Exchange Connect Agent

2002-01-11 Thread Phil Stockton
Hello, My NT administrator is off sick and I need a question answered urgently. What version of the Exchange Connect Agent supports the ADSMAuotodelete command. Also, am I correct in believing the command can run from the command line. Thanks In Advance Phil Stockton RS Components UK ***

ACD0151E, Domino incremental failure

2002-01-11 Thread Marc Lowers
One client on my TSM server fails to complete it's incremental backup (TSM 4.1.2, TDP v 1.1 for Domino). The other 30 or so clients had no problem so I'm wondering which log is being referred to here? Marc. Recovery Manger: Log File Full: Func=hlgWriteLogRecord File=rm\rmlogger.cpp:516 Recove

Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...***

2002-01-11 Thread Niklas Lundstrom
Hello Pete When will ver 5.1 Journal Sevice be out? Does it require ver 5.1 of TSM Server as well or does it work with 4.2.1? How do I disable logging to jbberror.log? On some servers it gets very big Regards Niklas Lundström Föreningssparbanken IT -Original Message- From: Pete Tane

Re: LTO tape visible labels

2002-01-11 Thread Daniel Sparrman
HiWith the right equipment(barcode printer, software) you could create your own labels.We're doing this today for our customersIf I remember correctly, the 3584 uses what we in europe call Code39. The labels has to be built up as follows:First, second and third characters are alfanumeric, the other

Re: W2K LAN FREE DSM.opt

2002-01-11 Thread Koen Willems
Brain, Thanx, it works... The now my only problem left is a failing storage agent service. I am guessing that my named pipe option isn't correct. Do you use this option? and if you do where can i find the named pipe name of the agent ? Greetz, Koen Willems. >From: "Scott, Brian" <[EMAIL PR

Re: W2K LAN FREE DSM.opt

2002-01-11 Thread Koen Willems
Thanx, Yep it works know I only got the problem left that my storageagent service won't started ? Any hints ? Best Regards,   Koen Willems "Every brilliant plan, can be ruined by a few well placed idiots"

Re: TSM, extending backup storage

2002-01-11 Thread Angelo DeAngelis
Not aware of any limitations regarding the size of disk pools. Currently I have seen customer that has a 4Tb disk pool defined on a EMC. Spread the volumes amoung controllers. - Original Message - From: "Rooij, FC de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 11,

MSGANR8015E

2002-01-11 Thread Philippe ZANNI
Dear listers I have a this message : ANS8015E File 'DD:DSCOPT', error code 109 from options processing. Anybody can help me ? Thanks Cordialement P.ZANNI [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MSGANR8015E

2002-01-11 Thread Juan Manuel Lspez
Check the options file, you have got any wrong entry on it Philippe ZANNI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> con fecha 11/01/2002 11:37:33 Por favor, responda a "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: (cci: Juan Manuel Lopez Azaqon/NATIONAL) Asunto: MSGANR

Re: ACD0151E, Domino incremental failure

2002-01-11 Thread Del Hoobler
> One client on my TSM server fails to complete it's incremental backup (TSM > 4.1.2, TDP v 1.1 for Domino). The other 30 or so clients had no problem > so I'm wondering which log is being referred to here? > > Recovery Manger: Log File Full: Func=hlgWriteLogRecord > File=rm\rmlogger.cpp:516 > Re

TSM 4.2 Install Problems.

2002-01-11 Thread Stuart Pitt
Hi, Currently having problems installing 4.2 Client onto Windows 2000 Server. Keep on getting Internal Server error 2755.1632 when installation starts. Any Ideas??? Regards Stuart Infrastructure Services Operations Bridge Innogy Swindon * 01793 896060 Fax 01793 896065 * mailto

Re: Exchange Connect Agent

2002-01-11 Thread Del Hoobler
> Hello, > My NT administrator is off sick and I need a question answered urgently. > What version of the Exchange Connect Agent supports the > ADSMAuotodelete command. > Also, am I correct in believing the command can run from the command line. Phil, If you are still running TDP for Exchange v

Re: Exchange Restore Problem

2002-01-11 Thread Del Hoobler
> PJMNT11, TSM Server: PJMNT24, Status: ACN4226E -- Exchange Error: ACN3516E -- An > unknown Exchange API error has occurred. > > Has anyone experienced this error? What are the possible causes? What are the > possible solutions? Can I use TDP V2.2 to restore these backups? If, so how? > Sean

Re: ACD0151E, Domino incremental failure

2002-01-11 Thread Marc Lowers
Del, Our transaction log disk is just under half full (we use archive logging and the disk space is set to be used to the full). So I guess Lotus will have to help from here on in. Thanks for your help. Marc. "Del Hoobler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PR

Re: TSM, extending backup storage

2002-01-11 Thread Salak Juraj
Hallo, not even as strange idea as you think. In fact, this configuration is recommended for backing-up directories since years, so this is only an uncommon idea expansion. I am just going to implement this for file server backup, but not for database backups. Given the high price tag for libr

Re: Tdp for Sql errors

2002-01-11 Thread Del Hoobler
Bruce, There is a fix to the TSM API that should solve the problem. Look at APAR IC31617. You can obtain the Version 4 Release 2, Level 1.20 of the TSM API by going here: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/client/v4r2/Windows/WinNT/v421/ TDP SQL APAR IC31372 is

EDT Distributape

2002-01-11 Thread Burton, Robert
Anybody out there using this product for lan free capabilities with STK's ACSLS? We are looking at evaling the product, Is there any known gotchya's we should consider before we start thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, O

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-01-11 Thread Sam Lovejoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-01-11 Thread Gent, Chad E.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

TSM V4.2.1.20 Windows NT/2000/XP Client Flash

2002-01-11 Thread Andrew Raibeck
= TSM V4.2.1.20 Windows NT/2000/XP Client Flash = TSM 4.2.1 was made generally available in September 2001, and we have many customers running it successfully. However, in an effort to give our customers the l

Re: Tapes and TSM

2002-01-11 Thread Wayne T. Smith
On 10 Jan 2002 at 15:13, Lawrence Clark wrote, in part: > ... Reclaim should be set to around 50% on primary storage pools. I disagree in that I believe that reclamation should be set as low as "practical" for your situation. Lower reclamation values generally result in quicker restores and

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-01-11 Thread Jian Chen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MSGANR8015E

2002-01-11 Thread Philippe ZANNI
My options file have some errors. Correcting this errors have the same effect with the same message -Message d'origine- De: Juan Manuel Lspez [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: vendredi 11 janvier 2002 12:31 A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet: Re: MSGANR8015E Check the options file, y

Oracle backup

2002-01-11 Thread Remeta, Mark
Hi all, I'm not a dba so I am not that familiar with Oracle or RMAN but I was wondering if anyone had the correct commands that would list all the 'backup pieces' that were backed up to the TSM server... Thanks in advance, Mark Remeta Seligman Data Corp. 100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017 Conf

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-01-11 Thread Nguyen Thanhquan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-01-11 Thread Jolley, Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Storage migration

2002-01-11 Thread Salak Juraj
Good afternoon, I am afraid you will have to setup as many disk storage pools as many tape pools you wish to be migrated into. This results in less effective sharing of disk space, maybe you will have to add an extra disk in order to prevent from excessive number of small migrations, but if tune

Re: Oracle backup

2002-01-11 Thread Dylan Ryback
Are you using the Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle agent? - Original Message - From: "Remeta, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:48 AM Subject: Oracle backup > Hi all, I'm not a dba so I am not that familiar with Oracle or RMAN but I > wa

StorageTek fibre attach.

2002-01-11 Thread Jason Morgan
Hi, I am involved in a project to integrate a StorageTekL700 containing 6*9840 Drives to TSM. Everthing is fibre attached to Hitachi 9200 SAN using Broacade Switches. The TSM server will be an RS/6000 p-series 660 Server containing 2 6228 HBA's. I would be interested in hearing peoples exper

RE : RECLAMATION - ANR1081W OF COPYPOOLS - STORAGE MEDIA INACCESS IBLE

2002-01-11 Thread Selva, Perpetua
We are on TSM 4.2.1.8 ON AIX Currently have been experiencing reclamation process failing for copy pool ! Any ideas?

Re: RE : RECLAMATION - ANR1081W OF COPYPOOLS - STORAGE MEDIA INAC CESS IBLE

2002-01-11 Thread Leijnse, Finn F SITI-ITDSES31
Yes, Find out what tapes are broken = giving the problems and you will have to restore/move them before your reclamation will start running again! met vriendelijke groeten, regards et salutations, Finn Leijnse ISES/31 - Central Data Storage Management Shell Services International bv. -O

Re: RE : RECLAMATION - ANR1081W OF COPYPOOLS - STORAGE MEDIA INAC CESS IBLE

2002-01-11 Thread Selva, Perpetua
Thanks for replying back! Yes, I did move them and reclamation starts! Why does this scenario occurs in the first place? Any ideas? > -Original Message- > From: Leijnse, Finn F SITI-ITDSES31 [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Su

4.1.44 server and 4.2.00 client

2002-01-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the TSM Server (AIX) who has 4.1.44 verssion and I have problems with a TSM client (4.2.00) running in Windows NT. Are they compatible? Thank You Note: The problem is ANR0444W mail2web - Check your email from the web a

FW: Exchange Connect Agent

2002-01-11 Thread Phil Stockton
Del, Thanks for this. We are still running version 1, for a variety of reasons. The /ADSMAUTODELETE ran ok on 3 of the 5 exchange servers. The fourth returned an invalid command line parameter error and the fifth didn't like the ADSMQUERY command. It said the ADSM server identified the nodenam

Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...***

2002-01-11 Thread Pete Tanenhaus
Answers and comments to questions . >>> When will ver 5.1 Journal Sevice be out? Tentative GA for 5.1 client is beginning of second quarter of this year. There is a formal beta program, if you are interested contact me offline and I will provide you with details. >>> Does it require ver 5.

Re: TSM V4.2.1.20 Windows NT/2000/XP Client Flash

2002-01-11 Thread Malbrough, Demetrius
Andy, Per APAR IC31873, is it implying that for optimal performance the MAXIMUM value of the TCPWindowsize should be 63 on Windows 98, Me, and NT 4.0? By having the TCPWindowsize at a value greater than 63, does it have a negative or positive affect on the restore/ retrieve performance of the cli

Re: 4.1.44 server and 4.2.00 client

2002-01-11 Thread Malbrough, Demetrius
You should have the NT clients upgraded to 4.2.1.20 as of Jan. 7th! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4.1.44 server and 4.2.00 client I have the TSM Server (AIX) who has 4.1.44 vers

Re: 4.1.44 server and 4.2.00 client

2002-01-11 Thread Dylan Ryback
Yes, they are compatible. Here's the explanation for that error: ANR0444W Protocol error on session session number for node client node name (client platform) - out-of-sequence verb (type verb name) received. Explanation: The server detects a protocol error on the specified session becaus

What changed from TSM Server 3.7.2. to 4.1.1?

2002-01-11 Thread Rupp Thomas (Illwerke)
Hi TSM'ers, our IBM CE just upgraded our NSM from TSM 3.7.2 to 4.1.1. Is there a book or web site where I can see what changed between this two releases? Kind regards Thomas Rupp Vorarlberger Illwerke AG MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TEL:++43/5574/4991-251 FAX:++43/5574/4991-820-8251

Re: Oracle backup

2002-01-11 Thread Remeta, Mark
Yes sir! (that's why I'm asking here) -Original Message- From: Dylan Ryback [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Oracle backup Are you using the Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle agent? - Original Message - From:

AW: SOLUTION TO BACKUPSET DELETE/EXPIRE PROBLEM

2002-01-11 Thread Rupp Thomas (Illwerke)
Hi, is there a way in 4.1.1 (I'm running on a NSM so this is the latest available release) to delete volumes from the volhist that have been deleted by the faulty DELETE BACKUPSET command? Or can I manually delete them from the volhist? Kind regards Thomas Rupp Vorarlberger Illwerke AG MAIL: [

Re: Copypool reclamation

2002-01-11 Thread John Naylor
Bill, Thats what we do. Works a treat if you have that remote site access of course you can do other nice things, like database backups directly offsite. - - - - Bill Colwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/10/2002 07:43:49 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: Backing up of symbolic 'LINK' files of UNIX / AIX

2002-01-11 Thread Kent Monthei
Vijay, I can't speak for AIX, but on Sun Solaris UNIX, if followsymbolic=no during backup, TSM properly restores symbolic links. "Vijay Havaralu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10-Jan-2002 15:52 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL P

Re: ***The JOURNALED BACKUP saga continues...***

2002-01-11 Thread Pete Tanenhaus
>>> This is a definitely a client-centric view! From my server-centric view >>> I think the primary benefit is the elimination of the server processing to >>> generate and download the whole activeset metadata. To some extent this is true but the point I was trying to make was that building the

RE : RECLAMATION - ANR1081W OF COPYPOOLS - STORAGE MEDIA INACCESS IBLE

2002-01-11 Thread Marc Lowers
Check the activity log to see if a volume is requested that may not be available to the server. Either it's marked as unavailable (check by doing a q vol ** f=d) or the tape is still offsite. Marc. "Selva, Perpetua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECT

DBBackup Tapes never being asked for

2002-01-11 Thread Ed Anderson
Folks, Has anyone experienced DBBackup tapes never going into a VaultRetrieve state from DRM? Some useful info : TSM Server 4.1.4.0 on Solaris 2.6. We're not deleting VolumeHistory nor are we deleting VolumeHistory type=backup, DRM is ( supposed to be ) taking care of it. We were deleting VolHi

Re: TSM, extending backup storage

2002-01-11 Thread Bill Mansfield
As long as you provide for protection against disk failures in your primary pool, this is fine. You'll still need tape for copy pools, since they have to be sequential devices and you want offsite copies in any case, right? The premise behind migration from disk to tape is that tape is cheaper th

Re: TSM V4.2.1.20 Windows NT/2000/XP Client Flash

2002-01-11 Thread Wayne T. Smith
On 11 Jan 2002 at 9:20, Andrew Raibeck kindly wrote, in part: > This 4.2.1.20 Windows NT/2000/XP client patch has gone through some > function and system testing. We support its use in a production > environment. ... I really like the seemingly more frequent patch levels for the Windows client .

Re: DBBackup Tapes never being asked for

2002-01-11 Thread William Boyer
I believe that DRM will only expire DBBackup VIRTUAL volumes, not normal DBBackup tape volumes. This is for server-2-server DB backups. You have to do a DEL VOLH T=DBB TOD=TODAY-n. I have this in a server script that does all my server backup commands: ba db type=full devclass=3590off scratch=yes

TSM and tapes.

2002-01-11 Thread Nazir
I have been working with TSM to make backups of my servers. The TSM server is on Windows NT and It is working with tapes too. The TSM makes backups and keep it in hard disk, after sends the data to tapes. TSM send this mensage: out of space Why doesn4t TSM use the tapes ? Thank you. Volume Na

Re: TSM and tapes.

2002-01-11 Thread Adam J Boyer
Please give a more detailed account of the errors you are receiving (such as error code, activity log entries, etc.). adam Nazir wrote: > > I have been working with TSM to make backups of my servers. > The TSM server is on Windows NT and It is working with tapes too. > The TSM makes backups an

Re: TSM and tapes.

2002-01-11 Thread PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
Sorry I did not see tapes are written!! -Original Message- From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager' Subject: RE: TSM and tapes. did u define tape s as nextstgpool,ex.update stgpool. -Original Message- From: Adam J Boyer [

Re: DBBackup Tapes never being asked for

2002-01-11 Thread Adam J Boyer
DRM will delete DB backups based on the value set by: SET DRMDBBACKKUPEXPIREDAYS I have seen that if you prune the volume history of database entries DRM loses track of those pruned entries. William Boyer wrote: > > I believe that DRM will only expire DBBackup VIRTUAL volumes, not normal > DB

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-01-11 Thread David Prokop
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TSM and tapes.

2002-01-11 Thread PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
did u define tape s as nextstgpool,ex.update stgpool. -Original Message- From: Adam J Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM and tapes. Please give a more detailed account of the errors you are receiving (such as er

Re: DBBackup Tapes never being asked for

2002-01-11 Thread Bill Mansfield
The other thing about this is that if you are making incremental backups to a local FILE class device along with your full backup series, DRM will not handle the full backup tapes. Makes sense if you think about it ... DRM cannot assure the incrementals are "in the vault".

Windows 3.7.2 to 4.2.1.20

2002-01-11 Thread Danny Miles
Hi Folks: I still have a 3.7.3.6 TSM server (I know, I know) on AIX 4.3.2. (I have a new 4.2 server but it will be March before I get it up and running due to a corporate splitup.) I may use the old server (3.7.3.6) for the W2K servers behind the firewall. What I'm wondering is if I can use

3995 Issue with ADSM

2002-01-11 Thread Gary Luther
We have an application Visual Info that utilizes a 3995-C64. We have filled it up. We want to add another 3995-C64 into the same storage pool so that both of the 3995's appear as on larger virtual device. I can't figure out how to pull this off with ADSM. Wonder if the secret is to move to T

AIX TSM 4.1.2.0 Server upgrade to 4.2.1.0

2002-01-11 Thread Malbrough, Demetrius
I am posting this for documentation purposes for any *SMers migrating from AIX Server 4.1.2.0 to 4.2.1.0! There is a problem with the LUM tools used by TSM for licensing: If you are having a problem registering your license and you are getting the message: ANR2841W Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE w

Re: AIX TSM 4.1.2.0 Server upgrade to 4.2.1.0

2002-01-11 Thread Seay, Paul
Don't even try to use 4.2.1.0 upgrade to 4.2.1.9 immediately. -Original Message- From: Malbrough, Demetrius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AIX TSM 4.1.2.0 Server upgrade to 4.2.1.0 I am posting this for documentation purp

SAP/Informix

2002-01-11 Thread Lane, Debbie
I am inheriting an HP box that houses an SAP/Informix database. We use a 3494 library with 3590E tape heads. We are at ADSM server 3.1.2.90 (on AIX 4.3.3) but will upgrade to TSM 4.1. What are my options for backing up a 115GB SAP/Informix database? HP-UX 10.20 Informix Version: 7.23.UC3 I a

Re: LTO tape visible labels

2002-01-11 Thread Suad Musovich
Have a look at the Label Specification document on the 3584 doco page: http://ssddom02.storage.ibm.com/tape/lto/ultrascalable_library/documentation.html As quoted: "Human readable characters are allowed provided there isn t a conflict or interference with the automation code. The format, colors