[TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis
This email begins the adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis. As mentioned [1], this updates language and fixes some errata against RFC8446 (as identified below). No other semantic changes were made. Errata fixed: - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6141, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/54 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6205, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/53 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6204, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/52 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6150, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/51 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6147, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/49 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6139, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/46 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6138, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/45 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6137, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/44 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6135, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/43 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6128, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/42 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6125, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/39 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6122, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/37 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6152, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/33 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6146, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/31 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6145, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/30 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6142, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/28 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6136, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/27 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6123, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/26 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5868, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/24 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5682, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/23 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5483, via https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/22 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5627 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5976 Errata ready to close with no action: - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6148 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6144 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6140 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6127 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6126 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6124 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6121 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6120 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5717 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6151 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6143 - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5874 Please let the WG know if you support adoption, and if so, are willing to contribute to the discussion and review changes going forward. If you oppose adoption, please explain why. The document may be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis/ This call for adoption will conclude on September 16. Best, Chris, on behalf of the chairs [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/bLPs94FGzzmjNirCn2yf-FFPfqo/ ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis
I support this and will help work on it. ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis
Unsurprisingly, I support adoption. My hope here is that we can quickly flush out remaining issues that could cause confusion and get this to the IESG. -Ekr On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:20 AM Salz, Rich wrote: > I support this and will help work on it. > > ___ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis
I support adoption on this. Yes, I'll assist in reviews, etc. tim On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:18 PM Christopher Wood wrote: > This email begins the adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis. As > mentioned [1], this updates language and fixes some errata against RFC8446 > (as identified below). No other semantic changes were made. > > Errata fixed: > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6141, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/54 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6205, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/53 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6204, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/52 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6150, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/51 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6147, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/49 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6139, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/46 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6138, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/45 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6137, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/44 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6135, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/43 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6128, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/42 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6125, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/39 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6122, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/37 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6152, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/33 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6146, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/31 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6145, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/30 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6142, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/28 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6136, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/27 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6123, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/26 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5868, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/24 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5682, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/23 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5483, via > https://github.com/ekr/tls13-spec/issues/22 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5627 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5976 > > Errata ready to close with no action: > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6148 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6144 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6140 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6127 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6126 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6124 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6121 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6120 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5717 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6151 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6143 > - https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5874 > > Please let the WG know if you support adoption, and if so, are willing to > contribute to the discussion and review changes going forward. If you > oppose adoption, please explain why. > > The document may be found here: > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis/ > > This call for adoption will conclude on September 16. > > Best, > Chris, on behalf of the chairs > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/bLPs94FGzzmjNirCn2yf-FFPfqo/ > > ___ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis
I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has already incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.) ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis
I support adoption and am willing to help review. In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 David On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ben Smyth wrote: > I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has > already incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.) > ___ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi wrote: > I support adoption and am willing to help review. > > In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: > > https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 > Thanks. I attempted to backport all the substantive changes made in RPC processing. However, there are a number of places (tables, line breaks, etc.) where the formatter behaved differently. In addition, some of the references are different because of differences between kramdown2629/xml2rfc's automatic reference processing and how the RPC does things. If you find changes you believe are material, please send PRs. -Ekr David > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ben Smyth wrote: > >> I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has >> already incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.) >> ___ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> > ___ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
[TLS] Reminder TLS interim focused on ECH on Thursday
Let the chairs know if you can help out as note taker or jabber scribe: The Transport Layer Security (tls) WG will hold a virtual interim meeting on 2020-09-03 from 10:00 to 11:00 America/Los_Angeles (17:00 to 18:00 UTC). Agenda: ECH Issue Discussion https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues Information about remote participation: https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m03f90210684f8e73e98a1fa737884d37 ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis
I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi > wrote: > >> I support adoption and am willing to help review. >> >> In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 >> > > Thanks. I attempted to backport all the substantive changes made in RPC > processing. However, there are a number of places (tables, line breaks, > etc.) where the formatter behaved differently. In addition, some of the > references are different because of differences between > kramdown2629/xml2rfc's automatic reference processing and how the RPC does > things. If you find changes you believe are material, please send PRs. > > -Ekr > > David >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ben Smyth wrote: >> >>> I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has >>> already incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.) >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> >>> >>> TLS mailing list >>> >>> >>> TLS@ietf.org >>> >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >>> >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> >> >> TLS mailing list >> >> >> TLS@ietf.org >> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> >> >> > > ___ > > TLS mailing list > > TLS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis
I support adoption. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:17 PM Richard Barnes wrote: > I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi >> wrote: >> >>> I support adoption and am willing to help review. >>> >>> In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446: >>> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00 >>> >> >> Thanks. I attempted to backport all the substantive changes made in RPC >> processing. However, there are a number of places (tables, line breaks, >> etc.) where the formatter behaved differently. In addition, some of the >> references are different because of differences between >> kramdown2629/xml2rfc's automatic reference processing and how the RPC does >> things. If you find changes you believe are material, please send PRs. >> >> -Ekr >> >> David >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ben Smyth wrote: >>> I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has already incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.) ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >>> >>> ___ >>> >>> >>> TLS mailing list >>> >>> >>> TLS@ietf.org >>> >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >>> >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> >> TLS mailing list >> >> TLS@ietf.org >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> >> ___ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
