From: Lawrence Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problem:
> Loaded TSM Decision Support V4.2.0 Loaded and configured and populated
> a MSSQL DB with the 1st set of data.
>
> Tried installing Decision Support for Storage Management Analysis V
> 4.2.0 and I get
> message: UNABLE TO FIND REGISTRY EN
>We tried going direct-to-tape with our LTO. That worked OK on Domino and
>Oracle, but it was terrible on file servers.
The underlying problem with file system backup and drives with mediocre start-stop
performance is in the "sputtering" way that Backup will send files as it encounters
them in tr
Lloyd,
We tried going direct-to-tape with our LTO. That worked OK on Domino and
Oracle, but it was terrible on file servers.
What I finally did was put a fairly small (24 GB) disk pool upstream and
set a MaxSize on it (50 MB). That allows small files to collect on disk;
we force migrate to tape
Richard,
I'm glad you mentioned VirtualMountPoint. Is there ANY way to simulate
that in Windows?
What I've found is that the TSM client can back up the local machine via
its shares, and that gives better granularity if you want to use
backupsets,especially on a large file server. But what I wou
Jerry,
Thanks for the info. I tried that after receiving your message but the TSM client spawned the Java console anyway. I even rebooted after turning Java off in the IE settings. Made no difference.
What I have found since my original message is that the Java console is tied to the specific
I am workin on Solaris, client tsm 4.2.1
tsm> q file
Node Name: EQ201PATROL02
Please enter password for node "EQ201PATROL02":
Session established with server ADSM: MVS
Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50
Server date/time: 06/13/03 15:22:46 Last access: 06/13/03 15:19:27
Num Last
For my academic brethren and sistren only. All responses privately. Not
limited to US institutions.
We are in the process of reassessing our ITSM organization and looking to
how to expand our services. How others do things will be of help to our
discussions.
1. How many clients? I have abo
Well, either something is broken or something isn't what you are
expecting...
to verify, from your unix prompt, in the directory
"/home/u/NetCmmnd/proyecto/rexx/" do a "df ./"
it should show /home as the file system...
AIX-> df ./
Filesystem512-blocks Free %UsedIused %Iused Mounted o
I've had v5.1.7.0 in test for a bit and went live with it on two
servers this morning.
I was pleasantly surprised (and pleased) that I could now delete
filespaces
and nodes that had been problematic earlier (see my earlier posting on
auditing a db and Jim Owen's explanation of the problem).
Server
It is a problem with the server - IC34754 - supposedly fixed in 5.1.7.
-Original Message-
From: Mitch Sako [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 13, 2003 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dsmadmc query response defect
On a Linux server running 5.1.5.6 with a Linux admin client runnin
yes, I checked with a query -incremental the last backup date and TSM add
one new backup. If I do not mofified anything file, why TSM backed up again?
Janeth
-Mensaje original-
De: Dwight Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Viernes, 13 de Junio de 2003 01:08 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTE
but, anything was updated. It is a test environment. If I do one incremental
backup by date, the query show me one new active backup for all files.
janeth
-Mensaje original-
De: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Viernes, 13 de Junio de 2003 12:14 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PR
On a Linux server running 5.1.5.6 with a Linux admin client running 5.1.x
client I get the following response to 'q proc'
tsm: SERVER1>q proc
Process Process Description Status
Number
-
186 Migration
The manual states that:
If a file system is specified, all new and changed files are backed up.
In addition, the last incremental date for the file space is updated on the
server.
If a file or directory is specified, the last incremental date is not
updated.
This means the file or directory might b
Good afternoon,
Well we have finally made the jump. We will be moving our TSM server off
of OS/390 to AIX in the near future. My question has to do with network
connectivity and redundancy.
In our new TSM environment we will be using 2 GIG connections into our
network to a single TSM image and
TSM Win2K Server 4.2.1.4, Win2K client TSM client vers 5.1.1
We just updated some of our servers with the latest code fixes from M$
On two servers that run M$SQL the client can backup the data, but it
fails daily.
When trying to do a manual backup using the client GUI, the data will
backup, but t
>Total number of objects inspected: 61
>Total number of objects backed up: 34
>
This indicates that tsm looked at 61 files and determined that 34 of
them had been updated and thus needed backing up.
David
I did an full backup and then did a incremental by date backup
I -incrbydate /home/u/NetCmmnd/proyecto/rexx/*.rex
Node Name: EQ201PATROL02
Session established with server ADSM: MVS
Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.50
Server date/time: 06/12/03 19:54:43 Last access: 06/12/03 19:42:05
Thanks Tim
I will do it. I think readonly is not necessary, this is full volume so no
data can be written to it.
Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Rushforth, Tim
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 5:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
>I have sort of the same problem. But my drives are connected through a SAN.
>So small flies in LANFree Backups are an issue. Is there a way to avoid this
>interrupted stream issue? It sounds like a terrible waste to have several
>LTO-1s with fibre attachments and HBAs and what nots to have to alwa
You may want to run "audit volume" to check the inconsistency between TSM DB
record and the tape and fix it. This may happens when your TSM server fail
sometime before while "backup stgp" is running and you restore TSM DB
point-in-time.
Fred Yang
Sr. Unix Admin
NSLIJ
-Original Message-
F
Try running an Audit on the volume - you will have to mark the access to
Read-only first.
-Original Message-
From: Tomáš Hrouda Ing. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 13, 2003 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot delete copypool volume
Hi all,
I have copypool volume which st
Hi all,
I have copypool volume which still some data reported, but never reclaimed.
VOLUMESTGPOOL EST_CAPUTILRECLSTATUS ACCESS
- -- -- -- --
WSS001L1 LTOCOPYP 104485.0 0.099.9 FULLOFFSITE
When enter
Hi All
I have sort of the same problem. But my drives are connected through a SAN.
So small flies in LANFree Backups are an issue. Is there a way to avoid this
interrupted stream issue? It sounds like a terrible waste to have several
LTO-1s with fibre attachments and HBAs and what nots to have to
So all "active" versions of files stored on a TSM server is what you can
classify as ~the current restore set~.
They make up all the data as it existed the last time a ~backup~ was
performed (be it "incr" or "sel")
Now, what might be missing ? files that are found in "exclude"
statements, files t
Also...an Adaptec 2940 is an older SCSI-2 card...10MB/sec, isn't it?
Maybe that's an issue
-Lloyd
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 08:11:51 -0500
Colby Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We in the process of moving to an IBM 3580 external LTO drive for manual
> offsite vaulting of primary storage pool
Are you seeing this behavior for backups/restores, or just tape-tape
operations?
If you are getting this for backups/restore, try using a disk storage
pool, if you are not already doing so. The key to success with LTO1
drives is keeping their buffers full and the drive in streaming mode; if
you a
Incremental refers to a filespace. Active or inactive refers to a file.
An active version of a file is always the most recent backup of a
file.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/03 10:19AM >>>
hi, how I know if the active version is a full or partial incremental
backup?
Janeth
Hey gang. Does anyone have a quick sql statment I can type to view which
tapes contain the active files for a node.
Thank you in advance.
Eddie Jones
770-953-1959 ext.2824
"The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right
sometimes."
- Sir Winston Spencer Churchill
---***---
hi, how I know if the active version is a full or partial incremental
backup?
Janeth
The 3580 is the only drive on the 2940UW. As for cable quality, I have
tried three different cables with the same result. I even disconnected the
Mammoth2 from the onboard IBM Ultra160 controller and used its cable with
the 2940UW, with the same results.
I originally had the 3580 connected to th
Hot Diggety! Colby Morgan was rumored to have written:
> The SCSI adapter is a 2940UW. It does run great with large files, so if we
> had an adapter hardware bottleneck file size shouldn't make a difference.
> We are running the v5.0.2183.1 of the Microsoft drivers. I also opened a
> call with IB
The SCSI adapter is a 2940UW. It does run great with large files, so if we
had an adapter hardware bottleneck file size shouldn't make a difference.
We are running the v5.0.2183.1 of the Microsoft drivers. I also opened a
call with IBM, and they didn't make any recommendations to update the
adapt
Sorry if I left out a few details.
All of our primary pools are defined as FILE device classes either on local
attached SCSI or network storage. The reason we are installing an LTO drive
is that we have had terrible reliability problems with our existing
Exabyte/IBM Mammoth2. The Mammoth2 runs g
>That begs the question of why a collocated session can not have
>multiple backup threads.
Collocation is often diminished in List discussions for lack of
qualification. That is, there are two types of Collocation:
by node, and by filespace. Therein lies additional opportunity,
further enhanced
Hi, I would try Tsmmanager ( www.tsmmanager.com ) or Servergraph (
www.servergraph.com ) instead of TDS !!
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support Center
Information Technology
Not quite sure where is you problem:
You want both collocation and parallel backup threads.
Using a (large enough) disk primary storage pool
as backup cache gives you the ability to backup using many threads.
Migrationg from disk to tape can use multiple tapes as well.
The only things which do
>Anybody has any good evaluation of SANERGY on AIX?
I've heard second-hand that IBM cannot promise a SANergy for AIX 5.2,
which may deter prospective implementations if it does not definitely
have a future. I'd be interested in what others may have heard.
Richard Sims, BU
Anybody has any good evaluation of SANERGY on AIX?
Remco Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:06:56 -0700
inotzki wrote:
> All,
>
> We are to do LAN free to disk and tape now. Has anybody has or knows of
> a working setup of:
>
> 1. SANERGY MDC on AIX 5.1/AIX 4.3.3
My suppier has
Our target is satisfactory restore time. It has been our experience
that if one has adequate set up for restore the backups run just fine.
In our shop, adequate restore time requires collocation. That said, in
my shop one must also take into account workplace politics. If that is
not the case at
>Are there advantages to using 10 X 2GB dbvols as
>opposed to using 1 X 20GB? Thank you..
You'll find years of discussions on this in the List archives...
More disk arms obviously mean better opportunity for performance.
More volumes means a server thread dedicated to each, and so another
opportun
>> All you need to do in TSM is use taming conventions
Well you could use taming conventions because TSM can get a bit wild sometimes,
but naming conventions are probably better.
John
**
The information in this E-Mail is c
Hi Luciano!
As you may already noticed, not many people take the time to respond to your
message. They are probably thinking the same thing as I am: why do some
people stick to unsupported base level coding?!?!?
So my advice: first upgrade to a supported level and DO NOT use TSM base
levels (4.1.0.
Nancy,
You are lucky with os390 that tape management is very sophisticated, and is
handled outside of TSM by a combination of tape management system, such as DFRMM
, library management system, in my case STK hsc/library station, and the os390
operating system itself.
I write TSM to two tape librari
Also, is there a diskpool? ie:
client->server[diskpool]->server[tapes]
If there's no diskpool in between the client and the tape drives, will be a
lot of stop/go writes to tape, resulting in about 1 MB/sec vs 10-25 MB/sec.
At least, that's true for LTO-1 drives. I've heard that LTO-2 drives bett
Are there advantages to using 10 X 2GB dbvols as
opposed to using 1 X 20GB? Thank you..
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
46 matches
Mail list logo
