Re: [9fans] using git

Any chance of getting mac9p codesigned and usable on 10.10? -jas > On Mar 19, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Federico Benavento wrote: > > Same here, https://bitbucket.org/fgb/mac9p > > — > Federico Benavento > benave...@gmail.com > > > >> On Mar 19, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Charles Forsyth >> wrote: >> >>

Re: [9fans] using git

Hi All. Giacomo Tesio pretty much expressed the flow. For me, the cheap branching and excellent merging are extremely important, esp. as compared with earlier systems like subversion. The distribution development is also a huge boon; I have several contributors with write access to the main git

Re: [9fans] using git

zsh: cd $git-sources zsh: wc -l **/*.{c,h,sh,py,pl}|tail -1 318901 total zsh: for a in c h sh py pl; do echo $a: `wc -l **/*.$a|tail -1`;done c: 161667 total h: 16971 total sh: 133214 total py: 5634 total pl: 1415 total

Re: [9fans] using git

Is all that even necessary? Dulwich is a 100%-complete pure-Python implementation of the Git API, which optional C extensions for speed. It comes with a simple Git driver remake that implements the core necessities, a.k.a. it has fetch-pack but no push and send-pack but no pull. It would still pro

Re: [9fans] using git

Actually, Jeff I appreciate a lot your work on mercurial. I know I could use the bookmarks extension to achieve a similar process with hg (never tried darcs and bzr seriously, sorry). but I still prefer git to mercurial, since it has been designed around the features that I like (when working alone

Re: [9fans] using git

this world sucks

Re: [9fans] using git

> On Mar 30, 2015, at 4:55 AM, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > > Ah, a small addendum: obviously we also use tags a lot to give a specific > commit (and related history) a name. > This is done automatically by build servers for the "official" tags, and > manually by developers whenever they want in the

Re: [9fans] using git

Ah, a small addendum: obviously we also use tags a lot to give a specific commit (and related history) a name. This is done automatically by build servers for the "official" tags, and manually by developers whenever they want in their own repository (often with tags like, "workedhere", "shittorefac

Re: [9fans] using git

As I use both git and hg, I really miss the feature-branching in hg (obviously, you can, if you try hard enough, use feature branching with hg too, but git makes it so easy that it became my default process whenever I can use git for development, even on solo projects): Suppose you have a team of

Re: [9fans] using git

I'd like to hear it too - much to learn from others' process. Paul On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:16 AM Charles Forsyth wrote: > > On 19 March 2015 at 18:26, wrote: > >> Charles Forsyth wrote: >> >> > On 19 March 2015 at 16:09, wrote: >> > >> > > There is definitely some >> > > learning curve and

Re: [9fans] using git

On 19 March 2015 at 18:26, wrote: > Charles Forsyth wrote: > > > On 19 March 2015 at 16:09, wrote: > > > > > There is definitely some > > > learning curve and mindset change > > > > Just what I want from a little servant that's supposed to help me manage > > some file changes. > > Git is intend

Re: [9fans] using git

Quoting "Devon H. O'Dell" : 2015-03-19 14:46 GMT-07:00 Skip Tavakkolian : servant of 9fans → loathed → cursed → saint It can (as is probably true in my case) also just stop at either loathed or cursed. You can skip steps, too! Non serviam. khm

Re: [9fans] using git

2015-03-19 14:46 GMT-07:00 Skip Tavakkolian : > servant of 9fans → loathed → cursed → saint It can (as is probably true in my case) also just stop at either loathed or cursed.

Re: [9fans] using git

cool! just to formalize the 9fans steps of canonization, i think it goes something like this: servant of 9fans → loathed → cursed → saint On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:31 PM Jeff Sickel wrote: > You can pick up a Cheesehead hat in Wisconsin, or online… > Some groups I’ve worked with would pass th

Re: [9fans] using git

You can pick up a Cheesehead hat in Wisconsin, or online… Some groups I’ve worked with would pass the Cheesehead hat to the person who checked something in that broke the nightly build. I’m not saying being sainted by the 9fans community wouldn’t be an honor, but the recipient might get something

Re: [9fans] using git

Charles Forsyth wrote: > On 19 March 2015 at 16:09, wrote: > > > There is definitely some > > learning curve and mindset change > > Just what I want from a little servant that's supposed to help me manage > some file changes. Git is intended for something completely different than RCS. I reall

Re: [9fans] using git

a 9fan/git-fan should volunteer to take one for the team, learn git thoroughly, then hide it behind an fs layer. we will revere such a person, and nominate him/her for sainthood. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:35 AM Charles Forsyth wrote: > > On 19 March 2015 at 16:09, wrote: > >> There is definite

Re: [9fans] using git

In the past, I have managed to get git-hg to work, but it's been extremely flaky -- for example, Python would refuse to find modules unless I ran hg from within the modules directory. Unfortunately, I've lost the drive with that system since. On Mar 19, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Jeff Sickel wrote: >

Re: [9fans] using git

> On Mar 19, 2015, at 11:09 AM, arn...@skeeve.com wrote: > > I know some real git fanatics. I'm not one, but I am a "fan". :-) > > I'll be happy to continue a discussion with you offline, if you wish. Don’t worry Arnold, I’ve been using source control systems for decades and have used git sinc

Re: [9fans] using git

Same here, https://bitbucket.org/fgb/mac9p — Federico Benavento benave...@gmail.com > On Mar 19, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Charles Forsyth > wrote: > > Anyway, I moved all my Google Code stuff to mercurial at Bitbucket. > I find both the command and web interfaces l

Re: [9fans] using git

Anyway, I moved all my Google Code stuff to mercurial at Bitbucket. I find both the command and web interfaces less annoying and less error-prone.

Re: [9fans] using git

On 19 March 2015 at 16:09, wrote: > There is definitely some > learning curve and mindset change > Just what I want from a little servant that's supposed to help me manage some file changes.

Re: [9fans] using git

> I'll be happy to continue a > discussion with you offline, if you > wish. are you asking him to take it outside