client and server are necessary.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Wholey, Joseph (IDS DM&DS) wrote:
>Bill,
>
>I hate to beat this... but my situationa is as follows: I have a TSM server residing
>on Z/OS with an
not reach them.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Hart, Charles wrote:
>How would you loose slots being that the secongripped will be
>on the robot ? I'm clearly missing somethig.
do on these boxes
over the past five years (yes, *five* years) has been negligible.
To bring in another thread, we are moving our TSM servers to
Linux, but not as a result of a disappointment with AIX, simply
keeping in line with corporate strategy.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, Dreamworks SKG
could
solve the problem in a conventional and secure manner.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ems as though it might
have different requirements, what with it's need to stay aligned,
etc.
Feel free to contact me directly or respond to the list if you
have had any experience in this area.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to the server.
If there isn't an outstanding request, I'll probably go ahead and
ask that one be made.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Richard Sims wrote:
>>Is it just me or does everyone think that placing
&
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Jin Bae Chi wrote:
>Suad, Thanks for your help. Let me see if I understand correctly.
>
>1. When you said putting db in backup mode, I can think of
>ARCHIVELOG mode for Oracle, which will take a few seconds and
>execute the flashcopy;
>Q: I heard flashcopy takes a lot less tim
I'm not sure what they were, as we started with version 2, but
if I recall past discussions on this list, they were added on
because Version 1 lacked a database backup and restore
functionality. They were, literally, "salvage" utilities, to be
used in the same circumstances that you would now use
'
l, and
all new database pages being allocated from the 5000MB volume.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While we're on the subject of passwords and password encryption,
is there any chance that TSM might support Kerberos in a future
release?
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Seay, Paul wrote:
>In encryption speak. The node n
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Chetan H. Ravnikar wrote:
>tell me what you want to achive and I will try and help you.
>I had the same probelm to get autmount working on solaris-2.8 and TSM
>4.2.20. Infact never got it to work., But I have a workarround.
>
>In my environment, I have a design to backup auto
c incr -domain="/usr/home/tlaporte"' seems to work fine, and
a query of that node reports a filespace type of NFS3.
Thanks for anybody's thoughts or experiences on the matter.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
he drawback that I see is that there is no "forever" parameter
for reusedelay. days is the maximum. Granted, that's over 27
years, but we know how long government investigations can last! :-)
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu
I'll take a stab:
select cast(entity as varchar(12)) as "Node Name", \
cast(activity as varchar(10)) as Type, \
sum(cast(affected as decimal(7,0))) as files, \
sum (cast(bytes/1024/1024 as decimal(12,4))) as "Phy_MB" \
from summary where end_time>=timestamp(current_date -1 days, '09:00:00') \
and
Anybody know of any plans for a TSM client for Linux on the IA-64
platform?
Thanks.
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s is "very slow"?
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Francisco Molero wrote:
>Hi everybody,
>
>My question is simple. We are running selective backup
>through Gigabit, and my STGpool is 3590 Tape Pool. I
>want t
to end users. I hope it didn't also
have to do with the fact that our software quote went up by
$70,000 when the change was made.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Zlatko Krastev wrote:
>'cause there is no published rule h
but I think
the resources are available to administer such a beast at
the large sites that require very large databases.
More food for thought *early* on a Thursday morning.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Paul Zarnowski wrote:
>TSM Development is
then there is a rush to see if our database backup is
going to finish and clear the log full condition before we use up
the additional log space--lest we find ourselves in the same
perilous condition, only *closer* to the seemingly arbitrary
maximum log size.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks
Fred,
If by talking to the server without a client you mean running
administrative commands, there is no TSM administrative API. The
client API is for backup/restore and archive/retrieve operations,
and that is the only API available.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED
at the TDP
products are all written with the API, so I am not surprised to
hear that they suffer from this problem, as well.
AFAIK, the best we have been able to get from support is the
admission that the error message is inaccurate, or at the very
least misleading.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
Drea
in this
support.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Don France (TSMnews) wrote:
>You've just about gottit all. There is some concern about this whole thing;
>currently, you are limited to image backups using NDMP; if you want
>file-lev
That would involve recycling the server, wouldn't it? I'm
guessing from Paul's e-mail that he's looking for something he
can do online.
What I've done in the past is update the start date of the
schedule to the following day, that way it won't run in the
coming evening, but will pick up again the
This often means that the tape volume on which the object resides
in in status "UNAVAILABLE".
Check your activity log on the server at the time of the restore.
You should see additional information.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Am
/cgi-bin/get/adsm0111/951.html
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Daniel Sparrman wrote:
>Hi
>
>Restoring the TSM server(database) to a different OS will work fine as
>long as you keep to an open systems platform such as Windows NT/2000,
dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=admin upd stg POOLNAME collocate=filespace
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, ARhoads wrote:
>except for all of the contention for tapes...
>- Original Message -
>From: "Bill Smoldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:08 AM
>Subject:
p and Recovery" by
Velpuri, et al (it exists in several editions for the various
versions of Oracle).
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
>I had earlier asked the question about using the TSM TDP for Oracle on a
>Lin
If you manage your RETVER and VEREXISTS and RETONLY parameters
properly, this can be accomplished with point in time *restores*,
rather than point in time backups.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Cheri Howard wrote:
>I have numerous customers
are set
to 0 and the timestamps are set consistently wrong indicates that
the BA client *is* attempting to use the struct stat info in
objInfo.
Has anybody reconciled this? Has anybody successfully written an
API client for which objects can be retrieved or restored using
the BA client?
Thanks,
-- Tom
gerly anticipating support for NDMP on AIX.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Prather, Wanda wrote:
> but, from what I have read on the Tivoli web site, you can only get
>NDMP support if your tsm SERVER is on Windows, and if your tape drives
version archived on
2001-11-20.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01/02/2002 Mike Crawford wrote:
>Good Afternoon,
>
>A client is having trouble locating archived files using dsmc q ar. The
>problem
>seems to be that the filespace_name and hl_names diff
est of the management classes (30 versions
retained for 30 days). As part of our TSM bootstrap process on
the clients, we log in to any local Oracle databases and
dynamically build a list of files to be excluded for that node.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks Animation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 1
parameter in your FILE device
class.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Wouter V wrote:
>So : "A FILE devclass device may be in use by only one party.", means only
>one client a time can backup to
>the SAN-disk device ? The SAN
double the amount of
space available for the actual export, because the data will
occupy at least two locations for the duration of the
export/import process.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Jolley, Bill wrote:
>If the Private and Scra
I've seen before.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Nancy Reeves wrote:
>I have a user who is trying to restore a few files and is getting error
>ANE4032E, A file that was flagged as compressed was not compressed, and
>the system failed.
O for Linux might become
available, given IBM's heavy push in the Linux arena, but without
any announcements I, and in turn my rep, have to seek out this
information, and report it back whatever unofficial information
that we have garnered.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROT
I just recently spoke with my IBM rep on this, and the word I got
back that, although there are no specific times set or announced,
a TDP for Oracle could be available on Linux with TSM v5 in the
first half of 2002.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 24 Oct
a vendor to loan you equipment for the process, I would think
that of the two options I've proposed, #1 is the better choice.
I'm sure others on the list might approach this question from a
different angle and offer further suggestions.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL
You appear to be accessing two different servers, ADSM and ADSME.
Note the following lines from your two distinct commands:
Session established with server ADSM: MVS
...
Server date/time: 09/05/01 11:17:26 Last access: 09/05/01 11:07:46
Session established with server ADSME: MVS
...
Se
Jeff,
NDMP support is meant to be available at the end of this month.
That they haven't set pricing information for this yet makes me
wonder if it will actually be available any time soon. I'm
skeptical, but hopeful, as we've several TB of NetApp storage in
our environment.
-
Also, if you're client and server are on the same host, the
network shouldn't enter into the picture, you should be using
SHAREDMEM as your protocol.
-- Tom
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, David Longo wrote:
>Your original post of actlog stats didn't include how many objects
>inspected/backed up. If you
Is it possible to break up the filesystem(s) with
VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT options? This will let you break down the
problem into smaller chunks, and possibly run your 'dsmc'
processes out of cron, rather than via the scheduler.
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Gerald Wichmann wrote:
>Has anyone come up with any g
on our ADSM servers. Just wondering if anybody else has gone
down this path before me, or have even thought about it.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tape, I'd say you're
getting pretty good storage utilisation.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Jeff Bach wrote:
>What is my problem?
>
>I am just going to 3590K. I use client compression on everything. I
>compress on the t
>
> 1) do a full database backup of the 3.1.0.5 instance
>
> 2) copy my relevant files (dsmserv.dsk, etc.) to the new
>DSMSERV_DIR (/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin)
>
> 3) start the TSM 4.1 server with 'dsmserv upgradedb'
>
> 4) re-register all of my licenses
>
27;dsmserv upgradedb'
4) re-register all of my licenses
Has anybody else gone through the process in this manner? Am I
missing something?
Any advice/tips/suggestions are welcome.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e present tense.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 9 May 2001, John Bremer wrote:
>Geoff,
>
>Tivoli announced that TSM version 4.2 should provide backup and restore of
>NAS filers - 3Q 2001. Tivoli Data Protection for NAS is a specialized
>c
this type. I'm a little bit concerned
that our collective guessing and anecdotal evidence is all that
any of us as administrators have to go on.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Shawn Drew wrote:
>TSM v3.7.3
>
>I have read alot on this
What about Linux? Is there plans for TDP for Oracle on Linux?
This would be extremely useful, especially since Linux is now a
tier one platform for Oracle.
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Thiha Than wrote:
>hi Geoff,
>
>We don't have it planned in the near future.
>
>regards,
>Thiha
>
>Date:Wed, 18 Apr
r database
within that time frame.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Jane Doe wrote:
>Given the following scenario,
>Full DB backup on SAT
>Incremental backup on Sun-Fri
>
>If I have a huge database, say 2 TB, Is this a typical scen
think
I'd rather have the 150 or so tape slots that we'd gain without
the option.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Richard Sims wrote:
>We have a 3494 with a dual gripper. Based upon experience, I'd
>recommend not getting a
re node_name = 'MEDRS1' -
group by node_name
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Shekhar Dhotre wrote:
>
>Thanks David ...
>
>tsm: TSM>select volume_name,node_name from volumeusage where node_name='MEDRS1
ng to run a large-scale ADSM implementation without a 3494
(or similar) tape library.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, bbullock wrote:
>That is also an option that we have not considered. It actually
>sounds like a good one. I'll bring
n have more
multiple processes working simultaneously on the backup. The
aggregate time it will take to back up the server will be the
same, but the wall clock time will be approximately divided by
the number of processes you can run simultaneously.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
x27;t
exist.
Just wondering if Tivoli is going to either update their vision,
or include any of the myriad functions discussed in this vision
paper in an actual product.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;NTTAPECO' -
or upper(stgpool_name)='NTTAPENO'
and pct_utilized <50
You'll probably need to set sqldisplaymode to wide, or if you run
it in batch to commadelimited or tabdelimited. Redirect the
output to a file and you've got a macro file that you can run.
-- To
Your best bet is to include the "-comma" or "-tab" options, which
will get you comma delimited or tab delimited output. You can
then process the output in any way necessary.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks Feature Animation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, G
We have never seen any issues with long running ADSM servers
(note we're further down level than you are!):
tsm: DLADSM>q stat
ADSM Server for AIX-RS/6000 - Version 3, Release 1, Level 1.5
Server Name: DLADSM
Server Installation Date/Time: 08/06/199
Fiber connection between the host and drive.
-- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks SKG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Ronnie Crowder wrote:
>We are in the process of getting a new TSM server and library. I was thinking
>about how the hardware connects up to the 3494 and drives. I the
ainst what you are trying
to do. Go with regular disk pools.
CAVEAT: We are on 3.1.1.5 of the AIX server--yes it's down rev,
it also works; we're not in the QA business :-). I can't speak to
whether these issues are addressed/fixed in any newer releases of
{AD,T}SM.
-- Tom
Thomas
LIZATION" that allows you to multiplex your client
sessions may be useful, however, that may also require a 3.7
server.
- Tom
Thomas A. La Porte
DreamWorks Feature Animation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Dieter Herzog wrote:
>Hi
>
> We have problems to backup (increme
61 matches
Mail list logo
