I have not talked for 3 years. not, I did not say which should be LTS. I said that there should be a stable release, and is receiving immediate bug fixes. and other critical updates that do not provide new features mean, for a considerable time until the new features are sufficiently tested. but did not know how to call because there is already a stable version.
Let me make clear that what I propose, is one of stability, no way I'd like to see decrease the wonderful pace with evolving web2py. 2010/12/22 Branko Vukelić <stu...@brankovukelic.com> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM, appydev <appy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think there should be a version, not to call it ... , > > Something likeUbuntu LTS (Long Term Support). and that > > this version receiveimmediate bug fixes. and other critical > updates that do > > notprovide new features mean, for a considerable time until thestable > > version and has been sufficiently tested. > > LTS is a completely different ting. It means a lot of backporting of > stuff that's fixed in later releases, and keeping it supported for 3 > years. I don't think any framework does it. It's sufficient that we > have a stable and unstable (or edge, or whatever) versions. The latter > would be a _released_ version, but is not considered thoroughly > tested. It's like Debian's unstable->testing->stable cycle. > > > -- > Branko Vukelic > > stu...@brankovukelic.com > http://www.brankovukelic.com/ >
