esday, November 13, 2001 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.1 & MVS 390 Performance
Also, are you checking the CPU use when ONLY backups are running?
I haven't done TSM on OS390 since V3, but on every platform, RECLAIM and
EXPIRATION are more CPU intensive than just doin
stead of letting TSM run them on its own, which is the
default...
-Original Message-
From: John Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 4.1 & MVS 390 Performance
Hi John,
Its not the amount of data, its t
t;Doherty, John
(ANFIS)"To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 4.1 & MVS 390 Performance
ED]> on 11/13/2001 02:53:58 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: TSM 4.1 & MVS 390 Performance
Hi let me explain my problem and see if any of you mainframe 390 guru's C
Hi let me explain my problem and see if any of you mainframe 390 guru's Can
help me.
We are currently running TSM 4.1.2.0 on a 390 mainframe running on a token
ring network
We currently back up on average 230 nodes per night amounting to approx.
+60GB per night.
We have found TSM very CPU intens
