EJ van - SPLXM
Sent: vrijdag 9 oktober 2009 16:27
To: Loon, EJ van - SPLXM
Subject: Migration problem
Hi TSM-ers!
Today I came in the office and customers complained about failing
backups. I checked the TSM server and noticed that the diskpool was
full. Migration was running, but onl
Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Loon, EJ van - SPLXM
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 6:46 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration problem
Hi George!
I do not want to treat one client different that the other one. Years of
experience with TSM taught me one
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Huebschman, George J.
Sent: maandag 5 oktober 2009 12:02
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Migration problem
It sounds a lot like T
: Migration problem
Eric,
Could it be that there were other sessions running to the next pool due
to settings in the bcg's so there were no more mountpoints for 10
migrations but only for 2?
Regards,
Stefan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.maris
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Loon, EJ van - SPLXM
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:47 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration problem
Hi Remco!
The high treshold is set to 5 because we want the data to go to virtual
tape
Loon,
EJ van - SPLXM
Verzonden: maandag 5 oktober 2009 10:47
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration problem
Hi Remco!
The high treshold is set to 5 because we want the data to go to virtual
tape a.s.a.p. This weekend the diskpool went to 100% again because of
the strange migr
deviceclass has mountlimit=drives which is 30 drives.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Remco Post
Sent: vrijdag 2 oktober 2009 17:10
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Migration
Have you ever considered increasing the high threshold? IIRC TSM won't
start new automig processes when migration is already running, and
will only start as many processes as there are different clients
having data in your pool. Also, check out your mountlimit on the tape
devclass.
Furthermor
Behalf Of
Huebschman, George J.
Sent: vrijdag 2 oktober 2009 16:03
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Migration problem
The diskpool was full, but high migration is 5%.
A low highmig threshold could easily start off migrations that run just
one file then quit, especially if there are large files
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Loon, EJ van - SPLXM
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 9:17 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Migration problem
Hi Eric!
Yes! Here are all settings for the storagepool:
Storage Pool Name: DISKPOOL_LBU3_1
Storage
oktober 2009 15:01
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Migration problem
Do you have a high and low migration threshold set?
Eric Vaughn
Technical Administrator
Stevenson University
Office (443)334-2301
evau...@stevenson.edu
>>> "Loon, EJ van - SPLXM" 10/2/2009 8:33 AM &g
Do you have a high and low migration threshold set?
Eric Vaughn
Technical Administrator
Stevenson University
Office (443)334-2301
evau...@stevenson.edu
>>> "Loon, EJ van - SPLXM" 10/2/2009 8:33 AM >>>
Hi TSM-ers!
Today I came in the office and customers complained about failing
backups. I che
Hi TSM-ers!
Today I came in the office and customers complained about failing
backups. I checked the TSM server and noticed that the diskpool was
full. Migration was running, but only two processes at the same time. A
migration starts, migrates a file an then completes successfully,
another one sta
Hello!
We need to migrate NAS data from EMC Celerra to IBM NS5200. The network
connection on the source is only 100 MB. We tried copying using Robocopy on
CFS-mounted source and target filesystems using a Windows server. The transfer
was painfully slow (about 60 GB in four days). There about a
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Migration problem
Its been a long time since I have posted to the list since I know that
support for mainframe based TSM is pretty non-existent at this point.
However, things have run well, so I haven't needed any help.
Unfort
Its been a long time since I have posted to the list since I know that
support for mainframe based TSM is pretty non-existent at this point.
However, things have run well, so I haven't needed any help.
Unfortunately, that has changed. One of my servers is now coming up with
an error that is not d
:05 AM
Subject: Re: TSM migration problem & recovery log question???
I really don't know what is wrong with the recovery log. There are no
clients that have been connected to the server for more than 4 minutes. I
have a backup of a primary tape pool to a copy tape pool running 1 proce
Subject: Re: TSM migration problem &
recovery log question???
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU>
01/14/2003
e. Suite 220
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-4606
Office (918) 732-7109
-Original Message-
From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM migration problem & recovery log question???
The recovery log on TSM is 95% fu
The recovery log on TSM is 95% full. I do a full DB backup everyday, which
I thought would reset the log to 0%. It is in normal mode, not
rollforward. Why would it be so high when I just did a full backup last
night that ended at 9 PM. The log right now is 4.6 GB with 4.2 GB
utilized. Any sugg
respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Migration Problem
TSM Server 4.2.2.0 on Solaris 2.8
TSM Client 5.1.0 on Linux 2.4
Test system.. pr
it on your diskpool even
earlier when the diskpool is fragmented.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Wichmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 01:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Migration Problem
TSM Server 4.2.2.0
TSM Server 4.2.2.0 on Solaris 2.8
TSM Client 5.1.0 on Linux 2.4
Test system.. primary disk pool filled up almost but not quite to hit the hi
threshold of 90 that would start a migration.. yet I notice backups are now
going to tape instead of the diskpool. What gives? Theres no Max size
threshold
Forced a migration by lowering the hi threshold.. activity log fills up with
nasty errors so I turned on contextmessaging to see if anything more cropped
up.. Looks like the filesystem is having probs.. I/O related.. can't even
umount the filesystem without it griping.. guess I found my problem..
D]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2 server migration problem on NT
The TSM 4.2 server requires Internet Explorer 5 or higher. Since you are
running NT 4.0, SP 5, it is possible you do not have this on your system.
Try installing IE5 (or higher), then try the install again.
e is your friend.
> "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
>
>
>
>
> Joerg Pohlmann/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 08/22/2001 16:26
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
y of excellence.
Joerg Pohlmann/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/22/2001 16:26
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: TSM 4.2 server migration proble
et to 4.2.
Joerg Pohlmann
tsm aloes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 2001-08-22 07:30:36
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: T
Hi all,
before deployment, I experience the migration of a TSM
4.1.3.0 server to a TSM 4.2.0.0 server on NT platform
(NT 4 service pack 6). NLS is french.
The readme provided with installation package (CDROM)
tells the following:
Upgrading from TSM 4.1.x.x to the current version
1) Write dow
29 matches
Mail list logo
