Re: [web2py] Instant Press in beta
Congratulations, it's great. 2010/10/18 Martin.Mulone > After almost 3 month of heavy development, i think its mature enough > to move to beta phase. Well for me was a proof of concept, of what can > i do in web2py, i have to thank to massimo and the community to > answered my littles questions. What's new in beta, well i suggest to > see the page and watch new tour in instant press video, because I made > a lot of changes, and i test it a lot. What you can do for instant > press? Test. I know there some little issues, and some others I don't > know. I made the code clear enough for who's like to read source code, > and want to start medium size project in web2py. > > new video in: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtdJ5JCxiJQ > > http://code.google.com/p/instant-press/ > > Instant Press is an open source CMS developed in Web2py Framework. > Instant Press is simple, easy to use and attractive. Upload to your > web2py framework or to Google Application Engine and you are ready to > start! > > thanks, > > Martin.
Re: [web2py] web2py 1.89.1 is OUT
Really beautiful!
[web2py] Application developed with web2py like "Django People"
Greetings to everyone. I recently read about an application developed with web2py like "Django People" I get to test it and I read about some suggestions from Massimo. I've been looking but can not find it. Anyone remember it?
Re: [web2py] Re: Application developed with web2py like "Django People"
Excellent. Thanks for responding. A much changed. I remember an application that was made just for the map of the "experts." And since I'm beginner, I wanted to see the application to learn, remember being hosted on Google App Engine. 2010/11/17 mdipierro > we are taking a different approach > > https://experts4solutions.com > > You can sign up. I will approve those people who I recognize as > contributors and/or have proven skills by deploying a web2py > application. After we reach ~50 people new members will have to be > endorsed by 5 existing members to be approved. > > If you have already signed up but your name is not listed (not > approved) but you feel you deserve it, please email me and explain > why. It is possible I did not recognize your name. > > Massimo > > On Nov 17, 9:07 am, appydev wrote: > > Greetings to everyone. > > > > I recently read about an application developed with web2py like "Django > > People" I get to test it and I read about some suggestions from Massimo. > > > > I've been looking but can not find it. Anyone remember it? >
Re: [web2py] Re: Application developed with web2py like "Django People"
Yes! Thanks Anthony. 2010/11/17 Anthony > Are you talking about this: > > http://web2pyople.appspot.com/ > > > On Nov 17, 10:46 am, appydev wrote: > > Excellent. Thanks for responding. > > > > A much changed. I remember an application that was made just for the map > of > > the "experts." And since I'm beginner, I wanted to see the application to > > learn, remember being hosted on Google App Engine. > > > > 2010/11/17 mdipierro > > > > > > > > > we are taking a different approach > > > > > https://experts4solutions.com > > > > > You can sign up. I will approve those people who I recognize as > > > contributors and/or have proven skills by deploying a web2py > > > application. After we reach ~50 people new members will have to be > > > endorsed by 5 existing members to be approved. > > > > > If you have already signed up but your name is not listed (not > > > approved) but you feel you deserve it, please email me and explain > > > why. It is possible I did not recognize your name. > > > > > Massimo > > > > > On Nov 17, 9:07 am, appydev wrote: > > > > Greetings to everyone. > > > > > > I recently read about an application developed with web2py like > "Django > > > > People" I get to test it and I read about some suggestions from > Massimo. > > > > > > I've been looking but can not find it. Anyone remember it?- Hide > quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
Re: [web2py] Re: Application developed with web2py like "Django People"
Thank you very much Anthony, I spend part of the morning trying to find in the search of the group without any results. with queries like "django clone people." Is rare. Thank you very much again. 2010/11/17 Anthony > Also, there's this one (a little older): > > http://www.appenginepeople.net/users/tag/web2py/ > > Discussed here: > > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_frm/thread/668fade78f5c3d79 > > and here: > > http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_frm/thread/aa692ce9bc9c572e > > On Nov 17, 10:57 am, Anthony wrote: > > Are you talking about this: > > > > http://web2pyople.appspot.com/ > > > > On Nov 17, 10:46 am, appydev wrote: > > > > > > > > > Excellent. Thanks for responding. > > > > > A much changed. I remember an application that was made just for the > map of > > > the "experts." And since I'm beginner, I wanted to see the application > to > > > learn, remember being hosted on Google App Engine. > > > > > 2010/11/17 mdipierro > > > > > > we are taking a different approach > > > > > > https://experts4solutions.com > > > > > > You can sign up. I will approve those people who I recognize as > > > > contributors and/or have proven skills by deploying a web2py > > > > application. After we reach ~50 people new members will have to be > > > > endorsed by 5 existing members to be approved. > > > > > > If you have already signed up but your name is not listed (not > > > > approved) but you feel you deserve it, please email me and explain > > > > why. It is possible I did not recognize your name. > > > > > > Massimo > > > > > > On Nov 17, 9:07 am, appydev wrote: > > > > > Greetings to everyone. > > > > > > > I recently read about an application developed with web2py like > "Django > > > > > People" I get to test it and I read about some suggestions from > Massimo. > > > > > > > I've been looking but can not find it. Anyone remember it?- Hide > quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
[web2py] Beginner Auth problem
Greetings.
I have a problem, I hope you can help me.
I have two models: Teacher, Student. Each with different attributes.
It occurred to me to implement them, linking tables:
db.define_table('teacher',
Field('person', length=64), requires=IS_IN_DB(db,
'auth_user.uuid')),
...
db.define_table('student',
Field('person', length=64), requires=IS_IN_DB(db,
'auth_user.uuid')),
...
Maybe not the best way to do it if they think of a better, please I'd like
to hear.
The problem is that I want to make a registration form to "Teacher." But
generating Auth, just fields "auth_user.
How do I include in a form fields auth_user + fields teacher?
Re: [web2py] Re: Beginner Auth problem
Thank you very much for your response.
But I still have a doubt:
Is it possible to modify the registration form to insert data into two
tables?
where one of the tables is auth_user.
2010/11/23 mdipierro
>
>
> On Nov 23, 7:40 am, appydev wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I have a problem, I hope you can help me.
> >
> > I have two models: Teacher, Student. Each with different attributes.
> >
> > It occurred to me to implement them, linking tables:
> >
> > db.define_table('teacher',
> > Field('person', length=64), requires=IS_IN_DB(db,
> > 'auth_user.uuid')),
> > ...
> >
> > db.define_table('student',
> > Field('person', length=64), requires=IS_IN_DB(db,
> > 'auth_user.uuid')),
> > ...
> >
> > Maybe not the best way to do it if they think of a better, please I'd
> like
> > to hear.
> >
> > The problem is that I want to make a registration form to "Teacher." But
> > generating Auth, just fields "auth_user.
> >
> > How do I include in a form fields auth_user + fields teacher?
>
> Although this can be done the problem is workflow. When a person
> register, the person cannot decide to be a teacher. Somebody must
> appoint the teacher.
>
> I would:
> - give the auth_user table a field 'teacher' boolean and default to
> false
> - have an administrator use appadmin to turn the teacher flag to on
> -
>
> appydev
> View profile
> More options Nov 23, 7:40 am
> From: appydev
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:10:50 -0430
> Local: Tues, Nov 23 2010 7:40 am
> Subject: [web2py] Beginner Auth problem
> Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
> original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
>
> Greetings.
>
> I have a problem, I hope you can help me.
>
> I have two models: Teacher, Student. Each with different attributes.
>
> It occurred to me to implement them, linking tables:
>
>
> db.define_table('teacher',Field('person',db.auth_user,writable=False,readable=False,default=auth.user_id),...)
> - add code like:
>
> if auth.user and auth.user.teacher but not
> db(db.teacher.person==auth.user_id).count():
>redirect(URL('page_to_create_teacher_record'))
>
Re: [web2py] Beginner Auth problem
Thank you very much for the help.
2010/11/23 appydev
> Greetings.
>
> I have a problem, I hope you can help me.
>
> I have two models: Teacher, Student. Each with different attributes.
>
> It occurred to me to implement them, linking tables:
>
> db.define_table('teacher',
> Field('person', length=64), requires=IS_IN_DB(db,
> 'auth_user.uuid')),
> ...
>
> db.define_table('student',
> Field('person', length=64), requires=IS_IN_DB(db,
> 'auth_user.uuid')),
> ...
>
>
> Maybe not the best way to do it if they think of a better, please I'd like
> to hear.
>
>
> The problem is that I want to make a registration form to "Teacher." But
> generating Auth, just fields "auth_user.
>
> How do I include in a form fields auth_user + fields teacher?
>
[web2py] Actions exposed by auth.
Greetings I have another question from beginner: In web2py book reads as follows: "By default they are all exposed, but it is possible to restrict access to only some of these actions." Referring to the following: http://.../ [app] / default / user / register http://.../ [app] / default / user / login http://.../ [app] / default / user / logout http://.../ [app] / default / user / profile http://.../ [app] / default / user / change_password http://.../ [app] / default / user / verify_email http://.../ [app] / default / user / retrieve_username http://.../ [app] / default / user / request_reset_password http://.../ [app] / default / user / reset_password http://.../ [app] / default / user / impersonate http://.../ [app] / default / user / groups http://.../ [app] / default / user / not_authorized Is it possible to expose only some of these actions?
Re: [web2py] Re: Actions exposed by auth.
Thanks again Massimo. 2010/11/24 mdipierro > auth.settings.actions_disabled=['groups','impersonate'] # etc etc > > On Nov 24, 12:34 pm, appydev wrote: > > Greetings > > > > I have another question from beginner: > > > > In web2py book reads as follows: > > > > "By default they are all exposed, but it is possible to restrict access > to > > only some of these actions." > > > > Referring to the following: > > > > http://.../[app] / default / user / registerhttp://.../[app] / default / > user / loginhttp://.../[app] / default / user / logouthttp://.../[app] / > default / user / profilehttp://.../[app] / default / user / > change_passwordhttp://.../[app] / default / user / > verify_emailhttp://.../[app] / default / user / > retrieve_usernamehttp://.../[app] / default / user / > request_reset_passwordhttp://.../[app] / default / user / > reset_passwordhttp://.../[app] / default / user / > impersonatehttp://.../[app] / default / user / groupshttp://.../[app] / > default / user / not_authorized > > > > Is it possible to expose only some of these actions? >
[web2py] query incompatible in GAE
Greetings. I'm doing a query that returns only some fields. rows = db(db.theacher.id>0).select(db.theacher.subject) Web2py server works properly. theacher.subject math But in the GAE development server, it returns all fields. theacher.id theacher.modified_on theacher.subject 1 2010-11-27 17:12:37.685454 math Does anyone know the cause of the problem?
Re: [web2py] Re: query incompatible in GAE
Thanks Massimo. 2010/11/27 mdipierro > GAE does not support filtering of fields. We could filter at web2py > level. > Shall I implement this? Anybody against? > > Massimo > > On Nov 27, 11:55 am, appydev wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > I'm doing a query that returns only some fields. > > > > rows = db(db.theacher.id>0).select(db.theacher.subject) > > > > Web2py server works properly. > > > > theacher.subject > > math > > > > But in the GAE development server, it returns all fields. > > > > theacher.id theacher.modified_on theacher.subject > > 1 2010-11-27 17:12:37.685454 math > > > > Does anyone know the cause of the problem? >
Re: [web2py] Beginner Auth problem
Greetings. As above. I wanted to build a registration form to fill two tables, auth_user and teacher. I use SQLFORM.factory (table1, table2) to create the form. http://www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/102 to fill the tables. And auth.settings.actions_disabled = ['register'] to disable the registration form created by default. (Thanks again to massimo and to mr.freeze) But later I realized that this way is no longer created a new group to contain the user, automatically. As is indicated by: auth.settings.create_user_groups = True My question is: Is there any other functionality that is lost when working as I am doing? Am I doing my application less secure, creating myself my registration form?
Re: [web2py] Re: Beginner Auth problem
Massimo apology, no understand. Sorry if poorly formulated question, do not speak English and use google to translate. The registration form I made. working, and stored in the database correctly. My doubts began when I realized I lost functionality with respect to the registration form by default. also not to create a group for new users[1], Is there any other functionality that is lost when working as I am doing? Am I doing my application less secure, creating myself my registration form? ___ 1 Authorization Once a new user is registered, a new group is created to contain the user. The role of the new user is conventionally "user_[id]" where [id] is the id of the newly created id. The creation of the group can be disabled with auth.settings.create_user_groups = False although we do not suggest doing so. 2010/11/29 mdipierro > Lots. > > this > > form=SQLFORM.factory (table1, table2) > form.accepts(...) > > will not do any database IO > > On Nov 29, 4:28 pm, appydev wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > As above. I wanted to build a registration form to fill two tables, > > auth_user and teacher. > > > > I use SQLFORM.factory (table1, table2) to create the form. > http://www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/102to fill the tables. > > And auth.settings.actions_disabled = ['register'] to disable the > > registration form created by default. > > (Thanks again to massimo and to mr.freeze) > > > > But later I realized that this way is no longer created a new group to > > contain the user, automatically. > > As is indicated by: > > auth.settings.create_user_groups = True > > > > My question is: > > > > Is there any other functionality that is lost when working as I am doing? > > Am I doing my application less secure, creating myself my registration > form? >
[web2py] accessible_query implement in GAE.
Greetings
Is there any way to do something like this in GAE?
rows = db (auth.accessible_query ('read', db.mytable)). select
(db.mytable.ALL)
Thanks
Re: [web2py] Re: accessible_query implement in GAE.
And what do you recommend if I have the need to obtain from the database
only records for which the user performing the query has read permission?
2010/11/30 mdipierro
> Not yet.
>
> On Nov 29, 9:38 pm, appydev wrote:
> > Greetings
> >
> > Is there any way to do something like this in GAE?
> >
> > rows = db (auth.accessible_query ('read', db.mytable)). select
> > (db.mytable.ALL)
> >
> > Thanks
>
[web2py] Safety in my registration form
Greetings. I disable the registration form that generated auth: auth.settings.actions_disabled = ['register'] I made a new registration form that stores information in two tables (auth_user and teacher), with the help of this recipe: http://www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/102 But I realized that to do it myself, my form loses functionality when compared to that generated by default for auth. To be more specific, I realized that I do not think the "unique group" for each user (that's no problem because they can easily solve it.) The question is: Am I missing some other functionality? Am I doing my registration form less safe? Thanks.
[web2py] Registration form
Greetings. I disable the registration form that generated auth: auth.settings.actions_disabled = ['register'] I made a new registration form that stores information in two tables (auth_user and teacher), with the help of this recipe: http://www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/102 But I realized that to do it myself, my form loses functionality when compared to that generated by default for auth. To be more specific, I realized that I do not think the "unique group" for each user (that's no problem because they can easily solve it.) The question is: Am I missing some other functionality? Am I doing my registration form less safe? Thanks.
[web2py] even I have this doubt.
Greetings. I disable the registration form that generated auth: auth.settings.actions_disabled = ['register'] I made a new registration form that stores information in two tables (auth_user and teacher), with the help of this recipe: http://www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/102 But I realized that to do it myself, my form loses functionality when compared to that generated by default for auth. To be more specific, I realized that I do not think the "unique group" for each user (that's no problem because they can easily solve it.) The question is: Am I missing some other functionality? Am I doing my registration form less safe? If there is a better way to do this, your suggestions will be welcome. Thanks.
Re: [web2py] Re: even I have this doubt.
Thanks. But, Am I missing some other functionality? Am I doing my registration form less safe? My fear is that by making myself the registration form, perhaps this making it less safe. Is it so? 2010/12/7 mdipierro > I do not see a problem. You do not really need to have a group for > every user, unless you use > > has_permission > > and you want to give a specific permission to a single user. Anyway > you can create the groups manually too using db.auth_group.insert(...) > > Massimo > > On Dec 7, 7:52 pm, appydev wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > I disable the registration form that generated auth: > > auth.settings.actions_disabled = ['register'] > > I made a new registration form that stores information in two tables > > (auth_user and teacher), with the help of this recipe: > >http://www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/102 > > But I realized that to do it myself, my form loses functionality when > > compared to that generated by default for auth. > > > > To be more specific, I realized that I do not think the "unique group" > for > > each user (that's no problem because they can easily solve it.) > > > > The question is: Am I missing some other functionality? Am I doing my > > registration form less safe? > > > > If there is a better way to do this, your suggestions will be welcome. > > Thanks. >
Re: [web2py] Vote in web2py for PyCon 2011 Tutorials
One more vote for web2py! 2010/12/15 Bruno Rocha > PyCon is made up of a number of different parts, each with its own goals. > For the talks presented during the conference portion of PyCon, we go for > both breadth and quality. There are enough different sessions and different > tracks that each person can customize their PyCon experience according to > their interests. For tutorials, the goal is slightly different. We want to > present tutorials that help developers deal effectively with their most > common day-to-day challenges. Accordingly, the following topics have been > generally proposed for tutorials at PyCon 2011. Which of these topics would > be the most useful for you? If tutorials were held on all these topics, > which ones would you or your organization pay to attend? > > > https://spreadsheets0.google.com/viewform?formkey=dF9wdHV0SHhMLWVKV1MzX0hpYW9XZnc6MQ#gid=0 > > -- > > Bruno Rocha > http://about.me/rochacbruno/bio >
Re: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it...
Greetings. I am a new member of the community, however, I will take the dare to give my humble opinion: I think that a license of type "BSD or MIT" would be beneficial for web2py. I think the GPL license, frighten off the business and other potential users. Some do not understand the exception and others did not read it. Do not get me wrong, I love Free Software, moreover, are said to permissive licenses given the total freedom. I think that a license of type "permissive" favor the growth of the community web2py and I think we should not fear, because, as stated above, we take the example of communities of Django and Ruby on Rails, two very large communities, and very active communities that have facilitated the evolution of free software. 2010/12/16 mdipierro > GPL2 creates the loophole. The AGPL closes the loophole. The GPL3 was > supposed to incorporate language from AGPL and close the loophole but > did not. It is not clear to me whether GPL3 closes the loophole or > not. If it does not (like GPL2 does not). > > I have no objection to move to GPL3. > > Yet that does not help in clarifying the web2py license. > > As a hypothetical question. Who here would oppose to moving to BSD or > MIT or other more permissive license? > > Massimo > > On Dec 16, 2:54 pm, "Branko Vukelic" wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > > From: mdipierro > > > Sent: 12/16/10 07:56 PM > > > To: web2py-users > > > Subject: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... > > > If we were to move from GPL2 to GPL3 people would not be allowed to > > > modify web2py running on their servers without making available the > > > source code of their changes. I do not see any reason for requiring > > > this. > > > > What's AGPL for then? Wasn't _AGPL_ supposed to prevent that? Anyway, I > think GPLv3 makes i possible to use code licensed under licenses like MIT > and BSD in a GPLv3 project, which is otherwise a bit incompatible. Or did I > miss something? > > > > -- > > Branko Vukelic > > > > branko.vuke...@gmx.com > > > > http://www.brankovukelic.com/http://flickr.com/photos/foxbunny >
Re: [web2py] web2py 1.91.1 is OUT (LGPLv3)
Thank you very much! 2010/12/21 mdipierro > web2py 1.91.1 is out, the first version with a new license. > > Main changes are the license, bug fixes (compared to 1.90.*) and a new > shell that runs better than before and runs on GAE too, if you choose > to deploy it. > > Massimo > >
Re: [web2py] The stability of web2py releases
Regards, Sometimes I notice that when an error is detected in the stable,this is fixed in the trunk. On the other hand, all the new featuresare included in the trunk. New features bring new bugs, thus thetrunk will always have some errors that are passed to the stable. I think there should be a version, not to call it ... , Something likeUbuntu LTS (Long Term Support). and that this version receiveimmediate bug fixes. and other critical updates that do notprovide new features mean, for a considerable time until thestable version and has been sufficiently tested. 2010/12/21 Luther Goh Lu Feng > I have started using web2py a few months ago and I have noticed that > some of the releases might actually be far from stable. Take for > instance, the 1.90 release. There were unfortunately quite a few > uncaught bugs and this was followed by a flurry of bug fix releases. I > understand that this is because there are not enough people testing > trunk. > > Given that web2py is supposed to be an enterprise web framework, I > wonder if it will be better if stable release versions are identified, > so that existing users of web2py can do upgrades without having > serious worries about breakage. Or are there some existing practices > that existing web2py users have to address such issues?
Re: [web2py] The stability of web2py releases
I have not talked for 3 years. not, I did not say which should be LTS. I said that there should be a stable release, and is receiving immediate bug fixes. and other critical updates that do not provide new features mean, for a considerable time until the new features are sufficiently tested. but did not know how to call because there is already a stable version. Let me make clear that what I propose, is one of stability, no way I'd like to see decrease the wonderful pace with evolving web2py. 2010/12/22 Branko Vukelić > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM, appydev wrote: > > I think there should be a version, not to call it ... , > > Something likeUbuntu LTS (Long Term Support). and that > > this version receiveimmediate bug fixes. and other critical > updates that do > > notprovide new features mean, for a considerable time until thestable > > version and has been sufficiently tested. > > LTS is a completely different ting. It means a lot of backporting of > stuff that's fixed in later releases, and keeping it supported for 3 > years. I don't think any framework does it. It's sufficient that we > have a stable and unstable (or edge, or whatever) versions. The latter > would be a _released_ version, but is not considered thoroughly > tested. It's like Debian's unstable->testing->stable cycle. > > > -- > Branko Vukelic > > stu...@brankovukelic.com > http://www.brankovukelic.com/ >
Re: [web2py] Re: The stability of web2py releases
I totally agree with Jonathan Lundell, I think the changes he proposes, would provide stability web2py, and I'm sure will appeal to users (both new and existing). My humble opinion is that the way they attack the bugs, is one of the weaknesses ofweb2py, I think it is messy and I'm sure many have decided not to use web2py for it. 2010/12/22 Jonathan Lundell > On Dec 22, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Branko Vukelić wrote: > > > > 2010/12/22 Luis Díaz : > >> > >> in particular whenever new versions come out ... I always say ... have > >> to wait 1 week or 2 to becomestable ... > > > > Not "become stable", but "be proven stable". You release, wait for > > everyone to give it a go. If everyone is happy, then it's considered > > stable, and move to stable box on the downloads page. If someone > > complains, it stays in unstable indefinitely, and a new release is > > made fixing the bugs. > > The problem is that "become stable" is in conflict with "add new features", > and the new release that fixes the bugs also gets new (and buggy) features. > > Linux has a similar problem, that gets addressed a couple of ways. One is > that we have Linux distributions independent of (and lagging) the core > kernel releases: Red Hat, Ubuntu, etc. The other, somewhat more recent, is > that certain kernel releases are maintained by the core kernel developers as > stable points. > > The web2py equivalent would be something like this. Massimo releases > 1.91.1, and we (for some "we") decide that that's a good feature/stability > set for a stable release point. We then create a stable branch, and somebody > (for some "somebody"--this is the catch) back-ports bug fixes to the stable > branch, so we have 1.91.1.1, 1.91.1.2, etc, with *only* confirmed bug fixes, > no new features, being back-ported. Meanwhile, trunk development proceeds > with 1.91, 1.93, etc. > > Problem is, maintaining stable branches requires real work, and in this > environment it means volunteer work.
Re: [web2py] Re: Cannot operate on a closed database
Why not so with: request = current.request? Is it safe to use the following? # modules/myobjects.py from gluon import * request,session,response,T,cache = current.request,current.session,current.response,current.T,current.cache and then use some class method : if form.accepts(request, session): Or rather it is better to use directly: if form.accepts(current.request, current.session): Do not think of something analogous to this affirmation made for the db object? the problem is that the latter statement is done at top leve therefor it is only executed once when the module is imported by the first http request. The module is then cached in ram and that line is no longer executed. Therefore db is not the current thread local database object but it is a reference to the db object of the first http request which by now may be closed. You cannot extract objects from the thread local "current" when you import the module, you have to do it inside functions called when a controller is executed. I apologize for my English. 2011/6/26 Massimo Di Pierro > I found the cause it this problem. It is not a bug in web2py but > something to be careful about in your programs. > > You have a models/meteo.py which imports modules/meteo.py. > > models/meteo.py does > > current.database = db > > and modules/mete.py does > > db = current.database > > the problem is that the latter statement is done at top leve therefor > it is only executed once when the module is imported by the first http > request. The module is then cached in ram and that line is no longer > executed. Therefore db is not the current thread local database > object but it is a reference to the db object of the first http > request which by now may be closed. You cannot extract objects from > the thread local "current" when you import the module, you have to do > it inside functions called when a controller is executed. > > Hope this makes sense. > > > > On Jun 24, 10:31 am, Manuele Pesenti > wrote: > > dear all, > > I've added a unique field to some existing tables and w2p gave me an > > error saing that he cannot add unique fields to a table so I deleted my > > db and restarted as a new application but I obtained this: > > > > ProgrammingError: Cannot operate on a closed database. > > > > it's sufficient to comment out the property unique=True and no errors > > occurs. > > > > Here under you can find the complete traceback. > > Any suggestion?? > > > > Thanks a lot > > > > Manuele > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > >File > > "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/restricted.py", line > > 192, in restricted > > exec ccode in environment > >File > > > "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/applications/wind2pow2/contro > llers/appadmin.py", > > line 410, in > >File "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/globals.py", > > line 137, in > > self._caller = lambda f: f() > >File > > > "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/applications/wind2pow2/contro > llers/appadmin.py", > > line 126, in insert > > form = SQLFORM(db[table], ignore_rw=ignore_rw) > >File "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/sqlhtml.py", > > line 817, in __init__ > > inp = self.widgets.options.widget(field, default) > >File "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/sqlhtml.py", > > line 206, in widget > > options = requires[0].options() > >File > > "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/validators.py", line > > 438, in options > > self.build_set() > >File > > "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/validators.py", line > > 426, in build_set > > records = self.dbset.select(*fields, **dd) > >File "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/dal.py", > > line 5382, in select > > return self.db._adapter.select(self.query,fields,attributes) > >File "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/dal.py", > > line 1159, in select > > rows = response(sql) > >File "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/dal.py", > > line 1149, in response > > self.execute(sql) > >File "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/dal.py", > > line 1234, in execute > > return self.log_execute(*a, **b) > >File "/home/manuele/Dropbox/sviluppo/web2py-1.96.4/gluon/dal.py", > > line 1229, in log_execute > > ret = self.cursor.execute(*a,**b) > > ProgrammingError: Cannot operate on a closed database. >
Re: [web2py] web2py received 2011 BOSSIE Award by InfoWorld.com
[?] 2011/9/7 wwwgong > Congratulations! > > more details from here: > > http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source-software/bossie-awards-2011-the-best-open-source-application-development-software-171759-0¤t=10&last=1#slideshowTop > <<330.gif>>
[web2py] Incompatibility with web2py 1.95.1.
Regards. Some time ago I took my first steps with web2py and web programming. Make a small application that works perfectly in web2py Version 1.89.5 and earlier, but today after spending some time away due to college, I resumed my training and I upgraded to web2py 1.95.1, and I realize that my application and is not compatible because SQLFORM.factory no longer works when the tables have fields with common names. The following can be read in the book: SQLFORM.factory One form for multiple tables "This only works when to the tables Do not Have field names in common. " My question is: How I can make my application compatible with new versions of web2py without having to change the field names in common? Translated from Spanish with the help of Google translator.
