> ... all clients see a lot of files being rebound.
See http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0110/1061.html for the likely
explanation. Less likely (but not inconceivable) is that you inadvertently
assigned the new management class as the default management class.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
Farren Minns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/12/2004 03:19
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Strange Policy Domain Question
Hi All
Running TSM 5.1.6.2 on Solaris 2.7
I have been trying to add a new management class to just one dir and all
sub-dir's on one of our Solaris clients. I have been doing this with the
following steps :-
1) Create a new management class called RETDEL750 under the STANDARD
policy
domain. The STANDARD backup copy group under the new man class looks as
follows :-
Policy Domain Name STANDARD
Policy Set Name STANDARD
Mgmt Class Name RETDEL751
Copy Group Name STANDARD
Versions Data Exists 3
Versions Data Deleted 1
Retain Extra Versions 180
Retain Only Version 750
Ok, so I'm happy that this means keep files deleted from the client backed
up for 750 days.
2) Now, I validate and then activate the STANDARD policy set. This works
fine.
3) Assign the new management class to the required dir with an include
statement. As follows :-
include /app/production/.../* retdel750
Now, the problem I have is that the backup for the following night shows
some strange behaviour for all clients using the STANDARD policy domain in
that all clients see a lot of files being rebound. But I would expect to
only see rebound files for the client and dir with the include statement.
Is this a bug, or am I missing something here (or just being stupid and
doing something wrong)?
Many thanks in advance
Farren Minns - John Wiley & Sons Ltd
*****************************************************************************
This email transmission is confidential and intended for the person or
organisation it is addressed to. If you are not the intended recipient,
you
must not copy, distribute, or disseminate the information, open any
attachment, or take any action in reliance of it. If you have received
this
message in error please notify the sender.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states otherwise.
Although this email has been scanned for viruses you should rely on your
own virus check, as the sender takes no responsibility for any damage
arising out of any bug or virus infection.
*****************************************************************************
