thread Keyvan M. Sadeghi
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025, 11:26 PM Matt Mahoney wrote: > > Exactly what test are you using to distinguish a conscious human from a > zombie LLM passing the Turing test by using nothing more than text > prediction? > Isn't it so cool that "Artificial" Intelligence is free to carve its own path to con

Re: [agi] The Cognitive Singularity Theorem (CST)

2025-02-19 Thread Keyvan M. Sadeghi
wrote: > The key property of an observer is not consciousness, but simply memory. > Writing to memory is not time symmetric because the prior content is erased > irreversibly. This is why time seems to us to have a direction. The > difference between past and future is what you know. > 👏 This

Re: [agi] The Cognitive Singularity Theorem (CST)

2025-02-19 Thread Matt Mahoney
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 5:50 PM Keyvan M. Sadeghi wrote: Also planck time, can't go smaller than that on this side of space-time, > right? > Time is not discrete even at the Planck level as far as we know. The universe wrote 10^90 bits over its lifetime of 10^60 Planck time units. We don't have a

Re: [agi] The Cognitive Singularity Theorem (CST)

2025-02-19 Thread John Rose
On Wednesday, February 19, 2025, at 1:42 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote: > Space, time, and matter are not fundamental. Physics tells us what we > observe, not what is. The key property of an observer is not consciousness, > but simply memory. Writing to memory is not time symmetric because the prior >