R?f:Memory leak fix in SCHEDULER for NOVELL Client

2001-03-19 Thread Alain Ricois
Hello I have also notice strange problems with client 4.1.2 . Filenames are displayed incorrectly, and could not be saved with these incorrect names. I works fine with client 4.1.1 Regards Alain Ricois Séparateur de messages Objet : Memory le

Jeroen Cromsigt/D268525/IS/DLVG is niet op zijn/haar kantoor.

2001-03-19 Thread Jeroen Cromsigt
Ik ben niet op kantoor vanaf 20-03-2001 tot 26-03-2001. Ik zal uw bericht doornemen wanneer ik terug ben. Voor ADSM, TSM of ESS zaken, benader mijn collega Luuk Kleibrink tst 020-594 2043.

Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway,and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary

2001-03-19 Thread Volovsek, Jay
I shouldn't have to RTFM when I had a contract with IBM to come out and do the installation for me. I had my configuration laid out and they were expected to perform the given task. Here is another example of a problem that RTFM wouldn't have solved: When installing TSM 4.1.1.0 on NT4.0, the se

A consensus on scheduling methodology

2001-03-19 Thread PETER GRIFFIN
I have never have been very happy with the scheduler in TSM because it is basically a time dependant process were I prefer an event dependant process. I would like to know what is the generally accepted method to schedule both admin and client processes Comment Please. Peter Griffin

Dirk Billerbeck ist im Urlaub

2001-03-19 Thread Dirk Billerbeck
I will be out of the office from 16.03.2001 until 03.04.2001. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht beantworten, sobald ich wieder aus meinem Urlaub zurückgekehrt bin. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Thomas Stüber (Tel. 040/300 53 - 0) oder Herrn Ulrich May (Tel. 040 / 300 53 - 0) Viele

Re: DB restore

2001-03-19 Thread Prather, Wanda
Well, I'll take a stab at this. I know when you do a DB restore, the same disk layout (i.e., number of DBVOLS) is NOT required, been there done that. I believe the requirement is that the RESTORE TO data base (and recovery log) must have AT LEAST as much space available as the original, although

Re: DB restore

2001-03-19 Thread Joe Faracchio
Good question. I'd like to know from someone that has experienced a restore. Somewhere it implies that you have to have the same disk layout because its a record backup and not logical. Is this true? Is it documented? I haven't found it, yet! ... joe.f. Joseph A Faracchio, Systems Program

Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade

2001-03-19 Thread arhoads
At one level of 3.7.x to 3.7.y there was a defect that prevented rmdev -dl from working on (some) TSM devices. "Mark S." wrote: > > Shekhar Dhotre wrote: > >I have experienced this before , upgrade deletes all drive info , and if you > >try to reconfigure it , using smit tivoli ..you can`t you h

Re: Root/Amin Privilege

2001-03-19 Thread Alex Paschal
Sure. You could have a path to request Systems to bounce schedulers/server, i.e. service request tickets or whatever, or they can give Operations appropriate permissions for day-to-day operations. UNIX: Systems could give Operations read/write access to the TSM client directory and put together

Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)

2001-03-19 Thread Andy Raibeck
Actually, this is not entirely true. * and *.* are NOT exactly the same. *.* means any file name with the '.' character anywhere in the name. * means any file name. So if you have this: exclude c:\Mydir\*.* And you have these files in C:\Mydir: abc.txt 123.txt myfile Then

DB restore

2001-03-19 Thread Najcnkj
If I have a 20GB database that is spread accross 10 dbvols but is only 10% utilized can I restore that database onto a server with 5 dbvols totaling 10GB since the 5 dbvols will hold over the 10% of utilization.

Root/Amin Privilege

2001-03-19 Thread Maria Ragan
My management has directed the move of the TSM Administrator function to our Operations department. We have a unix TSM server with a mixture of unix and NT clients. Software installation/planning would still be done on the Systems side of the house, but everything else would be handled in Operat

Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)

2001-03-19 Thread Hervé CHIBOIS
Hello there some hints... re-read your REGEXP definition, you do NOT need to put many lines * and *.* are EXACTLY the same for *SM try to use exclude.dir instead of /.../, *SM won't store directory definitions. rv - Original Message - From: "Gerrit van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <

Re: ADSM-L Digest - 7 Feb 2001 to 8 Feb 2001 (#2001-38)

2001-03-19 Thread Jim Hood
Search LISTSERV where subject contains no and query and restore

Re: Memory leak fix in SCHEDULER for NOVELL Client

2001-03-19 Thread Ross Davies
Cory - that is not good news. We are looking to upgrade to TSM 4.1 in the near future to fix the memory leak problem we are having on our Netware servers. The IBM / Tivoli guys tell us that it is not a problem with TSM but is a problem with the Netware garbagecollect function that is not working

Re: TSM 3.7 assigns new filespace names?

2001-03-19 Thread Davidson, Becky
I don't know if this will help but something that helped us was to refer to /oracle/PR1/sapdata01 as "{/oracle/PR1}sapdata01" Hope that helps. -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 3.7 a

Re: no "delete volume" because of segment references

2001-03-19 Thread Wayne T. Smith
I recently moved my disk random access pools to new disk and met similar messages. "Audit volume xxx fix=yes" corrected the problem in once case, but had to be run twice! In another case, this did not correct the problem and MOVE DATA (to the same storage pool, with the interesting unit set to A

Re: TSM 3.7 assigns new filespace names?

2001-03-19 Thread Prather, Wanda
And in times past when I got utterly frustrated and never could get the filespec working, I have resorted to renaming the filespace on the server end - to something like DOG, that isn't hard to identify or type! -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monda

Re: TSM and RSM

2001-03-19 Thread Mark Stapleton
Douglas Strilecky wrote: > I've looked and can't find any specific info about how tapes get checked in > and out of TSM under Win 2000 &RSM. I find places where it says checkin > and checkout aren't used but no where do I find what to do instead. Any > assistance in this will be greatly apprecia

Re: TSM 3.7 assigns new filespace names?

2001-03-19 Thread Richard Sims
>The trouble is, I can't find any way to access the old files with the same >path name that were stored under "/" filespace. I have tried (as per the >ADSM Concepts manual) using many combinations of curly brackets (e.g. >"{/xx/xx}/yyy") and/or wildcards with no success. I cannot get anything to >

TSM 3.7 assigns new filespace names?

2001-03-19 Thread Rik Foote
Gidday all. I have in the last week upgraded from ADSM 3.1.2.50 to TSM 3.7.4. Everything seems to be going okay, until I try to retrieve some oracle data archived under ADSM 3.1. The data was in a filesystem that had never been incrementally backed up, only archived from, so it seems ADSM was st

Re: deleting data of tape cartridges

2001-03-19 Thread Shawn Drew
remember that the only way to restore/retreive data (i think) that is on any adsm tape is to have the database. So delete the volume ,and if you can't degauss the data tapes, maybe you can degauss the db backups. (just throwning ideas out) i know its not a good one :) shawn ___

TSM and RSM

2001-03-19 Thread Douglas Strilecky
I've looked and can't find any specific info about how tapes get checked in and out of TSM under Win 2000 &RSM. I find places where it says checkin and checkout aren't used but no where do I find what to do instead. Any assistance in this will be greatly appreciated. In fact any info on using T

Re: how to find filename or node name

2001-03-19 Thread Poland, Neil
try "q cont stgpoolvolumename" IE: "q vol /usr/lpp/adsmserv/pools/stgpool.pool" -Original Message- From: Wu, Jie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 9:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how to find filename or node name Hi all, I did a backup stg

Re: no "delete volume" because of segment references

2001-03-19 Thread Richard Sims
>03/19/01 17:24:46 ANRD asvol.c(2847): Volume 0BA40C cannot be deleted to > SCRATCH - it still has SEGMENT references. Arnaud - Have you tried a Move Data on the volume? There is some hope that it would locate the companion volume having the remainder of the file, and move b

Re: no "delete volume" because of segment references

2001-03-19 Thread Ray Baughman
I to have several volumes with this same problem. After talking to TSM support they recommend doing a dsmserv auditdb archstorage fix=yes. However this is now APAR IC28965. The fix is due out in May. You may want to wait, as the auditdb can take days. Ray Baughman Engineering Systems Administ

Re: no "delete volume" because of segment references

2001-03-19 Thread Alan Davenport
Have you tried an audit volume" AUDIT VOLUME xx FIX=YES Perhaps this will clear it up for you. Alan Davenport Selective Insurance [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:01:56 +0100 > Subject: no "delete vol

Re: daemon

2001-03-19 Thread Bernhard Unold
Any error message in the schedule log? Nomally /tmp/adsmsched.log "Sandor W. Sklar" schrieb: > > I usually just do ... > > echo "/usr/bin/dsmc sched > /dev/null 2>&1" | at now > > There should be a soft link in /usr/bin/dsmc to the long, ugly path > version, and you might want to set passworda

no "delete volume" because of segment references

2001-03-19 Thread Arnaud Brion
Hi *SM'ers ! In order to remove a storage pool that is no longer in use, I tried to delete all volumes belonging this storage pool, what worked perfectly except for one volume that was already empty, where I got this message : 03/19/01 17:24:08 ANR2017I Administrator issued command: DELETE

Re: client notification

2001-03-19 Thread Prather, Wanda
John, I posted our email notification script in the Scripts depot at www.coderelief.com. It's under the Client Monitoring and Administration category, topic Monitor Client & Admin Schedules -Original Message- From: Talafous, John G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 20

System Objects for Windows

2001-03-19 Thread Collins, Brenda
Has anyone implemented a solution they would be willing to share that will keep copies of inactive system objects? Brenda Collins, Storage Solutions Group Phone: 651-848-5808 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer: "The views, opinions and judgements expressed in this message are solely those of

Memory leak fix in SCHEDULER for NOVELL Client

2001-03-19 Thread Cory Curtis
We are running client 4.1.2.13 on our Novell servers (thanks to the DST error), but after RTFD I noticed the schedule function is still not working. I saw a fix on the TSM FTP server earlier this month that was supposed to correct this memory leak. Did they recall that fix? We have been using

Re: Windows NT/2000 Daylight Savings Time Problem

2001-03-19 Thread Pearson, Dave
We have TSM 4.1.0 on AIX server and we have several Windows NT/2000 Clients. Does the Windows NT/2000 Daylight Saving problem effect the Windows server or doe it effect the clients even with AIX server. Dave Pearson Product Support Analyst > -Original Message- > From: Mark S. [SMTP:[EM

Re: Size returned by q vol and q occup don't match.

2001-03-19 Thread Wayne T. Smith
Dias, Bill (GTIWHQ) wrote, in part.. > Our current level of ADSM 3.1.2.50.I know, tell the bean > counters. We wanted to know how much storage was being used by different > parts of the system, so I wrote a PERL script to retrieve the information. > For s... and giggles I added some

Tivoli Administrative duties.

2001-03-19 Thread Sixbury, Dan
I am still new to Tivoli and searched the archives for information related to duties required of a Tivoli Administrator. In one of the emails, someone said they were spending 30-40 hrs per week to administer Tivoli. Does anyone have a "task list" of admin/operator duties that need to be maintain

Antwort: Re: Priority

2001-03-19 Thread Gerhard Wolkerstorfer
Richard, in my understanding, only the processes: Backup database, Restore, Retrieve, HSM recall, Export and Import are high priority Operations and only they can preempt lower priority Operations like Migrate, Reclamation, ... But one lower priority Operation (Migrate from Disk to Tape) won't pre

Re: Priority

2001-03-19 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Richard! Thanks for the update! I guess TSM waits for the running reclaim to complete. It does not cancel it. A 3590E reclaim can take a while... I changed the migration thresholds for the diskpool, so migration kicks in at an earlier stage and stops at a lower percentage. I hope this will prev

Re: Now ADSM has Restore problems

2001-03-19 Thread Robert L King
This is a SQL Server restriction. The code page and sort order of the restoring database must be the same as the current database. With SQL Server 7.0, this means the restoring database must match the SQL server's code page and sort order. Either the sort order of the SQL server was changed since

Re: Priority

2001-03-19 Thread John Naylor
Eric, On our site we look after this by scheduling. Best to have a dasd pool large enough to hold a complete overnight backup. Then use TSM command scripts :- 1) copy your dasdpool to a copy pool 2) migrate your dasdpool to tape pool 3) only after successful completion of previous two steps use

how to find filename or node name

2001-03-19 Thread Wu, Jie
Hi all, I did a backup stg *** *** preview=yes and noticed that there is a 25G file in the primary storage pool, I am wondering if there is any way to find out from which node the file is and what is its name. Thanks. Jie

TDP for Exchange - Is this normal?

2001-03-19 Thread Eliza Lau
Hi TSMers, We recently switched from Seagate Backupexec to TDP for Exchange. Backup and restore with Backupexec of our 25G Exchange database took about 3 hours. With TDP for Exchange, backup takes 1 hour and restore takes 3 hours. We are happy with the faster backup but are wondering why restore

Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade

2001-03-19 Thread Stephen A. Cochran
--- "Prather, Wanda" wrote: I've also done 2.x to 3.x, 3.1.x to 3.7.x, and it's the first time I've run into this. But nevertheless, it's true. --- end of quote --- I'm going to be doing a 3.1.x to 3.7.x upgrade soon, any big gotchas that you remember? Steve Cochran Dartmouth College

Re: TSM 3.7 to 4.1 Upgrade

2001-03-19 Thread Prather, Wanda
Is true. We just did a 3.7.2 to 3.7.4 upgrade, AIX 4.3.3. Something has changed in Tivoli's install script, and the device type changes from "tape" to "ADSMtape", so that you have to delete the drives and add them back, but rmdev -dl doesn't work, you have to use odmdelete. I've also done 2.x t

Re: Priority

2001-03-19 Thread Richard Sims
>TSM doesn't give the migrate process a higher priority than the reclaim >process! Eric - The Admin Guide topic Preemption of Client or Server Operations indicates that the Reclamation should have been pre-empted by the Migrate - unless you had NOPREEMPT in effect as a server option. If no

Re: SAP R/3

2001-03-19 Thread Petr Prerost
Hello , HP-UX 10.20 2.4.10.5 single-threaded ADSM API level 3.1.0.3 - translated : on HP-UX 10.20 you can use backint version 2.4.10.5 , this client is single-threaded and you have to use API version 3.1.0.3 . You can reach version info on http://www-5.ibm.com/de/entwicklung/tdp/matrix.html. Reg

SAP R/3

2001-03-19 Thread Tectrade Computers
Hi All Does anyone know if the old backint for ADSM was supported on HP-UX ver 10.2 Thanks Alex

Priority

2001-03-19 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi *SM-ers! I've just finished migrating from a 3575 to a 3494 with two drives and I encounter the first nasty problem. TSM doesn't give the migrate process a higher priority than the reclaim process! Customers were calling me, asking why there backups were stalling. I checked TSM, there were two

SAP R/3 and versions

2001-03-19 Thread Braich, Raminder
One of the TSM clients, having SAP R/3 and Oracle database, backup fails regularly. We have set the Versions to be 28 in the initSID.utl file. I believe that if the backup fails the TSM is not aware of the version and it will not increase the versions. However we do backup the remaining files wher

Re: deleting data of tape cartridges

2001-03-19 Thread Mogamat Gertse
if you are running tsm or adsm you can try the following command DELETE VOL * DISCARD=YES (***) = volname __ Reply Separator _ Subject: deleting data of tape cartridges Author: uwe.schonacher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at

Re: deleting data of tape cartridges

2001-03-19 Thread Nicholas Cassimatis
I thought you could degauss them, but it would ruin the tape, so it could never be used again. Nick Cassimatis [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: deleting data of tape cartridges

2001-03-19 Thread Richard Sims
>Richard, you're right but I thought that the commands (delete filespace, >delete volume) are only clean up the database and not deleting anything on >the physical tape cartridges. > >I'm looking for a method to delete data on tape cartridges physically. Ah - what you're looking to do is erase th

Re: deleting data of tape cartridges

2001-03-19 Thread "Schönacher, Uwe"
Richard, you're right but I thought that the commands (delete filespace, delete volume) are only clean up the database and not deleting anything on the physical tape cartridges. I'm looking for a method to delete data on tape cartridges physically. Thanks, so long -Original Message- Fro

DST fix for Alpha?

2001-03-19 Thread Reinhard Mersch
Hi, we have some huge NT on Alpha clients, which are using TSM 3.7.2., hence I'm in desparate need for the DST fix for them. Where can I find it? -- Reinhard MerschWestfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Zentrum fuer Informationsverarbeitung - ehemals Universitaetsrechenzentr

Re: deleting data of tape cartridges

2001-03-19 Thread Mary Manthata
Add parameter discarddata=yes to delete volume command.. Clarence Beukes IT Specialist (Unix system support) Geomar SSO Mid Range and Application Support Discipline Location: IBM Park Sandton, IA2G Tel: +27 (0) 11 302-6668 Cell: +27 (0) 82 573 5665 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

weird error

2001-03-19 Thread Toni Banire
I am running TSM 4.1.2 The server is on Unix whikst the clients are on NT4 SP6a The scheduled backups complete ok but when I issue: q file from the TSM backup server, the lastbckup date shows 28/2/01. However when I issue: q b on the NT server I get a full listing of all the backups I can't se

Re: deleting data of tape cartridges

2001-03-19 Thread Richard Sims
>does anybody know a method of deleting data on tape cartridges (3590) >without rewriting and destroying them? We need to wipe out round about 200 >tape cartridges an looking for a efficient method to do this. Uwe - There is DELete Volume for such a task. At a higher level, you could do DEL

Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)

2001-03-19 Thread Gerrit van Zyl
Steffan, No, not at all. It is the standard exclude statements: Exclude "*:\macintosh volume\*" Exclude "*:\macintosh volume\*.*" Exclude "*:\macintosh volume\...\*" Exclude "*:\macintosh volume\...\*.*" Exclude "*:\microsoft uam volume\*" Exclude "*:\microsoft uam volume\*.*" Exclude "*:\micro

Windows TSM server 4.1.3 finally supports SCSI attached 3583 for W2K!

2001-03-19 Thread Norback, Jan
Finally some good new for us happy people with 358X Libraries and W2K on SAN. The latest level of the Windows TSM server 4.1.3 is available (although Tivoli's Website is behind with the information as usual) see: ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/ server/

Re: 3494 library / VOLSER problem - SOLVED

2001-03-19 Thread Mahesh Babbar
Well, It turned out to be an easy one. Courtsey, Richard and Adolph. I did the following: 1. PAUSE the library. 2. Made the Volume READONLY. ( So that I don't write accidentally on the volume) 3. Mount the volume in one of drives. 4. Issued the command

Space Management and Oracle on Sun Solaris

2001-03-19 Thread Arye Shemer
Hello, Has someone ever tried Space management (HSM) on Oracle tables (preferably on Sun Solaris) ? Each Oracle table is contained in separate physical file. Any special glitch or pits that I should aware of ? Thanks for any tip or directions. Arye Shemer.

deleting data of tape cartridges

2001-03-19 Thread "Schönacher, Uwe"
Hi Chaps, does anybody know a method of deleting data on tape cartridges (3590) without rewriting and destroying them? We need to wipe out round about 200 tape cartridges an looking for a efficient method to do this. Thanks Uwe

Re: email appliances and TSM

2001-03-19 Thread WB
Even if I am not able to contribute something new to the topic, I would like to endorse Bob's statements. Our situation is quite the same. So far we are not using NAS appliance. But planning our next mail server generation and considering the amount of accounts (40,000) we have now a closer look a

Re: Multiple ADSM/TSM Instances Sharing a Library Via ACSLS

2001-03-19 Thread WB
Of course cooperation between IBM and STK is a crucial point. I was reluctant a long time to force myself to such a configuration. We are running this environment now for half a year and right in the beginning we had the oppurtunity to study the cooperation skills of IBM and STK on the basis of a