[yocto] Sanity tested distributions list
Hi all, We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set (SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros (latest versions of Fedora & Ubuntu, presumably?). I'd like to update and re- post the patch [3] so we can close bug #1096 [4] but for that we need to agree on the list. Thanks, Paul [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-August/004699.html [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.embedded.poky/6959 [3] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky- contrib/log/?h=paule/sanity-distros [4] http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096 -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Sanity tested distributions list
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi all, > > We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we > reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set > (SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros > (latest versions of Fedora & Ubuntu, presumably?). I'd like to update and re- > post the patch [3] so we can close bug #1096 [4] but for that we need to agree > on the list. I'm fairly comprehensively testing something close to the edison 1.1.1 release on CentOS 5.5 and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. We plan on adding more but maybe not in time for our next release. -M ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
[yocto] Minutes: Yocto Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, December 06, 2011 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
Attendees: Beth, Darren, Tom, Matthew, Scott R., Sean, Richard, Paul, Jeff, Denys, Bruce, Mark, Dave, Song New Action Item List: * Action item Review - 5 min 1. Mark will review unsorted features from Wind River team and try to have them scheduled (WIP) Focus of the current week: M1 development and bug fixing, keep features on schedule, get patches reviewed or pre-reviewed as soon as possible. Agenda: * Opens collection - 5 min (Song) * Opens - 10 min - Tested Distro - Paul requested that people review the Tested Distro list and send updates. * Yocto 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 point release update - 10 min (Josh/Beth) . Had an almost complete build for 1.0.2 last week, but still have some problems. Joshua is working on it. Targeting this week to have a build. . Will have CCB review the overall patch strategy for 1.1.1 tomorrow. * Yocto 1.2 M1 Status (features development) - 10 min (Song/Beth) https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.2_Status . We are in the 5th week of M1. Feature complete coming this weekend . The build is green, no high bugs. . Test plan for all testable features have been completed, will be executed when the feature is in the build. . Great progress on P1 features last week, One small P1 has 20% done. all others are more than 70% complete. Most of them are more than 80% complete. . Last week has a great surprise on bug fixing, fixed about 20 bugs. Richard contributed most of them . Not great update on package update. Only one package update last week, Saul and Song will follow up on that. . Darren 1635: this one may have to be rescheduled. Darren will see how to fit this one into the rest of his schedule. . Issue: lots of features in the development stage, there could be a stampede of patch review and pull request in this last development week. - Consensus of the team: most of the people are working diligently to keep the features on schedule and also get patches pre-reviewed. We should allow more time for this to work. - We should publish the current process we are using so that the community can understand it better. * Action item Review - 5 min 1. Mark will review unsorted features from Wind River team and try to have them scheduled (WIP) * Weekly team sharing (20 min) Dave: Manager and Mark: Internal WR stuff, Bitbake runtask work - mechanism to call into bitbake, prelinker maybe ARM-eabi prevents linkage Bruce: Traveling, M2 dev on schedule dev kernel 3.2rc4, Tracking Stable 3.0rt, Main RT at 3.2, kernel updating and BSP refreshes 1.2 will be at least 3.2 Denys: Nothing Jeff: Nothing Paul: Finished BuildHistory - enable on AB?, QT 4.8.0 release, bugfixing no blockers Richard: Patch pulling, slowed down by HW issue, moving forward to address M1 and master updating. Sean: Nothing Scott R: Cleaning up Doc Bugs 1773, 1500, continuing with bugs and working on Website doc pages, no blockers Matthew: Nothing Tom: Finished off M1 Intel video acceleration, internal bsp and support Darren: EFI Support (pounding head on desk), looking into other odd behavior, internal BSP work. Beth: License M1 task - custom license, license manifest, license cleanup, License Audit (team effort in the future), Gearing up for M1 Saul: Recovering from Sick, Pull wrangling, helping Joshua out with 1.0.2 debugging, selfhosted image work ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Sanity tested distributions list
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:59 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 < b29...@freescale.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we > > reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want > to set > > (SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more > distros > > (latest versions of Fedora & Ubuntu, presumably?). I'd like to update > and re- > > post the patch [3] so we can close bug #1096 [4] but for that we need to > agree > > on the list. > > I'm fairly comprehensively testing something close to the edison 1.1.1 > release on CentOS 5.5 and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. We plan on adding more but > maybe not in time for our next release. > The autobuilders are on openSuSE 11.4 x86-64 at this point. We lost I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 (with a planned switch over on one dev machine to openSuSE 12.1) -b > -M > ___ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > -- Elizabeth Flanagan Yocto Project Build and Release ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Sanity tested distributions list
On Tuesday 06 December 2011 08:54:30 Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > The autobuilders are on openSuSE 11.4 x86-64 at this point. We lost > I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 (with a planned switch over on one dev machine > to openSuSE 12.1) Sorry, what did we lose? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, December 06, 2011 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > . Will have CCB review the overall patch strategy for 1.1.1 tomorrow. Please include me if possible. Thanks, Matthew ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, December 06, 2011 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
On 12/06/2011 09:29 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Saul Wold wrote: . Will have CCB review the overall patch strategy for 1.1.1 tomorrow. Please include me if possible. This was a mistake, left over from last week, did not edit well. CCB will be in the New Year. Sau! Thanks, Matthew ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Sanity tested distributions list
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 06 December 2011 08:54:30 Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > > The autobuilders are on openSuSE 11.4 x86-64 at this point. We lost > > I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 (with a planned switch over on one dev > machine > > to openSuSE 12.1) > > heh, multitasking. We've standardized the distro on the ab infrastructure, so we lost the host testing (for now) that the ab provided. We'll be gaining that back when I move the ab slaves to VMs, but for the time being, we're only host testing opensuse on the abs > Sorry, what did we lose? > > Cheers, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > -- Elizabeth Flanagan Yocto Project Build and Release ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Minutes: Yocto Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, December 06, 2011 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
On 12/06/2011 08:44 AM, Saul Wold wrote: Attendees: Beth, Darren, Tom, Matthew, Scott R., Sean, Richard, Paul, Jeff, Denys, Bruce, Mark, Dave, Song New Action Item List: * Action item Review - 5 min 1. Mark will review unsorted features from Wind River team and try to have them scheduled (WIP) Focus of the current week: M1 development and bug fixing, keep features on schedule, get patches reviewed or pre-reviewed as soon as possible. Agenda: * Opens collection - 5 min (Song) * Opens - 10 min - Tested Distro - Paul requested that people review the Tested Distro list and send updates. Sorry folks, I did not edit this section below correctly, hit the send button too quickly. * Yocto 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 point release update - 10 min (Josh/Beth) 1.0.2 is on QA now, there was a problem with the x86-64 build the OpenSuSE 11.4 Autobuilder machines, we tracked it down to an LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue inside of binutils. Briefly, binutils builds a host binary which seems to pick up some target based libraries (since on an x86-64 host the target x86-64 libraries match), we are still investigating why this only occurs on OpenSuSE 11.4, so this will be release note item. * Yocto 1.2 M1 Status (features development) - 10 min (Song/Beth) https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.2_Status . We are in the 5th week of M1. Feature complete coming this weekend Saul Completely forget to use the Status page, partly because it was not updated since last week! A couple of notes * The build is stable and almost green, issues are identified and being worked * P1 Features (Package History & Initial Self-Hosted Minimal Build) are in, Some P2 work is in also. * We had 46 packages updated, which should allow us to reach the 50% goal for M1 * Action item Review - 5 min 1. Mark will review unsorted features from Wind River team and try to have them scheduled (WIP) * Weekly team sharing (20 min) Dave: Manager and Mark: Internal WR stuff, Bitbake runtask work - mechanism to call into bitbake, prelinker maybe ARM-eabi prevents linkage Bruce: Traveling, M2 dev on schedule dev kernel 3.2rc4, Tracking Stable 3.0rt, Main RT at 3.2, kernel updating and BSP refreshes 1.2 will be at least 3.2 Denys: Nothing Jeff: Nothing Paul: Finished BuildHistory - enable on AB?, QT 4.8.0 release, bugfixing no blockers Richard: Patch pulling, slowed down by HW issue, moving forward to address M1 and master updating. Sean: Nothing Scott R: Cleaning up Doc Bugs 1773, 1500, continuing with bugs and working on Website doc pages, no blockers Matthew: Nothing Tom: Finished off M1 Intel video acceleration, internal bsp and support Darren: EFI Support (pounding head on desk), looking into other odd behavior, internal BSP work. Beth: License M1 task - custom license, license manifest, license cleanup, License Audit (team effort in the future), Gearing up for M1 Saul: Recovering from Sick, Pull wrangling, helping Joshua out with 1.0.2 debugging, selfhosted image work ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Sanity tested distributions list
2011/12/6 Paul Eggleton : > Hi all, > > We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we > reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set > (SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros > (latest versions of Fedora & Ubuntu, presumably?). I'd like to update and re- > post the patch [3] so we can close bug #1096 [4] but for that we need to agree > on the list. BTW, what may I do to add Debian Squeeze (6.0) to supported and tested distributions list? -- Yury Bushmelev ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] Sanity tested distributions list
On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi all, We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set (SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros (latest versions of Fedora & Ubuntu, presumably?). I'd like to update and re- post the patch [3] so we can close bug #1096 [4] but for that we need to agree on the list. Thanks, Paul [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-August/004699.html [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.embedded.poky/6959 [3] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky- contrib/log/?h=paule/sanity-distros [4] http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096 -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto You may not be looking for anecdotal build data but I imagine I'm one of the few building on FC 16. Through an unintentional upgrade (don't ask), I have built and tested the following combinations to boot on actual hardware built on a Fedora Core 16 host: On a Routerstation Pro: Core image minimal Core image basic Core image base (both USB Root file system and SD root file system) demo-image-mediatomb (but mediatomb itself segfaults in initialization) On a Beagleboard Core Image Sato (with Linksys USB network adapter functioning) demo-image-mediatomb (mediatomb does not segfault). I'm having some trouble on the Atom platform but I think it is operator error, not host platform. David David Smoot davidsm...@gmail.com ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
