pp construct that is automatically recognized by the BA Spectrum
agents.
Cheers.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Per conto di Efim
Inviato: giovedì 20 settembre 2018 10:52
A: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Oggetto: Re: [ADSM-L] R: [ADSM-L] Netapp snapdi
Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Per conto di Efim
> Inviato: mercoledì 19 settembre 2018 18:39
> A: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Oggetto: Re: [ADSM-L] Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux
> machine, making use of NFS mounts
>
> Arnaud,
>
> Can you explain
18:39
A: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Oggetto: Re: [ADSM-L] Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux
machine, making use of NFS mounts
Arnaud,
Can you explain why you are copying the .snapshot folder during incremental
filesystem backup with snapdiff?
It contains snapshots created by netapp
mber 19, 2018 6:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux machine,
making use of NFS mounts
Arnaud,
Can you explain why you are copying the .snapshot folder during incremental
filesystem backup with snapdiff?
It contains snapshots created b
Arnaud,
Can you explain why you are copying the .snapshot folder during incremental
filesystem backup with snapdiff?
It contains snapshots created by netapp and SP for this FS.
I believe that it should be excluded from copying in your backup job.
Efim
> 19 сент. 2018 г., в 18:28, PAC Br
Hi Robert,
Thanks a lot for appreciated feedback, unfortunately even when using TSM own
snapshots the problem still exists :
root@xx:~ # dsmc i /Airwarder -snapdiff -diffsnapshot=create -snapdiffhttps
-optfile=$OPTPATH >/tmp/snapshot_Airwarder.log
root@ xx:~ # more /
rnaud
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del
Hoobler
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 10:16 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux machine,
making use of NFS mounts
Hi A
Brion:
Here at Cornell, we have a TSM client on a Linux system backing up NFS shares
via NFS mounts and snapdiff differentials - and have been doing so for years.
First, the gory details:
- For TSM
TSM Client Version 7, Release 1, Level 6.0 (*red faced, thought I had upgraded
to SP 8.1.2.0
t; wrote on 09/18/2018
07:57:56 AM:
> From: PAC Brion Arnaud
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 09/18/2018 07:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux
> machine, making use of NFS mounts
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
Hi Tommaso,
The backup command I'm using (dsmc i /Airwarder -snapdiff -snapdiffhttps
-diffsnapshotname="daily.*" -diffsnapshot=latest -useexistingbase
-optfile=dsm_netapp.opt) includes the "useexistingbase" statement.
Based on my understanding of the documentation
PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux machine,
making use of NFS mounts
Hi Arnaud,
Not related to SnapDiff ... but just some info on NDMP and B/A Client...
In Spectrum Protect BA client 8.1.6 that GAs this coming Friday (21
September) you wi
Hi Arnaud,
Not related to SnapDiff ... but just some info on NDMP and B/A Client...
In Spectrum Protect BA client 8.1.6 that GAs this coming Friday (21
September) you will be able to use the native Java GUI to handle NDMP
backups/restores.
Del
e rules in incl.excl file to
skip them.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Per conto di PAC
Brion Arnaud
Inviato: martedì 18 settembre 2018 12:21
A: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Oggetto: [ADSM-L] Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux machin
Hi All,
Following to IBM's decision to withdraw the web GUI in the latest versions of
their clients (thus making NDMP hardly usable), as well as to the renewal of
our NAS infrastructure (now using Netapp), I'm trying to implement netapp
snapdiffs in our shop.
So far we succeeded in defining ne
We have 6 Netapp fileshares that have a small number of large files but TB
daily change rates.
When Snapdiff runs, we are not seeing the number of sessions we expect after
setting resourceutilization=10.
Is this due to how TSM is receiving the changed file list from the Netapp?
Would we be
Thank you Sameer and Erwan. We got it working.
At 11:36 PM 3/17/2016, Sameer Veer wrote:
>Hello Paul,
>
>Earlier this month, for one of my customers, I configured NetApp
>snapshot-assisted progressive incremental functionality ('incremental
>-snapdiff' command) for &q
Hello Paul,
Earlier this month, for one of my customers, I configured NetApp
snapshot-assisted progressive incremental functionality ('incremental
-snapdiff' command) for "cluster mode" on the ONTAP CDOT 8.3 for both
Windows and Linux shares successfully.
We used TSM B/
Has anyone successfully used TSM on Windows (and Linux) to backup a NetApp
filer running ONTAP CDOT 8.3? We're looking for confirmation that this works,
as we've been having some problems getting it to run against a simulator
running 8.3.
Thanks!
..Paul
--
Paul Zarnowski
Mode.
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
- Mail original -
De: "Paul Zarnowski"
À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Mars 2016 21:41:51
Objet: [ADSM-L] Anyone using TSM Snapdiff support (linux and windows) to backup
ONTAP CDOT 8.3
Has anyone successfu
half Of Frank
Ramke
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 4:20 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Can Snapdiff be multithreaded per volume?
Hi Steve,
The only difference in "snapdiff backup" than any other remote file system
backup is that up front part. With Snapdiff, we use
Hi Steve,
The only difference in "snapdiff backup" than any other remote file system
backup is that up front part. With Snapdiff, we use 2 snapshots to
determine what has changed instead of traversing the remote filesystem.
Once we get past that, it is just like any other backup. S
TSM Server 6.3
TSM Client 7.1.3
Does anyone know if snapdiff backups are single or multi-threaded?
Specifically when we periodically run the full incremental
(-createnewbase=yes). From what I'm seeing, it looks like it is single
threaded, but it would help if we could somehow make eac
Thank you for this update, Del. That is indeed good news.
At 10:13 AM 6/3/2015, Del Hoobler wrote:
>I have an update for this thread:
>
>Spectrum Protect (TSM) support for NetApp snapshot-assisted
>progressive incremental backup (some may refer to it as "SnapDiff")
>
I have an update for this thread:
Spectrum Protect (TSM) support for NetApp snapshot-assisted
progressive incremental backup (some may refer to it as "SnapDiff")
for Clustered Data ONTAP (CDOT) is targeted for next month (July 20
11, 2015 2:17 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] support for SnapDiff on NetApp filers running CDOT?
NetApp snapdiff support for filers configured to run in c-mode was added in
ONTAP 8.2, so any future TSM client support would require this version of ONTAP.
As you probably know
Has anyone heard when Tivoli is going to release a version of SnapDiff that
works on Clustered Data Ontap 8 (think latest version is 8.2 or 8.3)? My
understanding is that NetApp has given the API's to IBM, waiting on IBM to
incorporate them.
Thanks,
Steve Schaub
Systems Engineer II, B
NetApp snapdiff support for filers configured to run in c-mode was added
in ONTAP 8.2, so any future TSM client support would
require this version of ONTAP.
As you probably know, ONTAP 8.2 is the last version of ONTAP which will
include legacy 7-mode support, future versions
starting with 8.3
Hi Steve,
That status is not quite correct.
IBM has the APIs, that's true. IBM also has them implemented
and working successfully in the lab.
IBM is working directly with NetApp on some special details
about how we support SnapDiff (and NDMP) with CDOT.
And so, at this point, I cannot g
TSM Server 6.2.5.0 on AIX
TSM client 6.3.1.0 on Windows 2008-R2
We are using 2 proxy servers to perform SnapDiff backups of our NetApp filers.
I can see in the logs that the backups are completing successfully, but when I
query the filespaces on TSM, many of the "end backup" dates
Thank you Grant.
Let me have a deeper look and will come back with findings.
+--
|This was sent by joe86ant...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+-
Hi
Snapdiff backups can only be done on the volume level. eg on Netapps we
have
/vol/volume_name/qtree_name
normally we export at the qtree level but in order to do snapdiff you
need to MOUNT it at the VOLUME level.
I also created a wiki which has some other snapdiff "features&quo
Hi
I am facing an issue with Snapdiff backup of NAS filers using TSM. I have added
the shares in NAS and associated TSM schedules. The issue is with names I
think. My Share name and Volume name are different. But if I am not wrong,
Snapdiff is purely based on CIFS share name and not volume
and line incremental of the local drives work ok, but
>when I try to execute a snapdiff, after a few seconds I get a popup saying
>"IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Backup-Archive Command Line Client has stopped
>working". Nothing shows up in any of the log files as far as I can s
Regular incremental command line incremental of the local drives work ok, but
when I try to execute a snapdiff, after a few seconds I get a popup saying "IBM
Tivoli Storage Manager Backup-Archive Command Line Client has stopped working".
Nothing shows up in any of the log files as fa
Just be careful when you mix snapdiff and include/exclude.
Just to state the obvious
The include/exclude only operates on the changed files so it is
suggested should you change the the include/exclude you need to run a
backup using createnewbase=yes.
for the following example
file ABC.txt is
Thanks very much!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Clark,
Margaret
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 3:15 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] -snapdiff incremental backups on Windows and
include/exclude
We run
We run snapdiff backups using 6.2.4 client, 6.2.3.1 server, Ontap 7.3.3, and
exclude and exclude.dir work as expected. - Margaret
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 10:38 PM
To: ADSM
ristian Svensson
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 1:47 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] SV: -snapdiff incremental backups on Windows and
include/exclude
Hi Wanda,
If you are using multiple vFiler, you can't run Snapdiff.
The issue was a NetApp problem and not a IBM problem.
But I sow so
Hi Wanda,
If you are using multiple vFiler, you can't run Snapdiff.
The issue was a NetApp problem and not a IBM problem.
But I sow some news about NetApp in TSM 6.4 but no one could tell me what news
it is.
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E-mail: christian.
Do:
include
exclude
exclude.dir
Work when you are doing an incremental with -snapdiff ?
(Netapp Vfiler, TSM 6.4 client on Win2K8, Ontap 8.1, TSM 6.3.0 server on Win2K8)
Thanks!
Wanda Prather | Senior Technical Specialist | wanda.prat...@icfi.com |
www.icfi.com
ICF International | 401
)
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Christian
Svensson [christian.svens...@cristie.se]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 15:54
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] SV: SNAPDIFF with CIFS on Linux supported?
Hi,
Do you know if your NetApp is a Virtual
2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
410.539.1135 (o)
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Paul
Zarnowski [p...@cornell.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 17:43
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SNAPDIFF with CIFS on
Street Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
410.539.1135 (o)
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Grant Street
[gra...@al.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 18:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SNAPDIFF with CIFS
pshot+Differencing+Caveats
I created it to lessen the pain of others
On 29/02/12 09:43, Paul Zarnowski wrote:
I would be happy to be proven wrong on this, but I believe that snapdiff for
CIFS is only supported on Windows. snapdiff for NFS is supported on AIX and
Linux.
BTW, that particular
I would be happy to be proven wrong on this, but I believe that snapdiff for
CIFS is only supported on Windows. snapdiff for NFS is supported on AIX and
Linux.
BTW, that particular error message seems to be issued for a variety of reasons.
We have found it hard to figure out what the problem
Hi,
Do you know if your NetApp is a Virtual NetApp (vFiler)?
If yes then can you open a PMR with NetApp and wait for a wild. NetApp don't
support SnapDiff API for vFiler.
If your NetApp is not a vFiler. Have you try to create a base SnapShot?
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
Cell: +46-7
What's in the can...
Obviously, Linux systems can mount CIFS shares, but does anyone have the
SNAPDIFF option working? I keep getting:
"ANS2831E Incremental by snapshot difference cannot be performed on /mountpoint
as is is not a NetApp NFS or CIFS volume."
It is too! The
It would be helpful if snapdiff backups updated the BACKUP_START field, even if
we have to resign ourselves to nothing recorded as BACKUP_END.
Is there a reason why that can't be done?
- Margaret Clark
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.ED
es" to
force a create new base eg delete the TSM created snapshot.
2. For "File skipped" or "file excluded for file set" Delete the newer
TSM snapshot, rather than the older one so that the problem can be
corrected and the files backed up on next run while still using
snapdif
>
>Periodic full progressive incremental backups are recommended because "less
>complete" backups such as snapdiff,
>incremental by date, and JBB can never be as comprehensive as a full
>progressive given that a full progressive examines
>every file on the local file
Actually this really isn't correct, a snapshot differential backup will
detect deleted files and will expire them on the TSM server.
Periodic full progressive incremental backups are recommended because "less
complete" backups such as snapdiff,
incremental by date, and JBB
The reason we use snapdiff is to avoid walking the file system. Running a
periodic 'createnewbase' is just not going to happen. We're just stuck with no
time stamp. - Margaret Clark
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
Grant,
The time stamps are not updated, because a snapdiff incremental does not
deactivate deleted files. You need to do periodic 'createnewbase' to do this,
which walks the file system and updates the time stamps.
..Paul
On Feb 14, 2012, at 12:32 AM, "Grant Street&qu
Hello
Just thought I would plug two snapdiff RFE's(Request For Enhancement)
that I created on the IBM developer works site.
I am trying to garner some support for these in the hope that they will
be implemented in the future.
I have seen that some of you have had experience with N
I had similar problems when using snapdiff. The fix was to have a pre-exec
map all of the volumes you wanted to backup. It doesn't matter what the
drive letters are as you carry one backing up the UNC.
Worth a try if you're not ding it already.
Steven
On 31 January 2012 15:41, Prat
L] SV: intermittent errors on -snapdiff backups
Hi Wanda,
Is your NetApp a vFiler? If yes it will not work until NetApp implement the
SnapDiff API to the vFilers.
I have talk to NetApp a couple of times and it seams like they maybe going to
implement the Snapdiff API in the end of Q4.
Best Re
Hi Wanda,
Is your NetApp a vFiler? If yes it will not work until NetApp implement the
SnapDiff API to the vFilers.
I have talk to NetApp a couple of times and it seams like they maybe going to
implement the Snapdiff API in the end of Q4.
Best Regards
Christian Svensson
Cell: +46-70-325 1577
E
Customer has a Netapp; trying to implement -snapdiff backups on several large
shares.
Having intermittent failures that make no sense to me.
Running the backup with:
dsmc -snapdiff -optfile=blah.opt
blah.opt contains:
..
domain /filer/sharepath1/filer/sharepath2 etc
We can get the first
om
>
>Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>09/22/2011 09:07 AM
>Please respond to
>ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
>
>To
>ADSM-L
>cc
>
>Subject
>Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hello Paul and David,
>
>A frequently asked questions
those invalid file handle messages related to this,
as well. We're also getting a fair number of "ANS1304W: An active backup
version could not be found", which I haven't been able to figure why.
To the original poster's question, we're running snapdiff from a 6.2 clie
[mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Remco Post
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:30 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice
good to hear. We have major issues with a windows client for CIFS
shares. The client keeps on complaining about the right to backup the
file
>
>
> Regards,
> Shawn
>
> Shawn Drew
>
>
>
>
>
> Internet
> r.p...@plcs.nl
>
> Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> 09/22/2011 01:25 PM
> Please respond to
> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
>
>
..@plcs.nl
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
09/22/2011 01:25 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice
Hi All,
I've got another question, maybe not for the FAQ ;-)
Has anybody got this working?
And maybe for the FAQ:
Are t
Hi All,
I've got another question, maybe not for the FAQ ;-)
Has anybody got this working?
And maybe for the FAQ:
Are there TSM server requirements? Does SnapDiff require the TSM server to be
at version 6, or is a 5.5 server supported?
On 22 sep. 2011, at 17:31, Shawn Drew wrote:
t prevents this?
Regards,
Shawn
Shawn Drew
Internet
ra...@us.ibm.com
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
09/22/2011 09:07 AM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff advice
Hello Paul and David,
A freque
Hello Paul and David,
A frequently asked questions website has been created for snapshot
differencing.
We have attempted to answer the questions you have recently raised.
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Snapshot
+Differencing+FAQ
We're running 8.0.1P3 on an n6210 gateway, in front of an SVC. The error we
get is:
>tsm> incr -snapdiff Y:
>
>Incremental by snapshot difference of volume 'Y:'
>ANS2840E Incremental backup using snapshot difference is not supported for Data
>ONTAP file server
Hi Paul,
8.0.1 should work. Ensure the NetApp user id has sufficient capabilities
and that it's password is not expired.
Frank Ramke
From: Paul Zarnowski
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Date: 07/15/2011 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: snapdiff advice
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist St
David,
Did you get this working with 8.0.1? We're getting this error:
>tsm> incremental -snapdiff Y: -diffsnapshot=latest
>
>Incremental by snapshot difference of volume 'Y:'
>ANS2840E Incremental backup using snapshot difference is not supported for Data
>
Clark, Margaret wrote:
>
> Back in March, I watched a recorded presentation about DB2 reorgs
> within TSM server 6.2.2.0, and discovered that OnTap will only allow
> snapdiff backups to work correctly with releases 7.3.3 and 8.1, NOT
> 8.0. Apparently OnTap 7.3.3 and 8.1 contain
Back in March, I watched a recorded presentation about DB2 reorgs within TSM
server 6.2.2.0, and discovered that OnTap will only allow snapdiff backups to
work correctly with releases 7.3.3 and 8.1, NOT 8.0. Apparently OnTap 7.3.3
and 8.1 contain the File Access Protocol (FAP), but 8.0 does
> with NET USE commands in a pre-schedule command.
Except, in my initial manual testing, I still had to do NET USE to get
the snapdiff backups to work at all, even when using the UNC name and
running the client under a domain account with rights to the share. I
didn't have to provide any a
-|
|06/28/2011 06:52 PM
|
>--|
|>
| Subject: |
|>
>-----
#x27;t comment on your error messages, but you asked how I schedule
> snapdiff backups.
>
> The schedule invokes a command on the client. Here is a shortened
> version of the command file.
>
> echo on
> for /f "tokens=2-4 delims=/ " %%a in ('date /t'
having no luck with snapdiff of NFS from a Linux client. The
share is mounted (exported read/write with root access), I'm using the
same NetApp account for the API connection (and the password is set at
the client), but the backup fails with the same errors as I originally
described. I was mis
Hi Dave,
I can't comment on your error messages, but you asked how I schedule
snapdiff backups.
The schedule invokes a command on the client. Here is a shortened
version of the command file.
echo on
for /f "tokens=2-4 delims=/ " %%a in ('date /t') do (se
We are using snapdiff for almost a year. We use some trick's found in the forum.
First, mount your share before starting the backup " net use \\dffdg\fgdgj"
Second, If you talking to a NAS like a Netapp, you need to have http access For
TSM : httpd.admin.enableon, and use co
Hi folks.
I'm trying to get snapdiff backups of our NetApp (OnTAP version 8.0.1P5)
working so I can move away from everybody's favorite NDMP backups...
So far, I'm not having much luck. I don't know whether I'm just Doing
It Wrong (tm) or if something else is going on
Internet
p...@cornell.edu
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
02/08/2011 06:16 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Snapdiff backup of vfilers
Thanks Shawn. Your observations confirm other support information I was
told. It's really unfortunate that
ient yet,
>but I'm not hopeful.
>
>
>Regards,
>Shawn
>
>Shawn Drew
>
>
>
>
>
>Internet
>p...@cornell.edu
>
>Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>02/07/2011 01:27 PM
>Please respond to
>ADSM-L@VM.MA
ul.
Regards,
Shawn
Shawn Drew
Internet
p...@cornell.edu
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
02/07/2011 01:27 PM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] Snapdiff backup of vfilers
Has anyone tried using Snapdiff on a vfiler (multistore)? My
understan
Has anyone tried using Snapdiff on a vfiler (multistore)? My understanding is
that this is not supported.
--
Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: p...@cornell.edu
quot;en" to "en.UTF-8". Oddly enough though the bit after
the .
> is supposed to refer to NFS.
>
We're looking to do this here to get snapdiff backups working. For
anyone that's made this change:
- Did you actually have to restart the filer after
though the bit after the .
> is supposed to refer to NFS.
>
We're looking to do this here to get snapdiff backups working. For
anyone that's made this change:
- Did you actually have to restart the filer after changing the volume
language?
- Did the change seem be visible to use
e or snapshot function.
>TSM function name : NAHWInterface::naPerformSnapDiff
> TSM function : Error invoking ONTAP API snapdiff-iter-next:
> Parsing error in results: Input is not proper UTF-8, indicate encoding !
>Bytes: 0xA0 0x2F 0x43 0x61
> TSM return code : 1
ction : Error invoking ONTAP API snapdiff-iter-next:
Parsing error in results: Input is not proper UTF-8, indicate encoding !
Bytes: 0xA0 0x2F 0x43 0x61
TSM return code : 13001
TSM file : NAHWInterface.cpp (6781)
06-09-2010 09:39:17 ANS5250E An unexpected error was encoun
Replying to my own thread... ONTAP is 7.3.2 - I'm guessing this may be the
issue?
On 6 February 2011 10:51, Steven Langdale wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I'm attempting to do snapdiff backups on an N series we have here.
>
> TSM Server: 5.5.3
> TSM Client: 6.2.2.0
> Ww
Hello all.
I'm attempting to do snapdiff backups on an N series we have here.
TSM Server: 5.5.3
TSM Client: 6.2.2.0
Wwindows Proxy: 2003 SP2 + pretty recent patches.
Snapdiffs on my 2 test voulmes work perfectly (after having to do a net use
to them as a pre-exec), but larger volumes with
Hello TSM admins,
We have TSM 6.1 client end server. Is it possible to enable the snapdiff option
if http is disable on our Nseries 7600 nas (netapp)?
We only admin acchs by https.
Thanks,
Alain
+--
|This was sent by alainrich
Thank you, Frank and Andy! ADSM-L scores again! - Margaret
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew
Raibeck
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 1:01 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Snapdiff with 6.2.2.0 client
entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2010-12-14
15:05:38:
> From: Frank Ramke/Knoxville/i...@ibmus
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
> Date: 2010-12-14 15:07
> Subject: Re: Snapdiff with 6.2.2.0 client
> Sent by: "
option set to yes in you option file. It would cause snapdiff to
continually create a new base, defeating the purpose of this type of
backup.
Anyway, let me know if you have trouble getting to the doc. I will be
glad to answer any questions you may still have with the option usage.
Frank
nover
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 10:00 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Snapdiff with 6.2.2.0 client
According to
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21417529
During snapshot difference incremental backup of N-Series or NetApp volumes, if
files are skipped due t
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the
argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
--William Pitt, House of Commons, 11/18/1783
On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Clark, Margaret wrote:
> When we started using snapdiff backups, the documentation s
When we started using snapdiff backups, the documentation said it was
compatible with any release of OnTap above 7.2.
We committed to using snapdiff with our OnTap 7.3.3 FAS, and by using the
arcane options TESTFLAG SNAPDIFFONTAPFAP and
TESTFLAG SNAPDIFFNAMEFILTEROFF, it mostly worked. We
Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Strand, Neil B.
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 7:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SNAPDIFF problems
Sam,
There may be a problem with the language set on the NetApp volumes.
We had a similar problem when we implemented
Sam,
There may be a problem with the language set on the NetApp volumes.
We had a similar problem when we implemented snapdiff 2 years ago but I
cannot recall the exact fix. Review the attached link for further info.
http://communities.netapp.com/thread/8392?tstart=0
Neil Strand
Storage
ger [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Cameron Hanover
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:50 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SNAPDIFF problems
We were having snapdiff backups show up with Failed 8 under 'q events' until we
upped idletimeout to 60 minutes. We didn't
We were having snapdiff backups show up with Failed 8 under 'q events' until we
upped idletimeout to 60 minutes. We didn't test thoroughly, but I believe
snapdiffs were showing failed when the command session idled out when
non-snapdiff backups wouldn't show as such.
-
C
After several stops and starts, I finally managed to get the SNAPDIFF feature
to work on our 6.1.3.4 server. Client is Win 2003 server 64 bit 6.2.0.1. We
have been backing up a large Windows file and print store with 5 or 6 servers
and having problems with volumes that were too large and with
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
