They will say not, but the history on this list at www.adsm.org will say
otherwise.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Diana Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 8:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Micr
I have seen similar things. You have to put on 4.2.2 to correct this
problem. However, a recycle of the dsmserv will fix the problem. The issue
manifests itself in several ways. I have only seen the problem once. I am
still on 4.2.1.15 which partially fixes the problem. The problem is caused
And, if that isn't SAD enough, at 16:58 today, the AIX tar file for 4.2.2.5
got updated! (Who knows what they just changed, if anything!?!)
-Original Message-
From: Don France [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 5:53 PM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROT
>Did you apply the latest patches to 5.1.0.0? (5.1.0.2, I believe.)
Yes, when the v5.1 CD didn't come up, I applied v5.1.1.0 (in
the maintenance section of the ftp site). Same results. It's
acting like some of the database wasn't converted with the
upgrade. I then tried to do ./dsmserv upgradedb,
Thanx for sharing, Dwight!!!
Don France
Technical Architect -- Tivoli Certified Consultant
San Jose, Ca
(408) 257-3037
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professional Association of Contract Employees
(P.A.C.E. -- www.pacepros.com)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAI
Ooops... we just advised a customer to install 4.2.2.5 --- for SumTab fix,
didn't know there is a (yet) new bug for expiration (introduced by
4.2.2.4???)
Are you sure that 4.2.2.6 is needed for EXPIRE INVENTORY to work, again ?!?
(There is nothing about expiration in the .4 or .5 APAR abstracts..
All,
FYI, the TSM 5.1 Technical Guide Redbook is out:
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg246554.h
tml?Open
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com
IBM Certified - AIX 5L, SAN, Shark
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
Tivoli Certified Consultant-
Gretchen,
I had a exact same plan to migrate from 4.2.2 to 5.1 in two weeks. I
guess I need to reschedule it until I gether better information. Would
you please keep us posted on this topic?
Regards,
Jin Bae Chi (Gus)
Data Center
614-287-2496
614-287-5488 Fax
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
I got my 5100-02 patch when someone at 800-IBM-SERV was playing phone tag
between myself and the CE when he was out investigating our PMH on duplicate
IP addresses.
I was told by level 2 this afternoon to avoid expiration on 4.2.2.4 until
4.2.2.6 is available
Real Soon Now.
-Original
Thanks, Max,
I 'q log' and lowered the log full percentage and db backup got
triggered. Problem solved!! Thanks much again.
Regards,
Jin Bae Chi (Gus)
Data Center
614-287-2496
614-287-5488 Fax
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/19/02 11:32PM >>>
Hi,
db backup trigger is ch
Well, just got off the phone with IBM.
they had me doing all sorts of queries looking for DR plans to delte
but absolutely nothing was there
UNTIL I did a "q machine" and another guys desk top AIX box was listed...
I did a "delete machine blah" and now I'm no longer using DRM !
Just thoug
If you have run and are comfortable with new PTF then I would
definitely upgrade other server to prevent problem before it happens.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/02 03:52PM >>>
We have two large TSM servers... One of them, running 4.1.1.0 recently had
some problems with expiring old da
I would wait if I had it to do over again and get the DB cleared up prior to
upgrade.
I do have it on fairly good authority that 4.2.2.6 will be out Real Soon
Now.
The corruption we have is something to do with the backups table (or at
least whatever keeps track of the backups) we can see some no
The best result I heared so far was a customer who switched his RS/6000 in
the NSM with a windows 2000 server, and also used the SSA disks took same
time and less pain..
Peter
At 15:24 20-06-2002 -0400, you wrote:
>As I understand, support for TSM 4.1 expires June 30, 2002. So if you want
>
Thanks a lot Paul.
It looks like even my LAN backup is not so successful now.
Jason Guo
"Seay, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It seems to me I have seen this before.
It had something to do with the
COMMMETHOD and the LANFREECOMMETHODs conflicting, but I cannot remember how
it was fixed. I w
Thank you, Andrew.
--- Andrew Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the DB and LOG, I would create the files on the
> local drives, then
> mirror the DB and LOG to them, then delete the copy
> on the SAN once the
> mirroring completes. For the disk pools, you can
> define the new disk
> pools
Did you apply the latest patches to 5.1.0.0? (5.1.0.2, I believe.)
-Original Message-
From: Gretchen L. Thiele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: upgrade from v4.2.2.5 to v5.1.0.0 failed (AIX)
I now in the process of recoverin
We are running on 2 NSM's version 4.2.2.4 with a database of 38 gig,.We
have not seen any problems so far. The eca needs to be applied on a later time.
Peter
At 15:20 20-06-2002 -0400, you wrote:
>We are currently testing version 4.2.2.2. Of course this is done on a very
>small basis so it
We have two large TSM servers... One of them, running 4.1.1.0 recently had
some problems with expiring old data. After a bunch of give and take with
TSM support, Tivoli/IBM told us to upgrade the server to 4.1.6.0. We did
that and it fixed the issue.
Now, we the 2nd TSM server is at Version 4,
I now in the process of recovering to v4.2.2.5 from an attempted
upgrade to v5.1.0.0 (from the CD). All went well from an installation
point of view, but when I started the server I got:
ANRD iminit.c(820): ThreadId<0> Error 8 converting Group.Members to
Backup.Groups.
Called it in as a sev
We are currently testing version 4.2.2.2. Of course this is done on a very small basis
so its hard to bump in to these problems. My production db is 18gb. Should I wait
until this is solved before leaving version 4.1.3 which has been very good to me the
past year and a half?
When you talk abour
> ok Thanks. now where do I go once I click on the link?
Paul,
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/tivoli-data-protection/ntsql/v221/
Site : ftp.software.ibm.com
Directory :
/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/tivoli-data-protection/nts
Look for msgno=8469 and see if the dismounts have been failing. I get this
kind of behavior occasionally and have found that the dismount fails
(hardware problem) and TSM transiently reports volumes unavailable.
Henk ten Have
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] T
As I understand, support for TSM 4.1 expires June 30, 2002. So if you want
to be supported, you have no choice but to upgrade to TSM 4.2.
We too have been trying to implement EC017 on our NSM, and have had two
failed attempts at the upgrade. The upgrade to AIX 5 and TSM 4.2.1.9
requires an AIX lo
> Backup of storage group Directory failed.
> Unable to perform an incremental backup because a required Microsoft
> Exchange database log file could not be found.
>
> Four days ago, the last full backup ran ok and the two incrementals
> afterwards (three days ago and the day before yesterday) ran
The corruption was in the DB before the upgrade.
There is a bad lock contention problem when running expiration with
4.2.2.0-4.
(4.2.2.4 did mitigate the problem some but didn't solve it)
We had symptoms prior to the upgrade, since the upgrade to 4.2.2 we have
been crashing on a regular basis.
I
Dwight, if you find out, would you please pass on the info?
We don't need DRM anymore, but I can't figure out how to get rid of it,
either.
-Original Message-
From: Cook, Dwight E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to fl
Hello,
I was just wondering if anyone happens to know if TSM has to be in
rollforward mode for the recovery log's spacetrigger to work? There is no
reference in any of the books about this, but I have put a spacetrigger on
for the recovery log and it didn't extend when it hit the 80% mark that I
ok Thanks. now where do I go once I click on the link?
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Del Hoobler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sql tdp 2.2 pit error
>
> > We just installed a new node with SQL TDP 2.2
I've already opened a problem with Tivoli but anyone know how to flush all
references to DRM ?
At one point in time in an attempt to issue a "q pr" the "q" was left off
and the "pr" initiated a prepare.
Now my server shows I'm using DRM !
In the past I just stuck on the license so it would repo
> We just installed a new node with SQL TDP 2.2 and when we go and do
> a PIT this is the error we receive.
> any thoughts?
>
> ACO5801E A log must be selected to use point in time.
Paul,
Make sure you are running version 2.2.1.
(It is available on the ftp.software.ibm.com.)
You need to select a
Are you seeing any I/O errors on these tapes or errors on
the drives? What type of process was mounting the tapes -
backup stg, reclamation etc.?
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/20/02 11:17AM >>>
I couldn't find an APAR that describes what we have been seeing
on our 4.2.1.11 (AIX 4.3.3) se
What is, and how is the page_shadow_token calculated/created in the
dsmserv.dsk file?
For the DB and LOG, I would create the files on the local drives, then
mirror the DB and LOG to them, then delete the copy on the SAN once the
mirroring completes. For the disk pools, you can define the new disk
pools on the local drives, then make the SAN disk pools read only, and,
if you have s
I have seen the latest and fastest computer causing log pin. Cause? due to
incorrect NIC setting, like 100 Half duplex, and/or incorrect setting at
the switch. Have u tried to backup using 10 MB with half duplex? I did,
it will drive u crazy.
Sung Y. Lee
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
The Exchange server will backup the adressbook and the information store.
The normal backup/restore client backups the the active directory. When
doing a restore, you first restore the files and system objects(AD), and
then restore the information store.
In this way, all the information fr
Dale,
Thanks for the info.
The majority of the work will be completed by the CE under the NSM agreement
but I was told there will need to be some housekeeping tasks that we need to
do anyway. We'll be prepared for that and make sure that everything is
checked and documented.
What sort of probl
I tried naming the column, but that didn't seem to work.
Using the column number as you and Paul suggested worked fine.
Thanks for the help!
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 10:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Selec
You don't have to, but we were *strongly* recommended to go to microcode
level 35A on our 3590 E1As (FC attach), which should - together with Atape
7.0.7.0 - solve some long-running troubles we've had.
Richard Foster
Norsk Hydro asa
I couldn't find an APAR that describes what we have been seeing
on our 4.2.1.11 (AIX 4.3.3) server during the last few weeks
so I was wondering if we have discovered new bug.
First we got this message in the activity log:
06/09/02 10:39:38 ANR1229W Volume 000591 cannot be backed up - volume i
40 matches
Mail list logo
