Jeff,
You should edit the file C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPSql\tdpsql.cfg and
add (or change) the stripes parameter to 2.
STRIPes 2
I'm concerned about your performance. Of course that depends on the LAN
infrastructure you have. We use a Gbit network and a 190GB dbase is backed
up in abou
Hi all,
I use TDP and RMAN to backup database for Oracle.
By default, TSM server storages database that was backuped with name : \adsmorc. I
want to change this default name on TSM server.
Does anyone know how to change it ?
Thanks in advanced !
Nghiatd,
Hi,
you should use TDPO_FS in tdpo.opt.
If you change the filespacename on the TSM server be sure to set TDPO_FS
correctly. The filespacename on the TSM server and TDPO_FS have to be in sync.
See "Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle - Installation and User's Guide"
TDPO_FS
This option specifies a f
>My AIX TSM server (5.2.2.3) just spewed the following error messages.
>
>Talk about schizophrenic/indecisive !!
>
>What gives ? All I was doing is a DB backup. Just inserted and
>initialized this tape. The init went fine.
>
>This is an IBM 3583-L72 with 2-LTO2 drives.
>
>*
Hello everyone!
I am in the process of creating a new storage hierarchy to create two
simultaneous backups of a client's data. In the book it states that you
can write to a primary disk or tape storage pool and a copy pool at the
same time and that the data must be coming from the client at the t
Hi *SM-ers!
One of our AIX guys wants to exclude all filespaces and then include
specific others.
We have tried the following:
include.fs /home
include.fs /usr
exclude.fs *
But that doesn't work. I don't know how to accomplish this.
Because they want to use our standard way for excluding files
(i
there should be a parameter in the /opt or
/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/tdpo.opt file called: "tdpo_fs_name" or
something to that affect. That value will determine what filespace name
your backupsets are all stored as on the tsm server if backedup via that
Oracle tdp.
thanks!.
--Justin Richar
I could be mistaken, but you should just be able to move the "exclude.fs
*" to the top. That should do it since it reads from the bottom up, and
uses the first match it comes to.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Kevin!
I know that it reads bottom up, so your solution will not work. If you code:
exclude.fs *
include.fs /home
include.fs /usr
It will first encounter the includes and then the exclude all, so It will
not backup anything. TSM processes all include/excludes, it wil not exit as
soon as a matc
Hi Eric,
> ... it wil not exit as soon as a match has been found.
Actually, TSM include/exclude processing does indeed exit as soon as a
match is found.
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intern
Eric,
That is not correct.
It starts from the bottom and works its way up.
If it finds a "match" it stops processing.
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/20/2004
09:04:06 AM:
> Hi Kevin!
> I know that it reads botto
It does? I didn't knew that!
I'll give it a try, thanks Andy and Del!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 15:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exclude on AIX
Hi Eric,
Eric - The postings didn't indicate whether a Query Inclexcl was done
to verify the full list.
Remember that any server-side client options set takes precedence,
so that command can be invaluable when working on the client.
Customers often overlook the unseen client options set, and wonder
w
Thanks Steve. We have used the expire command, but this only seems to
mark them inactive. Because the management class they are assigned to
holds the only version forever, or until it knows the file has been
deleted, they are marked inactive, but never go away. Any suggestions
for completing the
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Joni Moyer
I am in the process of creating a new storage hierarchy to create two
simultaneous backups of a client's data. In the book it states that you
can write to a primary disk or tape storage pool and a copy pool at the
same time and that the data mu
Hi Richard!
Thank you very much for your reply!
We don't use server defined include-excludes, so that's not the problem.
We currently tried the following:
exclude.fs *
include.fs /home
include.fs /usr
Backup now finishes in 1 second. I've had them issue a q inclexcl which
shows the correct statem
>Hi Richard!
>Thank you very much for your reply!
>We don't use server defined include-excludes, so that's not the problem.
>We currently tried the following:
>
>exclude.fs *
>include.fs /home
>include.fs /usr
>
>Backup now finishes in 1 second. I've had them issue a q inclexcl which
>shows the cor
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:04:06 +0200
"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kevin!
> I know that it reads bottom up, so your solution will not work. If you
> code:
>
> exclude.fs *
> include.fs /home
> include.fs /usr
>
I don't think there is such a thing as an include.fs, just an
>From the client manual:
"The exclude.fs and exclude.dir statements override all include statements
that match the pattern."
Orville L. Lantto
Datatrend Technologies, Inc. (http://www.datatrend.com)
IBM Premier Business Partner
121 Cheshire Lane, Suite 700
Minnetonka, MN 55305
Email: [EMAIL P
TSMers,
Please help me NOT migrate the server to a different platform from AIX.
server:
4way P660, 3G memory running AIX 5.1
3494 with 6 FC 3590E tape drives connected to 2 SAN switches
90G database at 60% utilized on a Shark
24T of backup data
2600 3590E tapes
460 clients: Windows, Linux, Solari
Hello,
isnt there a way to simulate an restore and look at the actlog ?
But i think it is possible that there Data on all volumes but you dont need
all to do a restore. And tomorrow it is on other volumes. The information
then isnt very useful. May be your theme is collocation=yes.
Is this selec
You need to look at Appendix C.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/TSMC/GC32-0786-04/en_US/HTML/ans3tfrm.htm
Julian Armendariz
System Analyst - UNIX
H.B. Fuller
(651) 236-4043
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/19/2004 8:58:17 AM >>>
Every question seems to relate to Novell when I am on here
It is time to upgrade our tape drives - the current lease is coming up for
renewal. I will be replacing LTO-1 SCSI drives with LTO-2 fiber drives. Do I
need to get the AIX 'Control Path Fallover' option for TSM to properly
recognize that there are two paths to a drive and only use one? My current
u
How about:
Select * from volumeusage where node_name='nomenodo' and
stgpool_name='nomestgp' and filespace_id= fs#
?
Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma
Via Sciangai 53, Roma
phones : +39(0)659664598
+393351270554 (mobile)
[EMAIL
Ahh, the politics, we all get it. I'm in a very similar boat as
you are
I too am getting "encouragement" to move our 8 TSM servers from
AIX to anything else. My first choice would be to keep with the IBM
PSeries hardware and run Linux on it, but management also seems to want
the IB
Thanks. Hopefully this won't be too much of an adventure.
"Slag, Jerry B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:No issues. We did make changes to WLM to
place TSM into a separate service
class that has the 'storcrit' setting active. TSM runs well and the storcrit
setting keeps the cpu usage way down.
...
>I'm a Unix admin, so I lean towards some other flavor of *nix.
...
IBM would do well to consider producing a TSM server for the Macintosh
platform. Apple has seriously been into server systems for years now,
and sells some of the fastest servers made, along with RAID (and an
upcoming Xsan of
Hi Eliza,
My condolences; I don't envy the position that you're in. I'm not sure
what arguments have been laid out against staying with AIX, but perhaps you
could put some weight on the other pan of the scale by doing some testing
and extrapolating the results to approximate the real costs of mig
Tom,
>From what I understand, LTO2 aren't dual attached drives, so you wouldn't
need the Control Path Failover for your server. Now, the 3592's are dual
attached, but they are enterprise drives and . Please someone correct
me if I'm wrong concerning the dual paths on the drives...
Hi All,
We installed Netware client couple of months ago. During install we tested restore
also. Worked OK.
Now they needed some files and they cannot connect from web GUI to TSM client on
Netware server.
Backup works OK, restore works fine from Netware server (TSM command line)itself.
When the
Hello everyone!
I was just wondering if anyone would happen to know an approximate cost of
using the TDP for Oracle and RMAN for backup/recovery on Oracle servers?
Thanks!
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6603
Fax:(717)302-5974
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for the explaination.
However, what does it all mean ? Why do I get error message that try to
address 20-different possibilities of reasons for some failure, that I am
not sure I am having ?
What does it all mean to me ?
Should I just call IBM and have them come figure it out ?
hi all,
there has been a method how to permanently delete an already backed-up
object, canm someone give me a quick hint?
Juraj
Hi Ted,
Since you are in Blacksburg you know who we are. But for the other folks,
Virginia Tech is a state univeristy (The Hokies) and we do things cheap here.
I have been offered a SUN Enterprise 250 and a SUN L1000 DLT library with
10(?) slots that will soon be surplused by the other backup sys
TSM Community :
Flash 10282 has been published:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/FLASH10282
Including the Flash text below :
Abstract: TSM Server can not be restarted after running REPAIR STGVOL
utility in 5.1.9.0 or 5.2.2.0, if a volume is not
specified when the comm
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Eliza Lau
>Please help me NOT migrate the server to a different platform from AIX.
All right.
1. The only way to move TSM data from one operating system platform to another is by
using the export/import functions.
2. Exporting 24TB of data, even runn
> All right.
>
> 1. The only way to move TSM data from one operating system platform to another is by
> using the export/import functions.
>
> 2. Exporting 24TB of data, even running a direct export from the old TSM server to
> an import on the new server will take days.
>
> 3. How to prove this?
My recommendation is to set up a new Solaris server and slowly put new clients
on it. Then over time we will move all clients to the new server. But I
know it won't fly because it will entail buying a new tape library.
Eliza,
Would it be feasible to share the 3494 between servers during th
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Eliza Lau
This is something I can look into. I can paritiion the 3494 so each server
has its own frame, tape drives, and tapes. But will the 3494 control manager
get confused when 2 TSM servers try to talk to it at the same time? Doesn't one
has to be
AIX 'Control Path Fallover' is a feature to allow the library robot
control path to automatically fail over to a different drive. The Atape
driver provides for load balancing and fail over between different routes
to the drive.
Orville L. Lantto
Datatrend Technologies, Inc. (http://www.datatrend
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:45:03 -0400
Eliza Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote thusly:
>
> This is something I can look into. I can paritiion the 3494 so each
> server has its own frame, tape drives, and tapes. But will the 3494
> control manager get confused when 2 TSM servers try to talk to it at the
>
> No. The 3494 library manager can handle connections to multiple TSM servers. Using a
> library manager/library client is not necessary in your case.
>
> Consult your 3494 manuals on how to set this up.
>
> --
> Mark Stapleton
>
>
Thanks Mark. This will be in my recommendation.
Eliza
Doesn't it depend?
If she wants to dedicate certain drives to certain TSM servers,
she can do that simply with the functions built into the 3590 library.
Piece of cake, we do that on all our libraries.
If she wants to connect the drives to both the AIX and Solaris
host at
Yes.
Based on the wording in her post, it sounded like she just wanted to
attach another (test) host to the library, which, as you say, is easy.
But it also sounded like she was thinking of partitioning the 3494 as you
would a 3584, with specific slots assigned to each host, which is not
necessar
Thanks for the clarification, Orville. This looks like an option I can
easily justify not buying as it doesn't do as much as I thought it did.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: Orville Lantto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
Well I'm confused. I can't find REPAIR in the 5.2.2 admin guide or admin
ref.
Anybody know what it is/how to use it?
-Original Message-
From: Sam Giallanza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Flash 10282 has been published
TSM C
It is not necessary to have both the AIX and Solaris host share the drives.
They will be dedicated to one host only. This 'sharing' of the library will
be temporary (we have heard that one before) during the migration of the
AIX server to the new solaris server with export/import. Then the migrat
Well, if you problem is just getting them out of the 3484, all you have to
do is mark them as OFFSITE and run the CHECKOUT command.
Keeping track of them is another matter entirely.
If this is something you plan to do regularly, look at a product called
Autovault at www.coderelief.com.
We use it
Hi Wanda, try www.ibm.com and searching on:
+"repair stgvol" +tsm
to find some hits.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb quest
One method is to define a mgmt class with zero versions deleted,
use include/exclude to backup the object and rebind it to the new
class, then either delete the object or exclude it from backup, and
it will be deleted on the next backup.
-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EM
Hi, Debbie, Tab.
You'll have to rebind those objects. Since they're inactive, it'll be
really fun. In fact, it's probably not worth doing all the steps in Option
2 if you have a lot of objects, but it's a fun exercise anyway.
Option 1) This is the easiest if you're a C programmer. Use the TSM
Debbie
Your management class setup seems incorrect to me.
The only way for a backup to be deleted is that
1. it must expire
2. it must age off through verexists/verdeleted/retextra/retonly
If your parameters are such that an expired file never is deleted, then that explains
why your backups ar
Hi,
Thank for your help.
As you said " if you have more than one Oracle database, back up each
Oracle target database to its own file space on the Tivoli Storage Manager server". I
assume that these Oracle databases are on the same machine. Could you help me to
implement, pls ?
Thanks in adv
53 matches
Mail list logo
