/Met vriendelijke groet,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schneider, John
Sent: donderdag 11 september 2008 17:50
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: How does VCB backups handle resource utilization?
Wanda,
My point
Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wanda Prather
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:17 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How does VCB backups handle resource utilization?
Well, now you've confused me, as well...
When I set RESOURCEUTILIZATION 10, I
does VCB backups handle resource utilization?
Well, now you've confused me, as well...
When I set RESOURCEUTILIZATION 10, I get 8 sessions, but 4 are producers and
4 are consumers - so how did you get 8 tape mounts?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Schneider, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.EDU> Re: [ADSM-L] How does VCB backups
handle resource utilization?
of
> rules? Anyone able to enlighten me?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> John D. Schneider
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bos, Karel
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:48 AM
> To: ADSM-L@
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bos, Karel
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:48 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU <mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How does VCB backups handle resource utilization?
It's late and it's long ago, but I s
w does VCB backups handle resource utilization?
Howard,
But resourceutilization is 4 now. It should give me fewer mount
points, not more. So why I am overrunning the client's maximum mount
points of 2 when resourceutilization is 4?
The reason I can't just increase the cl
der
Phone: 314-364-3150
Cell: 314-750-8721
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Howard Coles
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:39 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How does VCB backu
esday, September 10, 2008 10:48 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How does VCB backups handle resource utilization?
Copypool simultaneous write?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schneider, John
Sent: Wednesday, Septemb
Copypool simultaneous write?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Schneider, John
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 9:35 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] How does VCB backups handle resource utilization?
Greetings,
We
; Of Schneider, John
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:35 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] How does VCB backups handle resource utilization?
>
> Greetings,
> We are running TSM 5.4.3.0 server on AIX 5.3ML5. The Lan-free VCB
> proxy is running TSM clie
Greetings,
We are running TSM 5.4.3.0 server on AIX 5.3ML5. The Lan-free VCB
proxy is running TSM client 5.5.0.6.
We are getting an unexpected result with our VMWare Consolidated
Backups. We are just starting to run these in volume, and we are
getting frequent messages:
09/10/08 00:02
M: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Stapleton, Mark
> Sent: den 9 november 2005 01:37
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Resource utilization on TSM server 5.3.2.0
>
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Henrik
> Wahl
:-)
Yes you are right. But I know that my Server also utilize resources like
buffpoolsize, cpu and I/O.
Maybe resource utilization wasn´t the best choice of words since it is a client
option. ;-)
So, have anyone seen any drastic changes in memory, cpu and I/O usage on a 5.3
server?
//Henrik
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Henrik Wahlstedt
>I havent read anything about resource utilization on TSM server 5.3. My
>questions are. Will 5.3 use/need more memory, CPU and/or I/O?
>
>Most of the times when I upgrade my systems one or more H
Hello,
I havent read anything about resource utilization on TSM server 5.3. My
questions are. Will 5.3 use/need more memory, CPU and/or I/O?
Most of the times when I upgrade my systems one or more HW components
need to be upgraded as well...
//Henrik
Given that resource utilization is set to 10 and $OBJ1 and $OBJ2 are variables
containing multiple filesystem names... and the following command is issued:
$TSMDIR/dsmc archive -server=tsmpc1 -subdir=yes -archmc=keep_07_years $OBJ1
$OBJ2 1>> $TSMDIR/dsmsched.log
Will $OBJ1 and $OBJ2 e
strain on smaller machines.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:45 AM
To: EXCHANGE.ML.COM.JWholey; VM.MARIST.EDU;.ADSM-L
Subject: resource utilization
Is it recommended to add this value to the dsm.opt file? Initially,
IBM's recommendation was t
by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/31/2002 06:45
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:resource utilization
Is it recommended to add this value to the dsm.opt file? Initial
Is it recommended to add this value to the dsm.opt file? Initially, IBM's
recommendation was to use the default value of 2 unless you have a special
circumstances. What is Tivoli's positon at this
time? What are most people doing? What are the drawbacks, if any?
20 matches
Mail list logo
