On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Farren Minns wrote: >Hi Richard and thanks for the response.
[...] >However, the reason for my post was more that I was concerned about the >number of bytes moved figures (below). The 5000Mb volume is either plainly >being shown incorrectly, or perhaps something more serious is afoot. > >Is this something anyone has seen before? > > 5000Mb - 947,912,704 > 2500Mb - 2,621,440,000 > 1000Mb - 1,048,576,000 What you are seeing is the difference between assigned capacity and percentage utilized (see the output of q db). It would appear that your database has an assigned capacity of 8500MB (5000 + 2500 + 1000), and a percent utilization of 51.8%, with the second and third of your data volumes being full, and all new database pages being allocated from the 5000MB volume. -- Tom Thomas A. La Porte, DreamWorks SKG <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
