I think it's ok to start with NIX, not NxM.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 10:45 AM Stuart Morrow wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 16:39, Ron Minnich wrote:
> > take that 2011 code, bring it to your plan 9 system, and see if
>
> But https://github.com/rminnich/nxm has 410 commits after 2011? My
> under
I'm interested.
Not 100% sure how much work I'll be able to do, but like you said, pace
yourself and be consistent. :-)
Cheers,
Chris
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025, 08:39 Ron Minnich wrote:
> No need for money yet!
>
> Let's get this party started. I have queries in to ampere as to how we
> can set up a
05.01.2025 21:48:24 Stuart Morrow :
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 20:15, wrote:
>> not sure I have any devices so performance critical that I'd want
>> to dedicate a core to them. Benchmarks would be interseting.
>
> The curried syscall stuff came before the execac stuff.
>
> You were the one wanting u
Quoth Stuart Morrow :
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 20:15, wrote:
> > not sure I have any devices so performance critical that I'd want
> > to dedicate a core to them. Benchmarks would be interseting.
>
> The curried syscall stuff came before the execac stuff.
>
> You were the one wanting userspace de
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 20:15, wrote:
> not sure I have any devices so performance critical that I'd want
> to dedicate a core to them. Benchmarks would be interseting.
The curried syscall stuff came before the execac stuff.
You were the one wanting userspace devdraw.
I have a hookup at a company that builds modular compute nodes for DoD.
They make X86 pluggable compute devices the size of a credit card and lots
of types of clustering hardware for them. Each card is equivalent to a
typical desktop PC. I've used Plan 9 on these devices successfully in the
past. I
not sure I have any devices so performance critical that I'd want
to dedicate a core to them. Benchmarks would be interseting.
Quoth Stuart Morrow :
> > This has been a very interesting discussion, thanks all. My offer
> > remains: if anyone wants to revive NIX, I am happy to help.
>
> Am I the o
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 at 16:39, Ron Minnich wrote:
> take that 2011 code, bring it to your plan 9 system, and see if
But https://github.com/rminnich/nxm has 410 commits after 2011? My
understanding was NIX and "NxM" aren't really different things, that
they can be understood as just a name change si
On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 08:36:17AM -0800, Ron Minnich wrote:
> No need for money yet!
>
> Let's get this party started. I have queries in to ampere as to how we
> can set up a simulator. However, if someone wants to take a first
> step, take that 2011 code, bring it to your plan 9 system, and see
No need for money yet!
Let's get this party started. I have queries in to ampere as to how we
can set up a simulator. However, if someone wants to take a first
step, take that 2011 code, bring it to your plan 9 system, and see if
it builds.
Again, the key here is a sustained effort. You don't hav
There have been other ideas in similar directions over the years.
E.g.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342759611_SCE-Comm_A_Real-Time_Inter-Core_Communication_Framework_for_Strictly_Partitioned_Multi-core_Processors
about the concepts of ACs and CCs (communication cores).
On Sun, 5 Jan 20
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 01:29:19PM -0800, Ron Minnich wrote:
> let's make a deal.
>
> I will talk to Ampere about what is the right way to simulate their
> system. I have friends there. If we get enough people to get NIX
> running on a simulator, then I'll try to figure out how to get us some
> re
12 matches
Mail list logo
