I'm not directly familiar with the NDMP backup expiration scenario, but
what you're describing makes sense to me. If the full is older than what
the copy group is set to, then it seems reasonable that you can only
restore, in it's own right, the backups which have not yet been expired -
ie. a diff
Well, at least not unless the guest has an FC adapter direct attached to
it. :) But then that would probably moot part of the advantage of using a
VM... :)
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Del Hoobler wrote:
> Robert,
>
> You can not perform LAN-free data movement from inside a guest.
>
> Tha
A completely off-topic side note - when checking in tapes from your i/o door
that you're not certain of status, I would recommend running your two
checkins in the opposite order - first run a checkin with a status of
'scratch', then run with a status of 'private'.
TSM will happily check scratch ta
Further to that (this is of course assuming that the volumes you want are
not in the library, as opposed to something else going on).
Once you've checked in the needed volumes, do a "q vol [volumename]
format=detailed" for each volume and check that the Access is set to
READWRITE. Because you tr
Most places I know simply script the del volhost todate=-3 t=dbb
and/or t=dbs as appropriate, into their regular daily processing.
Indeed as mentioned above, regular database media is not considered
safe to delete until it's known to be out of the library an presumably
offsite, so in your case it'
ELOGSIZE is 90G, and depending on what's going on with the
> TSM server I may have activelog files with timestamps going back 2 days or 2
> weeks, but it's still 90G.
>
> The archive log files DO get deleted.
>
> W
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist St
gt; So it works as DB2 is supposed to do.
>
> Best regards,
> Kurt
>
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Namens Paul
> Fielding
> Verzonden: maandag 25 juli 2011 15:20
> Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Onderwerp: Re:
curity number or confidential personal information. For more details
> visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
>
>
>
> From:
> Paul Fielding
> To:
> ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date:
> 07/25/2011 08:50 AM
> Subject:
> [ADSM-L] Active logs taking 4 days to delete
So, at one of my client sites I noticed that the Active log filesystem is
sitting at 82% full. This is not normal for this TSM server. Looking in
the filesystem I saw active logs going back four days. Checking the actlog
shows that TSM db backups are still running properly every day, but just t
checkin libvol [libraryname] search=bulk status=scratch checklabel=barcode
unless the tapes are brand new and never been electronically labeled before,
then try:
label libvol [libraryname] search=bulk checkin=scratch labelsource=barcode
regards,
Paul
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Paul_Dudl
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBM_TSM_Supported_Devices_for_AIXHPSUNWIN.html
and more specifically:
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&uid=swg21273206
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:59 PM, lavan wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Scalar 50 tape drives is supported for T
Correction to my previous message - I asked if you really have that many
directories in the Oracle dir, when I meant to say do you really have that
many other directories on the E: drive?
Paul
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Paul Fielding wrote:
> Indeed just using the EXCLUDE as I specif
Indeed just using the EXCLUDE as I specified will grab the directory tree
still. It's a longer story, but the Reader's Digest version is that doing so
ensure's the TSM BA client GUI can drill down to any given directory to find
files you may have backed up.
You can't use EXCLUDE.DIR on the "E:\" d
I would suggest approaching it a different way. You have to keep in mind
that include/exclude lists are processed from the bottom up. If you put an
exclude in the list, and put an include below it, the include will override
the exclude. Additionally, since you're only interested in the E: drive,
Yup. Look in the TSM Admin Guide, Chapter 8 -> Using NDMP
Go to Backing up and restoring NAS file servers using NDMP -> Performing
NDMP filer to Tivoli Storage Manager server
backups
The short story - if you point the copygroup for the ndmp mgmt class to a
regular stgpool rather than one con
So, i apologize if i missed you saying this, but is there a particular
reason you want to schedule Selective Full backups for all these nodes,
rather than just doing incrementals?
Also, is there a reason you can't set up 10 schedules that are all scheduled
for the same time?
regards,
Paul
On W
If your only constraint is that you need to run them at the same day and
time, is there any reason you can't set up 10 separate schedules but set all
10 schedules for the same day and time?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Lakshminarayanan, Rajesh <
rajesh.lakshminaraya...@dfs.com> wrote:
> Hi
I've performed a couple of 6.1 to 6.1 upgrades successfully. Perhaps
there was just some vaguarity with that particular installation?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 3, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Back a while ago I did a virgin install of 6.1.0, then upgraded to 6.1.3.0.
> Started th
Hmmm When I do "show volumeusage NODENAME", I get no result, regardless
of node
Paul
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Shawn Drew <
shawn.d...@americas.bnpparibas.com> wrote:
> I would go with the volumeusage table instead of contents if you just want
> the tapes for a node.
> select dis
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Stefan Folkerts
wrote:
> The trick is that the backup in TSM IS the migrated version of the file, so
> when you migrate you backup.
>
It's been awhile since I've used HSM on Unix, but (unless something has
changed) I disagree with this statement.
In Unix HSM (w
I have a client who went from v5.5 32b to 6.2.2.2 64b on new hardware.
So far they're running noticeably faster
Paul
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:36 PM, "Prather, Wanda" wrote:
> Can anyone who has converted from V5 to V6.2.2.0 or V6.2.2.2 on Win2K8 64b
> confirm for me tha
I haven't seen the pricing structure, but I suspect that containing costs
completely depends on your site. Since they appear to be basing it on a
capacity model rather than server/product model, I would suggest that:
- if you have a large number/types of servers to backup, but aren't really
huge
I think clarification is needed on mb/s vs. MB/s.
a 1gb (gigabit) (note lowercase) connection will certainly do 800 mb/s
(megabit/s). it won't, however, do 800 MB/s (megabyte/s)
Paul
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Richard Rhodes wrote:
> A little more explanation is going to be needed.
; KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Paul Fielding
> Sent: donderdag 12 mei 2011 15:53
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: TSM Recovery log is pinning since upgrade to 5.5.5.0
of downtime.
> Simple not acceptable in our shop...
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf
> Of
> Paul Fielding
> Sent: donderdag 12 mei 2011 14:33
>
t;> doubt too...
>> Kind regards,
>> Eric van Loon
>> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
>> Paul Fielding
>> Sent: woensdag 11 mei 2011 20:05
>> To: ADSM-L@VM.MAR
Hi folks, if this has already been commented on, my apologies, I hvaen't
been following closely but just noticed this thread.
We were experiencing log pinned issues after upgrading to 5.5.0.0 code at
one of my client sites. What we were finding was that, occasionally, I'd
get up in the morning an
at.
> Maybe a previous perl script that hangs/waits until next timeout?
>
> Marcel
>
> 2011/5/9 Paul Fielding
>
> > I have a wierd issue I'm hoping someone has seen before. I have a 3584
> > tape library attached to an AIX box. I have a bunch of perl scripts tha
nd that.
> Maybe a previous perl script that hangs/waits until next timeout?
>
> Marcel
>
> 2011/5/9 Paul Fielding
>
> > I have a wierd issue I'm hoping someone has seen before. I have a 3584
> > tape library attached to an AIX box. I have a bunch of perl script
I have a wierd issue I'm hoping someone has seen before. I have a 3584
tape library attached to an AIX box. I have a bunch of perl scripts that
deal with tape automation. Part of this process uses lbtest to grab the
current contents of the IO door. However, I've had it happen a few times
wher
t;
> Joerg Pohlmann
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Paul Fielding
> Date: Friday, April 29, 2011 2:48 pm
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Calling all IBMtape Packrats
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have someone who has an (out of maintenance) 3592-J1
Hi folks,
I have someone who has an (out of maintenance) 3592-J1A (FC) Magstar tape
drive with a need to attach it to either Windows 2000 or Windows XP. The
currently available IBMtape drivers only support 2003 and 2008.
However, I recall from experience that IBMtape used to be supported on 200
Has anyone heard anything about Vista support on TSM Express? Coming down the
pipe?
regards,
Paul
e as it could fill an important niche. I'm hoping
that IBM will listen to the few cries for help out there that we can make to
give us a small business backup solution that they can both afford and use
effectively.
regards,
Paul Fielding
Anisoft Group Inc.
-- Original Message --
Subject:
There's several ways you could do this migration, but the way I would do it
is:
1. upgrade the old server to TSM 5.3, after backing up the DB of course. I
wouldn't bother putting the ISC on the old box at this time, it's not needed
to get TSM up to 5.3. Note - The last upgrade of TSM from 5.1 t
he TSM
scheduler service does not have access to the root of the drive it will
not be added to the domain list and you will not get any errors.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Paul Fielding
Sent: Wed 6/29/2005 12:52 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADS
Hi everyone,
After doing a few searches and not finding an answer to this I figured I'd see
if anyone else has encountered this.
Running Windows 5.1.7client (the last supported client for NT) on NT 4 (sp6 I
think).
Two drives, C: and D:
During a scheduled incremental, the C: drive gets backed
I had a client once that was experiencing high enough errors with their
tapes and drives (3494-3590E drives) that Imation actually asked to take a
few tapes for testing. They came back saying that the tapes had high
amounts of a black powder on the tape that appeared to be printer toner.
Upon lo
There's no reason you can't share the library. The 3584 supports
partitioning. Unlike in your 3494 where the Library Manager controls what
tapes go to what host via category codes, in the 3584 you partition the
library into multiple 'virtual' tape libraries, so some slots and drives are
visible
I get the same thing as well.
Unfortuantely, I don't particularly want to delete my cookies - I've got a
few useful ones tied in right now...
ah well...
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Iain Barnetson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] "T
Based on what you just described, I'm not sure where your lack of slots is.
If you still have 20 free slots after your primary pool then (aside from
data growth and long term retention) getting copypool tapes out is easy.
Just do a COPY STGPOOL and stop it once you've filled 10 tapes or so. Then
d
re in
different
LSSs.
And yes, I wear belt and suspenders.
Joerg Pohlmann
604-535-0452
Paul Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
2005-04-06 23:25
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Question on SETUP
I don't see the value in mirroring the db and logs if they're placed on
Shark disk. The purpose of TSM's mirroring is to provide disk redundancy
in case of disk failure. However, the Shark provides it for you. Why add
the extra overhead of software mirroring when the hardware does a valiant
j
Not only that, but even if one wasn't required to license the ba client if
using only the db agent, the next question is, are you *sure* you don't want
to back up any flat files on the box? Don't forget that a database is more
than the sum of it's data. There's usually flat file information that
The readme is there, but no download.
And the bit in the readme that lists fixed APARs is blank.
:(
Since most of the things I was looking for in 5.3.1 is hiding in the ISC rather
than TSM, I guess I'm still waiting...
later,
Paul
to as a preliminary to further pursuit
in IBM doc.
Richard Simshttp://people.bu.edu/rbs
On Mar 19, 2005, at 3:06 AM, Paul Fielding wrote:
I'd be interested in more discussion on this point. My original
understanding was actually a bit different that that. The impression
I had
was
I'd be interested in more discussion on this point. My original
understanding was actually a bit different that that. The impression I had
was that originally directory tree structures were restored before any files
happened, period. Following that, files would be restored. Net result -
tapes m
- Original Message -
in a much faster backup. Now all that being said this new feature in V5.3
warrents new consideration. My new consideration is to stop using DIRMC
pools as the reason they were created in the first place has also long been
fixed.
Which reason is this that has been fixe
Actually, this brings up a good question that I've never properly tested.
When running a scheduler service *without* an Acceptor service, then you
most definitely need to restart the service for changes to take place.
But how about when running an Acceptor service? It makes sense to me that
the Ac
- Original Message -
From: "steve freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Paul,
Thanks for this advice. I will installed via the admin cmd line
And disregard what the installation guide says.
That's true, the Admin Guide still says to use the Licensing Wizard. The
Admin Guide is indeed wrong. They
Hi Steve,
As far as I've been able to tell, the License Wizard doesn't exist in 5.3.
They've finally started to update licensing to better reflect the current
state of TSM affairs. You no longer license by node, etc. At the moment,
the only way to license is by using the 'register license' comma
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Sheppard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
With all of the 'horror' stories on the list about 5.3 and the ISC, I
was wondering if the old GUI from Version 3 will still work, at least to
the extent that it does in 5.2?
To be fair, for all my gripes about the ISC, I don't t
- Original Message -
From: "Stapleton, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you *really* want to make yourself heard, send your comments to your
local IBM/IBM Business Partner rep. That will make a whole lot more
impact.
Actually, over the years as an IBM Business Partner, I've found that my
voice
Ok IBM, here's my initial ISC findings for you. There'll probably be more down
the road, I'm sure
Bugs/Annoyances:
1. When setting the dbbackup trigger, the ISC doesn't let you set 0
incrementals between fulls. If I want to have every dbbbackuptriggered
dbbackup run as a full, I need to
that
I don't have to use dsmc to set the password locally but it might also be
something that I do differently which might be why I haven't run into
this.
Paul Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I agree - it's not a show stopper,
as long as you know what you're looking for
i
I agree - it's not a show stopper, as long as you know what you're looking for
it can be worked around.
I've gotten tied up today with a raid array failure so I haven't had a chance
yet to try my findings on a win2003 box - I'd still like to demonstrate that,
since my original findings (and the ca
u ever create services on a cluster
you
> must ensure that you create them adding the /clustername and
/clusternode
> options. Also, you have to use the /clusternode:no for the services
you
> create that aren't for the cluster. Finally you also have to make
sure
> that you create the c
:\Progra~1\Tivoli\TSM\Baclient
> > /optfile:C:\Progra~1\Tivoli\TSM\Baclient\dsm.opt /pass:%COMPUTERNAME%
> > /startnow:no /autostart:no
> >
> > One thing I have noticed is if you ever create services on a cluster you
> > must ensure that you create them adding th
FWIW, I've had better luck posting bugs on this list, where people from IBM
actually see it occasionally, than I have had actually trying to go through
proper channels to report a bug
Quoting Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a trap that you might like to avoid.
>
> When
sure
that you create the cluster services first. If you don't do this
correctly you will get errors but they aren't all as clear as I would
like.
Paul Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Several years ago I noticed an interesting behavior when installing
multiple client scheduler se
I think there's cross-communication going on here. Clarification is needed.
Is the the *only* TSM server you're trying to add, and the ISC is claiming
you've already added it, or is this an *additional* TSM server that you're
trying to add as a connection to the ISC?
regards,
Paul
- Original M
Try this:
- Upd node to new domain. TSM will not magically migrate data, but it will
know to restore previous data from old tape pool etc.
- MOVE NODEDATA to move data for that node only from old stgpool to new stgpool
good luck!
Paul
Quoting "Hart, Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We have a
I agree, this should work fine. I think the thing that previous posters were
commenting on (saying that the db would become corrupted), that wasn't made
clear in the original question, is that you want to make sure you shut down the
primary TSM server prior to breaking the mirror. As long as you
I'm wondering if I'm misunderstanding the use of the TCPCLIENTADDRESS dsm.opt
option.
Historically, I've used the TCPCLIENTADDRESS to force the client to present an
appropriate contact IP to the TSM server if the client has more than one nic,
or when using a cluster configuration.
I've just finis
Several years ago I noticed an interesting behavior when installing multiple
client scheduler services on a server. A ticket was opened with IBM and the
final word came back that there was indeed a bug, the apar was opened, and we
were told it would be resolved. This week I've encoutered the
main was originally designed for...
regards,
Paul
Quoting Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Feb 11, 2005, at 7:27 AM, Paul Fielding wrote:
>
> > ...My belief has always been that exclude would exclude both backups
> > and archives,
> > which would negate the need
Ok, I just tested, and indeed the exclude statement by itself does not exclude
archives, forcing an exclude.archive will exclude them. I'm surprised - I've
made a poor assumption over the years. I wonder if anyone else has been caught
by that one?
regards,
Paul
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
With the advent of the 5.3 Windows Client, the install defaults to includeing a
number of system excludes for the server. This is fine and all, but one of the
things it does is separates them by exclude.backup and exclude.archive,
repeating the same filespec for each.
My belief has always been th
I think a number of people have summed up the issues here well, no need for
me to harp on them. The one exception I would make is in regards to
creating an 'intuitive interface'.
So far, IMHO, the interface is far from intuitive. While I can see the
theoretical logic behind burying the Schedules
I'm interested to know if anyone has tried installing 5.3 yet and what
they've found...
Paul
Hey Miles,
I know of one customer who tried without much success. My understanding is
that the HMC was too far locked down to be able to install and run the TSM
client on it.
Given that the HMC is supposed to be a closed system, there shouldn't be
anything stored on there that you need to keep, ot
do you change it to
include dbsnapshots instead of dbbackups? Thanks!
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6603
Fax:(717)302-5974
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
****
"Paul Fie
I actually do the opposite - I send snapshots offsite and leave DBBs
onsite - the reason being that you can roll forward recovery logs on a dbb
but not on a dbs - if you lose your db due to non-disaster reasons, it is
quite possible that you may still have the recovery logs and can roll
forward.
> ok, that assumes that veritas is less able to support their product
> than IBM is. Since Veritas is a _big_ player in the back-up market,
> I'm not ready to do so just yet. Remember, this is a product in us
> by at least as may organisations as TSM is, and it wouldn't be if
> people can't rely on
Not only that, but if I recall correctly the only files that'll get rebound
are the ones that get touched by the client as either a still active file
(along with it's inactives) or a 'just' deleted file, one that was
previously active but as of this incremental has been deleted and becomes
inactive
That being the case any thoughts on why the root admin would be denied
access to the TSA via TSM assuming the correct account and pass are used?
paul
- Original Message -
From: "David Longo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: Net
Anyone have any problems with giving Netware root admin privileges to TSM? Using a
4.1.3 client on a 4.1 netware server, we get the following when trying to use the
admin account with full root privs:
03/09/2004 13:42:54 ANS1874E Login denied to NetWare Target Service Agent
'[TREENAME1]'.
03/0
I've seen this on other windows boxes before. It happens to me sometimes
if I try to install the Scheduler Daemon via the Wizard, and tell it to use
CAD to start, but don't try to install the Web Client via the Wizard, and
then adding a 'managedservices schedule webclient' in the dsm.opt file.
T
You're opening a big can of worms doing it with only 1 drive. That and you
need to deal with the fact that tape reclamation is a pain in the butt to deal
with tapes that aren't left in the library. Are you planning on taking just
the exchange data out of the library, or both the exchange data *a
You can certainly do it - in the copy pool for the management class domino data
is going to set the following:
verexist = nolimit
verdeleted = nolimit
retextra = nolimit
retonly = nolimit
However, don't forget these other two resultant settings:
size of library = not big enough
$$$ for new tapes
As it turns out, we couldn't ping the server when it became unaccessible.
There's a monitor server here that does regular ping tests on the site, and it
recorded the Netware server in question as going down roughly the same time our
backup died, and TCP didn't come back online until we rebooted the
That's actually a good question. The Netware admin had rebooted it by the time
I came in. We'll run another test tonight and if it freezes again i'll make
sure we test the connectivity more thoroughly...
regards,
Paul
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
>
>
>
> Can you ping the server when the se
Hi all,
Having dug though the archives I haven't found anything that looks quite like
this one, so I thought I'd throw it out there.
I'm currently implementing TSM at a site running several Netware 4.1 servers.
Understanding that it's no longer a supported platform, they still have a need
to back
I have a need to get a Novell 4.x box backing up to a new TSM implementation
under IPX/SPX. My current understanding is that IPX is no longer supported, my
my two quick questions are such:
1. Does not supported mean "will work but not supported", or does it
mean "won't work" ?
2. Assuming it won
Hi all,
I'm working with someone who's doing a BCV split on EMC disk, then using the TDP for
R3 to back up the database (SAP oracle). Leaving aside questions on whether or not
the TDP should be used here (I've already had that discussion), we're running into a
problem where we can restore the
Hi all,
I did some poking around the list and didn't see anything on the subject.
Does anybody have a good method for doing Monthly and Yearly backups of an R3 (oracle)
database using the TDP for R3? I have a requirement to maintain daily backups for 2
weeks, monthly backups for 3 months and y
I did some snooping and couldn't see anyone mention this one. I've got a script
running on one box (HPUX 11, 4.1.2 client) to run an archive:
dsmc archive -se=tsm_x1_apps -archmc=6month -subdir=yes\
-desc="ADSM X1-FVO2 Online Backup"\
"/etc/*.ora" \
"/p/util/oracle/adm/FVO2/*"\
"/db/x1_ora
Hi all,
I'll be darned if I can find this.
Running a TSM 4.1 server, I want to disable the message output to the NT Application
Event log.
Anyone know where to do it?
Paul
I'm trying to back up a couple of network mounted drives. In the past I've done this
by simply adding the drives to the domain list. This time, however, I'm having
problems getting them to run, and I suspect that since I am using the NT 4.1.1.0
client this time that it is either a) a change
Ok, so here's a question based on my lack of knowledge of Domino. Going through the
Domino Red Book, during the section on rebuilding a Domino server from scratch, I get
to the line that says -
"Re-install and configure the Domino Server".
The next steps are to set up the Domino client and ba
Hi All. I've got a set of AIT-2 drives that I'm setting up, using 50 GB native tapes.
As my first tapes have started becoming full, I'm finding I'm only getting just over
25 GB on the tapes.
Based on what I've read on the list, it looks like people have found the estimated
capacity to be 20
I've been digging all night through db2 manuals and red books, trying to find
something that would reasonably describe a straightforward way to backup and restore a
db2 5 or 6 database on NT.
The Databases Redbook is 2 years old and concentrates on AIX and OS/2, aside from
being a read somethi
Here's one. I've got a server that dies during reclamation on a copy pool tape with
the following error:
ANRD aferase.c(528): Invalid logSizeRatio
4048033.806786 (logSize=0.372, size=0.1061,
aggrSize=0.4860) for aggregate 0.9306677
Based on what I've read around
Richard,
You'll have to forgive me for being a bit blunt, but I know all about the various
factors involved in restore rates.
This is why my message stated:
"assuming the tape drive is the bottleneck, ie. disk is
fast enough, bus is wide enough, everything is local attached, machine is
supe
I'm looking to know what I could *realistically* expect from a 3590e drive
during a *restore*, assuming the tape drive is the bottleneck, ie. disk is
fast enough, bus is wide enough, everything is local attached, machine is
super zippy, and restoring BIG files.
Certainly the theoretical max is so
95 matches
Mail list logo
