Regards,
Stuart
Stuart Grant
UNIX SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR
IBM Global Services AUSTRALIA
55 Coonara Ave,
WEST PENNANT HILLS, NSW 2125
Office Telephone: +61-2-9354-9034
SameTime/E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheryl Miller
Wells Fargo Bank
You should look at the README (I havent seen it yet), it will detail the
kernel version that is supported for 5.2.2.0. Remember you must use the
supplied binary kernel from the distributor (as a guess RedHat in your
case).
2.4.9.e-27 was supported with 5.2.0 from memory.
...deon
---
Have you look
Folks,
Anybody out there know of how I might manipulate a HP-C7200 library (6
dlt7000) attached to a Sun Solaris box... at SCSI level. I am after a
utility or command similar to tapeutil/mtlib on AIX that might allow me to
inventory carts- in-slots and compare to output of libv within TSM.
Thanks.
Hi,
I have two Sun E250s with dds4 drives. I had tried to use the sun driver with tsm but
tsm did
not like it and was forced to use IBMs driver (the tape would not get mounted).
I have not had the need to do a bare restore but have been able to use the ibm driver
with
ufsdump. I use the dds4 dr
Sun e3500 server running solaris 2.8, tsm server v5.1.6.2.
I have just installed a dds4 drive on this machine.
Using the Solaris st driver, I can successfully use tar, and mt with this drive.
I would like to use it for creating backup sets, but also have the use of it with tar,
ufsdump etc.
Th
Yes, we're up to SP1. And there are no NSS post SP patches to speak of
- beta or otherwise.
Just double checked on Netware's site and still nothing new.
thnx
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/01/2004 12:18:48 pm >>>
Do you have the NSS patches installed ?
There have been some major problems with NSS. C
Do you have the NSS patches installed ?
There have been some major problems with NSS. Currently the "post SP"
patches are still in beta but every comment I have seen is to install
them, asap. Some of the fixed address data corruption issues, especially
from compression.
Curt Watts <[EMAIL PR
Has anyone come across a situation like this before?
Using TSM Server 5.2.1.2 and the latest version of the Netware Client
5.2.2.0.
When the client was originally installed on the Netware 6.5 server
(back in Dec), the backups/restores worked just fine.
Over the weekend, we upgraded several Netwa
Joe - I have seen the same thing and reported it to IBM,
but so far they have just given me a list of things to check.
I encourage you to call it in too, if they see another account having
the same problem, it might prompt them to work harder on it.
Everything on the server and client checks out f
I did need to install the new license fileset (tivoli.tsm.license.* - in
AIX) but I could use my old license files (mgsyslan.lic, etc).
-Bill
-Original Message-
From: Pothula S Paparao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 10:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upg
Hi,
I am configuring Tivoli Storage Agent for Linux v.5.2.1.2 in a Linux
machine, RedHat AS 2.1 kernel 2.4.9-e.27, but when I run the script to load
the tsm device driver I get the following message:
"TSM device driver not available for kernel release 2.4.9-e.27smp"
I upgraded the Storage Agent to
Turns out that I didn't need new keys but I did have to re-register my
existing keys.
-Bill
-Original Message-
From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upgrading to TSM 5.1.x.x
Yes, you'll need new license
This is a test from the list owner. Please ignore.
Martha
Some things to check that can affect the number of files after an IMPORT:
1) Did you specify ALLDATA or ALLACTIVE on your EXPORT NODE command?
ISUUED: Export node PHLHR files=* filed=all tos=AIXTSM-MAIN
2) Are ALL management classes/copy groups EXACTLY the same on the source
and
target ser
OH, yep, after seeing Wanda's note... it will depend on which TDP agent you
are using.
I'm so use to mainly dealing with TDP/R3, sorry...
the tdp/oracle and others use backups rather than archives to store the
data.
you may run a "q file " to look for the filespace that stands out
as what m
Problem: The default activity log query from the web browser is not
working. I get:
ANR2020E QUERY ACTLOG: Invalid parameter - DOMAINNAME.
I see we have written an APAR for this issue, dated 01-06-04 refer to
APAR # IC38868
regards
-Darrius
Da
All,
Does anyone know of any issues with any TSM client versions and windows 2003
cluster? O maybe a better way to ask is what version client runs best on a
Windows 2003 cluster?
Thanks,
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (858) 8
you can use the undocumented debug command to look at things
use "show archive" with the node's name and the file space /tdpmux, so say
the node is SAPSRV1, try
show archive sapsrv1 /tdpmux > mytemp.out
from a dsmadmc session
Dwight
Rob Hefty
You can check on the server end:
select * from backups where node_name='TDPNODE' and
filespace_name='TDPFSNAME'
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TDP Retention Verification
Is there any
Is there any way to verify what Management Class certain objects are being bound to
within TDP? I have the dsm.opt file for TDP set to a certain management class and I
want to verify it is working properly.
TDP Version: 5.2
Server OS: Windows 2003
Exchange Version: 2003
Thanks,
Rob
Rainer,
Here is the export command that we ran for this NT server
EXPORT NODE PHLHR FILES=* FILED=ALL TOS=AIXTSM-MAIN.
It is my understanding that this should move all of this nodes data.
When we move a W2K node I add the UNIFILES=* parameter.
I did notice that my 4.2 server might be havi
Brian,
what exactly was the export command you entered?
Could it be that only active files have been exported/imported?
I don't know how inactive files are handled at export/import which have
been deleted from client. Are they exported?
regards, Rainer
Alexander
When I have done server-to-server EXPORT/IMPORT to servers with incompatible
media types, there were some differences in the logical/physical space
occupied on the target server. I assume that was due to differences in how
blocks are formatted with the different media, because testing restores
wor
You're right, I hadn't noticed that. The number of files
should have been the same.
Regards,
Alexander
Alexander Verkooijen
Senior Systems Programmer
High Performance Computing
SARA Computing & Networking Services
> -Original Me
That was my original assumption but if you look at the 'q occ' results
there is a discrepancy in the number of files as well. That is my main
concern.
Thanks,
Brian
"Alexander
Verkooijen" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure but since the physical space occupied decreases
could it be that the export/import process reconstruct the
aggregates and thus removes any 'holes' you may have had
in your aggregates on the OS/390 server?
Regards,
Alexander
---
Hi Brian,
I have experienced the same discrepancies as you did at migration from
5.1.6.1 to 5.2.1.3 on AIX 5.2 ML02.
I don't know where these differences are comming from. I have wrote a
simple sql query to count the number of backup and archive files in both
ITSM servers (5.1.6.1 and 5.2.1.3). T
"Wrong write state" is a message that is left over from the Oracle Agent
days...it should now read "Wrong state". This message indicates that
Oracle made a call to Data Protection for Oracle that is out of sequence
from their stated protocol. Because there is nothing in the error log
preceding this
Good morning everyone,
We are in the process of migrating from TSM 4.2.1.9 running on OS/390 2.10
to TSM 5.2 on AIX 5.1. Due to incompatible media we are using the server to
server export import process to move node data, however I am seeing
discrepancies in the amounts of data to move. Here is a
...
>o - ANRD ssrecons.c(2412) and (2398)
...
David - The numbers in parentheses don't much matter, as they are just the
source code line numbers involved with the message for that VRML
instance of the software (noted in ADSM QuickFacts).
What you need, for a better (but perha
>Well that looks like it could well be the exp0lnation, but still doesn't
>make any real sense. Surely If I create a new man class and specify exactly
>what I want to bind it to, that should be it.
Farren - You want it to be as simple at specifying the Mgmtclass on the
Include, but there
The reason that TSM works this way is to help ensure that when restoring
deleted files, at least the most recent directory for those files will
still be available.
For example, suppose you had a directory structure like this:
c:\mydir\file1
c:\mydir\file2
Suppose you have two management classes,
did you check your dsm.sys file to see if landfress is YES
Roland Priest
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
office 856-489-4255
office 1800-767-5822 ext.4255
Cell 856-296-6086
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/08/04 11:01AM >>>
Am I right in finding that backup data transferred via a lan-free backup
does not show u
Hi there
Well that looks like it could well be the exp0lnation, but still doesn't
make any real sense. Surely If I create a new man class and specify exactly
what I want to bind it to, that should be it.
Anyway, thanks to all for the answers.
All the best
Farren :)
|+---
Your objects should be blank (not comma) delimited, just as you would do
if you issued the archive from the backup-archive command line interface.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello everyone! I was just wondering if anyone would happen to know what I
am doing wrong with the archive of /p01 & /p02? Is my syntax incorrect? I
know that the error message says that the directory path wasn't found.
Does that mean that TSM couldn't find the path or could it mean that the
syn
> ... all clients see a lot of files being rebound.
See http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0110/1061.html for the likely
explanation. Less likely (but not inconceivable) is that you inadvertently
assigned the new management class as the default management class.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM
All,
Hmn, funny one this.
o - Win2K AS, Compaq/HP DL380 G2, 5.1.6.2 TSM Server, DLT
drives.
Getting ANRD errors in actlog every 3 to 30 minutes - i.e. *loads*
of them:
o - ANRD ssrecons.c(2412) and (2398)
Had a quick look on the list archive, RBS's substantial-facts a
Do you have a directory statement. I don't remember the exact wordage but
DSMC or something like that in the .sys file. If not then what you are
probably seeing is directories being rebound to the new class. If there is
not a DSMC command then directories bind to the class with the largest
reten
Tony, thanks for your advice. I think tsm does not use c:\adsm.sys\...\* any
more to store the system objects, at least since version 5. Exception for
locked files.
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central S
Hi,
I think it is because default directories are bound to the management class
having the longest retention period.
Regards,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Farren Minns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 12 januari 2004 11:49
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Policy Dom
(I'm sending this again because it keeps getting returned telling me I have
already sent the same message. But I wrote this this morning for the very
first time, so that can't be. Thanks. Farren)
Hi All
Running TSM 5.1.6.2 on Solaris 2.7
I have been trying to add a new management class to just o
Hi All
Running TSM 5.1.6.2 on Solaris 2.7
I have been trying to add a new management class to just one dir and all
sub-dir's on one of our Solaris clients. I have been doing this with the
following steps :-
1) Create a new management class called RETDEL750 under the STANDARD policy
domain. The S
Hi Marcel,
it worked .
Thanks.
ABP / USZO CIS / BS / TB / Storage Management
Telefoon : +31(0)45 579 7773
Fax : +31(0)45 579 3990
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centrale Mailbox : Centrale Mailbox - BS Storage (eumbx05)
Tech Support: "Have you made backups of your software and data?"
Customer: "I
U welcome ;o)
Regarding problems; Nothing special - but I must say I haven't tried to make a
disaster recovery... Consider upgrading your NetWare to 5.1 or 6.X - else you wont get
support from Novell or Tivoli if something goes wrong.
Regards
Flemming
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Cynth
46 matches
Mail list logo
