From: Ochs, Duane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I have 3 TSM servers each with a SCSI attached L700 jukebox with 8 -
DLT7000 drives and 300 + full tapes. I intend on upgrading to SDLT320 by the
end of next month.
Now for the problem.
How do I get the data off the existing tapes and onto the new tap
Hi Roger,
>>> We have found that when there is a large change of data (over 2
gig's) on a Novell Server, the scheduled job looks at the files,
compares to the
include/exclude list and then starts the incremental backup. By the time
it reaches certain files, they might have been deleted. (ie. user
Does anyone know of an option that can be put into the dsm.opt for TSM
5.1.5 on a Novell 5.1 sp5 machine that does not continually try to backup a
file that a user deleted after the original backup list was created during
a scheduled incremental job?
We have found that when there is a large change
Hi,
>>> I need to backup a Netware 6.0 SP3 server with eDirectory (NDS +
LDAP).
Do I need to code anything special in the DSM.OPT / INCLUDE or is this
an
automatic thing ? If it is automatic, how can I tell ? Is it part of
the
"server specific" stuff ? <<<
you have two requirements to backup eD
The answer on the automatic part is "it depends". The newest version of the TSM
client for NetWare (5.2.2.0) will automatically backup NDS on a server that holds a
master replica. For other servers and previous versions of the TSM client, you need
to add NDS: to the domain line in your dsm.opt
I need to backup a Netware 6.0 SP3 server with eDirectory (NDS + LDAP).
Do I need to code anything special in the DSM.OPT / INCLUDE or is this an
automatic thing ? If it is automatic, how can I tell ? Is it part of the
"server specific" stuff ?
Also plan to do a test recovery of this server to
I have been struggling with this issue recently myself, Richard
was kind enough to answer my stupid questions several weeks ago too
*8<). I originally looked at the accounting file, but it did not
contain all of the info that my management and customers wanted so I
wrote my own script that
Hello. I have installed TMS Client 5.2.2 on a new Win2003 server to backup
non C: disk data. All is fine except when I try to use the CAD daemon
(service), page 14 in the Tivoli 5.2 Users Guide for Windows "Configuring
the Web Client". This is to access Tivoli on the W2003 server via http 1581
to d
I have 3 TSM servers each with a SCSI attached L700 jukebox with 8 -
DLT7000 drives and 300 + full tapes. I intend on upgrading to SDLT320 by the
end of next month.
Now for the problem.
How do I get the data off the existing tapes and onto the new tapes ?
Is there a way to define two drive types
ted
disregard previous note
i thought that fixed it, i set maxnummp=2
still same problem
toim
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Byrne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: setting max capacity for storage pools
> Take
Ted
Works!!!
thanks
tim
- Original Message -
From: "Ted Byrne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: setting max capacity for storage pools
> Take a look at maxnummp for the node backing up the data. If it's set to
> 0, you
Take a look at maxnummp for the node backing up the data. If it's set to
0, your data will not go to tape.
Ted
At 10:49 AM 1/14/2004 -0500, you wrote:
i have a disk storage pool which i previously never coded a maximum size
threshold for
i changed the disk storage pool to a max of 100mb, the serv
Hmmm, interesting that the expire inventory grinds to a halt
during incremental backups. My setup is AIX similar to yours (host, DB
size) although my disks are on locally attached SSA drives. I recently
upgraded my 8 TSM servers from TSM 5.1.1.0 to 5.2.1.3 (mainly to get the
NDMP file-level
Andy,
Have you thought about using the TSM Journal Service? If you're building a
ton of directories/files but not backing up much the journal will cut down
on the processing and keep your sessions down to a minimum.
Just a thought...
Brian Scott
EDS - EOGDE
GM Distributed Management Systems Engi
i have a disk storage pool which i previously never coded a maximum size threshold for
i changed the disk storage pool to a max of 100mb, the server started backig up. it
was running ok till it tried a 300mb file, i thought the 300mb file would then go to
the
next storage pool directly which is a
I'll supply as much information as anyone wants if they have any clues
about what could be going on. I will take a look at the current
performance book, but I have looked at it in the past.
Andy Carlson|\ _,,,---,,_
Senior Technical Specialist
Thanks for the quick response.
Expiration is not finishing. Before the main backups start, it maybe
expires 20 objects, but during the backup window it slows to a
crawl. It picks up some during the day when the backups and migrations
are running, but since we now have some 100 sessions not f
>We are having terrible performance with one of our instances of TSM. ...
Andy - We'd like to help, but would need a lot more information about the
context of the issue, and in particular what you've already
investigated.
I'd refer you first to the TSM Performance Tuning Guide at
http://p
Andy - what kind of clients do you have? I've had problems with Windows clients all
trying to do systemobject backups simultaneously and had to reorganize my nightly work
to split out the systemobject backups from the regular files and then to serialize
them because of contention problems with
Ted
By the way I almost always search for subject dealing with the same question
, but sometimes the answers are very old and quite not absolutely cleared.
So sorry if I ask again .
Regards Robert
-Original Message-
From: Ted Byrne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, J
Yiannakis
RC=418 means there was a TSM API error. The DSIERROR.LOG file
should have something that explains what the TSM API thought
was the problem. Please look there. Also, look in the TSM
Server activity log file to look for a message that might
tell you what went wrong.
RC=402 is the general
Robert,
As Richard suggested, the many postings to ADSM-L regarding the summary
table's contents (or lack thereof) are very informative.
Among other things, the location of the Accounting records is
detailed. Repeatedly. (The format is recorded in the Admin Guide.)
Before posting a question to AD
Hi,
also please note there is a bug about accounting records, up to version 5.1:
as soon as your reach session number 64k, accounting will be erroneous, TSM
server has to be restarted,
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
>OK Richard, then why did the propeller heads at IBM decide to use the
>summary table for collecting stats for the Operational Reporter?
>
>I'm now sitting with ten nodes that don't get reported on, and the number is
>growing.
>
>Leigh.
Check for there being only one blade on the propeller. :-)
>Richard
>
>Thanks for the advice . Do you know where I can found the
>format/structure of the accounting records (dsmaccnt.log)
Sure, Robert: in the Admin Guide manual.
See also "ACCOUNTING RECORD FORMAT" toward the bottom of
http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts for further insight on
fi
OK Richard, then why did the propeller heads at IBM decide to use the
summary table for collecting stats for the Operational Reporter?
I'm now sitting with ten nodes that don't get reported on, and the number is
growing.
Leigh.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[
>I'm running 5 backups using TDP for SQL on Win2000 SP3 servers. One of them
>fails with errors that don't give me any clues as to what goes wrong.
>I've got TSM Server at 5.1.5 on Windows and TDP for SQL 5.1.5.
>The error message ANS1017E is unknown to my TSM. ACO5436E suggests to look
>for the ne
Richard
Thanks for the advice . Do you know where I can found the
format/structure of the accounting records (dsmaccnt.log)
Regards Robert
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I
Robert - As you go through your professional life administering TSM, keep one
thing in mind: the Summary table is unreliable. It has historically
been unreliable. As testament, see the many postings from customers who have
wasted their time trying to get reliable data from it.
As we kee
Hello to everyone
Run every day a script to collect the amount and time for clients backup as:
SELECT ENTITY AS NODE, -
CAST(SUM(BYTES/1024/1024) -
AS DECIMAL(8,2)) AS "MB", -
substr(cast(min(start_time) as char(26)),1,19) as "DATETIME
", -
cast(substr(cast(max(end_time)-min
Hello to everyone
Run every day a script to collect the amount and time for clients backup as:
SELECT ENTITY AS NODE, -
CAST(SUM(BYTES/1024/1024) -
AS DECIMAL(8,2)) AS "MB", -
substr(cast(min(start_time) as char(26)),1,19) as "DATETIME
", -
cast(substr(cast(max(end_time)-min
רוברט אוזן would like to recall the message, "Inconsistency between summary
and actlog".
Hi *SM-ers!
I have several Windows clients (a mix of NT, 2K and 2003) which produce
vague errors every now and then.
I see errors like "ANS1301E Server detected system error", "Sending of
object 'C:' failed" and "ANS1931E An error saving one or more eventlogs."
Just one line every time, no further
Maybe this is what you're looking for.
Only one question ? Was the customer also not backupping the tapepool to
copypool ?
Maybe this could be the answer, because no updates ( changes) we're done on
the copypool. Then you cannot restore the tsm environment with the latest db
backup volume . You nee
Hi,
I'm running 5 backups using TDP for SQL on Win2000 SP3 servers. One of them
fails with errors that don't give me any clues as to what goes wrong.
I've got TSM Server at 5.1.5 on Windows and TDP for SQL 5.1.5.
The error message ANS1017E is unknown to my TSM. ACO5436E suggests to look
for the nex
I have posted many times in the past saying you should never do a
database unload/reload to gain performance. But this just might be the
one case where it might make sense - the remaining half of a split
server. But before you do something that drastic, dangerous, and time
consuming, look for the t
36 matches
Mail list logo
