Re: Firefighters at the site of WTC7 "Move away the building is going to blow up, get back the building is going to blow up."
On May 3, 12:14 am, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [...] > > > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and > > watching its' structure deform is too rational. > > Also, that was a Larry Silverstein impostor who > said they were going to 'pull it'. > And the only reason he took out huge amounts > of extra insurance on the buildings two months > before this happened was because of global > warming, because we all know a little bit of heat > will bring down steel buildings. > > John Pull = pull out the firefighters. Also, did you know that when they used "pull" to refer to pulling WTC6 it was because they were going to _pull it over_ not blow it up? http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Firefighters at the site of WTC7 "Move away the building is going to blow up, get back the building is going to blow up."
On May 2, 9:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 100% EVIDENCE - SEE THE TRUTH FINALLY - ON THE GROUND VIDEO > WITNESSEShttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNN6apj5B2U > > In order to appreciate just what Truthers are talking about when they > cry Treason over WTC7, you would want to see this History Channel > documentary on what they claim happened to > WTC7:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVSxeJH_RCY > > Ben Chertoff can't get his story > straighthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YND7XocMocj > > LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES > > 9/11 Truth Focoist Revolution. "When peaceful revolution is made > impossible, violent revolution is inevitable" - Martin Luther King. > How long shall they kill our prophets? Look up Focoism. Write about > it. Spread the method. It will be how this revolution will take shape. Maybe they were just speaking in the heat of the moment... or does this mean that the FIREFIGHTERS were in on the conspiracy too? Did you know that a conspiracy becomes more and more difficult to do the bigger it gets? Do you also know that every structural engineer, every scientist, all of NIST, everyone would have to be "in" on this conspiracy? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Firefighters at the site of WTC7 "Move away the building is going to blow up, get back the building is going to blow up."
On May 3, 9:53 am, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 3, 12:18 am, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 2, 10:14 pm, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and > > > > watching its' structure deform is too rational. > > > > Also, that was a Larry Silverstein impostor who > > > said they were going to 'pull it'. > > > ...maybe if you read the context, it would make a little more rational > > sense. Fucking nutter. > > > > And the only reason he took out huge amounts > > > of extra insurance on the buildings two months > > > before this happened was because of global > > > warming, because we all know a little bit of heat > > > will bring down steel buildings. > > > A little heat and major structural damage. > > > > John > > Gee, I'll bet all those explosions in the > subfloors of WTC1 + WTC2 did some > structural damage also! > > Come to think of it. > > When the firefighters got there, all the glass > on the street floors was blown out. > > Shock wave from the plane hitting > 80 floors up? > > Janitors and such coming up from the basement levels > bleeding and dazed. > > Jet fuel trickling down the elevator shafts being ignited > by someone's roach? And exploding? > Severing the three-foot thick steel columns? > All 5 dozen of them? > (That's mighty fine primo, pardner!) > > Your brain got structural damage? > Dropped on your head as a kid? > > Don't put that fire iron too close > to the flames, honey. It'll melt > and deform! > Never mind that the irons in the WTC were IN the fire, amongst the coals no less! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: Firefighters at the site of WTC7 "Move away the building is going to blow up, get back the building is going to blow up."
On May 3, 7:22 pm, The Great Attractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3 May 2007 08:53:39 -0700, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >On May 3, 12:18 am, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On May 2, 10:14 pm, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > [...] > > >> > > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and > >> > > watching its' structure deform is too rational. > > >> > Also, that was a Larry Silverstein impostor who > >> > said they were going to 'pull it'. > > >> ...maybe if you read the context, it would make a little more rational > >> sense. Fucking nutter. > > >> > And the only reason he took out huge amounts > >> > of extra insurance on the buildings two months > >> > before this happened was because of global > >> > warming, because we all know a little bit of heat > >> > will bring down steel buildings. > > >> A little heat and major structural damage. > > >> > John > > >Gee, I'll bet all those explosions in the > >subfloors of WTC1 + WTC2 did some > >structural damage also! > > You're an idiot. > You did not refute the claim. How do you know this claim is wrong? > > > >Come to think of it. > > Slugs do not think. > You did not refute the claim. > > > >When the firefighters got there, all the glass > >on the street floors was blown out. > > You're an idiot. > You did not refute the claim. > >Shock wave from the plane hitting > >80 floors up? > > You're a goddamned retard, boy. ARe you an islamic extremist by > chance? > You did not refute the claim. > > > >Janitors and such coming up from the basement levels > >bleeding and dazed. > > You're full of shit. > You did not refute the claim. > > > >Jet fuel trickling down the elevator shafts being ignited > >by someone's roach? And exploding? > > You're an ifiot. > You did not refute the claim. > >Severing the three-foot thick steel columns? > >All 5 dozen of them? > >(That's mighty fine primo, pardner!) > > The buildings collapsed WAY WAY UP on the floors where the planes > hit, and fell from there down, taking floors out as the large top > section of the building fell. > First good argument so far... > You could be a bit more retarded, just not in this life. > > >Your brain got structural damage? > > No, but your never was right from the moment your retarded felon > criminal mother shat you out of her ass and forgot to flush. > You did not refute the claim. > >Dropped on your head as a kid? > > Got any more adolescent baby bullshit, little boy? > You did not refute the claim. > >Don't put that fire iron too close > >to the flames, honey. It'll melt > >and deform! > > You're an idiot. There was a tanker crash in Oakland a couple days > back (Sunday) that melted sections of the bridge it was on. Second good argument so far. Two good arguments and eight non-arguments, but those two good arguments happen to clinch the thing anyway... > > Got Clue? You and Rosie are retarded. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
