This is a known problem. I do not think a fix has been released yet.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/01/03 11:10 AM >>>
Hello everyone!
Just recently upgraded TSM server from 4.1.5 to 5.1.6.2 and I am seeing
the
output on the web admin gui differently. Is there a fix for this that
anyone is awa
>Is this for Clients AND Server?
>Are most people planning on upgrading to 5.1?
>What are the implications of staying at 4.2 or lower?
>
>Is there any additional cost to upgrade?
V4 clients are supported with the v5 server but you will want to
upgrade to the v5 client to take advantage of the bug
>Are there any major issues with 5.1???
I missed this one.
No more so than with any other version.
David
Its only your changed or deleted data that goes inactive so you first
need an estimate of how much of your data is changed/deleted.
If you want support to look at the problem, take a svc dump. Then cycle
your tsm server to clear the deadlock.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/04/03 02:22PM >>>
Disk pools aren't full. Tape drives are available. There are plenty
of
tapes. The db is 88% full. Recovery log is 7% utilized. I di
Check to see if you have Receive Buffer overflow on the tsm server
machine. Use the command
netstat -v | grep "Receive Pool Buffer"
The "No Receive Pool Buffer Errors:" line should be zero. If it is
not, that may be the source of your problem.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/03 06:36A
The MIGPR parm on the storage pool controls now many concurrent
migration processes are started for the storage pool. I do not know of
any node level controls.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/03 07:23AM >>>
We have also been looking at using a large diskpool.
It appears migration only uses one tape d
select volume_name,pct_utilized from volumes where access<>'OFFSITE'
order by pct_utilized desc
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/30/03 09:31AM >>>
Enviro:
AIX TSM server 4.2.2.12 (I know, I need to upgrade!)
MagStar 3570 C12 library
Can someone suggest a query to list all the volumes in the library
sort
How about:
select node_name,filespace_name,backup_end from filespaces where
backup_end
I have a client node that backs up over the lan to tape. When I do a Q
SESS during a backup, there are 3-4 sessions running. One session has a
tape mounted but one of the others remains in MediaW. The node has
Maximum Mount Points Allowed: 2 defined. The device class has Mount
Limit: DRIVES def
I got there with no problems.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/10/03 03:23PM >>>
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/
I even tried through the websiite.
> Duane Ochs
> Enterprise Computing
>
> Quad/Graphics
>
> Sussex, Wisconsin
> 414-566-2375 phone
> 414-917-0736 beeper
> [EMAI
rage
MS 326
4000 N. Mingo Road
Tulsa, OK 74116-5020
* phone: +01-918-292-4364
* cell: +01-918-629-1819
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.eds.com
-Original Message-----
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MediaW
I
Yes, there are adequate scratch volumes and drives and paths are
online.
Thanks,
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/10/03 03:48PM >>>
>Any ideas why a tape is not being mounted?
This may not be the issue, but is the destination stgpool configured
with
an adequate number of scratch volumes allowed (
yes.
Try turning it off and running your backup again, I bet you will see it
pick
up more drives.
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MediaW
Collocation is set YES. Can co
in such
"own"
pool (or shared with few similar requirements nodes). Setting
collocation
off will have little or no impact on your restores. In fact allowing
backups to parallelize, you will set the ground for parallel restores.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
David E Ehresman <[EM
I have received notice that the problem with '~' tilde and '\' appearing
in tsm output where newlines belong is supposedly fixed in server
5.1.7.0 which is now available. I have not yet done the upgrade.
David
nts*
(usually
does not)
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
David E Ehresman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12.06.2003 15:29
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Incremental refers to a filespace. Active or inactive refers to a file.
An active version of a file is always the most recent backup of a
file.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/03 10:19AM >>>
hi, how I know if the active version is a full or partial incremental
backup?
Janeth
>Total number of objects inspected: 61
>Total number of objects backed up: 34
>
This indicates that tsm looked at 61 files and determined that 34 of
them had been updated and thus needed backing up.
David
>http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usalets&parms=H_203-095
>
June 27, 2003 (Electronic) and July 11, 2003 (Media): Tivoli Storage
Manager, Tivoli Storage Manager Extended Edition, Tivoli Storage Manager
for Storage Area Networks, Tivoli Storage Manager for Space Management,
Tivoli Storage Manager for Mai
Add nametype=unicode or codetype=unicode, I forget which.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/30/03 04:28PM >>>
Hi,
TSM 5.1.6.5 on Windows 2000 Server. Just testing out the new server
making
sure everything works, but I have a problem deleting filespaces on the
command line. I use the command:
tsm>d
This is an ongoing problem for us in an Aix environment too. Contary to
Karel's advice, I do not think it has to do with a hardware
communication problem. Everything else works fine over the same
connections. I don't know what the problem really is but since it
reconnects and goes on, I haven't
>Thanks for your information, Please point me where can I download v5.2
>admin
>client?
>
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v5r2/
Is the collocation groups feature in TSM 5.2.0 or is it further out? If
further out, any word on how far out?
David
>What is the best way to determine what your throughput is for each
>process? Are you just going by the activity log?
One of the many things Servergraph/TSM (http://www.servergraph.com)
will report for you is thoughput rates for the various TSM processes.
David Ehresman
University of Louisville
According to our marketing rep, on an lparable machine you only need to
license cpus rhat are used on an lpar that is running tsm server or
client code. Your marketing rep may have a different answer!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/24/03 10:39AM >>>
Hello,
how many tsm licenses are needed, when you ha
Other collocation considerations:
number of nodes in a storage pool mater and number of tape drives
matter - migration takes longer because you mount more tapes
if copy pool is not also collocated, reclaim take longer because more
onsite tapes have to be mounted to reclaim a given tape
if copy p
Does the tape management class have a longer retention than the default
MC? If so, backups of directories may be going straight to tape because
the default is to backup directories to the MC with the longest
retention unless this is overwritten with a DIRMC.
Also, if the disk stgpool is full enou
In tsm v5 where path and drive status are stored seperately, can anyone
help with a sql query that would return the number of drives that are
EMPTY and where the drive is online and the path to the drive is
online.
Thanks,
David
That almost gives me what I want. But it counts drives once its
apprearance in the drives table and once for each occurance in the paths
table (each drive appears multiples times in paths because they are
defines to storage agents). So with all 8 dirves empty, it gives me 48
instead of 8.
David
Here's what I finally came up with:
select count(*) as "Number of Free Drives" from drives -
where drive_name not in -
(select destination_name from paths where online='NO') and -
online='YES' and -
drive_state in ('EMPTY','UNKNOWN')
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/01/03 11:01AM >>>
That almos
TSM for SAN is a separate cpu based license at v5.1. You pay based on
the number of cpus in the boxes where you install the storage agents.
David Ehresman
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/06/03 09:20AM >>>
Are the 'Managed systen for SAN storage Agent's' part of the 5.1 base
product for the extended edi
For those of you using a 3494 library on a Unix tsm server, does your
3494 have a "Convenience I/O Station"? If so, do you run a script that
notifies operations when the station is full? If so, could you share
the script?
David Ehresman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>That can be like the conclusion of an operation where the surgeon
cannot
>account for a sponge or tool. It's best to check for the tape being
>stuck in a drive, dropped inside the library, or other expeditionary
>search.
>
Oh believe me, we're doing an exhausive search. I just want to know
what
I have a primary tape pool tape that has gone missing. Is there anyway
to determine if all/some/none of the files that were on the primary tape
have already been copied to the copy pool?
David
My problem was also with Prompted nodes only. Polling nodes ran ok as
did croned backups.
The tcp setting was the size of the Receive Pool Buffer. IBM gave me
this query to determine if there was a problem:
(echo "";date; netstat -v ent1 | grep "Receive Pool Buffer" )
The "No Receive Pool
er - Gestion du stockage
CGI - Gestion intégré des technologies
TEL.: (514) 415-3000 ext 5091
Pager: (514) 957-2615
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
________
David E Ehresman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 2003-08-14
11:04:49
When I had the problem, I did open a PMR and they finally tracked my
problem down to a tcp read buffer problem. They had me adjust the tcp
values and the problem has not reoccurred.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/14/03 03:52AM >>>
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:56:21 -0400
"Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)"
When we moved TSM off the mainframe, we moved to a 4 way 660-6H1
(7026-660) with 4 gig ram. But as Wanda inidicated, I think planning
for i/o is much more important. Our box has 2 i/o shelves and 6 fiber
channel adaptors to spread the i/o.
We back up between 110 - 775 GB/day with a total of 11.5
Try using nametype=uni or specifying the fsid number for the filespace
and use nametype=fsid.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/20/2003 8:02:30 AM >>>
Hello!
I have a quick question about when an individual gets rid of an old PC
and
gets a new one to backup to TSM. The one I am dealing with is
lemk
If you don't set DSM_CONFIG, the backup client will look for dsm.opt
first in the current directory and then in the install directory. So
make a dsm.opt in your install directory with a servername statement for
your "normal" backups. Then make another dsm.opt in some other
directory with a server
TSM for Sysback lets you store aix sysback tapes on the TSM backstore.
It uses the TSM api but does not set the last backup begin/end date in
TSM. Has anyone devised a good way to track whether their TSM for
Sysback backups are running successfully?
David
Replace $1 with the volume name and this LONG RUNNING query will tell you what nodes
are on a tape:
select distinct node_name from volumeusage where volume_name='$1'
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/5/2003 9:11:44 AM >>>
Hi,
as many of us probably, we use seq. stg pools with collocation ON for
backups. T
I'm currently going thru this process and the only way I have found to
reclaim the old non-collated tapes is to do a "del vol
discarddata=yes" to remove the unwanted data followed by a "backup stg
primarypool copypool" to re-backup the data that is not being moved to a
new stgpool.
My tsm server 5.2.3.4 crashed tonight. In the dsmserv.err log I find
"ANR7837S Internal error LOCKCYCLE02 detected." Any ideas. I can't get
into the IBM/Tivoli ESR site tonight so I'll report via that route
tomorrow. A web search of the support site only found v4 hits. So
meanwhile if anyone ha
Thanks. That appears to be it exactly.
Can one revert from 5.2.3.4 to 5.2.3.3 without restoring the tsm db?
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/16/2004 11:13:33 PM >>>
Likely suspect: IC43445:
ABSTRACT:
TSM SERVER ABENDS WITH ANR7837S INTERNAL ERROR LOCKCYCLE02
DETECTED
ERROR DESCRIPTION:
The TSM
You could mark the Js as readonly, insert the Ks, and do MOVE DATA to
move the data from Js to Ks.
Actually, I probably wouldn't. I'd mark the Js readonly, insert the Ks
and let normal processes take care of the migration.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/16/2004 2:53:32 PM >>>
** High Priority *
Andy,
Would you expect 5.2.3.5 to have a fix for IC43445? (Yes, I have a
PMR opened but answers are often faster here).
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/17/2004 12:06:01 AM >>>
I have heard next week, November 22, but I can not make a formal
promise
that will be the date.
Regards,
Andy
Andy
Charles,
We ran at 5.2.3.4 for about 3 weeks before we experienced our first
crash.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/17/2004 10:29:43 AM >>>
I've been searching IBM's Web for IC43445... And no hits, we just
updated two AIX TSM servers to 5.2.3.4... Are we screwed?
Thanks
-Original Message---
TSM 5.2.3.5 is not on the download server as of 8am est today. Is
there
an updated expected release date?
David
Mark,
Thanks for the link but I don't see anything there about the 5.2.3.5
release date.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/23/2004 9:05:47 AM >>>
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E Ehresman
>TSM 5.2.3.5 is not on the download
In TSM 5.2, you do NOT have to define your library as manual to do a tsm
db restore.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/24/2004 9:49:27 AM >>>
In previous 4.x versions to restore the TSM DB you had to set library
to Manual in the Device config. Its been quite a while since I've had
to restore a TSM DB (Tha
Any word on the availability of the TSM 5.2.3.5 patches?
David
>>Using other than IBM tapes (and possibly with them), it seems
that
cleaning each drive AT LEAST once per week is imperative, rather than
waiting till the drive says it needs cleaning. The IBMs do seem to
leave
lest 'dust' or residue on the heads.<<
You're cleaning LTO drives once a week
>>It has also been discussed several times that TSM doesn't appear to be
a
good fit for a VTL. May want to search the archives to find out more on
the
subject.<<
Has anyone heard of good experiences with TSM on a virtual tape
library? Can this ever be a good thing?
I'm trying to get a count of tapes pending by date. I'm using:
select date(pending_date),count(*) from volumes where
status='PENDING' -
group by date(pending_date)
but I get the error message:
ANR2904E Unexpected SQL key word token - 'DATE'.
pointing to the date in the group by claus
s='PENDING' -
group by pending_date
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of David E Ehresman
Sent: Tue 11/30/2004 6:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SQL Help
I'm trying to get a count of tapes pending by date. I'm using:
The use of upper/lower functions in SQL statements can save a lot of
grief!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/30/2004 8:47:29 AM >>>
On Nov 30, 2004, at 8:40 AM, James Choate wrote:
> The scratch column is case sensitive. Looks like the yes & no are
> capitalized.
>
> The status column is YES|NO|NULL
Su
'Date' is an unknown SQL column name.
|
.V.
e",count(*) from volumes where status='PENDING' group by
"Date"
ANS8001I Return code 3.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/30/2004 9:09:03 AM >>>
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
We wait to hear from our dba that backups are running too long.
Lan-free vs lan backups make a very noticable difference in their backup
times.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/30/2004 8:53:52 AM >>>
Hello All!
TSM 5.2.2.5 server AIX 5.2
Sun Solaris Lan-Free client 5.2.2.5
Once the lan-free data transfe
t is incorrect, use the following:
group by pending_date
the conversion to date format is already taken care of
in the first part of the select statement.
David E Ehresman wrote:
> tsm: ULTSM> select date(pending_date) as "Date",count(*) from
volumes
> where -
> cont> s
When I regress my AIX server from 5.2.3.4 to 5.2.3.3 do I also have to
regress the AIX Storage Agents from 5.2.3.4 to 5.2.3.3? Can a 5.2.3.4
storage agent work with a 5.2.3.3. server?
David Ehresman
University of Louisville
Either use the fsid parm and specify by number rather than name or use
the nametype=unicode parm.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/2004 1:16:51 PM >>>
Hello,
A server in out farm is being rebuilt. I've been asked to
retain
the last backup of the old instance by renaming the filespace
AIX 5.1 ML7 maintenance introduced a new vmtune option, -H, to tune
sequential readaheads. Our data base folks back up data bases by
shutting them down, using the cp command to copy then to a different
directory, then restart the data base and backup the copy. The -H
default, 0, caused the copy st
Query the volumes in the primary tape pool that are being called for.
Does the query show them marked as destroyed?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/10/04 3:32 PM >>>
sung
thanks but
it still call for tapes in pimary tape pool
after i marked them destroyerd
tim
- Original Message -
From:
TSM Server 5.2.3.4 has serious problems. Go to 5.2.3.5 instead.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/22/04 10:10 AM >>>
Hi to all,
I am running a TSM server version 5.1.5.0 and TSM clients version
5.1.5.0
on Windows 2000 platform. I am planning to migrate the current version
for
both TSM server and c
--Original Message-----
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 16:23
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Upgrading TSM server from 5.1.5.0 to 5.2.3.4
TSM Server 5.2.3.4 has serious problems. Go to 5.2.3.5 instead.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>ANRD sminit.c(656): ThreadId<20> SM Failed to Initialize - Time
Out.
Callc
hain of previous message: 0x1001634C outDiagf <- 0x104077BC
smWaitForInitializ
ation <- 0x1058589C MmsLibraryPollingThread <- 0x10007AF0 StartThread
<-
0xD00
4C6AC _pthread_body <-
ANRD mmsshr.c(658): ThreadId<20>
I was told by Tivoli Support that that message really means the Netware client
is trying to back up a file greater than 4gig and quietly (other that the
ANR1339W) failing leaving what looks like a good backup but which in fact is a
corrupted backup. Fix not expected until end-of-1st-quarter-200
We colocate onsite and offsite tapes for all of our important (in a DR
sense) nodes. TSM runs on a dedicated machine with dedicated tape
drives. Backups run at night. Thus the machine and tape drives are
available all day for backup storagepool, migrate, and reclaim. Since
reclaims are single-t
>>Thanks for the idea - by collocating the offsite, does that mean that
you
eject one tape per node every day?<<
Yes, for our "important" collocated nodes. That one tape per node
contains the results of the most recent "reclaim" (actually a MOVE DATA)
and the current nights backup.
Our schedule
When we moved TSM from OS390 to AIX, we only moved archive data. We
exported/inported nodes and then started doing new backups on the new
TSM. Our data retention is 30 days so we kept the old TSM around for 90
days as insurance.
David Ehresman
University of Louisville
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/2
I'm looking at a AIX server upgrade from TSM 4.2.4 to 5.2.4 with TSM EE
and TSM for SAN. All clients are AIX or Linux. The ilbrary is a 3584
with 4 LTO1 drives. Anything to watch out for?
Does the upgrade automatically convert DRIVE definitions into
PATH/DRIVE definitions or do the PATH defs hav
Make sure you have /etc/ibmatl.conf customized on your DR machine.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/11/05 11:36 AM >>>
We are setting up a DR machine. While we have TSM coming up after a
DB
restore, we still need to test connecting the 3494 tape library on the
DR machine. Looking through the software inv
>>I backup the DB each and every day, and before & after any changes,
and
keep (now at least) 28 days copies <<
Do you also have your offsite storagepool reuse delay set to 28 days?
If the data tapes have been reused, the data base backup will not do you
any good.
Since few of us can afford to ke
TSM clients for Novell systems can be downloaded from
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v5r2/Netware/
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/14/05 11:04 AM >>>
Hello
Where I can download client for Novell 5.1? (I planned install TSM
5.2.2.0 on W2KServer).
As TRushforth pointed out, MOVE NODEDATA only works for the pirmary
storage pool. A BACKUP STG of the new primary storagepool will get the
data into the new copy storagepool. Then you are left with all your old
data that is also still in the old copy storagepool. Unless this was
fixed int 5.3, th
My understanding is that reclamation only reclaims Filling tapes if they
are marked offsite. I want to reclaim those volumes. Since we are
talking collocated storagepools, it means I am sending a new partially
written volume offsite each day for each node. The reason I'm
collocating is to minimi
>>We have enough capcity to keep our primary storage pool in a tape
library. The tapes are reclaimed automaticly and returned to the
scratch
pool, never having been marked off site.<<
We keep our **primary** storage pool in our tape library also. It is
the DR copy pool volumes we send offsite. I
>>
> I also send 100-120 tapes offsite each day. If I did not bring about
that
> many back each day, I'd soon run out of both tapes and offsite
storage
> space. That is another reason I need to reclaim those offsite
filling
> tapes.
That's a -lot- of traffic. I don't collocate my offsite pool.
Instead of two option files, why not just assign the different data to
different magagement classes that point to different storage pools.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/15/05 5:04 AM >>>
Aloha,
I have a dual client installation on a Win2000 server, by dual client i mean
two schedules with different
The "q content" command has a copied=no option. Is there a way to do a
sql query against the "copied" attirbute?
David
I'll ask the obvious. Any chance you copypool reached 100% triggering a
reclaim?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/21/05 10:17 AM >>>
TSM Server 5.1.9.0 on AIX 5.2 ML-4
TSM Client mix of 5.1.6.0 and 5.1.7.0 mostly on Windows
This morning I found a primary storage pool tape "pending" as the
result
of rec
Our 3590K tapes have a 10 year warrenty.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/30/05 9:58 AM >>>
Anybody out there know how long 3590 K series tapes last ( I assume in
years). I am trying to figure if our recent batch of tape/drive errors
are
from tape drives and old tapes. Seem to be older number tapes givi
What methodology are folks using to restore Linux boxes in a DR situation?
If you deleted volumes while at the 5.2.0.0. level of the server, please see
apar IC36462. At that level, once you delete copypool volumes, the primary
pool equivalents DO NOT get rebacked up. This leaves you with a hole in your
offsite backups. The bug is fixed in later releases but the exis
If you use the TSM for Sysback to make your Sysback directly to TSM, you can do
a netboot of an AIX box using the sysback image stored in TSM.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/06/05 11:01 AM >>>
When you install the Tivoli version of SYSBACK it has panels related to
this,
but they seemed awkward.
The product manual for TSM for Sysback is at
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/StorageMangerforSysback5.6.5.html
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/06/05 10:47 AM >>>
Hi All,
I seem to recall that IBM integrated TSM and Sysback for AIX mksysb
restores and DR of AIX Systems. Can anyone
Logon onto passport advantage and check your entitlements.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/06/05 11:35 AM >>>
Hello again,
Does anyone know how we tell how many licenses we have?
we are using TSM 5.3.
Thanks in advance
TSM 5.3
I have a restore that is asking for a copypool tape. This implies a primary
tape is not availaable or has damaged files. How can I determine specifically
which tape TSM thinks is not available. A 'q vol access=unavail' does not find
any.
David
>From the linux machine you want to store to:
dsmc -virtualnode=node_name_whose_data_you_want_to_restore -verbose
Then enter you restore command and when prompted for userid/password use your
system admin userid and password.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/13/05 8:14 AM >>>
Hi
How do you restore an
If one uses DRM to expire data base backups, should one still routinely do a
"del volhist type=all today="? Why or why not?
I have a 3590 drive in a 3494 library san attached to an Aix box running tsm.
This is more of a 3494 problem than a tsm problem, but I do need help.
tapeutil can talk to the drive. but mtlib says the 3494 library does not see
it. That is if I do a " mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -DE" that drive is not li
rom: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E Ehresman
>If one uses DRM to expire data base backups, should one still routinely
>do a "del volhist type=all today="? Why or why not?
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tal
>From the client, do a restore of the file (to a new name) and see which tapes
>get called.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/15/05 6:26 AM >>>
Good Morning.
Running TSM Server 5.2.2 on an AIX 5.2 server. The client take was backed up
was running TSM 5.2 on Win2K.
Is there an quick way to find what tap
q drive
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/22/05 5:05 PM >>>
Frank Tsao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAX 25803, 626-302-5803
FAX 626-302-7131
For those of you who do DR testing with your normal copypool tapes,
1) do you stop reclaimations on your production tsm for the duration of the
test?
2) do you stop expiration on your production tsm for the duration of the test?
3) do you make any other adjustments to your normal production
>>We grab everything that is off-site and go
Just curious, but about how many tapes is "everything"?
David
Starting on page
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManagerVersionRelease.html
searching for PRS814 I get no hits. Searching for TSM Disaster Recovery
Manager, I get 122 hits. Can you point me a little bit closer to where I can
find this L&L?
David
>>
There are two apars, one fixed and one just opened, that describe problems with
stg backup completing normally but not all the files in the primary pool being
backup up. This can leave you with important data that is NOT offsite with no
warning. The two apars are IC36462 and IC45931.
Here is
101 - 200 of 766 matches
Mail list logo
