Kenneth,
Bradberry, Kenneth schrieb:
I am currently looking at Data Domain as a possible VTL and
de-duplication vender. Can anyone share there experiences with Data
Domain with TSM?
We just tested a DataDomain machine with TSM. The results were not as
good as we expected. It shows a very good
Hi there,
I have question on ISC.
ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN_CENTER issued command: QUERY LOG f=d (SESSION:
8781)
Above message will be repeated every 3 minutes forever.
My question is
1. How to change the frequency from 3 min to 30 minutes
2. Ho to disable the ADMIN_CEN
Wednesday, November 7 2007 is the date for the next meeting of TSMUG, the
TSM User Group for Baltimore, Washington, and Northern Virginia (and a lot
more of the Mid-Atlantic!)
We are planning to have a presentation on a real life TSM disaster
recovery, a presentation on a Kinder, Gentler way to ma
Search on that message number at
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/
IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
Richard Sims (sometime fishing instructor :-)
Search the activity log for the reason the tape is being put back to Private
status. Things such as write-protected tape, tape not
labelled and you don't have AUTOLABEL=YES defined for the library, I/O error,...
Bill Boyer
"Backup my harddrive? How do I put it in reverse?" - ??
-Original Me
Try running an Audit Volume (Fix=yes) on one of the volumes and see
if that takes care of the problem.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Nicholas Rodolfich
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 1:41 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: I wo
I have the same issue with a few volumes. they are at 0.1 % utilized but
a move data says there is no data on the volumes and a del vol says the
volume can't be deleted because it conatins data. The discard=yes should
delete it though. I haven't done that yet as I was trying to find a
solution as w
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/9/2007 2:40 PM >>>
Nicholas Rodolfich wrote:
> I have TSM server 5.3.5 on AIX 5.3.5 with an IBM 3584 library with
16
> drives. In my offsite pool I have approximately 300 volumes with
very
> low utilization but they are in the FILLING state, I would expect
them
> to be in t
Each Backup Storage pool thread will in general create 1 filling tape
each time it runs. In my case I run 1 backup storage pool thread for
each primary pool each day. Those tapes are then sent off-site. I have
12 primary pools and send about 40 tapes away each day, so I have a
little more than 2
The volumes released from a storage pool (Volume Type: STGDELETE) continue
with status = private.
To fix "UPDate LIBVolume TS3200 AA0038L3 STATus = SCRatch", but was again
put in Private
Thanks
Hello TSM's,
I have a copypool volume with nothing on it, meaning q content - no
data. When I try to #delete volume xxx discarddata=yes - it returns
- volume contains data. When I use move data - it returns - volume
contains no data. DRM says it is in vault status.
I would like to make
>> Is true, my disk pool is only 400Gb and we do 500-700 /night and
1.1Tb -1.3Tb on weekends. I am waiting on some more storage now.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/9/2007 2:45 PM >>>
Are your disk pools large enough? If your diskpool fills,
then your backups will write direct to tape. Check you activity
Are your disk pools large enough? If your diskpool fills,
then your backups will write direct to tape. Check you activity
log to see what is happening around the time that the extra
filling tapes are defined to the storage pool. What process or session
is first grabbing the tape, and what other pro
I believe that if they are marked as offsite, they will be reclaimed. If
not, for instance if you have them in an online remote library, you will
have to do the move data.
On 10/9/07, Nicholas Rodolfich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for your help!!
>
> I have TSM server 5.3.5
-Nicholas Rodolfich wrote: -
>I have TSM server 5.3.5 on AIX 5.3.5 with an IBM 3584 library with
>16 drives. In my offsite pool I have approximately 300 volumes with
>very low utilization but they are in the FILLING state, I would
>expect them to be in the FULL, EMPTY or PENDING state. Is
Nicholas Rodolfich wrote:
I have TSM server 5.3.5 on AIX 5.3.5 with an IBM 3584 library with 16
drives. In my offsite pool I have approximately 300 volumes with very
low utilization but they are in the FILLING state, I would expect them
to be in the FULL, EMPTY or PENDING state. Is there a way to
I ran into a similar issue and found a new STG was defined and the new
default for collocate is "group". I changed that to none. Then did a
move data on every volume in the "filling" state.
I reviewed every STG for all 4 TSM servers and did not find that issue
but did find a number of low utilized
Hi All,
Thanks for your help!!
I have TSM server 5.3.5 on AIX 5.3.5 with an IBM 3584 library with 16
drives. In my offsite pool I have approximately 300 volumes with very
low utilization but they are in the FILLING state, I would expect them
to be in the FULL, EMPTY or PENDING state. Is there a w
Thanks Ken,
I will get my DBA to run this.
Ken Chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps it's a timing issue. For DB2 you have to issue "db2adutl delete
older than x days without prompting" otherwise DB2 will keep backups
forever. In TSM you run "expire inventory". Both are necessary
Hi all,
I'm working with TSM version 5.3.4 on linux (fedora core 5), when I try
to connect to webclient I get this error:
ANS2600S Browser trying to establish connection to client; received
socket exception: java.net.ConnectException: Operation timed out: connect
After this error webclient is
I curently have the quantum DXI 5500 setup with Tivoli and it is
performing fantastic. However, since this is a new product you will
face some growing pains. What I like is that it does hardware
compression rather than software like DD
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [m
I am currently looking at Data Domain as a possible VTL and
de-duplication vender. Can anyone share there experiences with Data
Domain with TSM?
I am also looking at SEPATON as an "out of band" solution as well.
Thanks,
Ken Bradberry.
Yes, and you can set the nextstg for the existing lib to point to the
storage pools created in the newer libs and trigger migration, but again
that is sort of awkward and short term.
- you'd like to use all the drives during normal backup processing and not
just the drives in the original library.
Hi Tim,
If you take a look at the APAR I cited, you'll see it refers to the same
issue as the tech note. The latter is just a "shot-in-the-dark" attempt to
work around the APAR symptoms. The former has no known solution; we cannot
reproduce this in the lab, and diagnostic code run by customers
Hello Vinicius,
I think you will have to migrate the volumes so that the data is kept the
same. You probably need to "move data" or "move nodedata"
That way you are moving the data from the existing library to the new
library and then you have the old library that can be still be used for
other p
You could in the short term do something like:
- define new storage pools in the new libraries
- do move data's to empty volumes in the current library to the newer
libraries to allow you to bring volumes containing data back into the
existing library.
But the long term problem is that backups wil
Hi Juan, in this env we are a little bit different
We don't want to deactivate the old library (the library it self is not
old, it has the same config as the new lib, LTO3 FC, 44 sltos)
What I want to do is like this:
Today I have a pool: SP-FILESYSTEM-LTO -> LTOCLASS1 -> LTOLIB1
In this pool I
Hey,
We just did something similar.
we started with 1 old acsls library (library=lsm2 and acsid=1) 4 tapedrives
and 300 cartridges
we ended with 1 new acsls library (libray=lsm2 acsid=2) 4 tapedrives and
300 cartridges.
1)created the 4 new tape drives in the lsm2 library that were physically
l
Hi Andrew,
Thanks...I took a look at Technote IBM Technote 1234244 and APAR
IC44846. I think
IBM Technote 1234244 may be the problem because why would this happen
all of a sudden the backup was working up until 10/4/07. Though because
of that even looking
at Technote 1234244 I am skeptical.The
Ok, let me detail the env.
This client has 4 libraries (LTOLIB1 / LTOLIB2 / LTOLIB3 / LTOLIB4) each
library has 44 slots and 2 drivers, the library LTOLIB1 and LTOLIB2 are
destiny of filesystem data, and this 2 libraries are overloaded with
aprx 100 tapes off librarie.
The client is putting addit
Not using Lan-Free...
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wira Chinwong
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 7:41 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Oracle RMAN issue
Did you have used the Lan-free feature? If so, try to check
dear remco,
thanks, yes we did a database recovery, and now we have to make some audits
of our disk and tape volumes.
thanks for your help
stefan savoric
Perhaps it's a timing issue. For DB2 you have to issue "db2adutl delete
older than x days without prompting" otherwise DB2 will keep backups
forever. In TSM you run "expire inventory". Both are necessary to remove
all pieces of the db2 backup. Perhaps for this database you run the DB2
command
Richard Sims wrote:
> Search at http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/
> IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
> for'HEADING UNAVAILABLE'
Thank you for the clear pointer. For the rest of us: your message
catalog is not at the same level as your tsm server, install the
availabl
On Oct 9, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Pambos Kyriakides wrote:
We have TSM 5.3.5 for Windows and suddenly we start getting the error
“ANS1329S Server out of data storage space”. ...
Examine what is being sent at the time.
See accumulated notes on the experienced causes of that problem at
http://people
We have TSM 5.3.5 for Windows and suddenly we start getting the error
“ANS1329S Server out of data storage space”.
The clients giving this error are assigned to a Disk storage pool and
afterward the data are moving to a tape.
We checked all possible parameters and find nothing wrong. The storage p
Search at http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/
IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
for'HEADING UNAVAILABLE'
Hi,
I like to ask again why the results of a nas backup are not logged in
the accounting log file (dsmaccnt.log). Is it possible to find out how
much data has been backed up during the last backup session?
The only information seems to be logged in the activity log when the
backup process ends:
TSM wrote:
> hello,
>
> environment:
> windows 2000, tsm 5.2.4
>
> after stopping tsm server for canceling a "deadlock" situation (there was
> move data and backup stgp for the same big file) and tsm
> processes do not work for almost 1 hour, the tsm server restart hang.
>
>>> dsmserv
> ...
> ANR03
Hi All,
running TSM server 5.3.4.1 on AIX and tsm client 5.4 or 5.5beta on linux
(or 5.2.2.9 on AIX).
When I do a 'q vol vns000 f=d' the clients print 'HEADING UNAVAILABLE:'
on the last line. When I run the same command to a 5.4 server it
properly prints 'Drive Encryption Key Manager:', using bot
Hi to all
I read a paper called:
IBM - Modified Instructions for Complete Restores of Windows Systems with
the TSM Client Bare Metal Restore (BMR), System State Restore, Windows System
Object Restore.
On it the process to restore a complete system drive is:
1. Restore the
41 matches
Mail list logo
