Re: A Software Center for Fedora? [ somewhat OT ]
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:23 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 12:04 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> On 05/23/2013 12:00 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > >> > On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 14:40 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> >> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan > >> >> wrote: > >> >> On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 18:58 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > >> >> > On 18 May 2013 18:27, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> >> > > Any GNOME application is pretty much the same as any GTK > >> >> > > application > >> >> > > >> >> > Agreed. gnome-software just requires gtk3-devel at the > >> >> > moment so it'll work fine in LXDE/XFCE and will work fine > >> >> > in KDE if looking a little foreign. > >> >> > >> >> If only. I recently spent about a day figuring out why > >> >> evolution > >> >> wouldn't send emails on a KDE desktop. The reason is a > >> >> disagreement > >> >> between evolution, gnome-keyring, and the KDE infrastructure. > >> >> I have a workaround but no fix. > >> >> > >> >> Do file a bug report > >> > > >> > Where should I file it: evolution bugzilla, gnome keyring bugzilla, > >> > general KDE bugzilla, general Gnome bugzilla? I know developers frown > >> > on filing bug reports in more than one place. (Please excuse the late > >> > reply.) > >> > >> Hard to say without you giving details about what your workaround was. > >> > >> In my experience, > >> gnome developers generally use upstream bugzilla almost exclusively > >> > >> fedora kde-sig usually recommends: > >> * if you think it a distro-specific issue, use bugzilla.redhat.com > >> * if you think it an upstream issue, use bugs.kde.org > >> * and if in doubt, try distro/downstream bugzilla first. > > > > None of your suggestions seems exactly appropriate. > > > > The workaround is simply to autostart seahorse at the beginning of each > > session, double click on its Login padlock icon, and enter my login > > password. Having done this, evolution can get the password for the smtp > > server from the keyring. > > > > Under Gnome (as I remember it) the Login keyring is automatically > > enabled at login time. In the past (before Fedora-18, I think), when I > > attempted to send the first email of a session a popup box would appear > > (probably put up by the gnome-keyring system) to request my login > > password. More recently, this has not happened, so evolution simply > > hangs if the keyring is not opened manually. > > > Sounds like gnome-keyring-pam not functioning properly, thats the piece > that's supposed to auto-unlock your gnome-keyring on login. > > -- rex > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907156 Try yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gcr John -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
firefox crash
Hello, I observed a lot of crashes with firefox 21 for example just going to www.thesaurus.com I also use ABP to block the AD, but it does not seem to be the poblem. What is wrong ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox crash
On 05/24/13 16:38, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I observed a lot of crashes with firefox 21 > for example just going to www.thesaurus.com > I also use ABP to block the AD, but it does not seem to be the poblem. > > What is wrong ? I just went to www.thesaurus.com and had no problems You've tried starting FF in safe mode? -- The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Zathura -
On 24/05/13 02:10, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Regrettably, epdfview is dead. The best option is to switch to evince or zathura, following: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904148 I switched to zathura, and all pdf's render. Ranjan I just yum installed zathura in F-18/64/XFCE. It appears to run but displays a blank form with only [No name] at the bottom left. [bobg@box10 ~]$ zathura /mnt/HOME1/Documents/Toro/3375-638.pdf error: could not open plugin directory: /usr/lib64/zathura error: unknown file type Perhaps it wont work with XFCE? -- http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 Fedora-18 XFCE Linux -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Alien
I have an app that is available in three formats: Mac, Windows and .DEB. I would like to install it on my Fedora box, but, obviously, Fedora doesn't support .DEB files. So, I thought, why not use Alien to install it? Except, there doesn't seem to be an Alien RPM for Fedora 18. The most recent I could find was Fedora 16. Has Alien been abandoned? If not, where can I find it? Thanks! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Zathura -
On Fri, 24 May 2013 05:25:22 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > I just yum installed zathura in F-18/64/XFCE. It appears to run but displays > a blank form with only [No name] at the bottom left. > > [bobg@box10 ~]$ zathura /mnt/HOME1/Documents/Toro/3375-638.pdf > error: could not open plugin directory: /usr/lib64/zathura > error: unknown file type > > > Perhaps it wont work with XFCE? It's sort of "mispackaged". You need to install the zathura-pdf-poppler package, too. The zathura package description mentions that "plugins" are used, but is describes Zathura as PDF viewer although by default it cannot displays PDF, because the pdf-poppler plugin is not installed. Description : Zathura is a highly configurable and functional PDF viewer based on the Poppler rendering library and the GTK+ toolkit. The idea behind zathura is an application that provides a minimalist and space saving interface as well as an easy usage that mainly focuses on keyboard interaction. Zathura uses plugins to open different file formats, for instance: * zathura-pdf-poppler to open PDF files, * zathura-ps to open PostScript files, * zathura-djvu to open DjVu files. All of these are available in Fedora. -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.3-301.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.17 0.07 0.06 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Alien
On Fri, 24 May 2013 06:56:31 -0400, John Aldrich wrote: > I have an app that is available in three formats: Mac, Windows and .DEB. > I would like to install it on my Fedora box, but, obviously, Fedora > doesn't support .DEB files. So, I thought, why not use Alien to install > it? Except, there doesn't seem to be an Alien RPM for Fedora 18. The > most recent I could find was Fedora 16. Has Alien been abandoned? If > not, where can I find it? First place to look at is Fedora package git. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/alien.git/ It's a rather new addition to the package collection. The package review has been completed just recently: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695233 -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.3-301.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.29 0.23 0.13 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Alien
Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2013 06:56:31 -0400, John Aldrich wrote: > >> I have an app that is available in three formats: Mac, Windows and .DEB. >> I would like to install it on my Fedora box, but, obviously, Fedora >> doesn't support .DEB files. So, I thought, why not use Alien to install >> it? Except, there doesn't seem to be an Alien RPM for Fedora 18. The >> most recent I could find was Fedora 16. Has Alien been abandoned? If >> not, where can I find it? > > First place to look at is Fedora package git. > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/alien.git/ > > It's a rather new addition to the package collection. > The package review has been completed just recently: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695233 > I don't know how useful alien would really be. Because package naming is not consistent between debian and Fedora, I'm guessing that it's unlikely to be able to satisfy requirements most of the time. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: A Software Center for Fedora?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/17/2013 09:45 PM, Anthony wrote: > One of the things I really like about Ubuntu is the concept behind > the software center. Canonical has poorly implemented it but the > idea behind it is pretty solid. > > That got me wondering...why doesn't Fedora have a similar product? > Yes, I'm aware of Yum Extender but that's not a 'proper' software > store. I mean a full fledged store, complete with backend > processing and tracking. > > Perhaps this is something that would be better for the dev list but > I thought I'd float it here before going there just to see the > general feel of the community. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, Anthony Papillion > There are some very interesting ideas in this thread that are probably worth having a session on at Flock. I've added a workshop proposal to http://flock-lmacken.rhcloud.com/proposals (as a proxy; I'm not necessarily the right person to run that discussion, but maybe to moderate it). If this is an interesting topic to you, please try to make it to Flock! http://www.flocktofedora.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlGfX/oACgkQeiVVYja6o6NoAACdEafwsEA6S9eLIV6Py2DibNU0 8woAoIR3uoN37RbIQK3sqUotDkRQrYO3 =Bzf6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Zathura -
On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:57:21 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2013 05:25:22 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > > I just yum installed zathura in F-18/64/XFCE. It appears to run but > > displays a blank form with only [No name] at the bottom left. > > > > [bobg@box10 ~]$ zathura /mnt/HOME1/Documents/Toro/3375-638.pdf > > error: could not open plugin directory: /usr/lib64/zathura > > error: unknown file type > > > > > > Perhaps it wont work with XFCE? > > It's sort of "mispackaged". You need to install the zathura-pdf-poppler > package, too. The zathura package description mentions that "plugins" are > used, but is describes Zathura as PDF viewer although by default it cannot > displays PDF, because the pdf-poppler plugin is not installed. > > Description : > Zathura is a highly configurable and functional PDF viewer based on the > Poppler > rendering library and the GTK+ toolkit. The idea behind zathura is an > application that provides a minimalist and space saving interface as well as > an easy usage that mainly focuses on keyboard interaction. > > Zathura uses plugins to open different file formats, for instance: > * zathura-pdf-poppler to open PDF files, > * zathura-ps to open PostScript files, > * zathura-djvu to open DjVu files. > All of these are available in Fedora. I also found configuration confusing earlier, but the following helped me get there (as per my notes on my zathurarc in my $HOME/.config/zathura/zathurarc # http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/oneiric/man5/zathurarc.5.html # # see also http://pwmt.org/projects/zathura/configuration/ # and http://pwmt.org/projects/zathura/options/ # as well as http://pwmt.org/projects/girara/options/ Example: set window-height 1150 set window-width 887 set adjust-open width map goto top map goto bottom map scroll full-up map scroll full-down map scroll full-up map r rotate rotate-cw map c rotate rotate-ccw --= One thing I was not able to find is how to get a NextPage key-binding using the PageDown which does not also impact the Spacebar (which by default only pages down the screen, which I would like to keep). HTH, Ranjan GET FREE SMILEYS FOR YOUR IM & EMAIL - Learn more at http://www.inbox.com/smileys Works with AIM®, MSN® Messenger, Yahoo!® Messenger, ICQ®, Google Talk™ and most webmails -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
lvm from NAS
Hi, I will try to recover some folder deleted from one disk that is part of RAID 1 using Fedora Security Lab scenario: 1. Is a disk from NAS iomega StorCenter ix2 (two disk, RAID 1) 2. this nas was configured to obtain accounts from a Active Directory users 3. with the web interface of the NAS, a shared folder from some user was deleted. 4. this NAS haven't a recovery tool for deleted files and folders. 5. I was attach one of the two disk on Backtrack live then the same disk on Centos and I discover this: - I can't mount the disk (backtrack say me "is a lvm2pv", centos ask me for a disk format) - Disk format: 83 Linux (with centos) - pvscan,vgscan, lvscan don't work properly, because there are no volumes to restore. and this is OK because I don't want to restore the RAID. I need to recover some foldes from this disk, I don't need to reconstruct the RAID 1. How can a do this with FSL I will appreciate your aids. sincerely, Ricardo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Zathura -
On 24/05/13 06:57, Michael Schwendt wrote: It's sort of "mispackaged". You need to install the zathura-pdf-poppler package, too. The zathura package description mentions that "plugins" are used, but is describes Zathura as PDF viewer although by default it cannot displays PDF, because the pdf-poppler plugin is not installed. Description : Zathura is a highly configurable and functional PDF viewer based on the Poppler rendering library and the GTK+ toolkit. The idea behind zathura is an application that provides a minimalist and space saving interface as well as an easy usage that mainly focuses on keyboard interaction. Zathura uses plugins to open different file formats, for instance: * zathura-pdf-poppler to open PDF files, * zathura-ps to open PostScript files, * zathura-djvu to open DjVu files. All of these are available in Fedora. Good, I installed the three plug-ins and it now displays the pdf file I was testing with. I put it into "full screen" and it took a while to find that could be undone with F5 ... I'm not sure it's any better than evince but I saw it mentioned and wanted to try it. I will try the commands Ranjan suggests. Thanks, Bob -- http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 Fedora-18 XFCE Linux -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
VERP and Exim sender_verify - was Re: Solicited sales email distribution - advice needed
Hi folks
I haven't re-invented the wheel but have borrowed someone else's. I'm managed
to do all of the functionality within EXIM and have even managed to manage
the subscription list from our CRM :-)
I basically have /etc/aliases.d/list. which is used to inform EXIM
(a) that the mailing list exists and (b) contains the addresses of
administrators who are allowed to post and who receive errors.
I then have /etc/aliases.d/list..members which contains the target
addresses.
I then set up EXIM as per
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-some_common_configuration_settings.html
including using VERP and other settings to generate individual outgoing
emails and individual incoming error messages.
All works as expected except where the remote mail server does a
sender_verify. For some reason when the remote server does a sender_verify my
EXIM server doesn't verify the sender (VERP generated FROM address) despite
being able to handle errors coming back to the same address. Anyone got a
clue what I've missed.
The relevent sections of my config consists of:
begin routers
#Added because Yahoo based services are blocking 88.211.105.30
smarthost:
driver = manualroute
domains = +smarthost_domains
transport = remote_smtp
route_data = mail.vaioni.com
no_more
verp_dnslookup:
driver = dnslookup
domains = ! +local_domains
transport = remote_smtp
condition = ${if match {$return_path}{^(.+?)-bou...@ringways.co.uk\$} {yes}
{no}}
errors_to = ${if match {$return_path}{^(.+?)-bou...@ringways.co.uk\$}\
{$1-bounce+$local_part=$dom...@ringways.co.uk}fail}
no_more
dnslookup:
driver = dnslookup
domains = ! +local_domains
# domains = groucho.ringways.co.uk
transport = ${if match {$return_path}{^(.+?)-bou...@ringways.co.uk\$}\
{verp_smtp}{remote_smtp}}
ignore_target_hosts = 0.0.0.0 : 127.0.0.0/8
no_more
# The remaining routers handle addresses in the local domain(s), that is those
# domains that are defined by "domainlist local_domains" above.
# handle distribution lists
distribution_lists:
driver = redirect
domains = ringways.co.uk
condition = ${if exists {/etc/aliases.d/lists.$local_part.members} {yes}
{no}}
file = /etc/aliases.d/lists.$local_part.members
# forbid_pipe
forbid_file
errors_to = $local_part-bou...@ringways.co.uk
no_more
distribution_list_requests:
driver = redirect
domains = ringways.co.uk
local_part_suffix = -bounce*
file = /etc/aliases.d/lists.$local_part
no_more
..
begin transports
# This transport is used for delivering messages over SMTP connections.
remote_smtp:
driver = smtp
# used with distribution lists
verp_smtp:
driver = smtp
max_rcpt = 1
return_path = ${if match {$return_path}{^(.+?)-bou...@ringways.co.uk\$}\
{$1-bounce+$local_part=$dom...@ringways.co.uk}fail}
# This transport is used for delivering messages over SMTP using the
# "message submission" port (RFC4409).
On Monday 20 May 2013 16:31:18 Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Hi Folks.
>
> I have at work one of our salesmen who has an opt-in stock-list
> distribution that has been running for some time now. He has in excess of
> 2500 recipients on this list.
>
> Up until now he has simply had a Distribution list in his MS Outlook which
> he maintains himself. He then sends himself an email every week containing
> the stock list and BCC's the distribution list. Other than generating an
> excessive load on my EXIM server there has been no real down side to this
> as it meant that I didn't have to get involved.
>
> However, we are now experiencing problems and I would like a better
> solution.
>
> I need a system that will distribute the email to each recipient as a
> seperate message, and if possible will monitor and highlight any emails
> that fail.
>
> Can anyone suggest a way of doing this? Ideally I would like the salesman
> to still be able to administer it but that isn't essential. If it is a
> system that is either text file or database driven I can create a UI that
> he would be able to use.
>
> Gary
--
Gary Stainburn
Group I.T. Manager
Ringways Garages
http://www.ringways.co.uk
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] dual change log entry with retro changelog plugin
sorry for the high traffic. discussed with some collegues and it seems the following is applicable: "It's not a bug, it's a feauture!" the attribute passwordgraceusertime is not present in the iPlanet LDAP server or perhaps not enabled by default. https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.1/html/Schema_Reference/Schema_Reference-Operational_Attributes_Special_Attributes_and_Special_Object_Classes.html#passwordGrace_UserTime . So instead of filing a bug, my question is: is it possible to somehow not have this attribute reset? I couldn't find anything under password policy. Googling did not help either. Any help is greatly appreciated! On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Vincent Gerris wrote: > I verified this behaviour is still present in Fedora 389 Directory Server > 1.2.6. > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Vincent Gerris wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I think I found it, it seems a bug to me. >> With audit logging enabled, I noticed a difference in output in the >> output log when changing for example a fax field or the password. >> I also noticed that this is also reproducible with the 389 admin GUI. >> What I see for example with changing a fax number is: >> >> >> time: 20130524143610 >> dn: uid=,ou=,o=* >> changetype: modify >> replace: telephoneNumber >> telephoneNumber: 1234 >> - >> replace: modifiersname >> modifiersname: >> uid=admin,ou=administrators,ou=topologymanagement,o=netscaperoot >> - >> replace: modifytimestamp >> modifytimestamp: 20130524123610Z >> - >> >> When ANY modification is made where the password field is modified, I >> see something like this: >> >> time: 20130524141847 >> dn: uid=,ou=,o=* >> changetype: modify >> delete: preferredLanguage >> - >> replace: userPassword >> userPassword::somelongthingjhere* >> = >> - >> replace: modifiersname >> modifiersname: >> uid=admin,ou=administrators,ou=topologymanagement,o=netscaperoot >> - >> replace: modifytimestamp >> modifytimestamp: 20130524121847Z >> - >> >> time: 20130524141847 >> dn: uid=,ou=,o=* >> changetype: modify >> replace: passwordgraceusertime >> passwordgraceusertime: 0 >> - >> >> Note the extra time: entry. >> Apparently, this extra time enty triggers the creation of the extra >> changelog entry. >> I looked on the old iPlanet server, when a password is changed there, >> there is no second time entry. >> >> Can anyone check this on a recent 389 or RH DS? >> >> kind regards, >> Vincent >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Vincent Gerris wrote: >>> Hi Ludwig and fellow readers, >>> >>> I will do that. >>> In the mean time I did some more investigating of the access log and >>> it seems like a bug to mee. >>> It may be true that sometime triggers te bug, but this is what I see >>> in the access log: >>> [24/May/2013:12:16:48 +0200] conn=20 op=1 MOD >>> dn="uid=,ou=***,o=*" >>> >>> This single MOD log entry in the access log triggers 2 changelog >>> entries with the same time step, but one with a higher numer (+1). >>> I believe the proper behaviour of the Retro Changelog Plugin schould >>> be that only 1 entry is made in the cn-changelog tree. >>> >>> We are running 9.0.0 of the Red Hat Directory Server now, perhaps this >>> is a bug that is fixed in the mean time? >>> I am now off to enable Audit logging and perhaps after that look with >>> wireshark at what happens. >>> I hope in the mean time someone can confirm this bug and maybe a solution? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Vincent >>> >>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Ludwig Krispenz >>> wrote: On 05/23/2013 02:22 PM, Vincent Gerris wrote: > > Hi Ludwig, > > We see the same change with a different change number. > This does not happen while using the 389-console or a tool we use to > directly connect to the directory. > When other integration tools are used that do no trigger a duplicate > entry with iPlanet, they do show a duplicate entry. > I can attach a part of the slapd access log file that records this > activity. maybe you can also turn on audit logging and see if there is a difference in the ops from different clients > We are planning a migration from iPlanet 5 to RH DS 9 and this came up > yesterday. > > Kind regards, > Vincent > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Ludwig Krispenz > wrote: >> >> What do you mean by two entries - the same change duplicate with >> different >> change numbers or an additional change logged ? >> >> Ludwig >> >> >> On 05/23/2013 08:57 AM, Vincent Gerris wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We are using Red Hat Enterprise Directory Server (which is a stable >>> 389). >>> We have been using the retro changelog plugin from the old iPlanet >>> server for synchronisatio
Re: Zathura - A Space Adventure
On 24.05.2013 12:57, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2013 05:25:22 -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > >> I just yum installed zathura in F-18/64/XFCE. It appears to run but displays >> a blank form with only [No name] at the bottom left. >> >> [bobg@box10 ~]$ zathura /mnt/HOME1/Documents/Toro/3375-638.pdf >> error: could not open plugin directory: /usr/lib64/zathura >> error: unknown file type >> >> >> Perhaps it wont work with XFCE? > > It's sort of "mispackaged". You need to install the zathura-pdf-poppler > package, too. The zathura package description mentions that "plugins" are > used, but is describes Zathura as PDF viewer although by default it cannot > displays PDF, because the pdf-poppler plugin is not installed. repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura/* dnf provides /usr/lib64/zathura/* Don't bother package maintainer, weekend begins. ;) poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox crash
On 05/24/2013 01:38 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I observed a lot of crashes with firefox 21 > for example just going to www.thesaurus.com > I also use ABP to block the AD, but it does not seem to be the poblem. Just went there with ABP -- works fine. If you just updated firefox, you may need to reboot the machine - I've seen stability problems before reboot -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Zathura - A Space Adventure
On 24/05/13 11:58, poma wrote: repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura/* dnf provides /usr/lib64/zathura/* Don't bother package maintainer, weekend begins. ;) poma Guess I had the wrong query? yum whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura No Matches found -- http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 Fedora-18 XFCE Linux -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Alien
On Fri, 24 May 2013, Neal Becker wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: I don't know how useful alien would really be. Because package naming is not consistent between debian and Fedora, I'm guessing that it's unlikely to be able to satisfy requirements most of the time. That's what I keep running into. There are a couple of apps I use a lot (Makehuman,for example) that are not packaged for fedora. I've tried to get them going, including compiling from scratch, but keep running into dependency problems. They are solvable but simply not worth the effort of tracking down. I ended up installing Mint in virtualbox and run it from there on my fedora box. billo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Zathura - A Space Adventure
On 05/24/13 11:28, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > On 24/05/13 11:58, poma wrote: >> repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura/* >> dnf provides /usr/lib64/zathura/* >> >> Don't bother package maintainer, weekend begins. ;) >> >> >> poma > > Guess I had the wrong query? > > yum whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura > No Matches found > Under rawhide: yum provides /usr/lib64/zathura/* zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.3-1.fc20.x86_64 : PDF support for zathura via poppler Repo: rawhide Matched from: Filename: /usr/lib64/zathura/pdf.so zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.3-1.fc20.x86_64 : PDF support for zathura via poppler Repo: @rawhide Matched from: Filename: /usr/lib64/zathura/pdf.so Kevin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Alien
On 05/24/2013 06:34 PM, Bill Oliver wrote: On Fri, 24 May 2013, Neal Becker wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: I don't know how useful alien would really be. Because package naming is not consistent between debian and Fedora, I'm guessing that it's unlikely to be able to satisfy requirements most of the time. That's what I keep running into. There are a couple of apps I use a lot (Makehuman,for example) that are not packaged for fedora. Makehuman is packaged for Fedora. # repoquery makehuman makehuman-0:0.9.1-0.9.rc1a.fc18.x86_64 Ralf -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Zathura - A Space Adventure
On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:49:28 -0500 Kevin Martin wrote: > On 05/24/13 11:28, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > > On 24/05/13 11:58, poma wrote: > >> repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura/* > >> dnf provides /usr/lib64/zathura/* > >> > >> Don't bother package maintainer, weekend begins. ;) > >> > >> > >> poma > > > > Guess I had the wrong query? > > > > yum whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura > > No Matches found > > > Under rawhide: > > yum provides /usr/lib64/zathura/* > > zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.3-1.fc20.x86_64 : PDF support for zathura via poppler > Repo: rawhide > Matched from: > Filename: /usr/lib64/zathura/pdf.so > > > > zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.3-1.fc20.x86_64 : PDF support for zathura via poppler > Repo: @rawhide > Matched from: > Filename: /usr/lib64/zathura/pdf.so > > > Kevin Any chance 2.3.1 will come to F18? Ranjan TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if5 Capture screenshots, upload images, edit and send them to your friends through IMs, post on Twitter®, Facebook®, MySpace™, LinkedIn® – FAST! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Zathura - A Space Adventure
On Fri, 24 May 2013 17:58:29 +0200, poma wrote: > repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura/* > dnf provides /usr/lib64/zathura/* Uh? What run-time environment is that with? For comparison, this is with Fedora 19 development: $ repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura/* zathura-djvu-0:0.2.2-1.fc19.x86_64 zathura-pdf-poppler-0:0.2.2-1.fc19.x86_64 zathura-djvu-0:0.2.3-1.fc19.x86_64 zathura-pdf-poppler-0:0.2.3-1.fc19.x86_64 zathura-ps-0:0.2.2-1.fc19.x86_64 zathura-ps-0:0.2.1-1.fc19.x86_64 -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.3-301.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.23 0.11 0.08 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Alien
On Fri, 24 May 2013, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Makehuman is packaged for Fedora. # repoquery makehuman makehuman-0:0.9.1-0.9.rc1a.fc18.x86_64 Ralf Thanks, but it turns out that the current version is 1.0 alpha 7, and the differences between 0.9 and 1.0 are pretty big. billo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Alien
On 05/24/2013 03:45 PM, Bill Oliver wrote: Thanks, but it turns out that the current version is 1.0 alpha 7, and the differences between 0.9 and 1.0 are pretty big. So, request an update Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Alien
On 05/24/2013 03:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 05/24/2013 03:45 PM, Bill Oliver wrote: Thanks, but it turns out that the current version is 1.0 alpha 7, and the differences between 0.9 and 1.0 are pretty big. So, request an update I have filed one now at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967124 Next time, consider doing so before you attempt workarounds like building it yourself or using alien or whatever else Rahul -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox crash
Am 24.05.2013 10:38, schrieb Patrick Dupre: > Hello, > > I observed a lot of crashes with firefox 21 > for example just going to www.thesaurus.com > I also use ABP to block the AD, but it does not seem to be the poblem > > What is wrong ? which build are you using [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q firefox firefox-21.0-4.fc18.x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=421141 [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q xulrunner xulrunner-21.0-5.fc18.x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=420991 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Zathura - A Space Adventure
On 24.05.2013 19:47, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2013 17:58:29 +0200, poma wrote:
>
>> repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura/*
>> dnf provides /usr/lib64/zathura/*
>
> Uh? What run-time environment is that with?
>
> For comparison, this is with Fedora 19 development:
>
> $ repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib64/zathura/*
> zathura-djvu-0:0.2.2-1.fc19.x86_64
> zathura-pdf-poppler-0:0.2.2-1.fc19.x86_64
> zathura-djvu-0:0.2.3-1.fc19.x86_64
> zathura-pdf-poppler-0:0.2.3-1.fc19.x86_64
> zathura-ps-0:0.2.2-1.fc19.x86_64
> zathura-ps-0:0.2.1-1.fc19.x86_64
Kulové Krávě.
Whoever wants to, file a bug >= Monday ;)
Have a nice weekend-1.
poma
diff --git a/zathura.spec b/zathura.spec
index 9b8f490..1f7ec3e 100644
--- a/zathura.spec
+++ b/zathura.spec
@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ License:zlib
URL:http://pwmt.org/projects/%{name}/
Source0:http://pwmt.org/projects/%{name}/download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
+Requires: zathura-djvu >= 0.2
+Requires: zathura-pdf-poppler >= 0.2
+Requires: zathura-ps >= 0.2
+
BuildRequires: cairo-devel
BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
BuildRequires: file-devel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Dual screen video display problem
Hello, I have had a video display issue after an update a few months ago. I cannot post from work due to mail filters so I am posting from another account so responses will be slower. Fedora 18, 64bit, clean install using nvidia graphics with Nouveau using KDE. Both monitors are the same make and model. Purchased at the same time. Before the problem occurred, I would boot and get all messages on the left screen until the X server started. If the screen saver locked the screen, the unlock dialog box would be on the left screen (screen 0). I could run KDE with effects enabled. The first indication of a problem was the reboot after the kernel upgrade and error messages about the KDE desktop effects not being able to run. Due to work schedule, I couldn't deal with the problem before now. Now, when I boot, the left display shows the BIOS boot and then the displays enter mirror mode. When the X server kicks in and KDE starts, the display goes to side by side as expected. The desktop works as side by side when I can drag windows between the monitors and virtual desktops as expected, just slower. I cannot run any of the KDE desktop effects. When the screen saver kicks in, it is a different screen savers on each monitor, not one across both. Previously it was one screen saver across both monitors. Using the Galaxy screen saver, the star movements would go between the screens. Now there are two different galaxy scenes and motions. If I move the trackball, I get a unlock dialog box on both screens but they are not mirrored. If I enter a password in to either dialog box, the desktop unlocks. I cannot use anything that requires a full screen such as You Tube videos in a browser or any game. I have gone through the settings in Grub and tried different desktop settings. Nothing I can find on the net has pointed me in the right direction on this matter. This setup has worked flawlessly for two years now and worked well until the update. Due to this issue, the system runs slower when moving between screens or virtual desktops. Lack of full screen is a pain for some things. No Tux Extreme racer unless I want mirrored action. I have tried changing the "GRUB_GFXMODE=" with no success. Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3840 x 1080, maximum 8192 x 8192 DVI-I-1 connected primary 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 531mm x 298mm 1920x1080 60.0*+ 1680x1050 59.9 1600x900 60.0 1280x1024 60.0 1280x960 60.0 1280x800 59.9 1280x720 60.0 1024x768 60.0 1024x576 60.0 800x60060.3 640x48060.0 DVI-I-2 connected 1920x1080+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 531mm x 298mm 1920x1080 60.0*+ 1680x1050 59.9 1600x900 60.0 1280x1024 60.0 1280x960 60.0 1280x800 59.9 1280x720 60.0 1024x768 60.0 1024x576 60.0 800x60060.3 640x48060.0 I hope someone can point me in the right direction to get operation back to normal. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Big problem with an update
I was updating Fedora 19 tonight when my system crashed ( I suspect it's a memory error)but anyway it now **appears I have a lot of duplicate files on my system, at least that what yum check all reports. The crash happened after the updates had been installed I think during the verify stage. This is a partial list of what "yum check all" reports: Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit SDL-1.2.15-8.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with SDL-1.2.15-7.fc19.i686 1:autocorr-en-4.0.3.3-3.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with 1:autocorr-en-4.0.3.3-2.fc19.noarch 1:cups-1.6.2-7.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 1:cups-1.6.2-4.fc19.i686 1:cups-filesystem-1.6.2-7.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with 1:cups-filesystem-1.6.2-4.fc19.noarch 1:cups-libs-1.6.2-7.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 1:cups-libs-1.6.2-4.fc19.i686 desktop-backgrounds-compat-19.0.0-2.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with desktop-backgrounds-compat-19.0.0-1.fc19.noarch desktop-backgrounds-gnome-19.0.0-2.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with desktop-backgrounds-gnome-19.0.0-1.fc19.noarch dialog-1.2-2.20130523.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with dialog-1.2-1.20121230.fc19.i686 dmraid-1.0.0.rc16-21.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with dmraid-1.0.0.rc16-20.fc19.i686 dmraid-events-1.0.0.rc16-21.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with dmraid-events-1.0.0.rc16-20.fc19.i686 dracut-027-46.git20130430.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with dracut-027-45.git20130430.fc19.i686 dracut-network-027-46.git20130430.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with dracut-network-027-45.git20130430.fc19.i686 glusterfs-3.4.0-0.5.beta2.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with glusterfs-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.i686 glusterfs-api-3.4.0-0.5.beta2.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with glusterfs-api-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.i686 glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0-0.5.beta2.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.i686 1:grub2-2.00-18.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 1:grub2-2.00-16.fc19.i686 1:grub2-efi-2.00-18.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 1:grub2-efi-2.00-16.fc19.i686 1:grub2-tools-2.00-18.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with 1:grub2-tools-2.00-16.fc19.i686 The list goes on and on... I am a relative newcomer to Fedora ( I'm a Debian refugee) so my knowledge of yum at the moment is pretty minimal. Does anyone have any suggestions on how this can be fixed? The system still boots fine Thanks -- --Cheers-- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Big problem with an update
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 22:35 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: > I was updating Fedora 19 Let me stop you right there. This list is for F17 and F18. F19 is not released yet so you should go to the Fedora Test list (note that many testers don't even read the Users list). poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Big problem with an update
On 05/24/2013 10:44 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 22:35 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: I was updating Fedora 19 Let me stop you right there. This list is for F17 and F18. F19 is not released yet so you should go to the Fedora Test list (note that many testers don't even read the Users list). poc This is not a F19 problemit's a YUM/RPM problem which happened during a system crash. The crash I can explain, the other problem I can't yet fix. -- --Cheers-- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Big problem with an update
On 05/24/2013 11:51 PM, Frank McCormick wrote: On 05/24/2013 10:44 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 22:35 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: I was updating Fedora 19 Let me stop you right there. This list is for F17 and F18. F19 is not released yet so you should go to the Fedora Test list (note that many testers don't even read the Users list). poc This is not a F19 problemit's a YUM/RPM problem which happened during a system crash. The crash I can explain, the other problem I can't yet fix. Frank, Sorry but this happened in a F19 system with F19 packages, so please ask in the test list. All the best, Germán. -- Germán A. Racca Fedora Package Maintainer https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Skytux -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Big problem with an update
Frank McCormick wrote: >I was updating Fedora 19 tonight when my system crashed ( I suspect >it's >a memory error)but anyway it >now **appears I have a lot of duplicate files on my system, at least >that what yum check all reports. >The crash happened after the updates had been installed I think during >the verify stage. > >This is a partial list of what "yum check all" reports: > > Try package-cleanup --dupes -- Sent from my Android tablet with K-9 Mail. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Big problem with an update
On 05/24/2013 11:23 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Frank McCormick wrote: I was updating Fedora 19 tonight when my system crashed ( I suspect it's a memory error)but anyway it now **appears I have a lot of duplicate files on my system, at least that what yum check all reports. The crash happened after the updates had been installed I think during the verify stage. This is a partial list of what "yum check all" reports: Try package-cleanup --dupes Yeah, that's what I found in the Fedora forums. So I tried it. Now the partition won't boot. package-cleanup --dupes removed the dupes..at least it said it wasbut it also ran into a bunch of files it said were zero-length...what it did about them I don't know. Short version: the partition is now unbootable. So I am back in Fedora 18...where I think I'll stay for a while. I don't anticipate re-installing 19...at least not for a while. -- --Cheers-- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Big problem with an update
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 22:51 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: > This is not a F19 problemit's a YUM/RPM problem which happened > during a system crash. How do you know that? It's a problem with F19 versions of yum and rpm. You can't assume this doesn't matter. That's what the Test list is for. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Big problem with an update
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 22:35:14 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: I was updating Fedora 19 tonight when my system crashed ( I suspect it's a memory error)but anyway it now **appears I have a lot of duplicate files on my system, at least that what yum check all reports. The crash happened after the updates had been installed I think during the verify stage. Have you tried yum-complete-transaction? That will probably work. You can check things afterwords with package-cleanup --dupes and package-cleanup --problems. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: firefox crash
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 09:15 -0700, Konstantin Svist wrote: > If you just updated firefox, you may need to reboot the machine - I've > seen stability problems before reboot Seems a bit extreme, this isn't Windows. For sure, you quit Firefox and make sure it's not running at all, after an update. I've certainly seen Firefox screw up if I tried to use it while it was still running during an update. But I've never had to reboot for it. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
