NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice
which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf
Hi all
Battling to define library path, Adic Scalar i2000.
We have the following configuration in our environment
TSM server 5.3.2 with TSM
It would be better idea thart you move data on other
volumes in same storage
pool for the volumes which shows 99% reclaimable
manually to ensure all the
reclaimable volumes are now empty and get converted
into scracth.
After that redifine the thresholds for the storage
pool. Sometimes in
specif
Hi,
Is there anyone out there who has a working journal db back-up.
Setup: ITSM 5.3.2.0 server + ITSM 5.3.2.0 client (upgraded from 5.3.0.15
because of instable journal backups) on Windows 2003 cluster server.
Cluster has 4 virtual servers on 2 cluster controlers (active /active or
dual active/p
If you are having trouble finishing reclaims, you can step down to force
it to do the easy ones first. First reclaim at the 99% level, then 95,
90, etc. for as much time as you have available.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/21/05 2:25 PM >>>
I have noticed this. I did not know if it started with the 70
In 5.2 and below,
Offsite Reclamation is handled differently than onsite.
Onsite reclamation starts with the most-reclaimable tape (99.9) and does
them one at a time.
Reclamation for tapes marked OFFSITE (usually your copypool) is
different.
Since TSM must mount the ONSITE/primary pool tapes to d
On Nov 21, 2005, at 2:32 PM, pj wrote:
ANRD tb.c(880): ThreadId<0> Column count mismatch for table
MMS.Libraries -
expected 26, found 28
We don't have the needed context of the db restoral, but the above
message suggests to me that the db backup was performed on a rather
different instance
Hey all,
I'm trying to recover a TSM Database. I can restore it fine without any
problems, when I go to start the server up after recovery, the server stops
and the only thing i've been able to pick out of it is that it wants me to
run dsmserv ugpradedb. I do that, and the server starts, but not a
I have noticed this. I did not know if it started with the 70% as you said
but I know that it does not start with the 99.9%. We have been having
trouble getting reclaim to finish. Since it starts with the 70% and does
not finish, over time we have a lot of tapes offsite which are 99%
reclaimable
Aaah Ok, makes sense now.
Thank you for your response.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:00 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Reclamation
Andrew -
The prevailing info we have
Andrew -
The prevailing info we have about Reclamation, as embodied in the TSM
Wiki and ADSM QuickFacts, is that volumes are chosen by the oldest
"Date Last Written", not Pct Util or Pct. Reclaimable Space. (This
is, of course, subject to change as the architecture evolves.) TSM
wants to genera
I was wondering if anyone else has noticed this same issue and if there
is anything that I can do for it.
I am running on version 5.3.1.6 on AIX 5.1. Storage pools in question
are LTO gen 1
Scenario:
Copypoola has 50 volumes that are over 70% reclaimable with the
percentages ranging from 70% to 99
All,
I would appreciate hearing/reading other experiences with NDMP TOC
builds and using your TOCs through the TSM Java GUI interface, or
just querying the contents of your TOC.
We're running a dedicated NDMP TSM server 5.3.1.3, pSeries 615, dual
processor, 4GB memory, AIX 5.2, 65GB DB, RAID-5.
Your right, I am on a Windows 2K3 server and I recently migrated from
version 5.2.1.3 to 5.3.2.0. I'll try out those suggestions.
Mel Dennis
Systems Engineer - IT743
Siemens Power Generation
4400 Alafaya Trail
Orlando, FL 32826
MC Q1-110
Tel: (407) 736-2360
Win: 439-2360
Fax: (407) 736-5069
Em
When posting PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR SERVER platform & version.
If you have recently upgraded to TSM 5.3.x, it may be IC47584.
I have a PMR open and am hoping to get a test fix shortly.
While annoying, it appears to be harmless.
Try cleaning up that volume by doing a MOVE DATA instead of a
reclamati
Do you mean that you UPGRADED your TSM server from 4.2.2.8 to 5.3.2.0,
or that you pointed the client to a DIFFERENT server?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Rupp
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:59 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.ED
I can confirm that it is fixed in TSM for Windows 5.2.3.0 server.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:51 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Drive-Serial-Number
On Nov 18, 2005, at 2
Short answer: No worries.
Is it possible to use a mixed (model 3 and model 9) environment for the
TSM DB ? (and reclog and storage pools)
>> Yes, that's fine. TSM will put your DB anywhere you create the data
sets/volumes for it to use.
Do I have to create a new devclass e.g. DISKmod9 ? Or c
Go here:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp
On the left side, look for "Storage Manager for HSM for Windows".
The admin guide is available in .pdf format.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herrmann,
Bo
Prather, Wanda wrote:
> Ooh, that's really sneaky! I like it!
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> John Monahan
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:36 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Adding a short delay in a ser
Ooh, that's really sneaky! I like it!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Monahan
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:36 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Adding a short delay in a server command script
Another option is
There is not an easy way to do that.
A management class is NOT in use, if there is no file bound to it.
The only place to get that information is to run a SELECT on the entire
BACKUPS table, and that can take a very long time.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAI
If you want them all to run serially, omit all the 'Parallel' and 'serial'
statements, and ensure the commands have a 'wait=yes'.
We have this script called by our fullbackup script, which itself runs as
part of an admin schedule which backs up the storage pools, prepares the DR
plan and backsup t
Thanks again Robert & Adam,
Adam,
What if I don't want any of these commands to run parallel
can I just set them up to run serially. Also, How would I
schedule these commands to run the script?...I assume
I can use the admin schedule commands to do this?
"Crosskey, Adam - Resources, ICT Servi
Hello,
We are having performance issues now that we have
upgraded to AIX 5.3.
Are there any TSM performance Guides for TSM 5.3 that cover
AIX 5.3? I did find a IBM top 10 guide for improving TSM
performance but it doesn't say anything about Aix 5.3
TSM 5.3.1.4
Aix 5.3
Thanks for any help, advic
==> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:10:57 +, Farren Minns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> As such, my plan of action is going to be as follows. I know the points are
> basic, but for now I want to make sure the general plan is acceptable
> before working out the details.
> Install the new server, OS (Sol
I have been recieving Space Reclamation Failures on my TSM server lately
and I am not sure why. When I go back to the time of the events, I get
the following ANRD log report: (sorry for the length of the report,
but I figured it would be best to include it all)
11/20/2005 15:59:12 ANR8
==> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:47:20 +0100, Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> We currently have out TSM server version 4.2.4 running on a PowerPC with AIX
> 4.3.3. We now want to migrate to new hardware using version 5.3 on a
> (Debian) Linux server.
> Are there any recommendation which m
Hi all
I have a new server coming in the next couple of weeks and will at last be
able to get us moved off TSM 5.1.6.2 and on to 5.2.?.?.
As such, my plan of action is going to be as follows. I know the points are
basic, but for now I want to make sure the general plan is acceptable
before workin
We currently have out TSM server version 4.2.4 running on a PowerPC
with AIX 4.3.3. We now want to migrate to new hardware using version
5.3 on a (Debian) Linux server.
Are there any recommendation which migration path to use?
- Is it possible to import a full backup of the TSM database from
ve
We are using the following:
/*-*/
/* SCRIPT : STGBACKUP */
/*-*/
/* Back up required storage pools */
/*-*/
SERIAL
backup stg METAPOOLLTOMETAC wait=yes maxproc=
30 matches
Mail list logo
