On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Eris Discordia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It will eventually install but won't get past a specific step after the
> installed system is booted. I asked about the problem on 9fans. No
> solutions... yet.
>
> Here's the thread: http://9fans.net/archive/2008/01/547
erik quanstrom wrote:
it would also be interesting to know if you are
seeing this randomly or if you can reliable reproduce
this condition.
i can reproduce it with this:
http://cm.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/cinap_lenrek/traptest/
8c test.c
8a int80.s
8l test.8 int80.8
./8.out
8.out 1249
Kernel Panic wrote:
http://cm.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/cinap_lenrek/traptest/
8c test.c
8a int80.s
8l test.8 int80.8
./8.out
8.out 12490667: suicide: sys: trap: general protection violation
pc=0x1333
the parent process loops and does "fake" syscalls while
the child posts notes to it
Eris, if you want to give last years iso a try (20070329, it works
perfectly on MS Virtual Server R2 SP1), give me a shout and I'll put
it somewhere you can download it.
Many thanks for the offer, but I just don't have access to the required
bandwidth. I had downloaded the first ISO image at a
IPv6 support is a little rusty, but was working. I need to
reestablish an IPv6 test environment here to continually exercise the
code and figure out some remaining thorny issues. The last time I
tried it, I could connect to remote systems via IPv6 using 6in4(8) but
not local systems, and it appea
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Eris Discordia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Eris, if you want to give last years iso a try (20070329, it works
>> perfectly on MS Virtual Server R2 SP1), give me a shout and I'll put
>> it somewhere you can download it.
>>
>
> Many thanks for the offer, but I just d
hello,
i have 3com etherlink iii 509b isa card that refuses to let me change
its port or irq. also the only way i can get the card to talk on the
network is to put my usb mouse on the same irq and wiggle it around
really fast when i'm trying to receive or transmit. initially i could
change neith
> have 3com etherlink iii 509b isa card that refuses to let me change
> its port or irq. also the only way i can get the card to talk on the
> network is to put my usb mouse on the same irq and wiggle it around
> really fast when i'm trying to receive or transmit. initially i could
> change neit
> i can reproduce it with this:
>
> http://cm.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/cinap_lenrek/traptest/
>
> 8c test.c
> 8a int80.s
> 8l test.8 int80.8
> ./8.out
>
> 8.out 12490667: suicide: sys: trap: general protection violation
> pc=0x1333
okay. it seems pretty clear from the code that you'r
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:43 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IPv6 support is a little rusty, but was working. I need to
> reestablish an IPv6 test environment here to continually exercise the
> code and figure out some remaining thorny issues. The last time I
> tried it, I could connect to remo
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:40 PM, michael block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
>
> i have 3com etherlink iii 509b isa card that refuses to let me change
> its port or irq. also the only way i can get the card to talk on the
> network is to put my usb mouse on the same irq and wiggle it around
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:40:29PM -0500, michael block wrote:
>
> from what i can tell by gleaning the 9fans archives, the 3c509b is
> quite a troublesome card. i found rumors of a dos utility that would
> convince the card to change its port and irq. i think this leaves me
> with two questions
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 1:06 PM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> inform the kernel what the irq is. plan9.ini(8) has more information
> but i think you wish
>
> ether0=type=3C509 irq=12
>
> in your plan9.ini.
yes, i tried setting it in plan9.ini, but the card just ignores it
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:20 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:40:29PM -0500, michael block wrote:
>>
>> from what i can tell by gleaning the 9fans archives, the 3c509b is
>> quite a troublesome card. i found rumors of a dos utility that would
>> convince the card to cha
a windows machine with isa slots will be available to me on tuesday.
i'll try this out and see what happens. of course a better solution
would be to just fork over the cash for a better card...
Where can you even buy an ISA Ethernet (or any) card these days? I don't
even see them on Ebay or Cra
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> a windows machine with isa slots will be available to me on tuesday.
>> i'll try this out and see what happens. of course a better solution
>> would be to just fork over the cash for a better card...
>
> Where can you e
there's no reason it needs to be isa, i have pci slots too. it's just
the only card i have that qualifies as plan 9 supported hardware
ok ;-) i ass-u-med that you were stuck with a real antique out of no
choice.
This being the case, buy an Intel Pro/100[0] PCI card. Accept no
substitutes. T
heh. geez am i dopey. the problem was my misunderstanding of what the
irq=xx parts in plan9.ini do. bios decides the irq, plan9.ini tells
the kernel what the bios decided. that's my isa card mantra from now
on
thanks everyone,
-- m
> > i can reproduce it with this:
> >
> > http://cm.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/cinap_lenrek/traptest/
> >
> > 8c test.c
> > 8a int80.s
> > 8l test.8 int80.8
> > ./8.out
> >
> > 8.out 12490667: suicide: sys: trap: general protection violation
> > pc=0x1333
>
> okay. it seems pretty clea
> No! Notes are bufferd in the up->note[] array. If you are in the note handler,
> another process *can* send you further (NUser) notes without doing any harm.
>
> If we are in the note handler (up->notified == 1) and notify() gets hit,
> it will do nothing and return 0 see:
>
> /sys/src/9/pc/tra
> > there's no reason it needs to be isa, i have pci slots too. it's just
> > the only card i have that qualifies as plan 9 supported hardware
>
> ok ;-) i ass-u-med that you were stuck with a real antique out of no
> choice.
>
> This being the case, buy an Intel Pro/100[0] PCI card. Accept no
> heh. geez am i dopey. the problem was my misunderstanding of what the
> irq=xx parts in plan9.ini do. bios decides the irq, plan9.ini tells
> the kernel what the bios decided. that's my isa card mantra from now
> on
I was going to suggest you base your configuration on what OpenBSD
determines.
> i think you may be misunderstanding what i'm saying.
> the test for n->flag does not appear to be accidental.
> i am not quite sure why that test is there, but i go on
> the assumption that presotto knew what he was doing.
> if you're going to claim he was wrong, i think you'd better
> have good
23 matches
Mail list logo
