On May 3, 9:53 am, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 3, 12:18 am, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 2, 10:14 pm, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and > > > > watching its' structure deform is too rational. > > > > Also, that was a Larry Silverstein impostor who > > > said they were going to 'pull it'. > > > ...maybe if you read the context, it would make a little more rational > > sense. Fucking nutter. > > > > And the only reason he took out huge amounts > > > of extra insurance on the buildings two months > > > before this happened was because of global > > > warming, because we all know a little bit of heat > > > will bring down steel buildings. > > > A little heat and major structural damage. > > > > John > > Gee, I'll bet all those explosions in the > subfloors of WTC1 + WTC2 did some > structural damage also! > > Come to think of it. > > When the firefighters got there, all the glass > on the street floors was blown out. > > Shock wave from the plane hitting > 80 floors up? > > Janitors and such coming up from the basement levels > bleeding and dazed. > > Jet fuel trickling down the elevator shafts being ignited > by someone's roach? And exploding? > Severing the three-foot thick steel columns? > All 5 dozen of them? > (That's mighty fine primo, pardner!) > > Your brain got structural damage? > Dropped on your head as a kid? > > Don't put that fire iron too close > to the flames, honey. It'll melt > and deform! >
Never mind that the irons in the WTC were IN the fire, amongst the coals no less! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
