And here is the LaTeX to mimic roff output:
%% Sans serif font, virtually no line spacing, small titles, small margins, no
page numbers
\renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault}
\linespread{.8}
\usepackage{titlesec}
\titlelabel{\thetitle. }
\titleformat*{\section}{\bf}
\titleformat*{\subsection}
In all likelyhood it will be printed in Paris, where since 1791 we use units
and standards that make sense.
So, A4 :)
Le 15 février 2025 19:11:37 GMT+01:00, Alyssa M via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> a
écrit :
> I suppose we could have custom "Atlantic" paper size: the width of A4 and the
> height
This is cool :)
Can you pass xattrs through the ,ctl file ?
If you can find the time to write it up in thee pages, that would be a
nice WiP for iwp9 ! The deadline has just been extended !
Cheers,
Edouard.
"Alyssa M via 9fans" <9fans@9fans.net> writes:
> I have a complicated relationship wit
Dear all,
https://iwp9.org/#dat The Deadline for IWP9 has been extended for the
last time, pinky promise. You can send your papers or WiP to iwp9paper
at iwp9.org before the 3rd of March.
Looking forward to see all your late submissions :)
Edouard.
--
9f
pgf must have been a beast ! Looking forward to reading your paper and
seeing your talk.
writes:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 10:56:47AM -0800, Ron Minnich wrote:
>> the kertex paper sounds very interesting. I would still like to have
>> pictex for it :-)
>
> I will add it. Having added beamer with
Hi,
Despite half the active human members on this list already being aware,
as they make up the organizing committee ;), I think it is a good idea
to remind everyone that we will have the opportunity too meet in person
next may in Paris.
http://iwp9.org/
Here is the CfP:
Scope
This 2025 edition
/stack yields
cat: error reading /prog/4/stack: thread must be stopped
I'll try again tomorrow but would appreciate any help or hints.
Edouard Klein writes:
> For the sake of people stumbling on this post a long time from now:
>
> I solved my immediate problem by running:
rent hurdle is cleared so off I go.
Cheers,
Edouard.
Edouard Klein writes:
> Thanks Ron :)
>
> In DIS assembly, this is written as jmp $0, which can be changed to jmp
> $1 when I want to disable the loop and spare myself from decreasing all
> PC offsets in the code.
>
>
&
rom $Sys
word@ldt+0,1
ext @ldt+4,0xac849033,"print"
source "/tmp/quatorze/hello.b"
ron minnich writes:
> I put a
> 1:jump 1
> At the start, when I need to do this and have no other way.
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 01:28
Hi !
I'm writing dis assembly, and I would like to debug my program right
from the entrypoint.
I intend to use the /prog filesystem for that, thanks to which one can
stop a program by echoing "stop" to dbgctl file.
However, what I need to do is stop the program at the very start.
I have multipl
I'll add that it takes a special brand of courage to ask "Why has
everything got to be a file" in front of a Plan 9 crowd ;)
The off-track discussions with Daniel were enlightening. I think his
perspective on "NoT" is quite valuable, and has inspired some ideas
since I got back.
ron minnich wri
I love it when I discover that something down on my todo-list has
already been done, better than I would have, by someone else :)
Very neat tool, I'll be using it soon.
Dave Eckhardt writes:
>> One thing i did was sometimes to create a skeletron directory
>> tree and bind *before* each single di
sirjofri writes:
> 06.03.2024 11:36:39 Edouard Klein :
>
...
>>
>> I'll try to compile it on Linux and will let you know :)
>
> Well, it's designed for plan 9 systems, so you're probably out of luck on
> linux, except you try it with plan9ports.
&g
a...@9srv.net writes:
> I wonder what percentage of people who reply are going to be running a finger
> server they wrote. :-) My tcp79 comes from my implementation, here:
> http://txtpunk.com/finger/index.html
>
> I think we've got enough interoperable unicode-aware implementations we can
> s
hiro <23h...@gmail.com> writes:
> all this makes sense. thank you.
> i might be dense, but what's the problem with inetd exactly?
>
I have two main gripes with it:
- it runs as root, in order to switch users when launching a server, and
therefore is a security risk.
- it can be configured only
a...@9srv.net writes:
> I wonder what percentage of people who reply are going to be running a finger
> server they wrote. :-)
Indeed, it may be why I can't seem to find a good, standard
implementation: there are as many implementations as servers.
> My tcp79 comes from my implementation, here
sirjofri writes:
> Hi,
>
> 05.03.2024 22:38:59 Edouard Klein :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for your answer.
>>
>>
>> sirjofri writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I don't use /rc/bin/service anymore, but I use /cfg/ma
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
sirjofri writes:
> Hello,
>
> I don't use /rc/bin/service anymore, but I use /cfg/machinename/service
> instead. My contents are copies of what's in /rc/bin/service or my own
> scripts:
I assume that you then bind-mount /cfg/machinename/service to that
machine
Dear 9fans,
Those of you who run a Plan 9 or Inferno box, could you please share the
contents of your /rc/bin/service or /dis/svc dir ?
I'm writing about Plan 9's listen, and I've read the scripts included in
the default distribution (e.g.
http://git.9front.org/plan9front/plan9front/c5c19dfe4998f
my paper passes the IWP9 review.
Cheers,
Edouard.
Edouard Klein writes:
> For the record here is the lkml post
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/10/28/155
> Edouard Klein writes:
>
>> Thanks Moody for the nudge in a direction I hadn't explored.
>>
>> It seem
I, for one, will attend, barring any incident.
I will send my submission in a frenzy panic minutes before the deadline,
as one usually does.
"Don A. Bailey" writes:
> Last I checked (you) were asking for people to sign up. What’s the actual
> attendee count at this point?
>
>
>> On Jan 25, 2024
For the record here is the lkml post
https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/10/28/155
Edouard Klein writes:
> Thanks Moody for the nudge in a direction I hadn't explored.
>
> It seems that Linux does not see 9p as been safe to mount without
> privilege. From what I understand,
Thanks Ori for the update. Please do not hesitate if you feel I can make
myself useful somehow.
o...@eigenstate.org writes:
> Quoth Edouard Klein :
>> Dear 9fans,
>>
>> I tried emailing an abstract to all iwp9*@iwp9.org addresses, but got a
>> email delivery failure
Thanks Moody for the nudge in a direction I hadn't explored.
It seems that Linux does not see 9p as been safe to mount without
privilege. From what I understand, only FS with the FS_USERNS_MOUNT flag
can be mounted in a user namespace. It seems that v9fs is not one of
them:
For example, tmpfs is
Dear 9fans,
I'm trying to mount a 9p filesystem under a Linux user "namespace".
Apparently this is verboten, because mounting filesystems is dangerous.
So only fuse is permitted inside a user namespace.
I've tried
- using a setuid binary: does not work inside the user namespace,
- 9pfuse and 9pf
Dear 9fans,
I tried emailing an abstract to all iwp9*@iwp9.org addresses, but got a
email delivery failure notification back.
Do anybody know where we stand on the workshop organization ? Is there
anything I could do to help ?
Cheers,
Edouard.
--
9fans:
26 matches
Mail list logo
