We have a protracted problem with our 4560 library / Ultrium 1 tape =
drives after 8 months of faultless performance. IBM are blaming tapes.
Anybody has experience in using IMATION Ultrium 1 for LT0 tapes? Bad one in
particular. I would love to hear from you .,...
We are experiencing anr8950w err
If mynode is backing up to onsite-tape-pool which has
COPYSTGpools=offsite-tape-pool
COPYContinue=yes
Then 2 tapes are mounted during mynode backup, one for backup and one for
copy. Does this mean, I used 2 mount points for mynode? So mynode
definition should have maximum mount points allowed=2 (
I saw this posting, but I did not see a reply. SteveC, did you ever
receive a reply? Do you have any tips regarding move nodedata or other ways
to reduce the # of offsite tapes. We do not have enough tape head time
avaiable to keep up with offsite reclaims. All of our tapes are 3590, but I
nee
I would appreciate any tips or suggestions of white papers, redbooks etc.
about moving from a 3494 library with 3590 tape heads to an ADIC LTO
library. We will not have a 3590 tape drive in house.
We also plan to move the TSM server from an RS/6000 AIX platform to an Intel
Linux platform. We ar
An HP Systems Admin. changed the hostname of an ADSM client. We are at ADSM
Server 3.1.2.90 and ADSM client 3.1.0.8. Does ADSM use the first hostname
in the /etc/hosts file? There are a few aliases for this hostname in the
hosts file. What changes do I need to make to ADSM to have backups run
Ahhh, now I see the problem staring me in the face. I did not have a # in
front of the comment in the inittab.
adsmsch::respawn:/usr/lpp/adsm/bin/dsmc sched > /dev/null 2>&1 #ADSM Client
Schedule
Thanks to all who replied, this list is great! :>
--Debbie
-Original Message-
From: Poland
I am receiving the following errors in the dsmerror.log.
ANS1102E Excessive number of command line arguments passed to the program
ANS1133W An expression might contain a wildcard not enclosed in quotes
This client is also the ADSM server.
The backup is an incremental.
ADSM server 3.1.2.90 I und
opps, operator error. I issued the upd vol command again with an access of
readw and it worked this time.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lane, Debbie
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 3:54 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: UN destroy?
>
> I accidently updated a volume to destroy
I accidently updated a volume to destroyed. I need this volume, and it does
not have a copy. Is there anyway to get it back?
Are your drives 3590 E1A? I receive this error on a frequent basis since
moving to E1A, with a mix of "J" 128 track and "K" 256 track tapes.
-Original Message-
From: Derek Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANR error
All,
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Debbie Lane
Sent: Friday, 11 May 2001 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AIX lv and dbvol
Which is best for performance?
Create one AIX logical volume with 5 disk, then define 5 dbvol located in
the one lv.
OR
Create
Which is best for performance?
Create one AIX logical volume with 5 disk, then define 5 dbvol located in
the one lv.
OR
Create 5 AIX logical volume, 1 lv per disk, then define 5 dbvol - one per lv
.
Thanks for your help. I am creating a new ADSM server and I want to get it
right this time. :>
nufacturer of the tapes even
though IBM oem's them.
About 5 months we had a shipment delivered to our sit only to have Imation
contact us and ask to send them back due to what they called " a problem
with verification of Q/A"
H
"Debbie Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are at D25D, I am going to try E304.
Thanks,
--Debbie
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ANR8359E ANR8830E
>We have been receiving an abnormal amount of ANR8359E Media Fault, and
>
We have been receiving an abnormal amount of ANR8359E Media Fault, and
ANR8830E Excessive media failures for volume.
Hardware has replaced the cleaning brush, tape head, and card pack. ]
ADSM Server - 3.1.2.90
OS - AIX 4.3.3
Atape 6.0.4.0
atldd 4.1.5.0
Tape Library IBM 3494
Tape drive IBM 3590 E1
My experience with ADSM is with AIX server and clients only. Our ADSM
server 3.1.2.50 for AIX 4.3.3.
We want to start backing up an HP 9000/800 D350 2way, it is running HP-UX
10.20, Oracle 7.3.4.
DB and vault files are about 62GB.
q lic shows that we have available client licenses. Can I just
Thanks for all the input regarding this tape. Imation is the only
manufacture. I have decided not to use the K tape because, they seem too
fragile and the quality is not consistent. I need the extended capacity,
but I also need to know that I have a high probability of a successful
restore.
Re
Our tapes are IBM tapes. I would also be curious what tapes others are
using.
John, what brand of tapes are you using?
-Original Message-
From: Talafous, John G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590E
Keep in mind
--Original Message-----
From: Debbie Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3590E
We recently started using 3590E tapes. Several of them are damaged. We
talked to IBM support, and it sounds like other customers have had similar
pr
oops, The drive is a 3590-E1A. The tapes in question are the "K" higher
capacity tapes.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590E
>We recently started using 3590E tapes. Several
We recently started using 3590E tapes. Several of them are damaged. We
talked to IBM support, and it sounds like other customers have had similar
problems. I am wondering if any of you have experienced 3590E damaged in
shipment? Have you had other problems with the 3590E?
I am moving our ADSM server from an IBM RS/6000 59H to a H50. I did a fresh
install of the OS (AIX 4.3.3) on the H50. What will the ramifications be if
I create the file systems where the ADSM database and archive logs will
reside with a different names than they currently have? After I create
I would be interested in hearing if anyone out there is using the 3590 "K"
(Extended High Performance tape) tape.
How long have you been using them? Have you experienced any problems with
them? Are you using IBM or another brand? What price range can I expect
to pay for them?
Thanks,
--Debbi
23 matches
Mail list logo
