[Bug 354995] Re: Brasero Checksum Error
"Hello mrwizer, it seems that you're using wodim, could you please try to burn with growisofs (remove wodim) and test again? that could be the cause of the problem, thanks!." I am getting this error also - how do I do the above? I confirmed that there are no MD5 entries in Gconf-Editor > Apps > Brasero -- Brasero Checksum Error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354995] Re: Brasero Checksum Error
Also see: "Solution to checksum error and md5 sum error in Brasero, K3B and other burning software" http://www.zyxware.com/articles/615/solution-to-checksum-error-and-md5-sum-error-in-brasero-k3b-and-other-burning- software Still not a unified solution but may indicate a problem. -- Brasero Checksum Error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 285603] Re: MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first
Adam Niedling wrote: > emarkay: I think this bug is about the possible problems when people > with Ati video cards are upgrading from Intrepid to Jaunty. But maybe it > should be repoorted as a separate bug that the new ati driver is > freezing when using 3d apps. > Yea - I did the removal instructions there before installing the ATI driver. I am still researching - also that listed bug is for Jaunty... http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1133931 The above URL is the focus for me. -- MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369621] Re: ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid
** Description changed: Tried both the native 9.04 drivers, then removed them as shown here: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/285603 and then installed the latest ATI/AMD driver from here: http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/linux/Pages/radeon_linux.aspx?type=2.4.1&product=2.4.1.3.2&lang=English - I first got garbled video but after installing teh above driver, I gave up last night with no panels visible. Also apparently the screen size is larger than the monitor - BUT - rearranging the icons keeps them to the screen size displayed. + I first got garbled video but after installing the above ATI driver, I got a desktop, but with no panels visible. Also apparently the screen size is larger than the monitor - BUT - rearranging the icons keeps them to the screen size displayed. Also Firefox displays correctly. + I can get to the terminal, so of there are commands I can use to get additional data please let me know. This is on a backup machine that worked 100% in the prior (Jaunty) release! - It is a Radeon HD2600XT AGP card, on a HDTV using HDMI, at 1360 x 768 - with 512Meg VRAM, in a 2.8 GHz/2Gb/Celeron PC. + It is a Radeon HD2600XT AGP (R600 series) card, on a HDTV using HDMI, at + 1360 x 768 with 512Meg VRAM, in a 2.8 GHz/2Gb/Celeron PC. I have been posting and reading up on this, and while it may be similar to bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368187, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365059 There is not enough info there to confirm this is the same issue. - It may also be an "X" or XORG issue, and if this it appears as so, let me know and I can get the data as asked here: + It may also be an "X" or XORG issue, and if this it appears as so, let + me know and I can get the data as asked here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Reporting. (Question: how can I use "$ ubuntu-bug -p xserver-xorg-video-ati" if I am reporting this bug from another, correctly operating computer? - but I figured out a way to submit this anyway, but you may want to note this possibility.) ** Description changed: Tried both the native 9.04 drivers, then removed them as shown here: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/285603 and then installed the latest ATI/AMD driver from here: http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/linux/Pages/radeon_linux.aspx?type=2.4.1&product=2.4.1.3.2&lang=English - I first got garbled video but after installing the above ATI driver, I got a desktop, but with no panels visible. Also apparently the screen size is larger than the monitor - BUT - rearranging the icons keeps them to the screen size displayed. Also Firefox displays correctly. + I first got garbled video but after installing the above ATI driver, I got a desktop, but with no panels visible. Also apparently the screen size is larger than the monitor - BUT - rearranging the icons keeps them to the screen size displayed, and Firefox displays correctly. I can get to the terminal, so of there are commands I can use to get additional data please let me know. This is on a backup machine that worked 100% in the prior (Jaunty) release! It is a Radeon HD2600XT AGP (R600 series) card, on a HDTV using HDMI, at 1360 x 768 with 512Meg VRAM, in a 2.8 GHz/2Gb/Celeron PC. I have been posting and reading up on this, and while it may be similar to bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368187, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365059 There is not enough info there to confirm this is the same issue. It may also be an "X" or XORG issue, and if this it appears as so, let me know and I can get the data as asked here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Reporting. (Question: how can I use "$ ubuntu-bug -p xserver-xorg-video-ati" if I am reporting this bug from another, correctly operating computer? - but I figured out a way to submit this anyway, but you may want to note this possibility.) -- ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285603] Re: MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first
sorry - I replied to an email forgetting it posts, too - ignore this dupe post - the new bug report is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/369621 -- MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369621] Re: ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid
I reinstalled 9.04 completely and was not able to reproduce this condition, and was able to get a satisfactory display - GLXGEARS running at over 1000 FPS. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273558] Re: /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid
This may be a dupe - or that one is a dupe to this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323745 Confirming that the developers of third party programs need to change their code? If so, is the "1" version a "Drop-in" for the ")" and all they have to do is rename their link in their code? Regardless I will pass this along to the X-Plane folks -- /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285603] Re: MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first
Folks, this bug is logged in for 8.10 Intrepid. There's (apparently) a new set of issues that MAY be related, but IMHO need another bug report for 9.04 Jaunty. See details here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1133931 Can anyone confirm that this is a separate issue? -- MASTER: xserver crash, performs poorly, or other severe problem when loading the radeon driver if -fglrx has not been properly removed first https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285603 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369621] [NEW] ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid
Public bug reported: Tried both the native 9.04 drivers, then removed them as shown here: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/285603 and then installed the latest ATI/AMD driver from here: http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/linux/Pages/radeon_linux.aspx?type=2.4.1&product=2.4.1.3.2&lang=English I first got garbled video but after installing teh above driver, I gave up last night with no panels visible. Also apparently the screen size is larger than the monitor - BUT - rearranging the icons keeps them to the screen size displayed. I can get to the terminal, so of there are commands I can use to get additional data please let me know. This is on a backup machine that worked 100% in the prior (Jaunty) release! It is a Radeon HD2600XT AGP card, on a HDTV using HDMI, at 1360 x 768 with 512Meg VRAM, in a 2.8 GHz/2Gb/Celeron PC. I have been posting and reading up on this, and while it may be similar to bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368187, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365059 There is not enough info there to confirm this is the same issue. It may also be an "X" or XORG issue, and if this it appears as so, let me know and I can get the data as asked here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Reporting. (Question: how can I use "$ ubuntu-bug -p xserver-xorg-video-ati" if I am reporting this bug from another, correctly operating computer? - but I figured out a way to submit this anyway, but you may want to note this possibility.) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ati fglrx hd2x00 intrepid radeon xorg ** Description changed: Tried both the native 9.04 drivers, then removed them as shown here: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/285603 and then installed the latest ATI/AMD driver from here: http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/linux/Pages/radeon_linux.aspx?type=2.4.1&product=2.4.1.3.2&lang=English + I first got garbled video but after installing teh above driver, I gave up last night with no panels visible. Also apparently the screen size is larger than the monitor - BUT - rearranging the icons keeps them to the screen size displayed. I can get to the terminal, so of there are commands I can use to get additional data please let me know. This is on a backup machine that worked 100% in the prior (Jaunty) release! It is a Radeon HD2600XT AGP card, on a HDTV using HDMI, at 1360 x 768 with 512Meg VRAM, in a 2.8 GHz/2Gb/Celeron PC. I have been posting and reading up on this, and while it may be similar to bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368187, - - Question: how can I use" ubuntu-bug -p xserver-xorg-video-ati" if I am reporting this bug from another, correctly operating computer? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365059 There is not enough info there to confirm this is the same issue. + It may also be an "X" or XORG issue, and if this it appears as so, let me know and I can get the data as asked here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Reporting. + + (Question: how can I use "$ ubuntu-bug -p xserver-xorg-video-ati" if I + am reporting this bug from another, correctly operating computer? - but + I figured out a way to submit this anyway, but you may want to note this + possibility.) ** Tags added: ati fglrx hd2x00 intrepid radeon xorg -- ATI/AMD Radeon HD2*00 does not work in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344879] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3
Public bug reported: I did not see the bug report automatiaclly generated - I am just filing this in case it's not s a dupe - if so - sorry ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 ProcCmdLine: User Name=UUID=55576dad-f6cb-4fc1-a414-7c3b82335ca6 ro ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.27-13.29-generic SourcePackage: linux Title: package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344879] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050663/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050664/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050665/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050666/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050667/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "LsUsb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050669/LsUsb.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050670/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050671/ProcCpuInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050672/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24050673/ProcModules.txt -- package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 344879] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3
This was based on a "Crash Report". -- package linux-image-2.6.27-14-generic 2.6.27-14.30 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267376] Re: [intrepid] Package OpenOffice.org 3.0 for Backports
Therefore - what it the procedure to get OO3.X into Intrepid, for those that want it. We know it's not officially supported, but want it, and would like to have the "best" suggestions from the "source". This site seems to be the "top of the pile" in regarding the process , FWIW http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-To-Install-OpenOffice-org-3-0-in-Ubuntu-8-10-96449.shtml Thanks! -- [intrepid] Package OpenOffice.org 3.0 for Backports https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267376 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339450] Re: Problems with bookmarks in Firefox 3.0.7
I think I have the same issue. I just noticed that some bookmarks I added are not being stored in "unsorted bookmarks" and therefore they disappear when i reload a new FF session? I thought I was being forgetful, but I just checked this. This seems to be happening only recently - maybe since 3.0.7? This is the Canonical (Ubuntu Linux) variant. I have a post at Mozillazine: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=1131345 -- Problems with bookmarks in Firefox 3.0.7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347735] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17
Public bug reported: I get an error 17 on the 2.6.17-7 Linux Generic, when updating the "Live USB" that is created when I "Make USB Startup Disk". I thought it was because I wasn't allocating enough disk space but I gave it a persistent 10 gigs, and it still seems to be happening. This will be teh third time I try this. "E: linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17" ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 Package: linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true persistent file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.gz ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.27-7.14-generic SourcePackage: linux Title: package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347735 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347735] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298829/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298830/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298831/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298832/DpkgTerminalLog.txt ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298833/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "LsUsb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298834/LsUsb.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298835/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298836/ProcCpuInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298837/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24298838/ProcModules.txt -- package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347735 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347735] Re: package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17
The Package manager "gear" icon is always there when I am running this USB disk, but there is no update available when i check, and EVERY method I can think of from Synaptic, to "apt-get autoclean" and even enabling backports and cleaning out residual packages, that one xxx.x.xx.x.x.7 kernel item is still there. I remember an error message in the update that said something like "I. (word beginning with "i") is not updatable because this is a Live CD" or something like that; it was DIRECTLYrelated to this kernel (xxx.xx.xx.x-7) issue. I couldn't Cut and paste the words; if I encounter it again I will write it down. I plan to try this "Live USB" in a different computer later today. -- package linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347735 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158487] Re: A way to delete finished jobs needed
Tim Waugh, curious as to what this is? I thought Ubuntu was Debian based or is CUPS a Fedora based application, or what? Thanks. -- A way to delete finished jobs needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350575] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3
Public bug reported: Updating to 9.04 and doing 3-way merge (experimental)... Remove that option if it doesn't work!! ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 MachineType: Dell Inc. Dell DM061 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=55576dad-f6cb-4fc1-a414-7c3b82335ca6 ro ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.27-14.30-generic SourcePackage: linux Title: package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350575] Re: package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464655/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464656/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464657/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464658/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464659/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464660/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464661/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464662/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464663/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24464664/ProcModules.txt -- package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158487] Re: A way to delete finished jobs needed
Now this is elementary - if something is WRITING the data to a location , then something can ERASE data from that location. Having any sort of history that is unremovable (even with "under the hood tinkering" could preclude Ubuntu from ever being used in a secure or restricted environment. I consider this a security flaw! Original post on the Ubuntu Forums (...and I thought this was new to Jaunty!) http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=363 ** Changed in: system-config-printer (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => In Progress -- A way to delete finished jobs needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158487] Re: A way to delete finished jobs needed
This MAY have something to do with the CUPS Printing system interface: http://127.0.0.1:631/ as I can see teh jobs there, too, but can not clear or cancel them. -- A way to delete finished jobs needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352032] [NEW] Beta Testers need complete info on new/changed features
Public bug reported: For those not in the development loop, or the alpha testing, the Beta Technical Overview page needs to be more comprehensive: http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/jaunty/beta For example, how can I be a Beta Tester of 9.04 if I am both unsure what a new feature does and what the technical (behind the scenes) reasons are for it, what modes and options there may be and any specific issues on it, etc. Using the new "Computer Janitor" feature as an example in the following Ubuntu Forum posts: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=6985057 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=6985024 Alternatively couldn't an "Active" page can be added to the Beta Technical Overview pages, in collaboration with the forums, that can be an "official" moderated FAQ? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Beta Testers need complete info on new/changed features https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352032 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352035] [NEW] Fundamental flaw in "Update Manager"
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Open it and it says, EVERY TIME at the top: "Your system is up to date" However, if I click "Check" and enter my password, 70% of the time I get some updates. How about if the default become: "Your system appears to be up to date, but click the "Check" button to confirm." (I have noticed this since Ubuntu 6-point-whatever, but have never bothered to comment till now.) ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Fundamental flaw in "Update Manager" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158487] Re: A way to delete finished jobs needed
Thanks Eric, now how to clear the remaining 46 job data - Like I said, this is a SECURITY issue - will someone ensure this is flagged as such? -- A way to delete finished jobs needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 35009] Re: Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated
>From Duplicate #352035: "Open it and it says, EVERY TIME at the top: "Your system is up to date" However, if I click "Check" and enter my password, 70% of the time I get some updates. How about if the default become: "Your system appears to be up to date, but click the "Check" button to confirm." I have noticed this since Ubuntu 6-point-whatever, but have never bothered to comment till now" And I see this one DOES go back to 2006!!! -- Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 402767] Re: multisearch CSE breaks l18n+setfocus+images+cached+I'm feeling lucky functionality and "violates user trust"
What ever happened to the users? (Where's TRON when we need him?) Anything that sends information OUT of my computer that I have not pre- authorized is in violation of many privacy policies, regardless of the aggregate. Yes, I am aware of much that goes out (IP address for one), most necessary, some optional, but to include something as this as a default that is functionally UNNECESSARY is both inappropriate and an affront to the intelligence of the FOSS community. Let this be a wake-up call not to "assume" that everyone in the FOSS community is benevolent and good; or at least follow both Code of Conducts and common sense. I vote to remove it, and also to require full disclosure on any FURTHER outgoing data collected or sent from computers using Ubuntu and Ubuntu- authorized programs -- multisearch CSE breaks l18n+setfocus+images+cached+I'm feeling lucky functionality and "violates user trust" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 81208] Re: LiveCD 6.06.1 requires big download to update
While it's not a "bug" in the classical sense, the developers and other 'gurus' there need to know that having to do a 140MB ADDITIONAL download on EVERY "new" install (for the new O.O. version, security and library updates, and any other additions since August, '06) both sucks YOUR bandwidth, and ours, and, IMHO, also makes Ubuntu look pretty lame to a total "noob"! Why can't (at least) the updates be placed on a public server so they can be downloaded ONCE and burned to a CD? A must have on this, however, is that some way to "automagically" install these to any existing "virgin" Dapper (or Edgy as it may be) release must be provided for foolproof use, AND FOR verification and validation of the updates! Hypothetically speaking, on an "LTS" release, in 4 years from its offering, the updates may be gigabyte or more, and even a T3 line would "choke-n-puke" on that! Please, quarterly, release a new, tested, and "approved" Ubuntu "maintenance" ISO and make it clear that the prior ISO is now for archive use only! Thanks! MRK -- LiveCD 6.06.1 requires big download to update https://launchpad.net/bugs/81208 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 516412] Re: Pressing causes X to freeze
FWIW it happens with both ATI (HD2600) and NVIDIA (FX1500M) graphics here. -- Pressing causes X to freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon
Still using the following hardware configuration: "2.8 G/2G RAM/ATI HD2600,512VRAM/SIS AC97 OB Audio" Tested this morning with current Karmic and Lucid releases, at 32, 64, 256 & 512 Aperture settings as well as current "Live CD" of Lucid and had no problem booting, getting into the "X" GUI, or opening Firefox and displaying a WWW page. Am "invalidating" this as I presume that either the newer Kernels, or newer "X" and/or ATI drivers have corrected this problem. Thanks! MRK -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134672] Re: installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work
This appears to still be a valid issue. Curious to see if this could be investigated before release of Lucid? -- installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134672] Re: installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work
Addition to prior comment - the note in #4 should be added in some manner to the documentation of this plugin , possibly here? : https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-launchpad-plugin/0.4 Also, the maintainers of this package's URL appears to be dead. http://www.alveonet.org -- installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 456808] Re: Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention.
Can we get this marked as NOT "Invalid" and "Low" priority?? -- Karmic-Networking (SAMBA) just does not work, even with detailed attention. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
2 different Fujitsu MHY2160BH drives affected here. OK so who's going to elevate the priority on this one - over a hundred affected users here... ;) -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 493685] Re: Disk has many bad sectors
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 438136 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 438136 palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- Disk has many bad sectors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413673] Re: Palimpsest disk utility is annoying
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 438136 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 438136 palimpsest bad sectors false positive -- Palimpsest disk utility is annoying https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Duplicate bug reported and found this info - no resolution as of now, although I am updating the Karmic Laptop before doing further debugging. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-220231.html -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive
Contrary to statement: "The upstream fix is in karmic. Changed in libatasmart (Ubuntu): status: New → Fix Released " In marked duplicate bug, this issue is still affecting Karmic as of today's updates on a new install. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/413673 -- palimpsest bad sectors false positive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 509729] [NEW] LUCID-CUPS print spooler not loaded by default.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups CUPS is not loaded, and it is not possible to print. When selecting "System>Administration>Printing", there is no option to add new printer (It is grayed out). Also, see attachment for inconsistency in wording in help screen; there is no "System>Administration>Services". ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- LUCID-CUPS print spooler not loaded by default. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 509729] Re: LUCID-CUPS print spooler not loaded by default.
** Attachment added: "Screencapture details." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38092872/Screenshot.png -- LUCID-CUPS print spooler not loaded by default. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 425394] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 518891 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518891 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 518891 nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425394 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387184] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 518891 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518891 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 518891 nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387184 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 518891] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()
Just a "FYI" post - Lucid, Nautilus crash while copying files, Apport triggered, many dupes found. Other bugs with same title - some marked as duplicate here, some duplicated elsewhere. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/439694 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/422393 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/387184 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/394349 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/425394 -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481413] Re: KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop.
The crashes were submitted automatically to Mozilla. I have since reformatted and reinstalled Karmic, and now using only the Ubuntu supplied FF3.5.x, I am still getting this. There is much online talk about Karmic/FF/Flash issues, and even though I haveNoScript and FlashBlock, I am still affected, and on non flash sites. Not sure what an "upstream bug report is" in relation to this - to Mozilla or the Ubuntu, and where would I find the "Crash ID"? Thanks. -- KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481413] Re: KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop.
Micah, accepting my COC, ahem: "bovine fecal matter!" I do NOT get ANY Ubuntu indication or ANY Firefox indication - it just goes INSTANTLY to the desktop; no notes, no crash indication no bells or whistles except the occasional Firefox "oops we are embarassed... do you want to start a new session or restart the old one"... What does Apport have to do with ANYTHING in this bug - and if it's got "fingers" into Firefox, I need to know, to assist in debugging! Micah, I know you have "the finger on the button" but don't decide for us without actually asking for facts. This is a real issue. -- KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481413] Re: KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop.
Micah, OK, tell me what did "your" Apport tell you about the crashes this morning, yesterday, the day before, as well as all those that happened wewn I submitted this report, as well as the other users here, and on the forums with thje same issue... You are not showing integrity and proactivity, just "passing the buck"; I mean you haven't even looked at the forums of Ubuntu and Firefox, and offered individual suggestions and actions in the appropriate posts. But I will abide by the COC, and I guess if "you" powers that be don't care about a real problem, I will just deal at my end and forget trying to help. (I made a post on just this suject a few days ago...) Why don't you use your authority to make a difference, investigate and correct, or do the same, too. MRK -- KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481413] [NEW] KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 This is in a reformat install, nothing changed but the usual suite of add-ons: "AskForSanitize, BetterPrivacy, FireFTP, FlashBlock, ImageZoom, NoScript, ReloadEvery, take me to this URL, Littlefox and OpenDNS for Firefox." It is not a Flash issue and there is no error messages. Just an immediate appearance of the desktop. On reloading, some times the "This is embarrassing" restore dialog appears, other times the previous session just reloads. I did submit a "CrashReport" last night when it happened in FF 3.6.b2 to Mozilla. What can I do to assist in solving this? Mozillazine post: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=1566385&p=7980085#p7980085 Ubuntu Forum post: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=8301929#post8301929 ** Affects: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- KARMIC - FF 3.5.x AND FF 3.6.beta2 randomly crash to Desktop. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512268] Re: systray.py crashed with SIGSEGV
Concur with comments above. Lucid only. Consistently appears immediately on boot, yet causes no evident problems. I have a hp psc-1350 printer, which is rarely powered on at boot. -- systray.py crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512268 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 439694] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()
Crashed while copying 4 directories on 2 disks - yea that's multitasking, but... - did I loose any data Also see this Forum post for info on unmarked duplicates and more info: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1456604 -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295199] Re: system-config-samba.py crashed with KeyError in getSection()
Another Samba issue - in Lucid? Naw, it just works... Well, not really... :) How do I attach the Apport automatically generated data? -- system-config-samba.py crashed with KeyError in getSection() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555158] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryExtension()
I also just got an Apport created bug on this. Let me know if any of the data it collected is needed. -- glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryExtension() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461350] Re: Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program
It is STILL not functioning, even in Lucid with version 2.5.2! One would think that the ONLY Linux Video editor [that used] to]have this feature would ensure that this useful and "modern" feature would be fixed by now! Alessio Treglia, I have returned this to "Confirmed". ** Changed in: avidemux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461350 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461350] Re: Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program
Also, it may not now always crash the program, but it's still missing and there is no legit workaround. See: http://avidemux.org/admForum/viewtopic.php?pid=43849# -- Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461350 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461350] Re: Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program
Also, the newest version (via GetDeb) 2.5.3 still crashes as originally submitted. "Segfault at line 0, file ??ADM_backTrack sig_segfault_handler(int) [0x259400] CONFcouple::lookupName(char const*) CONFcouple::getCouple(char const*, unsigned int*) ADMVideoPartial::ADMVideoPartial(AVDMGenericVideoStream*, CONFcouple*) partial_create(AVDMGenericVideoStream*, CONFcouple*) filterCreateFromTag(unsigned int, CONFcouple*, AVDMGenericVideoStream*) avidemux2_gtk() [0x8178eb8] g_closure_invoke g_signal_emit_valist g_signal_emit gtk_tree_view_row_activated g_closure_invoke" -- Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461350 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461350] Re: Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program
Returned to Complete - I am not Alpha testing Maverick, and will not update to it when it is released. This does however affect Lucid which is a LTS as well as Karmic, both which are still active products and are affected by this bug. I also have confirmed that this is also an issue in the latest GetDeb (release, which is newer than the Canonical Repos). Thank you. ** Changed in: avidemux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- Video>Filters-"Add Logo" removed, "Partial" selection crashes program https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461350 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593352] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Public bug reported: Darn launchpad "Timed Out" again. Will someone PLEASE address this! Anyway, "Yea, what I said before... G!" Second time I tried to make a boot USB with "Create Startup Disk" in an updated Lucid. This is a 16GB USB with 4GB persistence. Will get more data as available. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 Regression: Yes Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: SI7012 [SiS SI7012], device 0: Intel ICH [SiS SI7012] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: ubuntu 4271 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'SI7012'/'SiS SI7012 with ALC655 at irq 18' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC655 rev 0' Components : 'AC97a:414c4760' Controls : 41 Simple ctrls : 26 Date: Sun Jun 13 15:38:59 2010 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429) ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true persistent file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.34.1 RfKill: SourcePackage: linux Title: package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 dmi.bios.date: 03/07/2005 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD dmi.bios.version: 6.00 PG dmi.board.name: MS-7060 dmi.board.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvr6.00PG:bd03/07/2005:svn:pn:pvr:rvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:rnMS-7060:rvr:cvn:ct3:cvr: ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 kconfig lucid needs-upstream-testing regression-update -- package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593352] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272557/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272558/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272559/ArecordDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272560/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272561/Card0.Amixer.values.txt ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272562/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272563/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272564/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272565/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272566/Df.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272567/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272568/DpkgTerminalLog.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272569/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272570/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272571/PciMultimedia.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272572/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272573/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272574/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272575/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272576/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50272577/WifiSyslog.txt -- package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593352] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Upon rebooting I get" "Kernel Panic. Not synching VFS. Unable to mount root on unknown block (8,1)" and the a hang. This happens when I update the USB install with "Update manager". I did the same thing last night, and the same result this morning on a completely "erased" USB stick. I get a message at the end of the update in the "Details" section about 3 "Linux" installs - x.22 Kernel, -Generic) that even "Depmod" can't fix. I can't seem to "Cut-n-paste" the messages to a text file to save the exact data. (If it's in a log, it's gone now because erased everything and am trying again - I at least want a bootable Lucid USB for now.) Let me know if this is just a temporary issue or there is a problem with the x.22 Kernel in this instance. I will try the update on this USB stick with additional info or debugging tools later if advised to. -- package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.36 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548415] [NEW] Shutdown timer no longer appears
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gshutdown The former 60 second timeout to autoshutdown Ubuntu has apparently been removed. I do not recall this noted as an upcoming change to the OS. If this is intended, please confirm, and if not please investigate. This is in an updated Lucid Beta 1 Intel 32bit as of today. May also be related to the "About" of thew shutdown button, which is: Indicator Applet Session 0.3.4 Ubuntu Forum post: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1438847 ** Affects: gshutdown (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Shutdown timer no longer appears https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495726] Re: CUPS daemon does not start when booting Lucid
Why is this bug marked "incomplete"? What more information is needed? Why has an importance/priority not been assigned? Being unable to print anything is a rather serious problem - even for an Alpha release. -- CUPS daemon does not start when booting Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495726 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513938] [NEW] LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel
Public bug reported: In all versions, including the initial Lucid Alpha 2, one could click on the "Home Folder" icon in "Places" and move it to a Panel, then release the mouse to place a "shortcut" there. This is now not possible. See attachment to see intended operation. ** Affects: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513938] Re: LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel
** Attachment added: "Screenshot" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38502796/Screenshot.jpeg -- LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513938] Re: LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel
Acceptable workaround found, but still interested in why it was changed. "Open your home folder. Then from there drag the folder button to the top panel." -- LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 513938] Re: LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel
Acceptable workaround found, but still interested in why it was changed. "Open your home folder. Then from there drag the folder button to the top panel." -- LUCID-Unable to add "Home Ffolder" to Panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495726] Re: CUPS daemon does not start when booting Lucid
ls -l /etc/rc*/*cups* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc0.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc1.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc2.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc3.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc4.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc5.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2010-01-15 15:45 /etc/rc6.d/K50cups -> ../init.d/cups -- CUPS daemon does not start when booting Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495726 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 516412] Re: Pressing causes X to freeze
The last 4 posts are after "Fix Released", are still affected with the same issue. Thus is it safe to conclude that the released fix does not completely solve this problem? FWIW, I have Plymouth removed for now. -- Pressing causes X to freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498607] Re: [lucid] unable to shutdown
I get periodic partial closing - exits "X" and then hangs on a line (something like error 15 - I will document next time it happens). No recourse but to power off manually. This happens on 2 different machines - and yes I have uninstalled Plymouth. -- [lucid] unable to shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498607 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447426] Re: Crash report of indicator-users-service
Apport triggered this Crash Report, and I presume this bug is pertaining to this. Apport "collected complete information about this crash" and should, apparently attach this to this report. (Did it??) I have seen this a few times recently and after todays Ludid update figured I should report it. I have no additional information as to cause or effects of this crash, as it was autogenerated and I just "filled in the blanks" -- Crash report of indicator-users-service https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447426 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205919] Re: Brasero and nautilus-cd-burner cannot burn 4GiB file to DVD
No action since May 2009. What is the status on this in Lucid? -- Brasero and nautilus-cd-burner cannot burn 4GiB file to DVD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205919 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280395] Re: Synaptics "quick search" and "search button" conflict
Agreed. For reference, a Ubuntu Forum post: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9004526 Suggest merging the other similar bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/synaptic/+bug/412526 https://bugs.launchpad.net/synaptic/+bug/269361 https://bugs.launchpad.net/synaptic/+bug/299076 -- Synaptics "quick search" and "search button" conflict https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525295] Re: Lucid indicator icons are not shown. Displays the "unknown icon" instead
Can't mark the following bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-applet/+bug/543592 as a duplicate, but it is, and that one is now invalid. -- Lucid indicator icons are not shown. Displays the "unknown icon" instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543336] Re: "Mail" icon won't disappear
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543592 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543592 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 543592 Volume icon disappears when "Envelope" is removed -- "Mail" icon won't disappear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543673] [NEW] Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work
Public bug reported: FYI, I have not reported a bug against the Kernel before this is the procedure I followed: "If the boot errors or freezes even in "recovery mode", the bug should be reported against the kernel." from: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage#At%20the%20login%20screen to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage#Kernel to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelTeamBugPolicies Used as indicated:: ubuntu-bug -p linux Got this in response, but report (apparently) worked: "Warning: The options -p/-P are deprecated, please do not use them. See /usr/bin/ubuntu-bug --help" May want to look at those pages and the info below on the submission form. Also, on this form, when I do "Alternatively, at a minimum include the output of the following commands executed in a terminal as separate attachments in your bug report:", I get no response from Terminal from those. * This is a new ISO of the Intel 32 bit (standard) release of Beta 1 It boots to the point where the login screen would appear on a non-recovery boot and then just sits there with a blinking cursor. That's it - Computer must be recycled or powered off. Other confirmation and post: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1435319 ProblemType: Bug AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: SI7012 [SiS SI7012], device 0: Intel ICH [SiS SI7012] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: emarkay1211 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'SI7012'/'SiS SI7012 with ALC655 at irq 18' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC655 rev 0' Components : 'AC97a:414c4760' Controls : 41 Simple ctrls : 26 CurrentDmesg: [ 18.429115] eth0: Media Link On 100mbps full-duplex [ 26.732012] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Date: Sun Mar 21 14:50:39 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=6e59eeb1-1bc4-4263-8880-11fc4dae8b47 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318) IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. Lsusb: Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 002: ID 045e:00d1 Microsoft Corp. Optical Mouse with Tilt Wheel Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Package: linux-image-2.6.32-16-generic 2.6.32-16.25 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-16-generic root=UUID=de18706e-0539-4083-8315-4b20bd92b4e6 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic Regression: Yes RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.33 Reproducible: Yes RfKill: SourcePackage: linux TestedUpstream: No Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic i686 dmi.bios.date: 03/07/2005 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD dmi.bios.version: 6.00 PG dmi.board.name: MS-7060 dmi.board.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvr6.00PG:bd03/07/2005:svn:pn:pvr:rvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:rnMS-7060:rvr:cvn:ct3:cvr: ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid needs-upstream-testing regression-potential -- Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543673] Re: Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545936/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545937/ArecordDevices.txt ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545938/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545939/Card0.Amixer.values.txt ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545940/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545941/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545942/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545943/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545944/PciMultimedia.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545945/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545946/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545947/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545948/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545949/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545950/WifiSyslog.txt -- Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543673] Re: Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work
May be "same-but-different" as new Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/543580 so I did not mark that one as a Dupe. -- Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134672] Re: installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work
Looks like "Incomplete" is not correct - it's a Documentation issue, not a bug. Brian, agree? -- installing Firefox plugins from add/remove applications doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452218] Re: Recovery Menu-"NTP Server NTP" message appears corrupting menu screen
FWIW I still see this as of today. Also - seeing this [unrelated] bug, I believe that this is a Kernel issue .https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/543673 I am not able to assign this to "linux (Ubuntu)" Regardless, Brian, I apologize for not doing the research when this was submitted. -- Recovery Menu-"NTP Server NTP" message appears corrupting menu screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526290] Re: Thunderbird 3 hyperlinks broken
>From http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9006611: "Thunderbird-gnome-support" wasn't installed. (Now I know to do this in the future on any reinstall of Thunderbird - All new installs need to have this added.) But installing it does nothing, until you again reinstall Thunderbird3. (Luckily doing so did not overwrite or remove existing configurations). Now it works as before/intended. -- Thunderbird 3 hyperlinks broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526290 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543673] Re: Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 543580 Recovery mode in lucid fails to load recovery menu -- Lucid Beta 1-New Install-Recovery Mode does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543580] Re: Recovery mode in lucid fails to load recovery menu
Marked my bug a dupe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/543673 -- Recovery mode in lucid fails to load recovery menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444824] [NEW] AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd In a 2.94 Ghz Celeron with the ATI/AMD Radeon 2600XT AGP8X card (This card is still supported by ATI), Mfg. is: "ati2mag_RV630,PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_9586" To boot into live CD or installed Karmic Beta, the BIOS setting of "AGP Aperture" must be set at 256 or greater. This details efforts in finding this: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1281661 also: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1283376 This happens on a native (default) install or a live CD. (By using the PC's onboard SVGA I was able to get a test install). I consider this important because it could possibly prevent ATI/AMD AGP graphic card users from being able to use a Karmic Live CD, much less install it. ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: agp aperture karmic radeon -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33191273/Xorg.0.log -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon
Tormod, this is before the "Restricted Driver" is loaded; on a fresh install or any Live CD. -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444824] Re: AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33191250/Xorg.0.log.old -- AGP Aperture must be 256Mb or more with Radeon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445654] [NEW] Possible confusion between "Update" and "Upgrade"
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I know this is trivial, but as I see it, "Updates" update the Repo/Sources list, whereas "Upgrades" actually add, replace or delete apps/packages. Therefore shouldn't it be called "Upgrade Manager"? This could be transparent - leave all the code as it is, just change the wordring text in the dialog box... ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Possible confusion between "Update" and "Upgrade" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 35009] Re: Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated
Where are we on this? Has this been addressed for "Karmic"? -- Says "System is up to date" when package lists not updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35009 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446483] Re: Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2
Oops, this is a "Karmic" 9.10 only issue. -- Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446483] [NEW] Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2
Public bug reported: #'ing out the entire line still leaves the Throbber page for a bit before going to the login screen - the pre-"X" stuff is still obscured. This is not how Jaunty appeared, and I want to see the boot process code as long as possible without having to look at logs and all that later. This is found in the file / etc/default/grub See: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1284677 OT, also, the Package select option above does not have an entry for "GRUB2". ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444395] Re: 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text)
Is this an AGP card? If so, see if setting the AGP aperture to 255Mb or greater in your BIOS helps. -- 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446371] Re: Audio not working
Unfortunately suggest a clean install to ensure no conflicts, but still can you get the type of hardware/software found in your system for the Audio? If you use Windows you can get that from "System Information" . In Ubuntu you realy need a package like "Sysinfo" - it's in the repositories. Latest Karmic kernel is: 2.6.31.12 -- Audio not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446292] Re: grub under karmic sets up wrong boot situation
I see 2.6.28-15 as a Jaunty Kernel. 2.6.31-x is the Karmic kernel. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicKoala/TechnicalOverview Did you do a upgrade or a new install? Did you see any "Partial Update/Upgrade" warnings? Suggest a fresh new install. If you have the disk space you can run the Karmic beta and Jaunty independently. -- grub under karmic sets up wrong boot situation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446370] Re: instaling update ?
This could be a specific error due to a daily update. Does this still happen after an update? Similar but not exact problem here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1256554 See also this Bug for possible dupe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/445077 -- instaling update ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446370 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445077] Re: package tzdata 2009n-0ubuntu0.9.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
After a Update/upgrade do you still get this error? Similar but not exact problem here. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1256554 See also this Bug for possible dupes. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/446370 -- package tzdata 2009n-0ubuntu0.9.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445077 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446208] Re: 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 444395 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444395 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 444395 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text) -- 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446208 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 444395] Re: 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text)
This same bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/446208 was marked as duplicate of this one. -- 9.10 beta fails to boot into LiveCD (flashing text) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444395 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446206] Re: (Karmic beta) Add/Remove Software still appears in menus, in addition to Software Center
Confirmed. One in "Applications" the other in "Administration". Suggest this be marked as "Invalid"; This is as intended for temporary testing. ** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- (Karmic beta) Add/Remove Software still appears in menus, in addition to Software Center https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445313] Re: After recent update unable to boot into karmic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 439784 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439784 Why is Jaunty (9.04) info attached on a Karmic (9.10) bug? This appears to duplicate this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/439784 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 439784 invalid: environment block -- After recent update unable to boot into karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445313 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 437429] Re: Cannot prevent login sound
Another vote for NOT having this enabled by default - it should fall in the "Startup Sounds" category. Wouldn't it just be a simple task to remove it in the code where it is now and then add it to where the "Startup Sounds" preferences work? There is no reason for this - libraries and late night reboots are 100% proof! -- Cannot prevent login sound https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446483] Re: Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 439284 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439284 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 439284 Please allow for an easy way to disable xsplash -- Xsplash (Throbber) appears even with "quiet splash" removed from GRUB2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
