On May 3, 7:22 pm, The Great Attractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3 May 2007 08:53:39 -0700, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >On May 3, 12:18 am, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On May 2, 10:14 pm, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > [...] > > >> > > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and > >> > > watching its' structure deform is too rational. > > >> > Also, that was a Larry Silverstein impostor who > >> > said they were going to 'pull it'. > > >> ...maybe if you read the context, it would make a little more rational > >> sense. Fucking nutter. > > >> > And the only reason he took out huge amounts > >> > of extra insurance on the buildings two months > >> > before this happened was because of global > >> > warming, because we all know a little bit of heat > >> > will bring down steel buildings. > > >> A little heat and major structural damage. > > >> > John > > >Gee, I'll bet all those explosions in the > >subfloors of WTC1 + WTC2 did some > >structural damage also! > > You're an idiot. >
You did not refute the claim. How do you know this claim is wrong? > > > >Come to think of it. > > Slugs do not think. > You did not refute the claim. > > > >When the firefighters got there, all the glass > >on the street floors was blown out. > > You're an idiot. > You did not refute the claim. > >Shock wave from the plane hitting > >80 floors up? > > You're a goddamned retard, boy. ARe you an islamic extremist by > chance? > You did not refute the claim. > > > >Janitors and such coming up from the basement levels > >bleeding and dazed. > > You're full of shit. > You did not refute the claim. > > > >Jet fuel trickling down the elevator shafts being ignited > >by someone's roach? And exploding? > > You're an ifiot. > You did not refute the claim. > >Severing the three-foot thick steel columns? > >All 5 dozen of them? > >(That's mighty fine primo, pardner!) > > The buildings collapsed WAY WAY UP on the floors where the planes > hit, and fell from there down, taking floors out as the large top > section of the building fell. > First good argument so far... > You could be a bit more retarded, just not in this life. > > >Your brain got structural damage? > > No, but your never was right from the moment your retarded felon > criminal mother shat you out of her ass and forgot to flush. > You did not refute the claim. > >Dropped on your head as a kid? > > Got any more adolescent baby bullshit, little boy? > You did not refute the claim. > >Don't put that fire iron too close > >to the flames, honey. It'll melt > >and deform! > > You're an idiot. There was a tanker crash in Oakland a couple days > back (Sunday) that melted sections of the bridge it was on. Second good argument so far. Two good arguments and eight non-arguments, but those two good arguments happen to clinch the thing anyway... > > Got Clue? You and Rosie are retarded. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
