Antwort: Re: Trouble when TSM-database reaches 100Gb?

hello Robin, you wrote, that you can not delete any file yet, so you suppress expiration. but, when a file reaches the threshholds for versions exists or the other three parameters in copygroups for backups (archives similar), it is lost for restores immediately. Expiration is not the key in thi

Re: system object backup fails

Hi Andy, Sorry for the late reply. I guess u are right. Thanks and Warmest Regards, ___ DKSH Market Intelligence Liew Callie www.dksh.com Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Man

Re: Trouble when TSM-database reaches 100Gb?

Hans, I don't believe that 100GB is a "magic" limit. Just doesn't make sense. The TSM server is a very complex thing; there are many factors affecting performance, as others have stated. For the record, we run a 370GB TSM on an HP rp7410 with (8) 875MHz processors and 12GB RAM. This is a Unix (

Re: Query Output Format in Version 5.3

You can tailor a SELECT statement to get the output format you want. Here is the basic syntax you can work with: select stgpool_name, \ devclass, \ est_capacity_mb, \ pct_utilized, \ pct_migr, \ highmig, \ lowmig, \ nextstgpo

Re: ANR0496E

Hmm... I don't know much about this subject, but it could be a configuration issue. Is the copygroup's RETINIT setting set to CREATION or EVENT? Make sure you are using EVENT retention. Also, check that the Content Manager's TSM device driver is configured with parameter MODE=RETENTION. Regards,

ANR0496E

Hi all in august i had a question here about Content manager and TSM Data Retention. Unfortunately I got no answer In that problem I got the message ANR0496E ... verb (BackInsNormEnhanced) is not allowed when archive retention is active.. Does anyone know the exact meaning of that message? I

Mario Strehlow istaußer Haus.

Ich werde ab 05.09.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 26.09.2005. Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.

Re: Query Output Format in Version 5.3

Indeed the output from the q stgpool seems to be changed and it also re-introduced an old bug again: IC37161. Issuing a q stgpool f=gui causes the following error: ANRD ThreadId<15> issued message 486 from: <-0x00010001c470 outMsgf <-0x000100482de8 smEndMessage <-0x0001004858bc sm

Re: Query Output Format in Version 5.3

Possibly the Help command may reflect the newer output format. In any case, it's worth sending feedback through the formal channels regarding lack of doc in the manual. Richard Sims

Re: Temporary disabling a client scheduled job

Hi, Thanks I'll give that a go. Pete -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Dourado Sent: 05 September 2005 10:48 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Temporary disabling a client scheduled job 3) Use EXPIRATION field , enter

Oracle TDP - Help with removing files from a filespace created by rman nocatalog

Hi, I have backups using TDP for Oracle of my rman catalog database. These are done in nocatalog mode, so the records of the backup are kept in the database control file. My problem is that I now have files in a filespace that are no longer referenced by rman and I do not know how to delete them

Re: Query Output Format in Version 5.3

As far as I know, this output format was since 5.2.2 version, by my archive logs (maybe since 5.2.1, but I am not sure that). No other stgpool output format is possible, as I know. But I didnt found any note nor in PDF doc neither in readme's about it. Tom -Original Message- From: ADSM: D

Restore Exchange Public Folders

Hi all, I need advice in restore public folders from one Ex2003 server to another (into Recovery Storage Group). I had read in some older thread, that it is possible for Exchange 2003 server with TDP Exchange 5.2.1+. I had tried it, but with no success. Env.: TSM server - Win 2003, TSMS v5.2.0.0

Re: Temporary disabling a client scheduled job

3) Use EXPIRATION field , enter a date. Bill Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 02/09/2005 16:24 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Temporary disabling

Another question about server to server

Hi to All I ceated a server to server backup db from Server1 source (Windows) to Server2 target (Unix) working like a dream ... Here some outputs: Server1:q drmedia * source=dbs Volume NameState Last Update

Query Output Format in Version 5.3

Hi QUERY STGPOOL has a different output format in Version 5.3 (z/OS): Storage DeviceEstimated Pct Pct High Low Next Pool Name Class Name CapacityUtilMigrMig Mig Storage Pct Pct Po

Re: [api] Admin API commands

Hello, Steven Harris wrote: >Maurice, > >As I understand it the new web admin tools in 5.3 employ a new administrative >api. Now, if > > Yes, it is currently Java based and used in conjunction with ISC. It is only usable with a 5.3.x server as it uses a new version of verb 0xF1 (VB_AdmCmdResp).