05.01.2025 21:48:24 Stuart Morrow :
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 20:15, wrote:
>> not sure I have any devices so performance critical that I'd want
>> to dedicate a core to them. Benchmarks would be interseting.
>
> The curried syscall stuff came before the execac stuff.
>
> You were the one wanting u
I think it's ok to start with NIX, not NxM.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 10:45 AM Stuart Morrow wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 16:39, Ron Minnich wrote:
> > take that 2011 code, bring it to your plan 9 system, and see if
>
> But https://github.com/rminnich/nxm has 410 commits after 2011? My
> under
I'm interested.
Not 100% sure how much work I'll be able to do, but like you said, pace
yourself and be consistent. :-)
Cheers,
Chris
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025, 08:39 Ron Minnich wrote:
> No need for money yet!
>
> Let's get this party started. I have queries in to ampere as to how we
> can set up a
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 16:39, Ron Minnich wrote:
> take that 2011 code, bring it to your plan 9 system, and see if
But https://github.com/rminnich/nxm has 410 commits after 2011? My
understanding was NIX and "NxM" aren't really different things, that
they can be understood as just a name change si
not sure I have any devices so performance critical that I'd want
to dedicate a core to them. Benchmarks would be interseting.
Quoth Stuart Morrow :
> > This has been a very interesting discussion, thanks all. My offer
> > remains: if anyone wants to revive NIX, I am happy to help.
>
> Am I the o
I have a hookup at a company that builds modular compute nodes for DoD.
They make X86 pluggable compute devices the size of a credit card and lots
of types of clustering hardware for them. Each card is equivalent to a
typical desktop PC. I've used Plan 9 on these devices successfully in the
past. I
Quoth Stuart Morrow :
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 20:15, wrote:
> > not sure I have any devices so performance critical that I'd want
> > to dedicate a core to them. Benchmarks would be interseting.
>
> The curried syscall stuff came before the execac stuff.
>
> You were the one wanting userspace de
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 20:15, wrote:
> not sure I have any devices so performance critical that I'd want
> to dedicate a core to them. Benchmarks would be interseting.
The curried syscall stuff came before the execac stuff.
You were the one wanting userspace devdraw.
No need for money yet!
Let's get this party started. I have queries in to ampere as to how we
can set up a simulator. However, if someone wants to take a first
step, take that 2011 code, bring it to your plan 9 system, and see if
it builds.
Again, the key here is a sustained effort. You don't hav
On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 08:36:17AM -0800, Ron Minnich wrote:
> No need for money yet!
>
> Let's get this party started. I have queries in to ampere as to how we
> can set up a simulator. However, if someone wants to take a first
> step, take that 2011 code, bring it to your plan 9 system, and see
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 01:29:19PM -0800, Ron Minnich wrote:
> let's make a deal.
>
> I will talk to Ampere about what is the right way to simulate their
> system. I have friends there. If we get enough people to get NIX
> running on a simulator, then I'll try to figure out how to get us some
> re
There have been other ideas in similar directions over the years.
E.g.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342759611_SCE-Comm_A_Real-Time_Inter-Core_Communication_Framework_for_Strictly_Partitioned_Multi-core_Processors
about the concepts of ACs and CCs (communication cores).
On Sun, 5 Jan 20
12 matches
Mail list logo
