That depends on how you did the reorganization. Either backup/restore or
DEFINE DBVOL/DELETE DBVOL is probably how you did it, and niether of
those methods will accomplish your goal of spreading out the I/O load.
At least not right away. As time goes on, it should very gradually
spread itself out o
<>
Equal or exceed assigned capacity value.
Sung Y. Lee
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 11/30/2005
11:52:24 AM:
> I am working on plans for disaster recovery at a hot site that will not
> necessarily have the same number and size disks as our primary site. I
know
> that a TSM database resto
I'm not trying to make it know the disk architecture, I just want it to
evenly distribute amongst it's own dbvols. I already took care of
distributing the dbvols across disks. I agree that the raid1+0 route
would be best in a perfect world, but I don't have enough drive bays to
do that for dbvols
Hi
recently when we upgraded our server I tried to assign a greater capacity to
the DB volumes than was needed (in this case 40GB instead of the 32) and the
restore reduced the size of the Assigned space back down to 32 although the
volumes physical size obviously stayed the same.
HTH
Japes
- -
Go to the link in my sig, then look for this:
Tivoli Storage Manager Overview, Related Products, and Platforms Supported
Follow the link, and there you'll find a description for "IBM Tivoli
Storage Manager for Application Servers". That might help.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Grou
Bingo!
I thought i'd checked all the ends but when I went to remove the short
cable daisy-chaining the one good drive to the one bad drive, I found
a bent pin on the end of the cable I had not previously checked. I was
removing it because the first device was working in the chain and the
second wa
Check this out:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/storage-mgr-app-servers/
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 11/30/2005
02:30:44 PM:
> Good Afternoon.
>
> We currently have TSM 5.2.2 running on all our servers(
==> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:52:24 -0500, Thomas Denier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am working on plans for disaster recovery at a hot site that will not
> necessarily have the same number and size disks as our primary site. I know
> that a TSM database restore does not require matching volume si
==> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:20:59 -0600, Mark Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> This is a bone of network contention (no pun intended), particularly with
> Cisco networks. It is *not* a TSM problem. (As usual, TSM is the World's
> Best IT Infrastructure Problem Finder.)
What he said, but l
On Nov 30, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Troy Frank wrote:
...Is there some way to force tsm to evenly
distribute the info, ...
Troy - An application is best kept ignorant of specific disk
architectures upon which it is situated.
The way to attain your goal is via disk striping.
We are using RAID
Good Afternoon.
We currently have TSM 5.2.2 running on all our servers(UNIX/INTEL) and
the TSM server is 5.2.2 on AIX 5.2
We have a problem restoring Websphere servers successfully, not all the
services come up successfully.
Does TSM have an Add-on or anything that allows for a successful backup
On Nov 30, 2005, at 11:25 AM, Thomas Rupp wrote:
... 31 (OP=WRITE, Error Number=1117, CC=205, ...
The Error Number is that which the operating system returns.
IBM has nicely provided a comprehensive summary of the
"Windows 2000 error code list" in Technote 1218286.
Sometimes the error
On 11/30/05, Ray Louvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can anyone give the technical reason why auto detect on Server NICs
> cause such horrible performance for TSM server backups and restores. We
This sounds like a network problem, not a TSM one. Quick way to prove it:
try a backup/restore to
On a related note (if somewhat off-topic)
Can somebody point me to a mailing list/resources for Enterprise Storage
Servers?
Recently I "inherited" the administration of an ESS F20 for no other reason
than the fact that I use space of it for my TSM disk pools (and the fact
that the current admin l
I am working on plans for disaster recovery at a hot site that will not
necessarily have the same number and size disks as our primary site. I know
that a TSM database restore does not require matching volume sizes, as long
as the aggregate size of the replacement volumes is sufficient. However, I
You do have to order the CDs but you can (at least we can) still get
free shipped CDs as part of our Passport provisoned maintenance. You
can also download the code via Passport. That all assumes that Passport
thinks your entitled. If it doesn't, its a problem for your marketing
rep.
David Ehre
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 11/30/2005
10:19:03 AM:
> I'm ready to plan my upgrade from TSM 5.2.2.0 to 5.3 (on AIX). In the
past
> I have received CDs unsolicited with new version code. Do I need to
order
> something or download something? Or should I have received the CDs
> already?
Not g
This might help you in chasing down SCSI errors.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21063859
In the doc, there is a PDF document. Tivoli Storage Problem Determination
Guide - Understanding Sense Data
Sung Y. Lee
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 11/30/2005
11:25:25 AM:
> Hi TSM-
Hi TSM-ers,
I'm in the process of moving from AIX with 3590 to Windows with LTO1.
So the following errors are completely new to me:
11/30/2005 11:24:51 ANR8302E I/O error on drive TAPE2 (mt0.2.0.4) with
volume
31 (OP=WRITE, Error Number=1117, CC=205,
KEY=FF,
Because nic & switch vendors never seem to implement the autodetect spec
in the same and/or correct way. Depending on the manufacturer of the
switch/nic, sometimes you have to use auto on both, sometimes you have
to hardcode both, sometimes you have to hard code one but set the other
to auto. The
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 11/30/2005
10:00:06 AM:
> Can anyone give the technical reason why auto detect on Server NICs
> cause such horrible performance for TSM server backups and restores.
This is a bone of network contention (no pun intended), particularly with
Cisco networks. It is
I'm ready to plan my upgrade from TSM 5.2.2.0 to 5.3 (on AIX). In the past
I have received CDs unsolicited with new version code. Do I need to order
something or download something? Or should I have received the CDs
already?
Nancy Reeves
Technical Support, Wichita State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Your situation sounds even worse than mine. When I lose a lun I only
lose that particular lun. Other systems and luns on the controller are
still functional. Although in order to get that lun back I must
shutdown every system connected to the controller then reboot the
controller and the lun com
Any success stories out there for using large amounts of
serial-access disk with TSM?
At 06:19 PM 11/29/2005, you wrote:
Richard,
I share your pain.
We have an EMC Clariion CX500 SAN. We have found that AIX in general, and
TSM in particular, can just "hose" the sucker.
> I have about 6TB o
I previously had an 88G db @ 19% utilization spread over 3 dbvols.
2 dbvols on D: (hardware mirrored drive), and one on E: & F: (tsm
mirroring).
These drives were all on the same scsi controller (and same channel on
that controller).
I reorganized this so that I now have 4 db vols, with each one o
Can anyone give the technical reason why auto detect on Server NICs
cause such horrible performance for TSM server backups and restores. We
have our TSM server NIC set to 100MB Full also our switch Port set to
100 Full but we have users with sorted networks such as 1 GB switches
plugged into 100 M
>From the TSM server test team:
--
Problem abstract: Ridiculously wide portlet windows cause excessive
horizontal scrolling in Firefox.
Problem description: Firefox does not dynamically adjust the width of
columns to match window sizes. IE does not exhibit this behavior,
Your INCLUDE statement doesn't do anything except maybe bind the
c:\adsm.sys *directories* (not files, which are not backed up) to SPECIAL.
To bind system object or system state to a different management class, see
the INCLUDE.SYSTEMOBJECT or INCLUDE.SYSTEMSTATE options.
You are otherwise correct
Hi,
This is what we are running on a daily basis:
delete volhistory todate=today-4 type=STGDELETE
delete volhistory todate=today-4 type=STGNEW
delete volhistory todate=today-4 type=STGREUSE
Because the itsm database is only kept for 3 days, stgpool reuse for
primary set to 1 and copy to 2, we don
Hi, we use
"include c:\adsm.sys\...* special" to assign a managent class to system
objects. Is this (still) correct?
I think include and exclude to the same directory isn't a good idea.
Regards
Stefan Holzwarth
_
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Tue 29.11.2
If you are referring to the file system file which TSM maintains with
volume history information, it is a waste of time to make any changes
to the file, as it is a generated copy of the volume history info
maintained in the TSM database.
You may housekeep the volume history information, by age, b
I have a P3000 library with 4 DLT7000 tape drives that are on my san. The TSM
server (5.3 on AIX 5.3) sees them and is happy.
The Win2003 storage agent (with an LSI 929x 2gb hba and 5.3 stg agt) sees the 4
tape drives, but I am getting the following errors.
>From actlog:
11/30/2005 08:57:14
Just looked at the volume history file again.
Redoing the disaster recovery plans for tsm.
Is there any reason to keep the "STGNEW" entries that build up in this file?
Been removing the "STGDEL" entries during daily processing.
Didn't see anything in the manuals about keeping this file from growi
Hi, Bill!
what our dbadmins and we tsmers do is the following:
daily db2 backup (generations, controled by db2 itself) directly to tsm
tape (special stgp); backup via tsm db2 api to tape, becourse the file is
too large; in tsm only this one version exists.
the db2 logs are written in a disk pool,
Another option is to shutdown your db, copy the db files to be backed up
to another directory that is not excluded, and start the db back up.
Then let your regular incremental pick up the files in the backup
directory while continuing to exclude the live db files.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/2
Hi all,
Take a look at this :
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&q1=116584
1&uid=swg21165841&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
May be related to your problem ...
HTH.
Cheers.
Arnaud
**
Panalpina
First, I would check the permissions issue. Can you backup up the System State
with the NT Backup utility ?
If the box is a domain controller, I think you have to have additional rights
to backup the System State. Normally Backup Operators + System Operators domain
group membership is enough (f
I have the same problem here. TSM 5.3.2 on AIX 5.3 64bits. Two drives
9840 that were working properly stop functioning suddenly with
messages
ANR8302E I/O error on drive MYDRIVE (/dev/mt0) with volume XX (OP=WRITE,
Error Number=5, CC=205, KEY=FF, ASC=FF, ASCQ=FF,
SENSE=**NONE**,
Description=SC
38 matches
Mail list logo
