[Bug 1752921] Re: autopkgtest failed in bionic-proposed
right, thanks Jochen. ** Changed in: urdfdom (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: urdfdom (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752921 Title: autopkgtest failed in bionic-proposed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom/+bug/1752921/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1817595] Re: [SRU] urdfdom-headers and urdfdom should not use locale dependent parsing for floating point numbers
Thanks Julian for the fixes. Let us know if we can help with the SRU verification once the testing packages have been generated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817595 Title: [SRU] urdfdom-headers and urdfdom should not use locale dependent parsing for floating point numbers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1817595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1770678] [NEW] [SRU] Simbody package ships erroneous paths for blas/lapack in the cmake module
Public bug reported: Affecting Artful: According to the publishing history, the package Simbody for Artful was directly copied from Zesty: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simbody/3.5.4+dfsg- 1ubuntu1/+publishinghistory The problem is that a couple of dependencies of Simbody (libblas and liblapack) changed the location of their libraries to be arch dependent (from /usr/lib to /usr/lib/$arch-triplet/) and these paths are hardcoded by Simbody in the cmake module at building time. [Impact] * Any software using Simbody cmake module won't compile because of non existant lib paths in Simbody exported libraries. - See https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/gazebo-ci-default-artful-amd64-gpu-none/23/consoleFull#-14256201906ea37b8d-a6d4-40ae-8431-d90c018842af * Rebuilding the package (binNMU) without any modifications to the source code would make cmake to get the new paths and hardcode them in the cmake module. [Test Case] * To check that there are non-existant paths in the current cmake module: - apt-get install libsimbody-dev - if [[ -f $(sed -n 's:.*\(/usr/.*libblas.so\).*:\1:p' /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/simbody/SimbodyConfig.cmake | uniq) ]]; then echo "fixed!"; else echo "Wrong path in cmake module"; fi * If you run the oneliner in any other release different than Artful it will return a success message. [Regression Potential] * There is no change in code or in Debian metadata, there is a change in the building environment. Changing the build environment from Zesty to Artful could produce some changes in the binary interface but given that it should be its 'native enviroment' I don't expect any incompatibility introduced by the change in the compiler of build flags/libraries. * The lack of changes in code should keep the API stable. * The lack of change in debian metadata should keep the packaging stable. * To minimize the possible problems in the binary interface or any other thing related to the change I created a PPA and rebuild the current version: - https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/simbody-artful * I've used Gazebo simulator (which uses Simbody) large test suite for trying to detect possible problems. All seems fine and problems are not related to this bug: - https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/gazebo-ci-default-artful-amd64-gpu-none/25/console * This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered, and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU. [Other Info] * I'm currently the maintainer of Simbody in Debian ** Affects: simbody (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: artful ** Description changed: Affecting Artful: - According to the publishing history, the package Simbody was directly copied from Zesty: - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simbody/3.5.4+dfsg-1ubuntu1/+publishinghistory + According to the publishing history, the package Simbody for Artful was + directly copied from Zesty: + https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simbody/3.5.4+dfsg- + 1ubuntu1/+publishinghistory - The problem is that a couple of dependencies of Simbody (libblas and liblapack) changed the - location of their libraries to be arch dependent (from /usr/lib to /usr/lib/$arch-triplet/) - and these paths are hardcoded by Simbody in the cmake module at building time. + The problem is that a couple of dependencies of Simbody (libblas and + liblapack) changed the location of their libraries to be arch dependent + (from /usr/lib to /usr/lib/$arch-triplet/) and these paths are hardcoded + by Simbody in the cmake module at building time. [Impact] - * Any software using Simbody cmake module won't compile because of non existant lib -paths in Simbody exported libraries. -- See https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/gazebo-ci-default-artful-amd64-gpu-none/23/consoleFull#-14256201906ea37b8d-a6d4-40ae-8431-d90c018842af + * Any software using Simbody cmake module won't compile because of non existant lib paths in Simbody exported libraries. + - See https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/gazebo-ci-default-artful-amd64-gpu-none/23/consoleFull#-14256201906ea37b8d-a6d4-40ae-8431-d90c018842af - * Rebuilding the package (binNMU) without any modifications to the source code would make -cmake to get the new paths and hardcode them in the cmake module. + * Rebuilding the package (binNMU) without any modifications to the + source code would make cmake to get the new paths and hardcode them in + the cmake module. [Test Case] - * To check that there are non-existant paths in the current cmake + * To check that there are non-existant paths in the current cmake module: - - apt-get install libsimbody-dev - - if [[ -f $(sed -n 's:.*\(/usr/.*libblas.so\).*:\1:p' /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/simbody/SimbodyConfig.cmake | uniq) ]]; then echo "fixed!"; else echo "Wrong path in cmake module"; fi + - apt-get install libsimbody-dev + - if [[ -f $(sed -n 's:.*\(/usr/.*libblas.so\).
[Bug 1770678] Re: [SRU] Simbody package ships erroneous paths for blas/lapack in the cmake module
Thanks Brian for the quick response. I can confirm that the proposed one-liner submitted initially with the bug to check for right paths now returns that the bug is fixed. I also compiled the gazebo physics suite, that uses the simbody cmake module and the error is now gone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770678 Title: [SRU] Simbody package ships erroneous paths for blas/lapack in the cmake module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simbody/+bug/1770678/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1755231] [NEW] [FFE] Sync ignition-transport 4.0.0+dfsg-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync ignition-transport 4.0.0+dfsg-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current bionic version 4.0.0+dfsg-3: ignition-transport (4.0.0+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Include the missing the yaml file to fix current broken ign-tools support -- Jose Luis Rivero Fri, 09 Mar 2018 17:24:48 + Please not that the missed update is just to include a .yml file in the package that is currently missing in Ubuntu and leaves an optional feature broken. Thanks ** Affects: ignition-transport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755231 Title: [FFE] Sync ignition-transport 4.0.0+dfsg-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-transport/+bug/1755231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1755534] [NEW] Missing/broken support in ignition-msgs. Sync 1.0.0+dfsg1-5 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync ignition-msgs 1.0.0+dfsg1-5 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Related Bionic sync in ignition-transport: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-transport/+bug/1755231 Changelog entries since current bionic version 1.0.0+dfsg1-3: ignition-msgs (1.0.0+dfsg1-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Include the missing the yaml file to fix current broken ign-tools support -- Jose Luis Rivero Fri, 09 Mar 2018 17:26:43 + ignition-msgs (1.0.0+dfsg1-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Include ruby ignition-tools file in the -dev package -- Jose Luis Rivero Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:21:04 + Please not that the missed update is just to include a .yml/ruby files in the package that is currently missing in Ubuntu and leaves an optional feature broken. ** Affects: ignition-msgs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755534 Title: Missing/broken support in ignition-msgs. Sync 1.0.0+dfsg1-5 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-msgs/+bug/1755534/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1755873] [NEW] Missing/broken support in ignition-fuel-tools. Sync 1.0.0+dfsg4-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync ignition-fuel-tools 1.0.0+dfsg4-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Related Bionic sync in ignition-transport and ignition-msgs:: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-transport/+bug/1755231 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-msgs/+bug/1755534 This is the last one of series. Changelog entries since current bionic version 1.0.0+dfsg4-2build1: ignition-fuel-tools (1.0.0+dfsg4-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix broken ign-tools support by including the modules into the packaging -- Jose Luis Rivero Fri, 09 Mar 2018 19:01:37 + Please note that the missed update is just to include a .yml/ruby files in the package that is currently missing in Ubuntu and leaves an optional feature broken. Thanks to Jeremy Bicha for handling the previous syncs. ** Affects: ignition-fuel-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755873 Title: Missing/broken support in ignition-fuel-tools. Sync 1.0.0+dfsg4-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-fuel-tools/+bug/1755873/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611737] Re: Can't upgrade from a release if ros packages are installed from ROS servers
Before going down into particular cases, I would like to point that every ROS Release supports only a few subset of the Ubuntu distributions (see REP3 http://www.ros.org/reps/rep-0003.html#platforms-by- distribution). This makes some upgrades technically not possible since there could not be packages in the ROS repositories available for the new distribution in an upgrade process. For example, there is no a single ROS Release that support 14.04 and 16.04. I can not see a safe/straightforward upgrade path. If this is not the case, from Open Robotics we are happy help if something can be done in ROS packages or repositories. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611737 Title: Can't upgrade from a release if ros packages are installed from ROS servers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1611737/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1817595] Re: [SRU] urdfdom-headers and urdfdom should not use locale dependent parsing for floating point numbers
Thanks Simon for submitting the bug and the help to prepare this comment. SRU bugs in Ubuntu require to follow closely the instructions provided https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. Here we go: [Impact] * The parsing done by the code of urdfdom truncate floating values on systems that are not using the locales defined by default on English systems. The users of this system are getting wrong values which are specially sensible on variables with a range between 0 and 1. * The URDF schema defines doubles in URDF as xs:double. Looking at the XSD document it says that the mantissa for a double is represented as a "decimal" number. And looking at the XSD document a decimal number is a "finite-length sequence of decimal digits (#x30-#x39) separated by a period as a decimal indicator". Thus, the locale should have no effect on how the document is parsed, and using std::stod is incorrect. This patch switches the Vector3 class to using the stream operator, which seems to ignore locale. * urdfdom-headers is a key part for the largest open source robotics framework, ROS (Robot Operative System). So it potentially affects a big part of the robotics open source community. We (the devs and maintainers of ROS have been receiving many different issues or bugs coming from this problem, as Simon wrote in the initial post of this bug. [Test Case] * We have prepared a test case that demonstrate the problem and the fix. Patched packages for both urdfdom and urdfdom_headers are in this ppa: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom-headers-sru2/+packages * The dockerfile here https://github.com/j-rivero/sru_urdfdom/blob/master/Dockerfile tries to demonstrate the following: - Setup the test case, install packages - Import locale test from the latest development of urdfdom repo - Run tests, failed (demonstration of the bug) - Setup the PPA, install new version of packages - Run test, success (demonstration of the fix) * This is the testing build of the dockerfile https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/_urdfdom_sru/15/console [Regression Potential] * The change affected the result of parsed values from using stof/stod functions to use stringstream. Although the patch is not small, the same pattern is replied on every chunk of code changed. Standard use case of users setting up digits in the form of integer or double is unlikely to generate big regressions. Alternative use cases of users with weird values in the input would trigger an exception from the code. This is no different than the exceptions thrown by previous stof/stod funtions (std::invalid_argument or std::out_of_range). * The bug was reported in Nov 2017 (https://github.com/ros/urdfdom_headers/issues/41) the ROS community and fixes landed in upstream repositories few weeks after. Many users from different countries have been using new versions or these patches since them, some of them are commenting/voting in this bug. Note that we were also playing with upstream test suite to build the test case and no regression was found in there. [Other Info] * Upstream releases new patched versions with the fix that I’ve included into Debian Sid and have been synced by Ubuntu starting from Disco: 1.0.3-1 * debdiffs for versions from the PPA: - urdfdom debdiff: https://gist.github.com/j-rivero/9983dddc6dbbea99cd3c39774f1d0498 - urdfdom-headers debdiff https://gist.github.com/j-rivero/bc563620802d78129d775b2d5aee69ac ** Bug watch added: github.com/ros/urdfdom_headers/issues #41 https://github.com/ros/urdfdom_headers/issues/41 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817595 Title: [SRU] urdfdom-headers and urdfdom should not use locale dependent parsing for floating point numbers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1817595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1817595] Re: [SRU] urdfdom-headers and urdfdom should not use locale dependent parsing for floating point numbers
@Julian: thanks very much for reviewing. 1. I attach debdiffs to the bug 2. Fixed release version number in the debdiffs to be 0.1 3. I've changed the patching to have one commit in each patch 4. Upstream split the library in two repositories one for the headers and one for the libraries, this SRU covers both. Not usual but the packaging was done using this same division done upstream. With this in mind I think that the test case is a bit more clear but feel free to ask if you need more information. @Kyle: I'm happy to help with any regression that could appear of any other problem we found. ** Patch added: "urdfdom.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1817595/+attachment/5289101/+files/urdfdom.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817595 Title: [SRU] urdfdom-headers and urdfdom should not use locale dependent parsing for floating point numbers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1817595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1817595] Re: [SRU] urdfdom-headers and urdfdom should not use locale dependent parsing for floating point numbers
** Patch added: "urdfdom-headers.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1817595/+attachment/5289102/+files/urdfdom-headers.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817595 Title: [SRU] urdfdom-headers and urdfdom should not use locale dependent parsing for floating point numbers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1817595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1895553] Re: [FFe] sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Summary changed: - Sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) + [FFe] sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895553 Title: [FFe] sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1895553] Re: [FFe] sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Patch added: "sdformat.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+attachment/5421379/+files/sdformat_9.2.0+dfsg-4__sdformat_9.3.0+ds-3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895553 Title: [FFe] sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1895553] Re: [FFe] sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Description changed: - Please sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) + Asking for a FFe here since upstream is specially interested into having + changes in 9.3.0 in the latest Ubuntu which fixes an important behavior + bug, see: https://github.com/osrf/sdformat/issues/367 - Upstream is specially interested into having changes in 9.3.0 in the latest Ubuntu - See: https://github.com/osrf/sdformat/issues/367 + Attached: + * Changelog entry from 9.2.0 to 9.3.0 + * pbuilder log - Although I setup a PPA, it can be checked here: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/501751526/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-amd64.sdformat_9.3.0+ds-3_BUILDING.txt.gz - Changelog entries since current groovy version 9.2.0+dfsg-4: - - sdformat (9.3.0+ds-3) unstable; urgency=medium - - * Not ready for compat 13: - CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY=ON kills the arch:all build - - -- Jose Luis Rivero Thu, 10 Sep 2020 - 17:20:56 + - - sdformat (9.3.0+ds-2) unstable; urgency=medium - - * Ship files for ignition integration - - -- Jose Luis Rivero Wed, 09 Sep 2020 - 09:46:40 + - - sdformat (9.3.0+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium - - * New upstream version 9.3.0 - * Update python3 patch - * Update debhelper to 13 - * Add patch to define PATH_MAX for Debian Hurd - (Closes: #892231) - - -- Jose Luis Rivero Tue, 08 Sep 2020 - 16:19:36 + + Testing: + I've used our buildfarm to inject the packages created by my testing PPA in a Groovy docker container. Installation is good, smoke test starting up Gazebo (main consumer of sdformat) is also sane. (build fail is related to docker + alsasound nothing to do with this bug). ** Patch added: "Upstream entries for 9.3.0" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+attachment/5421377/+files/changelog.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895553 Title: [FFe] sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1895553] Re: [FFe] sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Attachment added: "pbuilder.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+attachment/5421378/+files/pbuilder.log ** Description changed: Asking for a FFe here since upstream is specially interested into having changes in 9.3.0 in the latest Ubuntu which fixes an important behavior bug, see: https://github.com/osrf/sdformat/issues/367 Attached: - * Changelog entry from 9.2.0 to 9.3.0 - * pbuilder log - Although I setup a PPA, it can be checked here: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/501751526/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-amd64.sdformat_9.3.0+ds-3_BUILDING.txt.gz + * Changelog entry from 9.2.0 to 9.3.0 + * pbuilder log - Although I setup a PPA, it can be checked here: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/501751526/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-amd64.sdformat_9.3.0+ds-3_BUILDING.txt.gz + * debdiff - Although the PPA I think provides one https://launchpadlibrarian.net/501750879/sdformat_9.2.0+dfsg-4_9.3.0+ds-3.diff.gz Testing: I've used our buildfarm to inject the packages created by my testing PPA in a Groovy docker container. Installation is good, smoke test starting up Gazebo (main consumer of sdformat) is also sane. (build fail is related to docker + alsasound nothing to do with this bug). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895553 Title: [FFe] sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1895553] Re: Sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Patch added: "debdiff against current version" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+attachment/5415031/+files/sdformat_9.2.0+dfsg-4_sdformat_9.3.0+ds-3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895553 Title: Sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1817921] [NEW] Sync urdfdom 1.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync urdfdom 1.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current disco version 1.0.0-2build2: urdfdom (1.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Jelmer Vernooij ] * Remove unnecessary 'Testsuite: autopkgtest' header. [ Jose Luis Rivero ] * New upstream version 1.0.3 -- Jose Luis Rivero Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:33:58 + ** Affects: urdfdom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817921 Title: Sync urdfdom 1.0.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom/+bug/1817921/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773811] Re: [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata
Jeremy: thanks for the pointer. You were right Gazebo was not updated at that moment. I've update it during the last months and Debian and disco- proposed both have 9.6.0 which include the fix to this problem. Robie: sorry for not being clear about the effects of the bug. The lack of the library libgazebo_test_fixture.a in the Ubuntu packages is making some users not to be able to use the test feature since their code can not link against it. Example: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo/issues/2299/how-to-run-gazebo- integrated-unit-test#comment-38049019 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773811 Title: [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1773811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773811] [NEW] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata
Public bug reported: [Impact] * The libgazebo9-dev does not include the static libs generated during the gazebo build. Users of gazebo binaries can not access to them through the normal package. * At this moment there is only one .a library being generated (libgazebo_test_fixture.a). This can be checked in the build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/358995329/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic- amd64.gazebo_9.0.0+dfsg5-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz (search for Linking CXX static library) * The change in the packaging metadata should make the new -dev package to ship the static libraries. [Test Case] * To trigger the bug: apt-get install libgazebo9-dev && find /usr/lib -name libgazebo_*.a && echo "static lib found" || echo "no static lib found" [Regression Potential] * The change does not modify in any way any of the current files being packed but add more regexp to the install fix. * Upstream debian custom packages made this change long ago and there was no problem reported: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo9-release/src/7b7893d6674b0059b2378b7b912f48cc001aeaa4/ubuntu/debian /libgazebo-dev.install#lines-2 [Other Info] * I'm part of Gazebo upstream and the debian maintainer. ** Affects: gazebo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: bion ** Patch added: "debdiff with the new version and the fix" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773811/+attachment/5145585/+files/gazebo_9.0.0+dfsg5-3ubuntu2.debdiff ** Description changed: [Impact] - * The libgazebo9-dev does not include the static libs generated during the gazebo build. -Users of gazebo binaries can not access to them through the normal package. + * The libgazebo9-dev does not include the static libs generated +during the gazebo build. + Users of gazebo binaries can not access to them through the +normal package. - * At this moment there is only one .a library being generated (libgazebo_test_fixture.a). -This can be checked in the build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/358995329/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-amd64.gazebo_9.0.0+dfsg5-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz (search for Linking CXX static library) + * At this moment there is only one .a library being generated +(libgazebo_test_fixture.a). This can be checked in the build log: - * The change in the packaging metadata should make the new -dev package - to ship the static libraries. + https://launchpadlibrarian.net/358995329/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic- + amd64.gazebo_9.0.0+dfsg5-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz (search for Linking + CXX static library) + + * The change in the packaging metadata should make the new -dev package +to ship the static libraries. [Test Case] - * To trigger the bug: apt-get install libgazebo9-dev && find /usr -name - libgazebo9*.a + * To trigger the bug: +apt-get install libgazebo9-dev && find /usr/lib -name libgazebo_*.a && echo "static lib found" || echo "no static lib found" [Regression Potential] - * The change does not modify in any way any of the current files being packed but adds -more regexp to the install fix. + * The change does not modify in any way any of the current files being packed but adds + more regexp to the install fix. - * Upstream debian custom packages made this change long ago and there was no problem -reported: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo9-release/src/7b7893d6674b0059b2378b7b912f48cc001aeaa4/ubuntu/debian/libgazebo-dev.install#lines-2 - + * Upstream debian custom packages made this change long ago and there was no problem + reported: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo9-release/src/7b7893d6674b0059b2378b7b912f48cc001aeaa4/ubuntu/debian/libgazebo-dev.install#lines-2 [Other Info] - - * I'm part of Gazebo upstream and the debian maintainer. + + * I'm part of Gazebo upstream and the debian maintainer. ** Description changed: [Impact] - * The libgazebo9-dev does not include the static libs generated -during the gazebo build. - Users of gazebo binaries can not access to them through the -normal package. + * The libgazebo9-dev does not include the static libs generated + during the gazebo build. + Users of gazebo binaries can not access to them through the + normal package. - * At this moment there is only one .a library being generated -(libgazebo_test_fixture.a). This can be checked in the build log: + * At this moment there is only one .a library being generated + (libgazebo_test_fixture.a). This can be checked in the build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/358995329/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic- amd64.gazebo_9.0.0+dfsg5-3ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz (search for Linking CXX static library) * The change in the packaging metadata should make the new -dev package -to ship the static libraries. + to ship the static libraries. [Test Case] - * To trigger the bug: -apt-get install libgazebo9-dev && find /usr/lib -name libgazebo_*.a &
[Bug 1773811] Re: [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata
** Summary changed: - Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata + [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773811 Title: [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1773811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773811] Re: [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata
Friendly ping. The bug is affecting most of the Bionic CI mechanisms that uses the gazebo simulator. i.e. https://github.com/ros- simulation/gazebo_ros_pkgs/pull/796#issuecomment-411387717 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773811 Title: [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1773811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1752921] [NEW] autopkgtest failed in bionic-proposed
Public bug reported: The migration excuses page[1] for Bionic displays an error in urdfdom due to the change in one of its dependencies: console-bridge (library ABI changes, renamed from 0.2 to 0.4). I see in the log[2] that urdfdom autopkgtest is failing because for some reason it is using the libconsole-bridge-dev version 0.2 instead of 0.4, available in -proposed. I just tested it in a Bionic system with proposed and the autopkgtest builds fine for me in the local system. Please let me know if you need any interaction by my side or it is just a matter to rerun the test to get the updated libconsole-bridge-dev package. [1] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html [2] https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/u/urdfdom/20180302_123347_ae0ee@/log.gz ** Affects: urdfdom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: re ** Tags added: re -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752921 Title: autopkgtest failed in bionic-proposed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom/+bug/1752921/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1554629] [NEW] Sync pydocstyle 1.0.0-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: This is not really a new package in the way that it is the rename of the project pep257 already in Xenial. This version is specially important since it add the python3 support and include 4 bugfixes not backport to other branches: https://pydocstyle.readthedocs.org/en/latest/release_notes.html#january- 30th-2016 Could we consider making an exception and including it for Xenial? Thanks. All changelog entries: pydocstyle (1.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * added deb/source/options (ignore egg-info). * deb/rules: skip test_integration completely temporarily (see comment, also changed in deb/tests/pydocstyle). * dropped fix-tests-py3-environment.patch (not needed anymore). -- Daniel Stender Sun, 06 Mar 2016 12:27:53 +0100 pydocstyle (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial release (Closes: #816498). -- Daniel Stender Wed, 02 Mar 2016 21:10:58 +0100 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554629 Title: Sync pydocstyle 1.0.0-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1554629/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1623660] [NEW] Sync ignition-msgs 0.5.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync ignition-msgs 0.5.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current yakkety version 0.4.0-2: ignition-msgs (0.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 0.5.0 -- Jose Luis Rivero Mon, 12 Sep 2016 17:01:28 + ignition-msgs (0.4.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix typo in VSC browser * Fix pkgconfig file name -- Jose Luis Rivero Sun, 11 Sep 2016 19:45:38 + Please note that the new version does *NOT* include any new feature. The 0.5.0 release ships bugfixes: https://bitbucket.org/ignitionrobotics/ign-msgs/branches/compare /ignition-msgs_0.5.0%0Dignition-msgs_0.4.0#diff ** Affects: ignition-msgs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623660 Title: Sync ignition-msgs 0.5.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-msgs/+bug/1623660/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624333] [NEW] Sync gazebo 7.3.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gazebo 7.3.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current yakkety version 7.3.0+dfsg-6build1: gazebo (7.3.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 7.3.1 -- Jose Luis Rivero Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:09:38 + The new 7.3.1 ships a patch for avoiding the application to crash under certain circunstances: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo/src/gazebo7/Changelog.md?fileviewer=file-view-default ** Affects: gazebo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624333 Title: Sync gazebo 7.3.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1624333/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624336] [NEW] Sync sdformat 4.1.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync sdformat 4.1.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current yakkety version 4.1.0-2build1: sdformat (4.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 4.1.1 -- Jose Luis Rivero Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:32:41 + ** Affects: sdformat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624336 Title: Sync sdformat 4.1.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1624336/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715448] Re: Sync sdformat 4.3.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Please note that I've pointed to a couple of important bugfixes that we will get if we upgrade directly to this new version, so I'm not sure if the Whislist tag is the best one in this case. I've built these sdformat update packages and gazebo (probably the only application depending on sdformat) in a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/gazebo7-artful/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715448 Title: Sync sdformat 4.3.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1715448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1319809] [NEW] Backport fix in libtar Utopic 1.2.20-4 to stable Trusty 1.2.20-3
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu Trusty, libtar is affected by the bug described in: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtar/+bug/1315742 While this was solved for Ubuntu Utopic (1.2.20-4), it is a good candidate to upload the stable version also in Trusty. The fix won't break the ABI so I don't see any reason not to fix the bug in Trusty. If there is any more help that I can provide, please let me know. Thanks. ** Affects: libtar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: trusty ** Project changed: trusty-backports => libtar (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319809 Title: Backport fix in libtar Utopic 1.2.20-4 to stable Trusty 1.2.20-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtar/+bug/1319809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1315742] Re: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3
I've created a new bug to handle the process of backporting the fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtar/+bug/1319809 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315742 Title: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1315742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1715448] [NEW] Sync sdformat 4.3.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync sdformat 4.3.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current artful version 4.2.0-3: sdformat (4.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 4.3.2 * Update to standards 4.0.0 -- Jose Luis Rivero Tue, 05 Sep 2017 19:03:51 + Important fixes present in version 4.3.2: * Fix parser to read plugin child elements within an * Fix segmentation Fault in sdf::getBestSupportedModelVersion CHANGELOG: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdformat/src/sdf4/Changelog.md?at=default&fileviewer =file-view-default The Open Source Robotics Foundation has an ABI checker in the buildfarm and I run it with to check the bump from 4.2.0 to 4.3.1: https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/gazebo-abichecker-any_to_any-xenial- amd64/API_ABI_report/ (there are some false positives in the source compat, added/removed symbols being the same) ** Affects: sdformat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1715448 Title: Sync sdformat 4.3.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1715448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1716025] [NEW] Sync gazebo 7.8.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gazebo 7.8.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current artful version 7.5.0+dfsg-1build3: gazebo (7.8.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Remove merged patches * Imported Upstream version 7.8.1 * Update standards to 4.0.0 -- Jose Luis Rivero Tue, 05 Sep 2017 19:29:48 + I'm the maintainer of gazebo in Debian and also part of upstream. The latest gazebo7 release missed the Ubuntu sync for a few days but I think that its worth to go into the LTS since it solves many bugs and adds some nice features developed during the last year (regarding the version available now). It was tested for months since it is available for Ubuntu in the open source robotics foundation .deb repository. Our ABI checker says it is not breakage from 7.5.0 to 7.8.0: https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/gazebo-abichecker-any_to_any-xenial-amd64/370/API_ABI_report/ I'm particularly interested into shipping the following fixes: * Fix race condition during Detach of HarnessPlugin (7.7.0 release) * Backport wide angle camera VM FSAA fix (7.8.0 release) * Fixes -inf laser reading being displayed as +inf (7.6.0 release) Changelog: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo/src/gazebo7/Changelog.md?fileviewer=file-view-default Thanks. ** Affects: gazebo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716025 Title: Sync gazebo 7.8.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1716025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1716025] Re: Sync gazebo 7.8.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Thanks Simon for the comment. I'm aware of the FreezeException but I think that there are important fixes in different releases that should be present in the artful release. I've uploaded it to a PPA and built on artful to be sure that there is no error in the inclusion into the buildfarm: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/gazebo7-artful/+build/13362044 Gazebo is mostly a final application, with no packages using it in Ubuntu artful. We have run the ABI checker on it and ready to run the rest of the tests that Ubuntu to upgrade the version as soon as possible. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716025 Title: Sync gazebo 7.8.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1716025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1716025] Re: [FFE] Sync gazebo 7.8.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Summary changed: - Sync gazebo 7.8.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) + [FFE] Sync gazebo 7.8.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716025 Title: [FFE] Sync gazebo 7.8.1+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1716025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534263] Re: [FFe] [merge request] Import cmake-3.4 series to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04LTS
My analysis of the delta between the patches in Ubuntu 3.3.2is3.2.2 (current in Xenial) and Debian 3.5.0: [[ Patches in 3.3.2is3.2.2 than can be removed ]] * cpack-doc-typo.patch (fixed in upstream code) * openjdk-8-detection.patch (fixed in upstream code, it was a commit cherry-picked) * custom-sphinx-flags.patch (fixed in upstream code, it was a commit cherry-picked) * protect-tests-from-makeflags.patch (fixed in upstream code, it was a commit cherry-picked) * FindJNI.cmake.mips.patch (fixed in upstream code) * fix-hdf5-hl.patch (fixed in upstream code) * fix-mips-endian.patch (code was moved to Utilities/KWIML/include/kwiml/abi.h but changes are now in upstream) * upstream_findpkgconfig.diff (fixed in upstream code) [[ Patches in debian 3.5.0 that will stay in Ubuntu 3.5.0 ]] * FindBoost_add_-lpthread_#563479.diff (in debian 3.5.0) * qt_import_dir_variable.diff (in debian 3.5.0) * fix-ftbfs-on-kfreebsd.patch (in debian 3.5.0) [[ Patches in Ubuntu 3.3.2is3.2.2 that needs to be updated ]] * ubuntu_boost-multiarch.patch - needs to be ported to the new upstream code * ubuntu_cmake-crosscompile.patch - needs to be ported to the new upstream code I've updated these last two patches, include them with in the debian 3.5.0 package and built in the Xenial PPA: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/cmake-3.4-xenial/+build/9386917 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534263 Title: [FFe] [merge request] Import cmake-3.4 series to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmake/+bug/1534263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620834] [NEW] urdfdom needs to be synced to version 1.0.0
Public bug reported: I'm the current debian maintainer of urdfdom. Please note that the urdfdom software is divided (upstream) in two different source packages: urdfdom and urdfdom-headers. The need to be in sync specially on major version bumps. The urdfdom-headers package was synced from debian to the latest 1.0.0 version so Yaketty already have this version: http://packages.ubuntu.com/hu/source/yakkety/urdfdom-headers. Perfect. The problem is that urdfdom was updated to version 1.0.0 but this changes is still waiting in the debian NEW queue: https://ftp- master.debian.org/new/urdfdom_1.0.0-1.html Hopefully it will be approved one of these days and we can directly sync from Debian unstable to fix the problem of having the two urdfdom packages with different major versions. I can ping in this bug when this happen. Thanks. ** Affects: urdfdom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620834 Title: urdfdom needs to be synced to version 1.0.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom/+bug/1620834/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1621420] [NEW] Sync ignition-transport 1.3.0-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync ignition-transport 1.3.0-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current yakkety version 1.3.0-3~build1: ignition-transport (1.3.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Added patch for pkgconfig file (Closes: #836384) -- Jose Luis Rivero Tue, 06 Sep 2016 21:22:27 + ** Affects: ignition-transport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621420 Title: Sync ignition-transport 1.3.0-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-transport/+bug/1621420/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534263] Re: [FFe] [merge request] Import cmake-3.4 series to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04LTS
Please note that my research and reduction of delta and Dirk's + Phillip's massive rebuilds are using cmake-3.5 although the tittle of the issue refers to 3.4. Looking at the debian issue tracker, I can not see any bug referring only to the new 3.5 version. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534263 Title: [FFe] [merge request] Import cmake-3.4 series to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmake/+bug/1534263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534263] Re: [FFe] [merge request] Import cmake-3.5 series to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04LTS
You are right guys, I've reviewed the patches but missed the added file inside the debian directory, it is used by the patch 'ubuntu_cmake- crosscompile.patch' and we probably did not get it in our massive rebuild because we did not run a cross compilation. Sorry about that. I'm updating the version on my PPA right now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534263 Title: [FFe] [merge request] Import cmake-3.5 series to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmake/+bug/1534263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1569604] [NEW] Sync urdfdom-headers 0.4.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) [bugfix-only]
Public bug reported: Please sync urdfdom-headers 0.4.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Critical bug which makes cmake unable to find the package in most of non amd64 arches. Please see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815683 Note that this version has been in debian unstable (for more than 1 month) and in testing (more than 3 weeks). No bugs so far. Changelog entries since current xenial version 0.4.1-1: urdfdom-headers (0.4.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Change architecturo from 'all' to 'any' (Closes: #815683) -- Jose Luis Rivero Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:45:55 + ** Affects: urdfdom-headers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569604 Title: Sync urdfdom-headers 0.4.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) [bugfix-only] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1569604/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1569604] Re: Sync urdfdom-headers 0.4.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) [bugfix-only]
You can check the current failure (for i386) in this PPA log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/253524295/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-i386.urdfdom_0.4.1-1_BUILDING.txt.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569604 Title: Sync urdfdom-headers 0.4.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) [bugfix-only] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1569604/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1569626] [NEW] [FFe] Sync urdfdom 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync urdfdom 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Why is necessary? Sorry for discovering this so late. urdfdom is composed by two packages the urdfdom libries (this request) and urdfdom-headers (all the .h files). urdfdom-headers was synced before the freeze to version 0.4.1-1 jrivero@nium $ (master) rmadison urdfdom-headers | grep xenial urdfdom-headers | 0.4.1-1 | xenial/universe | source urdfdom (libraries) was not synced since it landed few days after the Xenial freeze. It has really very little sense (and probably it is call to weird bugs) to have 0.4 headers together with 0.3 libraries from the same software. jrivero@nium ~ $ rmadison urdfdom | grep xenial urdfdom | 0.3.0-2 | xenial/universe | source Information --- * Upstream changes (no upstream changelog file): There are a good bunch of changes since 0.3 release. In another situation and different package I would not request the sync but note that urdfdom only has one rdepend: sdformat (I'm also the maintainer). We have been using together the two urfdom package 0.4 in debian for more than one month (no bug so far) so the current situation is more dangerous than the sync (to my understanding). I'm also testing current xenial version of sdformat in the PPA. * build log and install log: - urdfdom 0.4 in current Xenial: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom0.4-xenial/+build/9568607 * What I've made to be sure this does not break anything: - Build the only package that depends on urdfdom inside the PPA: sdformat 4.0.0-1 current in xenial (only rdependency) with test suite: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/253527560/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-amd64.sdformat_4.0.0-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz - The main executable using sdformat and urfdom is the robotics simulator Gazebo. I've built it and run the test suite with the new urdfdom 0.4 in our building farm: http://build.osrfoundation.org/job/gazebo-ci-default-xenial-amd64-gpu-none/10/ Let me now if there are something more I can do. Changelog entries since current xenial version 0.3.0-2: urdfdom (0.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Jose Luis Rivero ] * Imported Upstream version 0.4.0 * Update patch. Submitted upstream * Imported Upstream version 0.4.1 * Patch merged upstream * Migrate boost dependency to generic version (Closes: #812400) [ Anton Gladky ] * Apply "cme fix dpkg" -- Jose Luis Rivero Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:56:01 + ** Affects: urdfdom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Please sync urdfdom 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Why is necessary? Sorry for discovering this so late. urdfdom is composed by two packages the urdfdom libries (this request) and urdfdom-headers (all the .h files). urdfdom-headers was synced before the freeze to version 0.4.1-1 jrivero@nium $ (master) rmadison urdfdom-headers | grep xenial - urdfdom-headers | 0.4.1-1 | xenial/universe | source + urdfdom-headers | 0.4.1-1 | xenial/universe | source - urdfdom (libraries) was not synced since it landed few days after the Xenial - freeze. It has really very little sense (and probably it is call to weird bugs) - to have 0.4 headers together with 0.3 libraries from the same software. + urdfdom (libraries) was not synced since it landed few days after the + Xenial freeze. It has really very little sense (and probably it is call + to weird bugs) to have 0.4 headers together with 0.3 libraries from the + same software. jrivero@nium ~ $ rmadison urdfdom | grep xenial - urdfdom | 0.3.0-2 | xenial/universe | source + urdfdom | 0.3.0-2 | xenial/universe | source Information --- - * Upstream changes (no upstream changelog file): -There are a good bunch of changes since 0.3 release. -In another situation and different package I would not request the sync but -note that urdfdom only has one rdepend: sdformat (I'm also the maintainer). We -have been using together the two urfdom package 0.4 in debian for more than one -month (no bug so far) so the current situation is more dangerous than the sync -(to my understanding). I'm also testing current xenial version of sdformat in -the PPA. - - * build log and install log: -- urdfdom 0.4 in current Xenial: - https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom0.4-xenial/+build/9568607 - - * What I've made to be sure this does not break anything: -- Build the only package that depends on urdfdom inside the PPA: - sdformat 4.0.0-1 current in xenial (only rdependency) with test suite: - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/253527560/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-amd64.sdformat_4.0.0-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz - -- The main executable using
[Bug 1569626] Re: [FFe] Sync urdfdom 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Hello Martin: Thanks for the warning. The build is failing on non 64bits architectures because it is still using a buggy version (multiarch: all) of urdfdom- headers (0.4.1-1). It should be fixed by using the 0.4.1-2 version of urdfdom-headers, which should be ready in Xenial thanks to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1569604 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569626 Title: [FFe] Sync urdfdom 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom/+bug/1569626/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1569626] Re: [FFe] Sync urdfdom 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Thanks Martin, I will keep an eye on this just in case that you need quick assistant if new bugs appear. Feel free to ping me at any moment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569626 Title: [FFe] Sync urdfdom 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom/+bug/1569626/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1569626] Re: [FFe] Sync urdfdom 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Just back home: arg, I run the rdepends command in Wily and not in Xenial so I missed the new synced ros-* packages. Thanks Martin for syncing the ros-robot-model. We (in the open source robotics foundation, OSRF) are upstream for most of the ros-* packages, so feel free to assign/cc bugs directly to me (I will coordinate them inside the OSRF) or mail me directly, we are happy to help in any scenario involving ros-* packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569626 Title: [FFe] Sync urdfdom 0.4.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ros-robot-model/+bug/1569626/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338845] Re: [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch
** Attachment added: "Test case for sdformat crash" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1338845/+attachment/4147719/+files/test.cc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338845 Title: [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1338845/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338845] Re: [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch
Attached is the debdiff needed to solve the problem described in the bug. ** Patch added: "debdiff to patch current sdformat-1.4.11-1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1338845/+attachment/4147720/+files/sdformat_1.4.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338845 Title: [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1338845/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338845] [NEW] [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch
Public bug reported: Using the version of sdformat library from Trusty (1.4.11-1) will make the applications using it to abort (core dumped) under certain circumstances in the input file. The problem is in the patch applied in Debian. Upstream bug: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdformat/issue/63/gzsdf-segfaults-in-trusty [Impact] * Unfortunately, it is affecting what is probably the most extensive open source robotics framework (ROS - Robot operative system) community and a show stopper for their LTS next release. The bug is marked as critical. https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/issues/4933. [Development version] The problem does not affect to the version in Utopic since the current patch works fine with the liburdfdom version in Utopic. [Test Case] * apt-get install libsdformat-dev * Attached to this bug will be an .urdf file, download it using wget. * Attached to this bug will be a test.cc file. Download it in the same directory than urdf * g++ -I/usr/include/sdformat-1.4 test.cc -lsdformat -o test * ./test < ... invalid pointer ... > [Regression Potential] * The proposed solution is removing part of the patch introduced in debian which is only triggered under certain circunstances. These circunstances now lead to a segfault, so situation can not virtually goes worst. This patch (and a testing package) has been released, tested and is now in use by the ROS framework users, which should lead us to minimize regressions. [Other Info] * None ** Affects: sdformat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: trusty ** Attachment added: "fixed_joint_reduction_visual.urdf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338845/+attachment/4147718/+files/fixed_joint_reduction_visual.urdf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338845 Title: [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1338845/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338845] Re: [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch
Thanks Alberto, Brian. Indeed, Utopic is not really affected (the patch was removed) since Utopic is using urdfdom-0.3.0 and this bug is only triggered by urdfdom-0.2.0, Utopic should be safe. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338845 Title: [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1338845/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338845] Re: [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch
I have installed the new packages on my Trusty system, and the bug is not present any more. It would be nice if a different person also give it a try. Thanks. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done ** Description changed: Using the version of sdformat library from Trusty (1.4.11-1) will make the applications using it to abort (core dumped) under certain circumstances in the input file. The problem is in the patch applied in Debian. Upstream bug: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdformat/issue/63/gzsdf-segfaults-in-trusty [Impact] - * Unfortunately, it is affecting what is probably the most extensive open source robotics framework (ROS - Robot operative system) community and a show stopper for their LTS next release. The bug is marked as critical. https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/issues/4933. + * Unfortunately, it is affecting what is probably the most extensive open source robotics framework (ROS - Robot operative system) community and a show stopper for their LTS next release. The bug is marked as critical. https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/issues/4933. [Development version] The problem does not affect to the version in Utopic since the current patch works fine with the liburdfdom version in Utopic. [Test Case] - * apt-get install libsdformat-dev - * Attached to this bug will be an .urdf file, download it using wget. - * Attached to this bug will be a test.cc file. Download it in the same directory than urdf - * g++ -I/usr/include/sdformat-1.4 test.cc -lsdformat -o test - * ./test < ... invalid pointer ... > + * apt-get install libsdformat-dev + * Attached to this bug will be an .urdf file, download it using wget. + * Attached to this bug will be a test.cc file. Download it in the same directory than urdf + * g++ -I/usr/include/sdformat-1.4 test.cc -lsdformat -o test + * ./test < ... invalid pointer ... > [Regression Potential] - * The proposed solution is removing part of the patch introduced in debian which is only triggered under certain circunstances. These circunstances now lead to a segfault, so situation can not virtually goes worst. This patch (and a testing package) has been released, tested and is now in use by the ROS framework users, which should lead us to minimize regressions. + * The proposed solution is removing part of the patch introduced in debian which is only triggered under certain circunstances. These circunstances now lead to a segfault, so situation can not virtually go worse. This patch (and a testing package) has been released, tested and is now in use by the ROS framework users, which should lead us to minimize regressions. [Other Info] - * None + * None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338845 Title: [SRU] sdformat on Trusty crash due to a bug in debian patch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1338845/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1471047] [NEW] [SRU] urdfdom-headers: critical numerical issues problem when converting angles
Public bug reported: When using the urdfdom headers versions 0.2.3 (on Trusty) and 0.3.0-1 (Utopic and Vivid) there is a problem in the maths which makes that two very similar quaternions can result in different and non-equivalent roll pitch yaw angles. This is a severe bug for angles related to a severe bug in the mathematical calculations. Upstream bug: https://github.com/ros/urdfdom/issues/49 [Impact] * urdfdom-headers is a packages extensively use by probably the most famous open source robotics framework, ROS (Robot Operative System). So it potentially affects to a big part of the robotics open source community. [Development version] The patch is already hosted in the debian-science repository (waiting for mentor upload) and will land soon in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Willy after it: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/urdfdom-headers.git/commit/?id=c92c198a30d34a74abcf1905eeb484bfc76b0f5e I’m also waiting a new upstream version to sync Debian Sid and Ubuntu Willy. [Test Case] * apt-get install libboost-test1.54-dev liburdfdom-headers-dev * Download the urdf_unit_test.cpp from: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ros/urdfdom/master/urdf_parser/test/urdf_unit_test.cpp * g++ urdf_unit_test.cpp -lboost_unit_test_framework -o test * ./test The expected result at the end of the test with the fixed version is: ... *** No errors detected The failing versions should report: ... urdf_unit_test.cpp(56): error in "test_rotation_get_set_rpy_idempotent": check quat_are_near(rot0, rot1) failed … *** 1 failure detected in test suite "URDF_UNIT_TEST" [Regression Potential] urdfdom-headers is a hedare only package and we are not altering the ABI/API in any sense, just changing the way of computing maths. The dangerous computations (mostly asin and atan2) present in the patch were already present in the released code, that should minimize the possible regressions introduced by the patch. The computation of angles is already broken, so a possible bug in the new computation will not bring a worse state than current one. [Other Info] * I'm attaching the debdiff related to Trusty release but I'm available to make any other needed, vivid or utopic. ** Affects: urdfdom-headers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: trusty ** Patch added: "Debdiff for trusty attached" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471047/+attachment/4423707/+files/urdfdom-headers_0.2.3%2Bdfsg-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471047 Title: [SRU] urdfdom-headers: critical numerical issues problem when converting angles To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1471047/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1490650] [NEW] Sync ignition-math2 2.2.2+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync ignition-math2 2.2.2+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * debian/patches/fix_collinear_boundary.patch: update epsilon for collinearity check so that tests don't fail on i386. * Rename library packages for g++5 ABI transition. Important fixes in SSE detection, and new features that are widly used in the next gazebo (well known robotics simulator) version 6. Currently blocking this last package update. Changelog entries since current wily version 2.1.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu2: ignition-math2 (2.2.2+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 2.2.2 * Relax the error margin expected in Line test (Closes: #789826) Patch by Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre. -- Jose Luis Rivero Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:32:42 + ** Affects: ignition-math2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490650 Title: Sync ignition-math2 2.2.2+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-math2/+bug/1490650/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1491168] [NEW] Sync sdformat 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync sdformat 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Changelog entries since current wily version 2.3.0-1build1: sdformat (3.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 3.0.0 * Fix debian rules to compile architecture indepedent packages * Migrate from libsdformat-dev to libsdformat3-dev * Migrate 3 branch from experiemntal to unstable. Stable upstream release * Fix install file for libsdformat3-dev -- Jose Luis Rivero Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:03:20 + sdformat (3.0.0~pre3.0.6-1-1) experimental; urgency=medium * Patch to use c++11 unconditionally * Fix the patch for use external gtest * Update watch file * Imported Upstream version 3.0.0~pre3.0.6-1 -- Jose Luis Rivero Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:13:57 +0200 ** Affects: sdformat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1491168 Title: Sync sdformat 3.0.0-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1491168/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1491914] [NEW] Sync sdformat 3.1.1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync sdformat 3.1.1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Changelog entries since current wily version 3.0.0-1: sdformat (3.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 3.1.1 -- Jose Luis Rivero Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:27:25 + sdformat (3.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix install file for libsdformat3-dev -- Jose Luis Rivero Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:03:20 + ** Affects: sdformat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1491914 Title: Sync sdformat 3.1.1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1491914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418291] Re: FFe: Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid
Amazing. Thanks Scott, Micah. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418291 Title: FFe: Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1418291/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1436848] [NEW] Sync bugfix-only revision update gazebo 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp2 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gazebo 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp2 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) The ~exp2 revision bump fixes an important bug for the ROS (Robot Operative System) users using latest version of Gazebo 5. See reports: http://answers.gazebosim.org/question/7937/cant-find-model-database- when-roslaunchd-but-can/ https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo_tutorials/issue/27/roslaunch-not- working-properly-when-using The patch was commited to upstream and backported to this release bump which only include this patch and the version is already in Debian experimental. Changelog entries since current vivid version 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp1: gazebo (5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp2) experimental; urgency=medium * [99f894c] Backport from upstream a patch to solve GAZEBO_MODEL_PATH bug -- Jose Luis Rivero Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:17:06 + ** Affects: gazebo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436848 Title: Sync bugfix-only revision update gazebo 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp2 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1436848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1490650] Re: Sync ignition-math2 2.2.2+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
** Branch linked: lp:~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-math2_wily -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490650 Title: Sync ignition-math2 2.2.2+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-math2/+bug/1490650/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1498061] [NEW] Sync ignition-math2 2.2.3+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync ignition-math2 2.2.3+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Changelog entries since current wily version 2.2.2+dfsg1-1: ignition-math2 (2.2.3+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 2.2.3 * Missing files from bad merge of upstream branch -- Jose Luis Rivero Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:55:39 +0200 ** Affects: ignition-math2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1498061 Title: Sync ignition-math2 2.2.3+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-math2/+bug/1498061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1498061] Re: Sync ignition-math2 2.2.3+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
This request is specially important since the code present in 2.2.2 package is broken. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1498061 Title: Sync ignition-math2 2.2.3+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-math2/+bug/1498061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1446752] [NEW] Sync gazebo 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp3 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gazebo 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp3 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current vivid version 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp2: gazebo (5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp3) experimental; urgency=medium * [337a3cc] Fix problems with upgrade paths (Closes: #781651, #782104, #782105) -- Jose Luis Rivero Wed, 08 Apr 2015 02:02:08 +0200 ** Affects: gazebo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446752 Title: Sync gazebo 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp3 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1446752/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1446752] Re: Sync gazebo 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp3 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
Thanks very much Micah, the change should fix problems with upgrading. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446752 Title: Sync gazebo 5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp3 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1446752/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1548537] [NEW] Sync ignition-math2 2.3.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync ignition-math2 2.3.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current xenial version 2.2.3+dfsg1-4: ignition-math2 (2.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 2.3.0 -- Jose Luis Rivero Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:20:30 + ** Affects: ignition-math2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548537 Title: Sync ignition-math2 2.3.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-math2/+bug/1548537/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1471047] Re: [SRU] urdfdom-headers: critical numerical issues problem when converting angles
Thanks for handling the bug Mathew. Just one question: I'm seeing the bug marked as "Fix Released" but can not find the new version in Trusty or Vivid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471047 Title: [SRU] urdfdom-headers: critical numerical issues problem when converting angles To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom-headers/+bug/1471047/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534263] [NEW] Import cmake-3.4 series to Ubuntu Xenial
Public bug reported: Latest stable upstream release. New 3.4 series which brings nice features with respect to current version in Xenial. It has been in debian-sid for more than one month and I can not find any bug related to this latest version. It builds just fine in my Xenial PPA: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/cmake-3.4-xenial Regarding to the building issues in armhf, arm64 and powerpc in the 3.3 series, I see that 3.4 debian packages compiles in all them (https://packages.debian.org/sid/cmake) so probably they are now fixed. I was close to submit the standard requestsync but just realized that we probably want to keep a set of specific ubuntu patches. The requestsync displayed me this message: 8< Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * Cherry-pick upstream commit fe558718b30da989db8b880374012a0e580574e6 to fix test suite failure with new file. * Cherrypick Features_Extract_strings_from_test_binary_more_reliably.patch from Debian to fix test-suite errors. * Revert back to 3.2.2, build issues on armhf, arm64 and powerpc. * Merge with Debian; remaining changes: - debian/cmake-data.install debian/MultiArchCross.cmake debian/patches/ubuntu_cmake-crosscompile.patch Add MultiArchCross.cmake to installed files. (help cmake to find libraries in multiarch path) xnox says this is not yet ready to go upstream but he will work on it - debian/patches/ubuntu_boost-multiarch.patch find boost and python in multiarch path this is a candidate for removal but needs rdepend testing * Search for Python 3.5. 8< So: can we go with a normal requestsync? Is there any patches that needs to be migrated? I'm available to get some work done if needed. Thanks. ** Affects: cmake (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534263 Title: Import cmake-3.4 series to Ubuntu Xenial To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmake/+bug/1534263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534396] [NEW] Sync simbody 3.5.3+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync simbody 3.5.3+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) I'm the current maintainer in debian and ubuntu of the package. Please sync to the 3.5.3 version which is the latest one and it has been in debian for months. Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * Use the __linux__ macro instead of __linux. * Use the __linux__ macro instead of __linux. This changes were already merged upstream in version 3.5.3. simbody (3.5.3+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 3.5.3 (Closes: #801132) * Add testing cloud configuration to Excluded files * Make copyright to follow strictly dep5 -- Jose Luis Rivero Sun, 15 Nov 2015 23:36:46 +0100 ** Affects: simbody (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534396 Title: Sync simbody 3.5.3+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simbody/+bug/1534396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1487180] Re: urdfparser_py fails on valid new transmission element
Thanks for the report Guillaume: This bug tracker is specific for the urdfdom package delivered from Ubuntu. You problem comes probably from ROS packages. I would recommend to report the bug in one of both: * Upstream: https://github.com/ros/urdfdom/issues * ROS answers: http://answers.ros.org/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487180 Title: urdfparser_py fails on valid new transmission element To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom/+bug/1487180/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534858] [NEW] TAGFILES broken in current Ubuntu Xenial (fixed in >=1.8.10)
Public bug reported: The version present in Ubuntu Xenial (1.8.9.1) has a severe bug for those of us using tagfiles. Using a tagfile generated for another project some symbols from the current project are not being extracted anymore. - Upstream bug and full description in: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744762 To get a fix into the current development in Ubuntu Xenial I see two options: 1. Cherry pick the patch from the doxygen repository to our current 1.8.9.1 version 2. Sync the latest version (1.8.11) present in Debian experimental I have time to work on 1 if we want to go with this option or if some work needs to be to port the option 2. Thanks. ** Affects: doxygen (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534858 Title: TAGFILES broken in current Ubuntu Xenial (fixed in >=1.8.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doxygen/+bug/1534858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534858] Re: TAGFILES broken in current Ubuntu Xenial (fixed in >=1.8.10)
** Branch linked: lp:~j-rivero/+junk/doxygen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534858 Title: TAGFILES broken in current Ubuntu Xenial (fixed in >=1.8.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doxygen/+bug/1534858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534858] Re: TAGFILES broken in current Ubuntu Xenial (fixed in >=1.8.10)
The related branch (forked from xenial-proposed) has the upstream modifications in the form of a patch applied to the current Xenial version. I've verified that the bug is present without the patched version and it is fixed with the changes. I don't know why I can not request a merge in bzr doxygen branch as I did in the past with some other packages, sorry. ** Tags added: patch-accepted-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534858 Title: TAGFILES broken in current Ubuntu Xenial (fixed in >=1.8.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doxygen/+bug/1534858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551922] [NEW] Sync gazebo 7.0.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gazebo 7.0.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * No-change rebuild for new gdal I'm current the maintainer of Gazebo (Robotics simulator) package inside Debian and Ubuntu: http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/xenial/gazebo This sync will bring gazebo7 version to Ubuntu Xenial. The installation of current libgazebo6-dev is broken since the last upgrade of sdformat (dependency) from libsdformat4-dev deprecating libsdformat3-dev (used by gazebo6). gazebo7 works with libsdformat4-dev. For the Open Source Robotics community using the Gazebo simulator and the ROS (Robotic Operative System) framework, it is fundamental to get Gazebo7 into Xenial so Ubuntu can provide directly through official respositories the latest version of the simulator and allows ROS Kinetic (next release, uses Gazebo7) to be built directly on top of an out-of-the box Xenial system. Changelog entries since current xenial version 6.5.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1: gazebo (7.0.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Need sdformat4 in gazebo7 (Closes: #813001) * Add libqtwebkit dependency * Imported Upstream version 7.0.0 * Migrate all package metadata to gazebo7 * Remove patch. Circular dependencies problem is fixed upstream -- Jose Luis Rivero Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:49:54 +0100 ** Affects: gazebo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551922 Title: Sync gazebo 7.0.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1551922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551922] Re: Sync gazebo 7.0.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Description changed: Please sync gazebo 7.0.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: - * No-change rebuild for new gdal + * No-change rebuild for new gdal - I'm current the maintainer of Gazebo (Robotics simulator) package inside Debian - and Ubuntu: http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/xenial/gazebo + I'm current the maintainer of Gazebo (Robotics simulator) package inside Debian and Ubuntu: + - http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/xenial/gazebo This sync will bring gazebo7 version to Ubuntu Xenial. - The installation of current libgazebo6-dev is broken since the last upgrade of - sdformat (dependency) from libsdformat4-dev deprecating libsdformat3-dev - (used by gazebo6). gazebo7 works with libsdformat4-dev. + The installation of current libgazebo6-dev is broken since the last + upgrade of sdformat (dependency) from libsdformat4-dev deprecating + libsdformat3-dev (used by gazebo6). gazebo7 works with libsdformat4-dev. - For the Open Source Robotics community using the Gazebo simulator and the ROS - (Robotic Operative System) framework, it is fundamental to get Gazebo7 into - Xenial so Ubuntu can provide directly through official respositories the latest - version of the simulator and allows ROS Kinetic (next release, uses Gazebo7) to - be built directly on top of an out-of-the box Xenial system. + For the Open Source Robotics community using the Gazebo simulator and + the ROS (Robotic Operative System) framework, it is fundamental to get + Gazebo7 into Xenial so Ubuntu can provide directly through official + respositories the latest version of the simulator and allows ROS Kinetic + (next release, uses Gazebo7) to be built directly on top of an out-of- + the box Xenial system. Changelog entries since current xenial version 6.5.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1: gazebo (7.0.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium - * Need sdformat4 in gazebo7 - (Closes: #813001) - * Add libqtwebkit dependency - * Imported Upstream version 7.0.0 - * Migrate all package metadata to gazebo7 - * Remove patch. Circular dependencies problem is fixed upstream + * Need sdformat4 in gazebo7 + (Closes: #813001) + * Add libqtwebkit dependency + * Imported Upstream version 7.0.0 + * Migrate all package metadata to gazebo7 + * Remove patch. Circular dependencies problem is fixed upstream - -- Jose Luis Rivero Tue, 26 Jan 2016 + -- Jose Luis Rivero Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:49:54 +0100 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551922 Title: Sync gazebo 7.0.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1551922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534858] Re: TAGFILES broken in current Ubuntu Xenial (fixed in >=1.8.10)
The version 1.8.11 has been synced from debian unstable. All done. ** Changed in: doxygen (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534858 Title: TAGFILES broken in current Ubuntu Xenial (fixed in >=1.8.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doxygen/+bug/1534858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534263] Re: [merge request] Import cmake-3.4 series to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04LTS
cmake-3.4 series went into debian unstable so it is probably a good moment to sync: https://packages.debian.org/source/testing/cmake -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534263 Title: [merge request] Import cmake-3.4 series to Ubuntu Xenial 16.04LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmake/+bug/1534263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1422204] [NEW] Sync sdformat 2.3.0-1~exp1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync sdformat 2.3.0-1~exp1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current vivid version 2.2.0-1~exp1: sdformat (2.3.0-1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium * Added ruby as dependency to generate schemas * Added a patch to disable a test that requires network * Remove previous patch. Already merged upstream * Imported Upstream version 2.3.0 * Set Standards-Version: 3.9.6. No changes -- Jose Luis Rivero Wed, 04 Feb 2015 02:45:51 +0100 sdformat (2.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 2.2.0 * Update urdfdom patch with latest work done by upstream * Update standards version to 3.9.6 * Update mailing list -- Jose Luis Rivero Fri, 21 Nov 2014 01:14:22 + ** Affects: sdformat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422204 Title: Sync sdformat 2.3.0-1~exp1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1422204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418291] Re: Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid
The packages is now in the Debian NEW Queue https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/gazebo_5.0.1+dfsg-1~exp1.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418291 Title: Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1418291/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1417829] [NEW] Sync sdformat 2.2.0-1~exp1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync sdformat 2.2.0-1~exp1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) Changelog entries since current vivid version 2.0.0-6: sdformat (2.2.0-1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 2.2.0 * Update urdfdom patch with latest work done by upstream * Update standards version to 3.9.6 * Update mailing list -- Jose Luis Rivero Fri, 21 Nov 2014 01:14:22 + sdformat (2.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 2.0.1 -- Jose Luis Rivero Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:42:06 + ** Affects: sdformat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417829 Title: Sync sdformat 2.2.0-1~exp1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1417829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1417830] [NEW] Sync simbody_3.5.1+dfsg-1~exp1 from Debian new queue
Public bug reported: Please sync simbody_3.5.1+dfsg-1~exp1 from Debian to next Vivid release. Note: it is target to experimental but waiting in the NEW queue, which is currently frozen until the release of Jessie. Official debian-science repository is: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/simbody.git Let me know if we need a PPA or a bzr branch to sync from it. Changelog entries since current vivid version 3.4.1+dfsg-1 simbody (3.5.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Use RelwithDebInfo to build * Update cleanup script * Update debian files from 3.4 -> 3.5 * Imported Upstream version 3.5.1 -- Jose Luis Rivero Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:32:48 +0100 ** Affects: simbody (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - Please sync simbody_3.5.1+dfsg-1~exp1 from Debian. + Please sync simbody_3.5.1+dfsg-1~exp1 from Debian to next Vivid release. Note: it is target to experimental but waiting in the NEW queue, which is currently frozen until the release of Jessie. Official debian-science repository is: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/simbody.git Let me know if we need a PPA or a bzr branch to sync from it. Changelog entries since current vivid version 3.4.1+dfsg-1 simbody (3.5.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium - * Use RelwithDebInfo to build - * Update cleanup script - * Update debian files from 3.4 -> 3.5 - * Imported Upstream version 3.5.1 + * Use RelwithDebInfo to build + * Update cleanup script + * Update debian files from 3.4 -> 3.5 + * Imported Upstream version 3.5.1 - -- Jose Luis Rivero Mon, 12 Jan 2015 + -- Jose Luis Rivero Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:32:48 +0100 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417830 Title: Sync simbody_3.5.1+dfsg-1~exp1 from Debian new queue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simbody/+bug/1417830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1345881] Re: [needs-packaging] New package for Utopic: Gazebo Robotics Simulator
Hello Maarten: Thanks very much for the offer but the goal of this issue was trying to get gazebo 3 version into Utopic, which is now closed. If you are interested in using Gazebo, the latest is the version 5 which is available for utopic and trusty from the official Gazebo repository: http://gazebosim.org/tutorials?tut=install_ubuntu&ver=5.0&cat=install I'm going to submit this new Gazebo 5 version for inclusion into Ubuntu Vivid. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1345881 Title: [needs-packaging] New package for Utopic: Gazebo Robotics Simulator To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1345881/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418291] [NEW] Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid
Public bug reported: I'm current the maintainer of Gazebo (Robotics simulator) package inside Debian and Ubuntu: http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/vivid/gazebo I usually don't ask for this kind of updates since the automatic sync from Debian is usually enough. In this case, Debian unstable is in a frozen state for the next release and changes in major versions can be waiting in the NEW queue for long time or in experimental. I would like to request the update from the current Gazebo 3 version (more than one year old) already in Vivid to the new Gazebo 5 version (released two weeks ago). I've created a PPA containing the gazebo5 version in Vivid: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/gazebo5-vivid For the Open Source Robotics community using the Gazebo simulator and the ROS (Robotic Operative System) framework, it is pretty critical to get Gazebo5 into Vivid so Ubuntu can provide directly through official respositories the latest version of the simulator and allows ROS Jade (next release, uses Gazebo5[2]) to be built directly on top of an out- of-the box Vivid system. Thanks very much, let me know if I need to go any other action to get Gazebo5 into Vivid. ** Affects: gazebo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418291 Title: Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1418291/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418291] Re: Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid
** Package changed: ubuntu => gazebo (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418291 Title: Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1418291/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418291] Re: Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid
I have updated the PPA with latest changes on Debian repository. It is in the process of being reviewed by Debian and join the NEW Queue for experimental. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418291 Title: Please include gazebo5 (robotics simulator) update in Vivid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1418291/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1315742] Re: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3
Thanks for patch. I can see the version patched in Ubuntu Utopic but the bug is still present in the current version of Trusty (1.2.20-3): - http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/libtar0 Is there anything that stop the inclussion of the fix into the Trusty distribution? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315742 Title: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtar/+bug/1315742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1315742] Re: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315742 Title: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtar/+bug/1315742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1315742] Re: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3
** Also affects: trusty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315742 Title: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1315742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1332329] Re: Please merge python-paramiko 1.14.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
What is stopping Ubuntu to sync paramiko package from Debian? Is there anything that we can done to help with this update? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332329 Title: Please merge python-paramiko 1.14.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/paramiko/+bug/1332329/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1285278] [NEW] Sync request from Debian for sdformat (new package)
Public bug reported: Hello: My name is Jose Luis Rivero and I'm with the Open Source Robotics Foundation (OSRF; www.osrfoundation.org), a non-profit R&D foundation where we build software for programming and simulating robots. I would like to request an exception sync to include into Ubuntu Trusty (14.04) the package sdformat (1.4.11), currently in debian sid: https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/sdformat The reasons to propose this inclussion out of the standard sync period are: * sdformat is a key depencency for our software platform, called ROS (Robot Operating System; www.ros.org). ROS is the most widely used system of its kind in the world, relied upon by tens of thousands of people at universities, companies, and government agencies around the world, and used with many kinds of robots in many different domains. * ROS primary supported platform is Ubuntu, and as such, lots of robotics users are using it. Recenty, ROS has changed the release cycle to be in sync with Ubuntu LTS which is why I'm requesting this exception for going into Trusty. * Not having sdformat as an official package has generated all kind of problems in the past due to the duplication of code in the different PPA and extra repositories. Please see the following link as an example: -> https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdformat/issue/29/incompatibility- between-sdformats-urdf-and * sdformat-1.4.11 is an extensively used version and was released on Nov 2013. There are no open bugs against it. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285278 Title: Sync request from Debian for sdformat (new package) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1285278/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1285278] Re: Sync request from Debian for sdformat (new package)
Thanks for the information Sebastien, I will close this bug and open one following the FreezeException rules. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285278 Title: Sync request from Debian for sdformat (new package) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1285278/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1285453] [NEW] [Feature Freeze Exception] New package sdformat (from debian unstable)
Public bug reported: Hello: My name is Jose Luis Rivero and I'm with the Open Source Robotics Foundation (OSRF; www.osrfoundation.org), a non-profit R&D foundation where we build software for programming and simulating robots. I would like to request an exception sync to include into Ubuntu Trusty (14.04) the package sdformat (1.4.11), currently in debian sid: https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/sdformat The reasons to propose this inclussion out of the standard sync period are: * sdformat is a key depencency for our software platform, called ROS (Robot Operating System; www.ros.org). ROS is the most widely used system of its kind in the world, relied upon by tens of thousands of people at universities, companies, and government agencies around the world, and used with many kinds of robots in many different domains. * ROS primary supported platform is Ubuntu, and as such, lots of robotics users are using it. Recenty, ROS has changed the release cycle to be in sync with Ubuntu LTS which is why I'm requesting this exception for going into Trusty. * Not having sdformat as an official package has generated all kind of problems in the past due to the duplication of code in the different PPA and extra repositories. Please see the following link as an example: -> https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdformat/issue/29/incompatibility- between-sdformats-urdf-and * sdformat-1.4.11 is an extensively used version and was released on Nov 2013. There are no open bugs against it. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285453 Title: [Feature Freeze Exception] New package sdformat (from debian unstable) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1285453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1319338] Re: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed
Is there any way to provide help, patches or testing in order to get this bug fixed in the current LTS Trusty? Should I file a new SRU bug or this is enough? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319338 Title: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boost/+bug/1319338/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1315742] Re: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3
Thanks Brian, I've wrote a small testing case that should segfault with current libtar 1.2.20-3 but should work with the patch 1.2.20-4 - Compile: gcc foo.c -ltar -o foo - Run ./foo It will uncompress the contents in the /tmp directory. Let me know if you need anything else. ** Attachment added: "Test case for libtar segfault" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtar/+bug/1315742/+attachment/4134973/+files/foo.c -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315742 Title: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1315742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1315742] Re: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3
We successfully aplied the following patch to generate an own version (1.2.20-4~osrf1) that fixes the problem. ** Patch added: "Backport of libtar_1.2.20-4 to trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtar/+bug/1315742/+attachment/4135049/+files/libtar-4_backport.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315742 Title: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1315742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1319338] Re: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed
For the SRU, the test case to try is attached, please compile using: - g++ chat_client.cpp -std=gnu++11 -lboost_system -lpthread -o chat_client You will need the header chat I will attach in the following comment in order to make it to compile. Bug in current boost Trusty libraries, while trying to conect to non existing server. * Bug: ./chat_client localhost 2423424 Success * Expected: ./chat_client localhost 2423424 Connection refused ** Attachment added: "ASIO test case" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost-defaults/+bug/1319338/+attachment/4135954/+files/chat_client.cpp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319338 Title: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boost/+bug/1319338/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1319338] Re: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed
Here is the patch against current libboost1.54-dev in Trusty that fix the regression that makes impossible to use the ASIO library. ** Patch added: "debdiff patch to current boost1.54-dev in trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost-defaults/+bug/1319338/+attachment/4135956/+files/boost-1.54_asio.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319338 Title: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boost/+bug/1319338/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1319338] Re: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed
** Attachment added: "Header for the test" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost-defaults/+bug/1319338/+attachment/4135955/+files/chat_message.hpp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319338 Title: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boost/+bug/1319338/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1315742] Re: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3
I tested the new package for the amd64 arch and it fixes the bug for me. Thanks Brian, Collin. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315742 Title: Segmentation fault on tar_extract_all in 14.04/1.2.20-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1315742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1319338] Re: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed
Thanks Brian, Steve, Scott and Dimitri. I've tested the new boost1.54-dev package in my trusty amd64 system and is fixing the problem. Silvio Traversaro was kind enough to give it a try also and reported good results in OSRF Gazebo issue tracker: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo/issue/1204/trusty-remote_endpoint-transport-endpoint#comment-10857403 More testers are always welcome. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319338 Title: Default boost v1.54 has broken asio while available 1.55 is fixed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/boost/+bug/1319338/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1345881] Re: New package for Utopic: Gazebo Robotics Simulator
Working on it in the ppa: https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/gazebo-utopic ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1345881 Title: New package for Utopic: Gazebo Robotics Simulator To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1345881/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1345881] [NEW] New package for Utopic: Gazebo Robotics Simulator
Public bug reported:
It would be nice to have in the next version of Ubuntu (Utopic at the
time of writing) one of the most used open source robotics simulators,
Gazebo (www.gazebosim.org).
The debian packaging work is already done and the package is currently waiting
in the NEW queue:
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/gazebo_3.0.0+dfsg-1.html
A part from the benefit for the whole community of Gazebo users and robotics
hackers in general, I'm particularly interested on having it in Ubuntu Utopic
since it is a key depencency for the software platform, called ROS (Robot
Operating System; www.ros.org).
ROS is the most widely used system of its kind in the world, relied upon by
tens of thousands of people at universities, companies, and government agencies
around the world, and used with many kinds of robots in many different domains.
* ROS primary supported platform is Ubuntu, and as such, lots of
robotics users are using it. Recenty, ROS has changed the release cycle
to be in sync with Ubuntu which is why I'm requesting this exception for
going into Utopic.
* Not having Gazebo as an official package has generated all kind of
problems in the past due to the duplication of code in the different PPA
and extra repositories. Please see the following comment as an example:
-> https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo/issue/1204/trusty-remote_endpoint-
transport-endpoint#comment-11279212
* Gazebo 3.0 is an extensively used version and was released on Nov 2013
and it is actively supported and ubuntu packages has been built and
hosted since the begining on all the Ubuntu supported platforms.
As we are not sure about when debian will have time to upload to its
official repositories (it could take months), I'm starting this issue to
handle the inclusion into Utopic due to all the reasons detailed above.
Thanks.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)
Status: In Progress
** Tags: needs-packaging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1345881
Title:
New package for Utopic: Gazebo Robotics Simulator
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1345881/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1895553] [NEW] Sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Upstream is specially interested into having changes in 9.3.0 in the latest Ubuntu See: https://github.com/osrf/sdformat/issues/367 Changelog entries since current groovy version 9.2.0+dfsg-4: sdformat (9.3.0+ds-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Not ready for compat 13: CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY=ON kills the arch:all build -- Jose Luis Rivero Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:20:56 + sdformat (9.3.0+ds-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Ship files for ignition integration -- Jose Luis Rivero Wed, 09 Sep 2020 09:46:40 + sdformat (9.3.0+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 9.3.0 * Update python3 patch * Update debhelper to 13 * Add patch to define PATH_MAX for Debian Hurd (Closes: #892231) -- Jose Luis Rivero Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:19:36 + ** Affects: sdformat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895553 Title: Sync sdformat 9.3.0+ds-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1895553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058914] Re: [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7
Thanks Andreas. I don't have the time anymore to work on the SRU anymore for this package so I'm orphaning the work here for Noble. Just in case that someone wants to follow it up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914 Title: [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/2058914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058914] Re: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7
> Not sure what would be best, if RM the package or invest time into patching it. Since no action happened last week, my teammate Chris Lalancette patched the existing version to work with current flake8 on noble-proposed 7.0.0. I have updated the upstream PR with the information https://github.com/tholo/pytest-flake8/pull/96#issuecomment-2032433686, tested changes in a docker noble with: * flake8 7.0.0-1 (probably any version above 6 could work) * pytest 7.4.4-1 and pytest 8.0.2-1 I've created a PPA for testing the changes in proposed, builds fine in amd64 https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/python-pytest-flake8-noble/+packages The .debdiff against current noble version is attached in this comment. ** Patch added: "python-pytest-flake8_1.1.1-4ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pytest-flake8/+bug/2058914/+attachment/5761331/+files/python-pytest-flake8_1.1.1-4ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914 Title: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/2058914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
